The Trouble With Assumptions: A Reply to Jago and Ragan
Jago and Ragan (1986) conducted a computer simulation to model the assignment of leaders to the zones of situational control in the LEADER MATCH training program ( Fiedler & Chemers, 1984 ; Fiedler, Chemers, & Mahar, 1976 ). They found that in many cases, the zone of control to which a leade...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 1986-11, Vol.71 (4), p.560-563 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 563 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 560 |
| container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Chemers, Martin M Fiedler, Fred E |
| description | Jago and Ragan (1986)
conducted a computer simulation to model the assignment of leaders to the zones of situational control in the
LEADER MATCH
training program (
Fiedler & Chemers, 1984
;
Fiedler, Chemers, & Mahar, 1976
). They found that in many cases, the zone of control to which a leader was assigned was different in the
LEADER MATCH
case than it would be using the dichotomization method of assignment used in
Fiedler's (1967)
early exposition of the model. The computer simulation was guided by a large number of incorrect assumptions, both theoretical and operational, that greatly reduce the meaningfulness of Jago and Ragan's findings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.560 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614305683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614305683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-65afe46e5c0078e2979bfc820a92b19ab313aace4563091bc7d1599e333a35af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gHgo6jVxZj-zx1L8goKXiMdls25oStrE3eTQf--Gip48DQPP-87wEHKNkCMw9QBAMdOQVoU5z4WEEzJDzXSGheCnZPYLnJOLGLcAyJmGGbkpN35Rhm6sWr_4aIbNYhnjuOuHptvHS3JW2zb6q585J-9Pj-XqJVu_Pb-uluvMUi6HTApbey69cACq8FQrXdWuoGA1rVDbiiGz1nkuJAONlVOfKLT2jDHLUpbNye2xtw_d1-jjYLbdGPbppJHpTxCyYAm6-w9CqoGDklQnih4pF7oYg69NH5qdDQeDYCZVZjJhJhNGoeEmqUqh-2PI9tb08eBsGBrX-mhs3_5h33EMZQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614305683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Trouble With Assumptions: A Reply to Jago and Ragan</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Chemers, Martin M ; Fiedler, Fred E</creator><creatorcontrib>Chemers, Martin M ; Fiedler, Fred E</creatorcontrib><description>Jago and Ragan (1986)
conducted a computer simulation to model the assignment of leaders to the zones of situational control in the
LEADER MATCH
training program (
Fiedler & Chemers, 1984
;
Fiedler, Chemers, & Mahar, 1976
). They found that in many cases, the zone of control to which a leader was assigned was different in the
LEADER MATCH
case than it would be using the dichotomization method of assignment used in
Fiedler's (1967)
early exposition of the model. The computer simulation was guided by a large number of incorrect assumptions, both theoretical and operational, that greatly reduce the meaningfulness of Jago and Ragan's findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Computer Simulation ; Human ; Leadership ; Management Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 1986-11, Vol.71 (4), p.560-563</ispartof><rights>1986 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1986, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-65afe46e5c0078e2979bfc820a92b19ab313aace4563091bc7d1599e333a35af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27867,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chemers, Martin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Fred E</creatorcontrib><title>The Trouble With Assumptions: A Reply to Jago and Ragan</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><description>Jago and Ragan (1986)
conducted a computer simulation to model the assignment of leaders to the zones of situational control in the
LEADER MATCH
training program (
Fiedler & Chemers, 1984
;
Fiedler, Chemers, & Mahar, 1976
). They found that in many cases, the zone of control to which a leader was assigned was different in the
LEADER MATCH
case than it would be using the dichotomization method of assignment used in
Fiedler's (1967)
early exposition of the model. The computer simulation was guided by a large number of incorrect assumptions, both theoretical and operational, that greatly reduce the meaningfulness of Jago and Ragan's findings.</description><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Management Training</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gHgo6jVxZj-zx1L8goKXiMdls25oStrE3eTQf--Gip48DQPP-87wEHKNkCMw9QBAMdOQVoU5z4WEEzJDzXSGheCnZPYLnJOLGLcAyJmGGbkpN35Rhm6sWr_4aIbNYhnjuOuHptvHS3JW2zb6q585J-9Pj-XqJVu_Pb-uluvMUi6HTApbey69cACq8FQrXdWuoGA1rVDbiiGz1nkuJAONlVOfKLT2jDHLUpbNye2xtw_d1-jjYLbdGPbppJHpTxCyYAm6-w9CqoGDklQnih4pF7oYg69NH5qdDQeDYCZVZjJhJhNGoeEmqUqh-2PI9tb08eBsGBrX-mhs3_5h33EMZQo</recordid><startdate>198611</startdate><enddate>198611</enddate><creator>Chemers, Martin M</creator><creator>Fiedler, Fred E</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198611</creationdate><title>The Trouble With Assumptions</title><author>Chemers, Martin M ; Fiedler, Fred E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-65afe46e5c0078e2979bfc820a92b19ab313aace4563091bc7d1599e333a35af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Management Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chemers, Martin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Fred E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chemers, Martin M</au><au>Fiedler, Fred E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Trouble With Assumptions: A Reply to Jago and Ragan</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><date>1986-11</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>560-563</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>Jago and Ragan (1986)
conducted a computer simulation to model the assignment of leaders to the zones of situational control in the
LEADER MATCH
training program (
Fiedler & Chemers, 1984
;
Fiedler, Chemers, & Mahar, 1976
). They found that in many cases, the zone of control to which a leader was assigned was different in the
LEADER MATCH
case than it would be using the dichotomization method of assignment used in
Fiedler's (1967)
early exposition of the model. The computer simulation was guided by a large number of incorrect assumptions, both theoretical and operational, that greatly reduce the meaningfulness of Jago and Ragan's findings.</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.560</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 1986-11, Vol.71 (4), p.560-563 |
| issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614305683 |
| source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Computer Simulation Human Leadership Management Training |
| title | The Trouble With Assumptions: A Reply to Jago and Ragan |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Trouble%20With%20Assumptions:%20A%20Reply%20to%20Jago%20and%20Ragan&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Chemers,%20Martin%20M&rft.date=1986-11&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=560-563&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.560&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614305683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614305683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |