Affirmative Action Policies Are Demeaning to Women in Academia
Abstract Preferential hiring policies are often based on the erroneous assumption that if a designated group is not represented in an occupation or profession in the same proportion as it is represented in the population, then negative discrimination has taken place. In the school of discrimination-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian psychology = Psychologie canadienne 1997-11, Vol.38 (4), p.238-243 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 243 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 238 |
container_title | Canadian psychology = Psychologie canadienne |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | KIMURA, DOREEN |
description | Abstract
Preferential hiring policies are often based on the erroneous assumption that if a designated group is not represented in an occupation or profession in the same proportion as it is represented in the population, then
negative discrimination has taken place.
In the school of discrimination-logic, no alternative explanations are considered. Not only is it asserted that the white male majority keeps women out by deliberate exclusion, but also by creating a climate in which women are uncomfortable. This explanation is emphasized particularly for the smaller numbers of women in science and engineering.
Although there may have been a bias in favour of males in the past, a look at the evidence suggests that, currently, women in Canada are being hired in academic institutions at rates
higher
than would be expected from the number of qualified applicants. Moreover, their persisting low representation in some fields may be a matter largely of self-selection, reflecting different talents, different emphasis on the importance of family, and different occupational preferences from men.
Hiring women over better-qualified men will inevitably lead to the downgrading of women in academia, to a reduced respect for the professoriate, to poorer education for students, and to a deterioration of collegial relations between men and women.
Résumé
Cet article soutient que la liberté d'enseignement n'est pas absolute. Les politiques d'embauche préférentielle sont souvent basées sur le postulat erroné à savoir que si un groupe désigné n'est pas représenté dans un emploi ou une profession dans la méme proportion qu'il est représenté dans la population, il s'agit de discrimination négative. Dans cette logique de la discrimination, aucune autre explication n'est examinée. Non seulement l'on considère que la majorité des hommes blancs excluent délibérément les femmes, mais ils créent un climat dans lequel les femmes se sentent mal à l'aise. Cette explication s'applique particulièrement aux quelques femmes qui se retrouvent en sciences ou en génie.
Bien que par le passé il y ait eu un préjugé favorable envers les hommes, il faut se rendre à l'évidence. qu'aujourd'hui, dans les institutions universitaires canadiennes, le taux d'embauche des femmes est plus élevé que ne le laisserait supposer le nombre de candidates qualifićes. De plus, leur faible représentation constante dans certains domaines peut très bien ètre une question de libre choix, reflétant différents talents, une di |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0708-5591.38.4.238 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614325771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>391489991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-be37ca5d28d1e7d614762863d344e52c068497311700cbc0023b394883359d653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVdF3Ulrkps26UYo4xMEXSguQya9lQzTh0lHmH9v64goqKu7-c53D4eQQ0YTRkGeUUlVnKY5S0AlIuGgtsiEKaliCVRsk8kXsEv2QlhQSjljckLOi6pyvja9e8OosL1rm-ihXTrrMESFx-gCazSNa16ivo2e2xqbyDUDaUqsndknO5VZBjz4vFPydHX5OLuJ7-6vb2fFXWwg5308R5DWpCVXJUNZZkzIjKsMShACU25ppkQuYWhEqZ3boRzMIRdKAaR5maUwJUcbb-fb1xWGXi_alW-Gl3qQAU-lZP9BnFPFGMtH0_FfEOO5lErxDxXfUNa3IXisdOddbfxaM6rHxfU4qB4H1aC00MPiQ-h0EzKd0V1YW-N7Z5cY7Mp7bHptTfedPvmd_om9A9CHitI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297788271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affirmative Action Policies Are Demeaning to Women in Academia</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>KIMURA, DOREEN</creator><contributor>Gauthier, Janel G ; Cantano, Victor</contributor><creatorcontrib>KIMURA, DOREEN ; Gauthier, Janel G ; Cantano, Victor</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Preferential hiring policies are often based on the erroneous assumption that if a designated group is not represented in an occupation or profession in the same proportion as it is represented in the population, then
negative discrimination has taken place.
In the school of discrimination-logic, no alternative explanations are considered. Not only is it asserted that the white male majority keeps women out by deliberate exclusion, but also by creating a climate in which women are uncomfortable. This explanation is emphasized particularly for the smaller numbers of women in science and engineering.
Although there may have been a bias in favour of males in the past, a look at the evidence suggests that, currently, women in Canada are being hired in academic institutions at rates
higher
than would be expected from the number of qualified applicants. Moreover, their persisting low representation in some fields may be a matter largely of self-selection, reflecting different talents, different emphasis on the importance of family, and different occupational preferences from men.
Hiring women over better-qualified men will inevitably lead to the downgrading of women in academia, to a reduced respect for the professoriate, to poorer education for students, and to a deterioration of collegial relations between men and women.
Résumé
Cet article soutient que la liberté d'enseignement n'est pas absolute. Les politiques d'embauche préférentielle sont souvent basées sur le postulat erroné à savoir que si un groupe désigné n'est pas représenté dans un emploi ou une profession dans la méme proportion qu'il est représenté dans la population, il s'agit de discrimination négative. Dans cette logique de la discrimination, aucune autre explication n'est examinée. Non seulement l'on considère que la majorité des hommes blancs excluent délibérément les femmes, mais ils créent un climat dans lequel les femmes se sentent mal à l'aise. Cette explication s'applique particulièrement aux quelques femmes qui se retrouvent en sciences ou en génie.
Bien que par le passé il y ait eu un préjugé favorable envers les hommes, il faut se rendre à l'évidence. qu'aujourd'hui, dans les institutions universitaires canadiennes, le taux d'embauche des femmes est plus élevé que ne le laisserait supposer le nombre de candidates qualifićes. De plus, leur faible représentation constante dans certains domaines peut très bien ètre une question de libre choix, reflétant différents talents, une différente importance accordée à la famille et différentes préférences profesionnelles entre les hommes et les femmes.
L'embauche de femmes au dépend d'hommes plus qualifiés mènera inévitablement au déclassement des femmes dans le milieu universitaire, à une baisse de respect pour le professorat, à une diminution de la qualité de l'enseignement et à la détérioration des relations entre collègues hommes et femmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0708-5591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0708-5591.38.4.238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Canadian Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Affirmative Action ; Colleges ; Education ; Female ; Human ; Human Females ; Male ; Women</subject><ispartof>Canadian psychology = Psychologie canadienne, 1997-11, Vol.38 (4), p.238-243</ispartof><rights>1997 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychological Association Nov 1997</rights><rights>1997, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-be37ca5d28d1e7d614762863d344e52c068497311700cbc0023b394883359d653</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Gauthier, Janel G</contributor><contributor>Cantano, Victor</contributor><creatorcontrib>KIMURA, DOREEN</creatorcontrib><title>Affirmative Action Policies Are Demeaning to Women in Academia</title><title>Canadian psychology = Psychologie canadienne</title><description>Abstract
Preferential hiring policies are often based on the erroneous assumption that if a designated group is not represented in an occupation or profession in the same proportion as it is represented in the population, then
negative discrimination has taken place.
In the school of discrimination-logic, no alternative explanations are considered. Not only is it asserted that the white male majority keeps women out by deliberate exclusion, but also by creating a climate in which women are uncomfortable. This explanation is emphasized particularly for the smaller numbers of women in science and engineering.
Although there may have been a bias in favour of males in the past, a look at the evidence suggests that, currently, women in Canada are being hired in academic institutions at rates
higher
than would be expected from the number of qualified applicants. Moreover, their persisting low representation in some fields may be a matter largely of self-selection, reflecting different talents, different emphasis on the importance of family, and different occupational preferences from men.
Hiring women over better-qualified men will inevitably lead to the downgrading of women in academia, to a reduced respect for the professoriate, to poorer education for students, and to a deterioration of collegial relations between men and women.
Résumé
Cet article soutient que la liberté d'enseignement n'est pas absolute. Les politiques d'embauche préférentielle sont souvent basées sur le postulat erroné à savoir que si un groupe désigné n'est pas représenté dans un emploi ou une profession dans la méme proportion qu'il est représenté dans la population, il s'agit de discrimination négative. Dans cette logique de la discrimination, aucune autre explication n'est examinée. Non seulement l'on considère que la majorité des hommes blancs excluent délibérément les femmes, mais ils créent un climat dans lequel les femmes se sentent mal à l'aise. Cette explication s'applique particulièrement aux quelques femmes qui se retrouvent en sciences ou en génie.
Bien que par le passé il y ait eu un préjugé favorable envers les hommes, il faut se rendre à l'évidence. qu'aujourd'hui, dans les institutions universitaires canadiennes, le taux d'embauche des femmes est plus élevé que ne le laisserait supposer le nombre de candidates qualifićes. De plus, leur faible représentation constante dans certains domaines peut très bien ètre une question de libre choix, reflétant différents talents, une différente importance accordée à la famille et différentes préférences profesionnelles entre les hommes et les femmes.
L'embauche de femmes au dépend d'hommes plus qualifiés mènera inévitablement au déclassement des femmes dans le milieu universitaire, à une baisse de respect pour le professorat, à une diminution de la qualité de l'enseignement et à la détérioration des relations entre collègues hommes et femmes.</description><subject>Affirmative Action</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Females</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0708-5591</issn><issn>1878-7304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVdF3Ulrkps26UYo4xMEXSguQya9lQzTh0lHmH9v64goqKu7-c53D4eQQ0YTRkGeUUlVnKY5S0AlIuGgtsiEKaliCVRsk8kXsEv2QlhQSjljckLOi6pyvja9e8OosL1rm-ihXTrrMESFx-gCazSNa16ivo2e2xqbyDUDaUqsndknO5VZBjz4vFPydHX5OLuJ7-6vb2fFXWwg5308R5DWpCVXJUNZZkzIjKsMShACU25ppkQuYWhEqZ3boRzMIRdKAaR5maUwJUcbb-fb1xWGXi_alW-Gl3qQAU-lZP9BnFPFGMtH0_FfEOO5lErxDxXfUNa3IXisdOddbfxaM6rHxfU4qB4H1aC00MPiQ-h0EzKd0V1YW-N7Z5cY7Mp7bHptTfedPvmd_om9A9CHitI</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>KIMURA, DOREEN</creator><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDPSG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>~P9</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7RZ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>Affirmative Action Policies Are Demeaning to Women in Academia</title><author>KIMURA, DOREEN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-be37ca5d28d1e7d614762863d344e52c068497311700cbc0023b394883359d653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Affirmative Action</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Females</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KIMURA, DOREEN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><jtitle>Canadian psychology = Psychologie canadienne</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KIMURA, DOREEN</au><au>Gauthier, Janel G</au><au>Cantano, Victor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affirmative Action Policies Are Demeaning to Women in Academia</atitle><jtitle>Canadian psychology = Psychologie canadienne</jtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>238-243</pages><issn>0708-5591</issn><eissn>1878-7304</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Preferential hiring policies are often based on the erroneous assumption that if a designated group is not represented in an occupation or profession in the same proportion as it is represented in the population, then
negative discrimination has taken place.
In the school of discrimination-logic, no alternative explanations are considered. Not only is it asserted that the white male majority keeps women out by deliberate exclusion, but also by creating a climate in which women are uncomfortable. This explanation is emphasized particularly for the smaller numbers of women in science and engineering.
Although there may have been a bias in favour of males in the past, a look at the evidence suggests that, currently, women in Canada are being hired in academic institutions at rates
higher
than would be expected from the number of qualified applicants. Moreover, their persisting low representation in some fields may be a matter largely of self-selection, reflecting different talents, different emphasis on the importance of family, and different occupational preferences from men.
Hiring women over better-qualified men will inevitably lead to the downgrading of women in academia, to a reduced respect for the professoriate, to poorer education for students, and to a deterioration of collegial relations between men and women.
Résumé
Cet article soutient que la liberté d'enseignement n'est pas absolute. Les politiques d'embauche préférentielle sont souvent basées sur le postulat erroné à savoir que si un groupe désigné n'est pas représenté dans un emploi ou une profession dans la méme proportion qu'il est représenté dans la population, il s'agit de discrimination négative. Dans cette logique de la discrimination, aucune autre explication n'est examinée. Non seulement l'on considère que la majorité des hommes blancs excluent délibérément les femmes, mais ils créent un climat dans lequel les femmes se sentent mal à l'aise. Cette explication s'applique particulièrement aux quelques femmes qui se retrouvent en sciences ou en génie.
Bien que par le passé il y ait eu un préjugé favorable envers les hommes, il faut se rendre à l'évidence. qu'aujourd'hui, dans les institutions universitaires canadiennes, le taux d'embauche des femmes est plus élevé que ne le laisserait supposer le nombre de candidates qualifićes. De plus, leur faible représentation constante dans certains domaines peut très bien ètre une question de libre choix, reflétant différents talents, une différente importance accordée à la famille et différentes préférences profesionnelles entre les hommes et les femmes.
L'embauche de femmes au dépend d'hommes plus qualifiés mènera inévitablement au déclassement des femmes dans le milieu universitaire, à une baisse de respect pour le professorat, à une diminution de la qualité de l'enseignement et à la détérioration des relations entre collègues hommes et femmes.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Canadian Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0708-5591.38.4.238</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0708-5591 |
ispartof | Canadian psychology = Psychologie canadienne, 1997-11, Vol.38 (4), p.238-243 |
issn | 0708-5591 1878-7304 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614325771 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Affirmative Action Colleges Education Female Human Human Females Male Women |
title | Affirmative Action Policies Are Demeaning to Women in Academia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T17%3A55%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affirmative%20Action%20Policies%20Are%20Demeaning%20to%20Women%20in%20Academia&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20psychology%20=%20Psychologie%20canadienne&rft.au=KIMURA,%20DOREEN&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=238-243&rft.issn=0708-5591&rft.eissn=1878-7304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0708-5591.38.4.238&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E391489991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297788271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |