Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) Interpretation: Practice Recommendations From a Survey of Clinical Psychology Doctoral Programs Accredited by the American Psychological Association

Surveys of academic psychologists have suggested that the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is a diminished aspect of graduate training despite its popularity in practice. The authors surveyed training directors of clinical psychology doctoral programs accredited by the American Psychological Associa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 1997-08, Vol.28 (4), p.393-398
Hauptverfasser:	Rossini, Edward D, Moretti, Robert J
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Clinical Psychology Graduate Training Curriculum Development Directors Educational Personnel Graduate studies Human Psychology Thematic Apperception Test Training
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	398
container_issue	4
container_start_page	393
container_title	Professional psychology, research and practice
container_volume	28
creator	Rossini, Edward D Moretti, Robert J
description	Surveys of academic psychologists have suggested that the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is a diminished aspect of graduate training despite its popularity in practice. The authors surveyed training directors of clinical psychology doctoral programs accredited by the American Psychological Association to determine how the TAT was taught. Results indicated that TAT interpretation is a modest aspect of most respondents' programs. The only widely used resource was L. Bellak's psychoanalytic textbook (1986, 1993). Numerous chapters available and the entire journal canon appeared to be unaccessed. The authors pose a partial solution to the apparent disparity: Profession-wide recommendations are provided followed by a syllabus of recommended books, chapters, and articles.
doi_str_mv	10.1037/0735-7028.28.4.393
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614324630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614324630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-3c655ce8a65fb4ae32bb1cca63d62077302b88089a6b592f75df6a82ff695bb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMoWKt_wNMiHhTZNslsHnssxUeh4GU9h2yaYEu7G5P00H9vloooiDAwh_nm9SF0TfCEYBBTLICVAlM5yVFNoIYTNCI11CUBCqdo9A2co4sYNxhjAGAjNG3e7U6ntSlm3ttgrE_rvisaG1Nx18ya-2LRJRt8sEkPlUt05vQ22quvPEZvT4_N_KVcvj4v5rNlqYFXqQTDGTNWas5cW2kLtG2JMZrDilMsBGDaSollrXnLauoEWzmuJXWO1yyjMEY3x7k-9B_7fI3a9PvQ5ZWKkwpoxQH_B1FaSZZfFBmiR8iEPsZgnfJhvdPhoAhWgzw1uFGDG5WjUllebno4NmmvlY8Ho0N2tLXR7EOwXcoz-p_07d_0b-wTcLJ70A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614324630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) Interpretation: Practice Recommendations From a Survey of Clinical Psychology Doctoral Programs Accredited by the American Psychological Association</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Rossini, Edward D ; Moretti, Robert J</creator><contributor>DeLeon, Patrick H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rossini, Edward D ; Moretti, Robert J ; DeLeon, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><description>Surveys of academic psychologists have suggested that the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is a diminished aspect of graduate training despite its popularity in practice. The authors surveyed training directors of clinical psychology doctoral programs accredited by the American Psychological Association to determine how the TAT was taught. Results indicated that TAT interpretation is a modest aspect of most respondents' programs. The only widely used resource was L. Bellak's psychoanalytic textbook (1986, 1993). Numerous chapters available and the entire journal canon appeared to be unaccessed. The authors pose a partial solution to the apparent disparity: Profession-wide recommendations are provided followed by a syllabus of recommended books, chapters, and articles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.28.4.393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Clinical Psychology Graduate Training ; Curriculum Development ; Directors ; Educational Personnel ; Graduate studies ; Human ; Psychology ; Thematic Apperception Test ; Training</subject><ispartof>Professional psychology, research and practice, 1997-08, Vol.28 (4), p.393-398</ispartof><rights>1997 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 1997</rights><rights>1997, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-3c655ce8a65fb4ae32bb1cca63d62077302b88089a6b592f75df6a82ff695bb13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,30997</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>DeLeon, Patrick H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rossini, Edward D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretti, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) Interpretation: Practice Recommendations From a Survey of Clinical Psychology Doctoral Programs Accredited by the American Psychological Association</title><title>Professional psychology, research and practice</title><description>Surveys of academic psychologists have suggested that the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is a diminished aspect of graduate training despite its popularity in practice. The authors surveyed training directors of clinical psychology doctoral programs accredited by the American Psychological Association to determine how the TAT was taught. Results indicated that TAT interpretation is a modest aspect of most respondents' programs. The only widely used resource was L. Bellak's psychoanalytic textbook (1986, 1993). Numerous chapters available and the entire journal canon appeared to be unaccessed. The authors pose a partial solution to the apparent disparity: Profession-wide recommendations are provided followed by a syllabus of recommended books, chapters, and articles.</description><subject>Clinical Psychology Graduate Training</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Educational Personnel</subject><subject>Graduate studies</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Thematic Apperception Test</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0735-7028</issn><issn>1939-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMoWKt_wNMiHhTZNslsHnssxUeh4GU9h2yaYEu7G5P00H9vloooiDAwh_nm9SF0TfCEYBBTLICVAlM5yVFNoIYTNCI11CUBCqdo9A2co4sYNxhjAGAjNG3e7U6ntSlm3ttgrE_rvisaG1Nx18ya-2LRJRt8sEkPlUt05vQ22quvPEZvT4_N_KVcvj4v5rNlqYFXqQTDGTNWas5cW2kLtG2JMZrDilMsBGDaSollrXnLauoEWzmuJXWO1yyjMEY3x7k-9B_7fI3a9PvQ5ZWKkwpoxQH_B1FaSZZfFBmiR8iEPsZgnfJhvdPhoAhWgzw1uFGDG5WjUllebno4NmmvlY8Ho0N2tLXR7EOwXcoz-p_07d_0b-wTcLJ70A</recordid><startdate>19970801</startdate><enddate>19970801</enddate><creator>Rossini, Edward D</creator><creator>Moretti, Robert J</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970801</creationdate><title>Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) Interpretation</title><author>Rossini, Edward D ; Moretti, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-3c655ce8a65fb4ae32bb1cca63d62077302b88089a6b592f75df6a82ff695bb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Clinical Psychology Graduate Training</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Educational Personnel</topic><topic>Graduate studies</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Thematic Apperception Test</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossini, Edward D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretti, Robert J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossini, Edward D</au><au>Moretti, Robert J</au><au>DeLeon, Patrick H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) Interpretation: Practice Recommendations From a Survey of Clinical Psychology Doctoral Programs Accredited by the American Psychological Association</atitle><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle><date>1997-08-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>393</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>393-398</pages><issn>0735-7028</issn><eissn>1939-1323</eissn><abstract>Surveys of academic psychologists have suggested that the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is a diminished aspect of graduate training despite its popularity in practice. The authors surveyed training directors of clinical psychology doctoral programs accredited by the American Psychological Association to determine how the TAT was taught. Results indicated that TAT interpretation is a modest aspect of most respondents' programs. The only widely used resource was L. Bellak's psychoanalytic textbook (1986, 1993). Numerous chapters available and the entire journal canon appeared to be unaccessed. The authors pose a partial solution to the apparent disparity: Profession-wide recommendations are provided followed by a syllabus of recommended books, chapters, and articles.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0735-7028.28.4.393</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0735-7028
ispartof	Professional psychology, research and practice, 1997-08, Vol.28 (4), p.393-398
issn	0735-7028 1939-1323
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_614324630
source	EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects	Clinical Psychology Graduate Training Curriculum Development Directors Educational Personnel Graduate studies Human Psychology Thematic Apperception Test Training
title	Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) Interpretation: Practice Recommendations From a Survey of Clinical Psychology Doctoral Programs Accredited by the American Psychological Association
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T22%3A26%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thematic%20Apperception%20Test%20(TAT)%20Interpretation:%20Practice%20Recommendations%20From%20a%20Survey%20of%20Clinical%20Psychology%20Doctoral%20Programs%20Accredited%20by%20the%20American%20Psychological%20Association&rft.jtitle=Professional%20psychology,%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=Rossini,%20Edward%20D&rft.date=1997-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=393&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=393-398&rft.issn=0735-7028&rft.eissn=1939-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0735-7028.28.4.393&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614324630%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614324630&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true