Change analysis is short-changed: A reply to Benjamin

Change analysis is short-changed: A reply to Benjamin

Argues that L. S. Benjamin's (see PA, Vol. 50:Issue 2) critique of the authors' analysis of the overlap hypothesis suffers from basic flaws in the conceptualization and interpretation of change correlations. In addition, her discussion of difference equations is considered irrelevant both...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental psychology 1973-02, Vol.8 (2), p.184-186
Hauptverfasser: Etaugh, Alfred F, Etaugh, Claire F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Human
Statistical Correlation
Statistical Measurement
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 186
container_issue 2
container_start_page 184
container_title Developmental psychology
container_volume 8
creator Etaugh, Alfred F
Etaugh, Claire F
description Argues that L. S. Benjamin's (see PA, Vol. 50:Issue 2) critique of the authors' analysis of the overlap hypothesis suffers from basic flaws in the conceptualization and interpretation of change correlations. In addition, her discussion of difference equations is considered irrelevant both to her critique of the article and to the rate of change measure which she proposes. This measure is shown to be merely a composite change score, which avoids none of the previously discussed difficulties associated with change scores. It is concluded, in agreement with Benjamin, that the literature on change needs to be reexamined, but not in the direction she indicates.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0034091
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614293148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614293148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-8c6e014af3d44beff2f35d79f5f6c84ecb9791932b8158b7716a9e65134069cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLxDAQhYMouK6CP6Hoiy_VTHNpxrd18QYLvuhzSNPE7dJta9IV-u-NN3wSBoZhPs6cOYScAr0EysqrNaWMU4Q9MgNkmFOBuE9mlEKRg-R4SI5i3KSRMxQzIpZr0726zHSmnWITs1Rx3Ycxt1-L-jpbZMEN7ZSNfXbjuo3ZNt0xOfCmje7kp8_Jy93t8_IhXz3dPy4Xq9wwoGOurHTpkPGs5rxy3heeibpEL7y0ijtbYYnJZVEpEKoqS5AGnRSQPpBoPZuTs2_dIfRvOxdHvel3IVmNWgIvkAFXCTr_D4ICFWVFupKoi2_Khj7G4LweQrM1YdJA9Wdy-je5P0EzGD3EyZowNrZ1UdfuXStdaFCcfQBOS2lj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614293148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Change analysis is short-changed: A reply to Benjamin</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Etaugh, Alfred F ; Etaugh, Claire F</creator><creatorcontrib>Etaugh, Alfred F ; Etaugh, Claire F</creatorcontrib><description>Argues that L. S. Benjamin's (see PA, Vol. 50:Issue 2) critique of the authors' analysis of the overlap hypothesis suffers from basic flaws in the conceptualization and interpretation of change correlations. In addition, her discussion of difference equations is considered irrelevant both to her critique of the article and to the rate of change measure which she proposes. This measure is shown to be merely a composite change score, which avoids none of the previously discussed difficulties associated with change scores. It is concluded, in agreement with Benjamin, that the literature on change needs to be reexamined, but not in the direction she indicates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1649</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0034091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Human ; Statistical Correlation ; Statistical Measurement</subject><ispartof>Developmental psychology, 1973-02, Vol.8 (2), p.184-186</ispartof><rights>1973 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1973, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-8c6e014af3d44beff2f35d79f5f6c84ecb9791932b8158b7716a9e65134069cf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etaugh, Alfred F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etaugh, Claire F</creatorcontrib><title>Change analysis is short-changed: A reply to Benjamin</title><title>Developmental psychology</title><description>Argues that L. S. Benjamin's (see PA, Vol. 50:Issue 2) critique of the authors' analysis of the overlap hypothesis suffers from basic flaws in the conceptualization and interpretation of change correlations. In addition, her discussion of difference equations is considered irrelevant both to her critique of the article and to the rate of change measure which she proposes. This measure is shown to be merely a composite change score, which avoids none of the previously discussed difficulties associated with change scores. It is concluded, in agreement with Benjamin, that the literature on change needs to be reexamined, but not in the direction she indicates.</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Statistical Correlation</subject><subject>Statistical Measurement</subject><issn>0012-1649</issn><issn>1939-0599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1973</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLxDAQhYMouK6CP6Hoiy_VTHNpxrd18QYLvuhzSNPE7dJta9IV-u-NN3wSBoZhPs6cOYScAr0EysqrNaWMU4Q9MgNkmFOBuE9mlEKRg-R4SI5i3KSRMxQzIpZr0726zHSmnWITs1Rx3Ycxt1-L-jpbZMEN7ZSNfXbjuo3ZNt0xOfCmje7kp8_Jy93t8_IhXz3dPy4Xq9wwoGOurHTpkPGs5rxy3heeibpEL7y0ijtbYYnJZVEpEKoqS5AGnRSQPpBoPZuTs2_dIfRvOxdHvel3IVmNWgIvkAFXCTr_D4ICFWVFupKoi2_Khj7G4LweQrM1YdJA9Wdy-je5P0EzGD3EyZowNrZ1UdfuXStdaFCcfQBOS2lj</recordid><startdate>197302</startdate><enddate>197302</enddate><creator>Etaugh, Alfred F</creator><creator>Etaugh, Claire F</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HAGHG</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197302</creationdate><title>Change analysis is short-changed: A reply to Benjamin</title><author>Etaugh, Alfred F ; Etaugh, Claire F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-8c6e014af3d44beff2f35d79f5f6c84ecb9791932b8158b7716a9e65134069cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1973</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Statistical Correlation</topic><topic>Statistical Measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etaugh, Alfred F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etaugh, Claire F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 12</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Developmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etaugh, Alfred F</au><au>Etaugh, Claire F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Change analysis is short-changed: A reply to Benjamin</atitle><jtitle>Developmental psychology</jtitle><date>1973-02</date><risdate>1973</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>184</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>184-186</pages><issn>0012-1649</issn><eissn>1939-0599</eissn><abstract>Argues that L. S. Benjamin's (see PA, Vol. 50:Issue 2) critique of the authors' analysis of the overlap hypothesis suffers from basic flaws in the conceptualization and interpretation of change correlations. In addition, her discussion of difference equations is considered irrelevant both to her critique of the article and to the rate of change measure which she proposes. This measure is shown to be merely a composite change score, which avoids none of the previously discussed difficulties associated with change scores. It is concluded, in agreement with Benjamin, that the literature on change needs to be reexamined, but not in the direction she indicates.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0034091</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1649
ispartof Developmental psychology, 1973-02, Vol.8 (2), p.184-186
issn 0012-1649
1939-0599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614293148
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Human
Statistical Correlation
Statistical Measurement
title Change analysis is short-changed: A reply to Benjamin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Change%20analysis%20is%20short-changed:%20A%20reply%20to%20Benjamin&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20psychology&rft.au=Etaugh,%20Alfred%20F&rft.date=1973-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=184-186&rft.issn=0012-1649&rft.eissn=1939-0599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0034091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614293148%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614293148&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true