Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors
This study evaluated the extent to which 14 research skills were enhanced by science undergraduates' participation in an undergraduate research experience (URE). Fifty-seven undergraduates self-rated their ability to perform the skills at the beginning and end of the URE. Faculty mentors'...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of educational psychology 2000-03, Vol.92 (1), p.191-201 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 201 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 191 |
| container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
| container_volume | 92 |
| creator | Kardash, CarolAnne M |
| description | This study evaluated the extent to which 14 research skills
were enhanced by science undergraduates' participation in an
undergraduate research experience (URE). Fifty-seven undergraduates
self-rated their ability to perform the skills at the beginning and
end of the URE. Faculty mentors' ratings of their respective
interns' skills served as an objective measure of intern skill
level. Mentor and intern data revealed that the URE enhanced some
skills better than others. At the end of the URE, female interns
rated their ability to understand concepts in their field
significantly lower than did male interns. Female interns also
tended to perceive less of an increase in their ability to formulate
research hypotheses than did male interns. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614336653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ619368</ericid><sourcerecordid>52543152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a321t-ced0eb7a7384d5834b97ffa71380946a5e30be6276e6a78f31a9c3c8c39b11b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVpoK6TP1ByWNJe19VodqXVMQT3IxgKwTmLWe1ss8bZ3Uh2iP99ZGzsU3uR0OiZd8QjIb6AnIFE811KpXKpNc6smsEMLHwQE7BocwVGfxSTE_BJfI5xJaXEdJgINX-l9ZY23dBnQ5tRnz32DYe_gZpU5eyBI1PwT9n8beTQce_5Uly0tI58ddynYvljvrz7lS_-_Px9d7vICRVscs-N5NqQwapoygqL2pq2JQNYSVtoKhllzVoZzZpM1SKQ9egrj7YGqHEqbg6xYxhethw3bjVsQ58mOg0FpueX-D9IgbSlTUuCvv4LgrIsQBptqkSpA-XDEGPg1o2he6awcyDdXrLbO3R7h84qBy5JTk3fjtEUPa3bQL3v4rkTUWpVJOz6gCWF_nQ7v9fpi3R1TqGR3Bh3nsKm82uOjpvtedg7-t6OYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614336653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Kardash, CarolAnne M</creator><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the extent to which 14 research skills
were enhanced by science undergraduates' participation in an
undergraduate research experience (URE). Fifty-seven undergraduates
self-rated their ability to perform the skills at the beginning and
end of the URE. Faculty mentors' ratings of their respective
interns' skills served as an objective measure of intern skill
level. Mentor and intern data revealed that the URE enhanced some
skills better than others. At the end of the URE, female interns
rated their ability to understand concepts in their field
significantly lower than did male interns. Female interns also
tended to perceive less of an increase in their ability to formulate
research hypotheses than did male interns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Ability ; Biological and medical sciences ; College Faculty ; College Science ; College Students ; Concept Formation ; Educational psychology ; Experience Level ; Experimentation ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Higher Education ; Human ; Human Sex Differences ; Internship Programs ; Internships ; Male ; Mentor ; Mentors ; Perceptions ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopedagogics. Didactics ; Research Skills ; Science Education ; Self-Concept ; Sex Differences ; Skill Learning ; Skills ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Education</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2000-03, Vol.92 (1), p.191-201</ispartof><rights>2000 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2000</rights><rights>2000, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a321t-ced0eb7a7384d5834b97ffa71380946a5e30be6276e6a78f31a9c3c8c39b11b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a321t-ced0eb7a7384d5834b97ffa71380946a5e30be6276e6a78f31a9c3c8c39b11b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ619368$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1330624$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>This study evaluated the extent to which 14 research skills
were enhanced by science undergraduates' participation in an
undergraduate research experience (URE). Fifty-seven undergraduates
self-rated their ability to perform the skills at the beginning and
end of the URE. Faculty mentors' ratings of their respective
interns' skills served as an objective measure of intern skill
level. Mentor and intern data revealed that the URE enhanced some
skills better than others. At the end of the URE, female interns
rated their ability to understand concepts in their field
significantly lower than did male interns. Female interns also
tended to perceive less of an increase in their ability to formulate
research hypotheses than did male interns.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Experience Level</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Sex Differences</subject><subject>Internship Programs</subject><subject>Internships</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mentor</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopedagogics. Didactics</subject><subject>Research Skills</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Self-Concept</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Skill Learning</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Education</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVpoK6TP1ByWNJe19VodqXVMQT3IxgKwTmLWe1ss8bZ3Uh2iP99ZGzsU3uR0OiZd8QjIb6AnIFE811KpXKpNc6smsEMLHwQE7BocwVGfxSTE_BJfI5xJaXEdJgINX-l9ZY23dBnQ5tRnz32DYe_gZpU5eyBI1PwT9n8beTQce_5Uly0tI58ddynYvljvrz7lS_-_Px9d7vICRVscs-N5NqQwapoygqL2pq2JQNYSVtoKhllzVoZzZpM1SKQ9egrj7YGqHEqbg6xYxhethw3bjVsQ58mOg0FpueX-D9IgbSlTUuCvv4LgrIsQBptqkSpA-XDEGPg1o2he6awcyDdXrLbO3R7h84qBy5JTk3fjtEUPa3bQL3v4rkTUWpVJOz6gCWF_nQ7v9fpi3R1TqGR3Bh3nsKm82uOjpvtedg7-t6OYQ</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Kardash, CarolAnne M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience</title><author>Kardash, CarolAnne M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a321t-ced0eb7a7384d5834b97ffa71380946a5e30be6276e6a78f31a9c3c8c39b11b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Experience Level</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Sex Differences</topic><topic>Internship Programs</topic><topic>Internships</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mentor</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopedagogics. Didactics</topic><topic>Research Skills</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Self-Concept</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Skill Learning</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kardash, CarolAnne M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ619368</ericid><atitle>Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>191-201</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPA5</coden><abstract>This study evaluated the extent to which 14 research skills
were enhanced by science undergraduates' participation in an
undergraduate research experience (URE). Fifty-seven undergraduates
self-rated their ability to perform the skills at the beginning and
end of the URE. Faculty mentors' ratings of their respective
interns' skills served as an objective measure of intern skill
level. Mentor and intern data revealed that the URE enhanced some
skills better than others. At the end of the URE, female interns
rated their ability to understand concepts in their field
significantly lower than did male interns. Female interns also
tended to perceive less of an increase in their ability to formulate
research hypotheses than did male interns.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
| ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 2000-03, Vol.92 (1), p.191-201 |
| issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614336653 |
| source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Ability Biological and medical sciences College Faculty College Science College Students Concept Formation Educational psychology Experience Level Experimentation Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Higher Education Human Human Sex Differences Internship Programs Internships Male Mentor Mentors Perceptions Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychopedagogics. Didactics Research Skills Science Education Self-Concept Sex Differences Skill Learning Skills Teaching Methods Undergraduate Education |
| title | Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20an%20Undergraduate%20Research%20Experience:%20Perceptions%20of%20Undergraduate%20Interns%20and%20Their%20Faculty%20Mentors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Kardash,%20CarolAnne%20M&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=191-201&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E52543152%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614336653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ619368&rfr_iscdi=true |