Comparison of the Power of the Paired Samples t Test to That of Wilcoxon's Signed-Ranks Test Under Various Population Shapes

Monte Carlo methods were used to assess the relative power of the paired samples t test and Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test under ten population shapes. Results of the study indicated that: (a) Each statistic was more powerful than the other in given situations; (b) the power advantages of the t t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological bulletin 1985-01, Vol.97 (1), p.119-128
Hauptverfasser: Blair, R. Clifford, Higgins, James J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 1
container_start_page 119
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 97
creator Blair, R. Clifford
Higgins, James J
description Monte Carlo methods were used to assess the relative power of the paired samples t test and Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test under ten population shapes. Results of the study indicated that: (a) Each statistic was more powerful than the other in given situations; (b) the power advantages of the t test under normal theory were small; (c) in the nonnormal situation, the t test never attained more than modest advantages over the Wilcoxon test; (d) the Wilcoxon test was not only more often the more powerful test, but in those situations where it was more powerful, it was often vastly so; and (e) the magnitude of the Wilcoxon's power advantage often increased with increases in sample size. It was concluded that, insofar as these two statistics are concerned, the often-repeated claim that parametric tests are more powerful than nonparametric tests is not justified.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614299924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614299924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-5db0ab98c32ecc221a6f58e1468e9e4215ced393564072d7ad413e6e19ea6b2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1Lw0AQxRdRsFb_AU-LCp5S9ytJ9yjFLxAUW_W4TDdTm5pm426CFvzj3VKpJ0_DwO-9N7wh5JizAWcyv2BMykRopgc6H_AB53qH9LiWOuEqTXdJbwvsk4MQFoyxPM1kj3yP3LIBXwZXUzej7Rzpo_tEv12g9FjQMSybCgNt6QRDS1tHJ3No19BrWVn35erzQMflW41F8gT1e9hwz3URrV6iv-tCNG66CtoyRo3n0GA4JHszqAIe_c4-eb6-moxuk_uHm7vR5X0CQqk2SYspg6keWinQWiE4ZLN0iFxlQ9SoBE8tFlLLNFMsF0UOheISM-QaIZsKK_vkZOPbePfRxcPMwnW-jpEm40porYWK0Ol_EBc6G2opYod9IjaU9S4EjzPT-HIJfmU4M-tXmHXTZt200bnhJr4iis42ImjANGFlwbeljX2aaVf9YT8yGYgG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614299924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Power of the Paired Samples t Test to That of Wilcoxon's Signed-Ranks Test Under Various Population Shapes</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Blair, R. Clifford ; Higgins, James J</creator><creatorcontrib>Blair, R. Clifford ; Higgins, James J</creatorcontrib><description>Monte Carlo methods were used to assess the relative power of the paired samples t test and Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test under ten population shapes. Results of the study indicated that: (a) Each statistic was more powerful than the other in given situations; (b) the power advantages of the t test under normal theory were small; (c) in the nonnormal situation, the t test never attained more than modest advantages over the Wilcoxon test; (d) the Wilcoxon test was not only more often the more powerful test, but in those situations where it was more powerful, it was often vastly so; and (e) the magnitude of the Wilcoxon's power advantage often increased with increases in sample size. It was concluded that, insofar as these two statistics are concerned, the often-repeated claim that parametric tests are more powerful than nonparametric tests is not justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Human ; Nonparametric Statistical Tests ; Parametric Statistical Tests ; T Test ; Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1985-01, Vol.97 (1), p.119-128</ispartof><rights>1985 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1985, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-5db0ab98c32ecc221a6f58e1468e9e4215ced393564072d7ad413e6e19ea6b2c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blair, R. Clifford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, James J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Power of the Paired Samples t Test to That of Wilcoxon's Signed-Ranks Test Under Various Population Shapes</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>Monte Carlo methods were used to assess the relative power of the paired samples t test and Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test under ten population shapes. Results of the study indicated that: (a) Each statistic was more powerful than the other in given situations; (b) the power advantages of the t test under normal theory were small; (c) in the nonnormal situation, the t test never attained more than modest advantages over the Wilcoxon test; (d) the Wilcoxon test was not only more often the more powerful test, but in those situations where it was more powerful, it was often vastly so; and (e) the magnitude of the Wilcoxon's power advantage often increased with increases in sample size. It was concluded that, insofar as these two statistics are concerned, the often-repeated claim that parametric tests are more powerful than nonparametric tests is not justified.</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Nonparametric Statistical Tests</subject><subject>Parametric Statistical Tests</subject><subject>T Test</subject><subject>Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1Lw0AQxRdRsFb_AU-LCp5S9ytJ9yjFLxAUW_W4TDdTm5pm426CFvzj3VKpJ0_DwO-9N7wh5JizAWcyv2BMykRopgc6H_AB53qH9LiWOuEqTXdJbwvsk4MQFoyxPM1kj3yP3LIBXwZXUzej7Rzpo_tEv12g9FjQMSybCgNt6QRDS1tHJ3No19BrWVn35erzQMflW41F8gT1e9hwz3URrV6iv-tCNG66CtoyRo3n0GA4JHszqAIe_c4-eb6-moxuk_uHm7vR5X0CQqk2SYspg6keWinQWiE4ZLN0iFxlQ9SoBE8tFlLLNFMsF0UOheISM-QaIZsKK_vkZOPbePfRxcPMwnW-jpEm40porYWK0Ol_EBc6G2opYod9IjaU9S4EjzPT-HIJfmU4M-tXmHXTZt200bnhJr4iis42ImjANGFlwbeljX2aaVf9YT8yGYgG</recordid><startdate>198501</startdate><enddate>198501</enddate><creator>Blair, R. Clifford</creator><creator>Higgins, James J</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198501</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Power of the Paired Samples t Test to That of Wilcoxon's Signed-Ranks Test Under Various Population Shapes</title><author>Blair, R. Clifford ; Higgins, James J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-5db0ab98c32ecc221a6f58e1468e9e4215ced393564072d7ad413e6e19ea6b2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Nonparametric Statistical Tests</topic><topic>Parametric Statistical Tests</topic><topic>T Test</topic><topic>Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blair, R. Clifford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, James J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blair, R. Clifford</au><au>Higgins, James J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Power of the Paired Samples t Test to That of Wilcoxon's Signed-Ranks Test Under Various Population Shapes</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>1985-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>119-128</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>Monte Carlo methods were used to assess the relative power of the paired samples t test and Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test under ten population shapes. Results of the study indicated that: (a) Each statistic was more powerful than the other in given situations; (b) the power advantages of the t test under normal theory were small; (c) in the nonnormal situation, the t test never attained more than modest advantages over the Wilcoxon test; (d) the Wilcoxon test was not only more often the more powerful test, but in those situations where it was more powerful, it was often vastly so; and (e) the magnitude of the Wilcoxon's power advantage often increased with increases in sample size. It was concluded that, insofar as these two statistics are concerned, the often-repeated claim that parametric tests are more powerful than nonparametric tests is not justified.</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.119</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 1985-01, Vol.97 (1), p.119-128
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614299924
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Human
Nonparametric Statistical Tests
Parametric Statistical Tests
T Test
Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test
title Comparison of the Power of the Paired Samples t Test to That of Wilcoxon's Signed-Ranks Test Under Various Population Shapes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T19%3A57%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Power%20of%20the%20Paired%20Samples%20t%20Test%20to%20That%20of%20Wilcoxon's%20Signed-Ranks%20Test%20Under%20Various%20Population%20Shapes&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Blair,%20R.%20Clifford&rft.date=1985-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=119-128&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614299924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614299924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true