Choice, responsibility, causality, and psychotherapy
Discusses choice, responsibility, and causality in the context of psychotherapy, drawing on academic and humanistic theory, research, philosophy, and personal observation. From various perspectives, choice is seen as part of being human and as an indication of psychological health. The psychotherape...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1977-01, Vol.14 (2), p.106-119 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 119 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 106 |
container_title | Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Peterson, Roger L |
description | Discusses choice, responsibility, and causality in the context of psychotherapy, drawing on academic and humanistic theory, research, philosophy, and personal observation. From various perspectives, choice is seen as part of being human and as an indication of psychological health. The psychotherapeutic task is seen as expanding choice to its scientific existential limits. Contemporary theoretical positions on the relationship between choice and responsibility are seen as "justifying" an evasion of responsibility. In recent discussions of responsibility and causality in psychotherapy, some theorists confuse three levels of analysis: (a) the process of psychotherapy, (b) the nature of the therapeutic relationship, and (c) an understanding of causality. This confusion provides a basis for rationalizations of inhumane, irresponsible behavior and raises ethical issues. (34 ref) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0086517 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614312189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614312189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a281t-80eba5004dc454c68216d4794ee97c1a8ec36f23810d84c436041ad0e5a0553c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFbBj1DEgwejM5nZzeYoxX9Q8KLnZbrZkpTaxN30kG9vSvQ0b-D3ZnhPqWuEBwQqHmsAazQWJ2qGJZUZajKnagZAlFEOfK4uUtoCYAnMM8XLum18uF_EkLp2n5p1s2v64X7h5ZBkkrKvFl0afN32dYjSDZfqbCO7FK7-5lx9vTx_Lt-y1cfr-_JplUlusc8shLVoAK48a_bG5mgqLkoOoSw8ig2ezCYni1BZ9kwGGKWCoAW0Jk9zdTPd7WL7cwipd9v2EPfjS2eQCXO05QjdTZCPbUoxbFwXm2-Jg0Nwx0rcfyUjejuh0ok7JpLYN34X0rj0Dtnlo8HQL_zuXgE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614312189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choice, responsibility, causality, and psychotherapy</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Peterson, Roger L</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Roger L</creatorcontrib><description>Discusses choice, responsibility, and causality in the context of psychotherapy, drawing on academic and humanistic theory, research, philosophy, and personal observation. From various perspectives, choice is seen as part of being human and as an indication of psychological health. The psychotherapeutic task is seen as expanding choice to its scientific existential limits. Contemporary theoretical positions on the relationship between choice and responsibility are seen as "justifying" an evasion of responsibility. In recent discussions of responsibility and causality in psychotherapy, some theorists confuse three levels of analysis: (a) the process of psychotherapy, (b) the nature of the therapeutic relationship, and (c) an understanding of causality. This confusion provides a basis for rationalizations of inhumane, irresponsible behavior and raises ethical issues. (34 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0086517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Division of Psychotherapy , American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Causality ; Choice Behavior ; Gestalt Therapy ; Human ; Psychotherapy ; Responsibility</subject><ispartof>Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 1977-01, Vol.14 (2), p.106-119</ispartof><rights>1977 Division of Psychotherapy (29), American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1977, Division of Psychotherapy (29), American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a281t-80eba5004dc454c68216d4794ee97c1a8ec36f23810d84c436041ad0e5a0553c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Roger L</creatorcontrib><title>Choice, responsibility, causality, and psychotherapy</title><title>Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)</title><description>Discusses choice, responsibility, and causality in the context of psychotherapy, drawing on academic and humanistic theory, research, philosophy, and personal observation. From various perspectives, choice is seen as part of being human and as an indication of psychological health. The psychotherapeutic task is seen as expanding choice to its scientific existential limits. Contemporary theoretical positions on the relationship between choice and responsibility are seen as "justifying" an evasion of responsibility. In recent discussions of responsibility and causality in psychotherapy, some theorists confuse three levels of analysis: (a) the process of psychotherapy, (b) the nature of the therapeutic relationship, and (c) an understanding of causality. This confusion provides a basis for rationalizations of inhumane, irresponsible behavior and raises ethical issues. (34 ref)</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Gestalt Therapy</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><issn>0033-3204</issn><issn>1939-1536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFbBj1DEgwejM5nZzeYoxX9Q8KLnZbrZkpTaxN30kG9vSvQ0b-D3ZnhPqWuEBwQqHmsAazQWJ2qGJZUZajKnagZAlFEOfK4uUtoCYAnMM8XLum18uF_EkLp2n5p1s2v64X7h5ZBkkrKvFl0afN32dYjSDZfqbCO7FK7-5lx9vTx_Lt-y1cfr-_JplUlusc8shLVoAK48a_bG5mgqLkoOoSw8ig2ezCYni1BZ9kwGGKWCoAW0Jk9zdTPd7WL7cwipd9v2EPfjS2eQCXO05QjdTZCPbUoxbFwXm2-Jg0Nwx0rcfyUjejuh0ok7JpLYN34X0rj0Dtnlo8HQL_zuXgE</recordid><startdate>19770101</startdate><enddate>19770101</enddate><creator>Peterson, Roger L</creator><general>Division of Psychotherapy , American Psychological Association</general><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19770101</creationdate><title>Choice, responsibility, causality, and psychotherapy</title><author>Peterson, Roger L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a281t-80eba5004dc454c68216d4794ee97c1a8ec36f23810d84c436041ad0e5a0553c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Gestalt Therapy</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Roger L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Roger L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choice, responsibility, causality, and psychotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle><date>1977-01-01</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>106-119</pages><issn>0033-3204</issn><eissn>1939-1536</eissn><abstract>Discusses choice, responsibility, and causality in the context of psychotherapy, drawing on academic and humanistic theory, research, philosophy, and personal observation. From various perspectives, choice is seen as part of being human and as an indication of psychological health. The psychotherapeutic task is seen as expanding choice to its scientific existential limits. Contemporary theoretical positions on the relationship between choice and responsibility are seen as "justifying" an evasion of responsibility. In recent discussions of responsibility and causality in psychotherapy, some theorists confuse three levels of analysis: (a) the process of psychotherapy, (b) the nature of the therapeutic relationship, and (c) an understanding of causality. This confusion provides a basis for rationalizations of inhumane, irresponsible behavior and raises ethical issues. (34 ref)</abstract><pub>Division of Psychotherapy , American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0086517</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3204 |
ispartof | Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 1977-01, Vol.14 (2), p.106-119 |
issn | 0033-3204 1939-1536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614312189 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Causality Choice Behavior Gestalt Therapy Human Psychotherapy Responsibility |
title | Choice, responsibility, causality, and psychotherapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A57%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choice,%20responsibility,%20causality,%20and%20psychotherapy&rft.jtitle=Psychotherapy%20(Chicago,%20Ill.)&rft.au=Peterson,%20Roger%20L&rft.date=1977-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=106-119&rft.issn=0033-3204&rft.eissn=1939-1536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0086517&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614312189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614312189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |