The rational zero point on incentive-object preference scales: A developmental study
Attempted to distinguish between objects with positive and negative absolute value and to determine the extent of variation in absolute value for ss of different ages. 20 male and 20 female kindergartners, 2nd graders, and 4th graders made paired comparison and preference judgments for 10 incentive...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Developmental psychology 1971-11, Vol.5 (3), p.537-537 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 537 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 537 |
| container_title | Developmental psychology |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Haaf, Robert A |
| description | Attempted to distinguish between objects with positive and negative absolute value and to determine the extent of variation in absolute value for ss of different ages. 20 male and 20 female kindergartners, 2nd graders, and 4th graders made paired comparison and preference judgments for 10 incentive objects. Results show significant intra-s consistency, inter-s agreement, similar relative preferences across age groups, and no sex differences. When results were combined with those from an earlier study, it was noted that some objects were negative in absolute value and others had absolute values which increased with age. It is concluded that incentive objects in learning research must be carefully selected. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0031596 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614308963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1298040442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-15440f6b4cc40e4863f9f6ac6e10692c4c8c11610fb535a45ba287ca3570e95c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB_gTwi6cTN6M3nMxF0pvqDgpq5DJr1Dp0wnY5IW6q83UsWVq8u5fBw4HyFXDO4Y8Op-BcCZ1OqITJjmugCp9TGZALCyYEroU3IW4zpHwbWckMVihTTY1PnB9vQTg6ej74ZE_UC7weGQuh0WvlmjS3QM2GLA_KbR2R7jA53SJe6w9-Mmo7khpu1yf0FOWttHvPy55-T96XExeynmb8-vs-m8sJxBKpgUAlrVCOcEoKgVb3WrrFPIQOnSCVc7xhSDtpFcWiEbW9aVs1xWgFo6fk6uD71j8B9bjMms_TbkIdGovA9qrXiGbv6DWKlrECBEmanbA-WCjzHvNGPoNjbsDQPzLdb8iv0rtKM1Y9w7G1Lnsg2TVRhpuJG84l8rhnWR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614308963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The rational zero point on incentive-object preference scales: A developmental study</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Haaf, Robert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Haaf, Robert A</creatorcontrib><description>Attempted to distinguish between objects with positive and negative absolute value and to determine the extent of variation in absolute value for ss of different ages. 20 male and 20 female kindergartners, 2nd graders, and 4th graders made paired comparison and preference judgments for 10 incentive objects. Results show significant intra-s consistency, inter-s agreement, similar relative preferences across age groups, and no sex differences. When results were combined with those from an earlier study, it was noted that some objects were negative in absolute value and others had absolute values which increased with age. It is concluded that incentive objects in learning research must be carefully selected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1649</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0031596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Childhood Development ; Human ; Incentives ; Preferences ; Values</subject><ispartof>Developmental psychology, 1971-11, Vol.5 (3), p.537-537</ispartof><rights>1971 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1971, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-15440f6b4cc40e4863f9f6ac6e10692c4c8c11610fb535a45ba287ca3570e95c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haaf, Robert A</creatorcontrib><title>The rational zero point on incentive-object preference scales: A developmental study</title><title>Developmental psychology</title><description>Attempted to distinguish between objects with positive and negative absolute value and to determine the extent of variation in absolute value for ss of different ages. 20 male and 20 female kindergartners, 2nd graders, and 4th graders made paired comparison and preference judgments for 10 incentive objects. Results show significant intra-s consistency, inter-s agreement, similar relative preferences across age groups, and no sex differences. When results were combined with those from an earlier study, it was noted that some objects were negative in absolute value and others had absolute values which increased with age. It is concluded that incentive objects in learning research must be carefully selected.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Childhood Development</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0012-1649</issn><issn>1939-0599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1971</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB_gTwi6cTN6M3nMxF0pvqDgpq5DJr1Dp0wnY5IW6q83UsWVq8u5fBw4HyFXDO4Y8Op-BcCZ1OqITJjmugCp9TGZALCyYEroU3IW4zpHwbWckMVihTTY1PnB9vQTg6ej74ZE_UC7weGQuh0WvlmjS3QM2GLA_KbR2R7jA53SJe6w9-Mmo7khpu1yf0FOWttHvPy55-T96XExeynmb8-vs-m8sJxBKpgUAlrVCOcEoKgVb3WrrFPIQOnSCVc7xhSDtpFcWiEbW9aVs1xWgFo6fk6uD71j8B9bjMms_TbkIdGovA9qrXiGbv6DWKlrECBEmanbA-WCjzHvNGPoNjbsDQPzLdb8iv0rtKM1Y9w7G1Lnsg2TVRhpuJG84l8rhnWR</recordid><startdate>197111</startdate><enddate>197111</enddate><creator>Haaf, Robert A</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HAGHG</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197111</creationdate><title>The rational zero point on incentive-object preference scales: A developmental study</title><author>Haaf, Robert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-15440f6b4cc40e4863f9f6ac6e10692c4c8c11610fb535a45ba287ca3570e95c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1971</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Childhood Development</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haaf, Robert A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 12</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Developmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haaf, Robert A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The rational zero point on incentive-object preference scales: A developmental study</atitle><jtitle>Developmental psychology</jtitle><date>1971-11</date><risdate>1971</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>537</spage><epage>537</epage><pages>537-537</pages><issn>0012-1649</issn><eissn>1939-0599</eissn><abstract>Attempted to distinguish between objects with positive and negative absolute value and to determine the extent of variation in absolute value for ss of different ages. 20 male and 20 female kindergartners, 2nd graders, and 4th graders made paired comparison and preference judgments for 10 incentive objects. Results show significant intra-s consistency, inter-s agreement, similar relative preferences across age groups, and no sex differences. When results were combined with those from an earlier study, it was noted that some objects were negative in absolute value and others had absolute values which increased with age. It is concluded that incentive objects in learning research must be carefully selected.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0031596</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0012-1649 |
| ispartof | Developmental psychology, 1971-11, Vol.5 (3), p.537-537 |
| issn | 0012-1649 1939-0599 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614308963 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Age Differences Childhood Development Human Incentives Preferences Values |
| title | The rational zero point on incentive-object preference scales: A developmental study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T14%3A01%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20rational%20zero%20point%20on%20incentive-object%20preference%20scales:%20A%20developmental%20study&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20psychology&rft.au=Haaf,%20Robert%20A&rft.date=1971-11&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=537&rft.epage=537&rft.pages=537-537&rft.issn=0012-1649&rft.eissn=1939-0599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0031596&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1298040442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614308963&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |