Predicting achievement in medical school: a comparison of preclinical and clinical criteria
For 129 medical students, scores on an aptitude test battery were correlated with general grade averages at the end of both the first and third years of medical school. The trial battery, administered at the beginning of the first year, included (1) USAFI Reading Interpretation, (2) Miller Analogies...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 1954-08, Vol.38 (4), p.245-247 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 247 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 245 |
| container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Glaser, Robert Jacobs, Owen |
| description | For 129 medical students, scores on an aptitude test battery were correlated with general grade averages at the end of both the first and third years of medical school. The trial battery, administered at the beginning of the first year, included (1) USAFI Reading Interpretation, (2) Miller Analogies, (3) DAT Space Relations, and (4) AGCT Validities with first-year grades (.44 to .04) were about the same as validities with third-year grades (.39 to .13), Reading Interpretation having the highest validity in each case. Correlations between the criteria and scores on the medical Professional Aptitude Test followed the same pattern. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0055059 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614288515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614288515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-1a4cd5674884d4642fa09cac48059de774294f5f2404a5445f06b976b1a1df003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLxDAQB_AgCq4P8CME9SBIdZJO2sabLL5A0IOePIQxTd1IXyZdYb-9XVcFQU_DMD9mmD9jewJOBKT56QxAKVB6jU2ETnUiCoXrbAIgRaJBwCbbivEVQGCqYcKe7oMrvR18-8LJzrx7d41rB-5b3iwHVPNoZ11Xn3Hitmt6Cj52Le8q3gdna99-GmpL_tPY4AcXPO2wjYrq6Ha_6jZ7vLx4mF4nt3dXN9Pz24RSzIdEENpSZTkWBZaYoawItCWLxfhG6fIcpcZKVRIBSSGqCrJnnWfPgkRZAaTbbH-1tw_d29zFwbx289COJ00mUBaFEmpEB_8hIfWYnFQyHdXRStnQxRhcZfrgGwoLI8As8zXf-Y70eEWpJ9PHhaUweFu7aOchjBEa6muTFgaNxOX5w7_1b_YBFP-Hdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614288515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting achievement in medical school: a comparison of preclinical and clinical criteria</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Glaser, Robert ; Jacobs, Owen</creator><contributor>Paterson, Donald G</contributor><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Robert ; Jacobs, Owen ; Paterson, Donald G</creatorcontrib><description>For 129 medical students, scores on an aptitude test battery were correlated with general grade averages at the end of both the first and third years of medical school. The trial battery, administered at the beginning of the first year, included (1) USAFI Reading Interpretation, (2) Miller Analogies, (3) DAT Space Relations, and (4) AGCT Validities with first-year grades (.44 to .04) were about the same as validities with third-year grades (.39 to .13), Reading Interpretation having the highest validity in each case. Correlations between the criteria and scores on the medical Professional Aptitude Test followed the same pattern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0055059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement Prediction ; Aptitude Measures ; Human ; Medical Education ; Medical Students ; Test Battery</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 1954-08, Vol.38 (4), p.245-247</ispartof><rights>1954 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1954, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-1a4cd5674884d4642fa09cac48059de774294f5f2404a5445f06b976b1a1df003</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Paterson, Donald G</contributor><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Owen</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting achievement in medical school: a comparison of preclinical and clinical criteria</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><description>For 129 medical students, scores on an aptitude test battery were correlated with general grade averages at the end of both the first and third years of medical school. The trial battery, administered at the beginning of the first year, included (1) USAFI Reading Interpretation, (2) Miller Analogies, (3) DAT Space Relations, and (4) AGCT Validities with first-year grades (.44 to .04) were about the same as validities with third-year grades (.39 to .13), Reading Interpretation having the highest validity in each case. Correlations between the criteria and scores on the medical Professional Aptitude Test followed the same pattern.</description><subject>Academic Achievement Prediction</subject><subject>Aptitude Measures</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Test Battery</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1954</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLxDAQB_AgCq4P8CME9SBIdZJO2sabLL5A0IOePIQxTd1IXyZdYb-9XVcFQU_DMD9mmD9jewJOBKT56QxAKVB6jU2ETnUiCoXrbAIgRaJBwCbbivEVQGCqYcKe7oMrvR18-8LJzrx7d41rB-5b3iwHVPNoZ11Xn3Hitmt6Cj52Le8q3gdna99-GmpL_tPY4AcXPO2wjYrq6Ha_6jZ7vLx4mF4nt3dXN9Pz24RSzIdEENpSZTkWBZaYoawItCWLxfhG6fIcpcZKVRIBSSGqCrJnnWfPgkRZAaTbbH-1tw_d29zFwbx289COJ00mUBaFEmpEB_8hIfWYnFQyHdXRStnQxRhcZfrgGwoLI8As8zXf-Y70eEWpJ9PHhaUweFu7aOchjBEa6muTFgaNxOX5w7_1b_YBFP-Hdw</recordid><startdate>19540801</startdate><enddate>19540801</enddate><creator>Glaser, Robert</creator><creator>Jacobs, Owen</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19540801</creationdate><title>Predicting achievement in medical school: a comparison of preclinical and clinical criteria</title><author>Glaser, Robert ; Jacobs, Owen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-1a4cd5674884d4642fa09cac48059de774294f5f2404a5445f06b976b1a1df003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1954</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement Prediction</topic><topic>Aptitude Measures</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Test Battery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Owen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glaser, Robert</au><au>Jacobs, Owen</au><au>Paterson, Donald G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting achievement in medical school: a comparison of preclinical and clinical criteria</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><date>1954-08-01</date><risdate>1954</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>245-247</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>For 129 medical students, scores on an aptitude test battery were correlated with general grade averages at the end of both the first and third years of medical school. The trial battery, administered at the beginning of the first year, included (1) USAFI Reading Interpretation, (2) Miller Analogies, (3) DAT Space Relations, and (4) AGCT Validities with first-year grades (.44 to .04) were about the same as validities with third-year grades (.39 to .13), Reading Interpretation having the highest validity in each case. Correlations between the criteria and scores on the medical Professional Aptitude Test followed the same pattern.</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0055059</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 1954-08, Vol.38 (4), p.245-247 |
| issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614288515 |
| source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Academic Achievement Prediction Aptitude Measures Human Medical Education Medical Students Test Battery |
| title | Predicting achievement in medical school: a comparison of preclinical and clinical criteria |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A52%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20achievement%20in%20medical%20school:%20a%20comparison%20of%20preclinical%20and%20clinical%20criteria&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Glaser,%20Robert&rft.date=1954-08-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=245-247&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0055059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614288515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614288515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |