Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence

Conducted 2 experiments in which triads participated in multitrial block-stacking tasks that allowed for objective measures of productivity and process. In Exp I with 210 undergraduates, the task was executed either interdependently in the form of a single tower or individualistically in the constru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality and social psychology 1980-10, Vol.39 (4), p.626-642
1. Verfasser: Rosenbaum, Milton E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 642
container_issue 4
container_start_page 626
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 39
creator Rosenbaum, Milton E
description Conducted 2 experiments in which triads participated in multitrial block-stacking tasks that allowed for objective measures of productivity and process. In Exp I with 210 undergraduates, the task was executed either interdependently in the form of a single tower or individualistically in the construction of 3 separate towers. Reward points were distributed equally (cooperative), in relation to contribution (independent), or only to the most productive group member (competitive). Results indicate that cooperative and independent systems were associated with greater productivity than competitive systems only under conditions of high task interdependence, and that there was no relation between reward system and productivity for the individualistic task. In Exp II with 154 undergraduates, independent and competitive allocations were each combined in varied proportions with cooperative allocation to examine the effects of mixed reward systems on productivity and process. Results show that even a modicum of competitive reward led to lowered efficiency and productivity. (18 ref)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.626
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614318054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614318054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a435t-2c7c0421364d5633099dbf4b9eb886f7e1a8cc5c7a7b14308c958588faa5bae53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKeg3iR1_yZZb1K0CgU96MHTstmdQGqbxN2N2m_vphVR0NPAe783MzyEjgmeEMzyC4wpTZkgfMLkhE8ymu2gEZFMpoQRsYtG38A-OvB-gTHmgtIRep65tu-SzrW2N6F-q8M60Y0dBAPeXyYPvYONsqo_wCYO3rWziQ8u4tHyGy9o_5LUTQBnoYPGQmPgEO1Veunh6GuO0dPN9eP0Np3fz-6mV_NUcyZCSk1uMKeEZdyKjDEspS0rXkooiyKrciC6MEaYXOcl4QwXRopCFEWltSg1CDZGJ9u98eXXHnxQi7Z3TTypshggBRY8Qqf_QYRKIXHONxTdUsa13juoVOfqlXZrRbAaelZDjWqoUTGpuIo9x9D5NqQ7rTq_NtqF2izBm945aELUup_02d_0b-wTmaGMkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614318054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Rosenbaum, Milton E</creator><contributor>Steiner, Ivan D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Milton E ; Steiner, Ivan D</creatorcontrib><description>Conducted 2 experiments in which triads participated in multitrial block-stacking tasks that allowed for objective measures of productivity and process. In Exp I with 210 undergraduates, the task was executed either interdependently in the form of a single tower or individualistically in the construction of 3 separate towers. Reward points were distributed equally (cooperative), in relation to contribution (independent), or only to the most productive group member (competitive). Results indicate that cooperative and independent systems were associated with greater productivity than competitive systems only under conditions of high task interdependence, and that there was no relation between reward system and productivity for the individualistic task. In Exp II with 154 undergraduates, independent and competitive allocations were each combined in varied proportions with cooperative allocation to examine the effects of mixed reward systems on productivity and process. Results show that even a modicum of competitive reward led to lowered efficiency and productivity. (18 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.626</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Competition ; Cooperation ; Group Performance ; Human ; Individuality ; Interdependence ; Productivity ; Rewards</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1980-10, Vol.39 (4), p.626-642</ispartof><rights>1980 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1980, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a435t-2c7c0421364d5633099dbf4b9eb886f7e1a8cc5c7a7b14308c958588faa5bae53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Steiner, Ivan D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Milton E</creatorcontrib><title>Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><description>Conducted 2 experiments in which triads participated in multitrial block-stacking tasks that allowed for objective measures of productivity and process. In Exp I with 210 undergraduates, the task was executed either interdependently in the form of a single tower or individualistically in the construction of 3 separate towers. Reward points were distributed equally (cooperative), in relation to contribution (independent), or only to the most productive group member (competitive). Results indicate that cooperative and independent systems were associated with greater productivity than competitive systems only under conditions of high task interdependence, and that there was no relation between reward system and productivity for the individualistic task. In Exp II with 154 undergraduates, independent and competitive allocations were each combined in varied proportions with cooperative allocation to examine the effects of mixed reward systems on productivity and process. Results show that even a modicum of competitive reward led to lowered efficiency and productivity. (18 ref)</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Group Performance</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Interdependence</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKeg3iR1_yZZb1K0CgU96MHTstmdQGqbxN2N2m_vphVR0NPAe783MzyEjgmeEMzyC4wpTZkgfMLkhE8ymu2gEZFMpoQRsYtG38A-OvB-gTHmgtIRep65tu-SzrW2N6F-q8M60Y0dBAPeXyYPvYONsqo_wCYO3rWziQ8u4tHyGy9o_5LUTQBnoYPGQmPgEO1Veunh6GuO0dPN9eP0Np3fz-6mV_NUcyZCSk1uMKeEZdyKjDEspS0rXkooiyKrciC6MEaYXOcl4QwXRopCFEWltSg1CDZGJ9u98eXXHnxQi7Z3TTypshggBRY8Qqf_QYRKIXHONxTdUsa13juoVOfqlXZrRbAaelZDjWqoUTGpuIo9x9D5NqQ7rTq_NtqF2izBm945aELUup_02d_0b-wTmaGMkQ</recordid><startdate>198010</startdate><enddate>198010</enddate><creator>Rosenbaum, Milton E</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198010</creationdate><title>Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence</title><author>Rosenbaum, Milton E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a435t-2c7c0421364d5633099dbf4b9eb886f7e1a8cc5c7a7b14308c958588faa5bae53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Group Performance</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Interdependence</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Milton E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosenbaum, Milton E</au><au>Steiner, Ivan D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><date>1980-10</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>642</epage><pages>626-642</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><abstract>Conducted 2 experiments in which triads participated in multitrial block-stacking tasks that allowed for objective measures of productivity and process. In Exp I with 210 undergraduates, the task was executed either interdependently in the form of a single tower or individualistically in the construction of 3 separate towers. Reward points were distributed equally (cooperative), in relation to contribution (independent), or only to the most productive group member (competitive). Results indicate that cooperative and independent systems were associated with greater productivity than competitive systems only under conditions of high task interdependence, and that there was no relation between reward system and productivity for the individualistic task. In Exp II with 154 undergraduates, independent and competitive allocations were each combined in varied proportions with cooperative allocation to examine the effects of mixed reward systems on productivity and process. Results show that even a modicum of competitive reward led to lowered efficiency and productivity. (18 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.626</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 1980-10, Vol.39 (4), p.626-642
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614318054
source APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Competition
Cooperation
Group Performance
Human
Individuality
Interdependence
Productivity
Rewards
title Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Group%20productivity%20and%20process:%20Pure%20and%20mixed%20reward%20structures%20and%20task%20interdependence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Rosenbaum,%20Milton%20E&rft.date=1980-10&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=642&rft.pages=626-642&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.626&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614318054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614318054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true