Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process

Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological bulletin 1979-05, Vol.86 (3), p.493-522
Hauptverfasser: Mobley, William H, Griffeth, Rodger W, Hand, Herbert H, Meglino, B. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 522
container_issue 3
container_start_page 493
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 86
creator Mobley, William H
Griffeth, Rodger W
Hand, Herbert H
Meglino, B. M
description Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of the variance in turnover is explained. Lack of a clear conceptual model, failure to consider available job alternatives, insufficient multivariate research, and infrequent longitudinal studies are identified as factors precluding a better understanding of the psychology of the employee turnover process. A conceptual model is presented that suggests a need to distinguish between satisfaction (present oriented) and attraction/expected utility (future oriented) for both the present role and alternative roles, a need to consider nonwork values and nonwork consequences of turnover behavior as well as contractual constraints, and a potential mechanism for integrating aggregate-level research findings into an individual-level model of the turnover process. (62 ref)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614282497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614282497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-f53f64d566d05198e168bf24ce90cb37ada122b666fadfeba1abe01abdd1dbb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU9Fvbbmo0mbk8iyfsCCIHoO-Zhgl-62Ju1K_71ZVvTkZYaB550ZHoQuCS4IZtUtxozlVGJZ1KJgRSnZEZoRyWROSs6P0ewXOEVnMa4xxhUXbIbuXmHXwFemty6z3dZCP4y6TaNup9jErPPZ8AEZbPq2mwCyYQzbbgch60NnIcZzdOJ1G-Hip8_R-8PybfGUr14enxf3q1wzyYfcc-ZF6bgQDnMiayCiNp6WFiS2hlXaaUKpEUJ47TwYTbQBnIpzxBlTsjm6OuxNdz9HiINad-mVdFIJUtKalrJK0PV_EKFSSEpJzRJFD5QNXYwBvOpDs9FhUgSrvU21l6X2slQtFFPJZgrdHEK616qPk9VhaGwLUZmx_cO-ATlEdIM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614282497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Mobley, William H ; Griffeth, Rodger W ; Hand, Herbert H ; Meglino, B. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mobley, William H ; Griffeth, Rodger W ; Hand, Herbert H ; Meglino, B. M</creatorcontrib><description>Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of the variance in turnover is explained. Lack of a clear conceptual model, failure to consider available job alternatives, insufficient multivariate research, and infrequent longitudinal studies are identified as factors precluding a better understanding of the psychology of the employee turnover process. A conceptual model is presented that suggests a need to distinguish between satisfaction (present oriented) and attraction/expected utility (future oriented) for both the present role and alternative roles, a need to consider nonwork values and nonwork consequences of turnover behavior as well as contractual constraints, and a potential mechanism for integrating aggregate-level research findings into an individual-level model of the turnover process. (62 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Demographic Characteristics ; Employee Benefits ; Employee Motivation ; Employee Turnover ; Human ; Job Satisfaction ; Literature Review ; Working Conditions</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1979-05, Vol.86 (3), p.493-522</ispartof><rights>1979 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1979, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-f53f64d566d05198e168bf24ce90cb37ada122b666fadfeba1abe01abdd1dbb43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mobley, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffeth, Rodger W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hand, Herbert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meglino, B. M</creatorcontrib><title>Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of the variance in turnover is explained. Lack of a clear conceptual model, failure to consider available job alternatives, insufficient multivariate research, and infrequent longitudinal studies are identified as factors precluding a better understanding of the psychology of the employee turnover process. A conceptual model is presented that suggests a need to distinguish between satisfaction (present oriented) and attraction/expected utility (future oriented) for both the present role and alternative roles, a need to consider nonwork values and nonwork consequences of turnover behavior as well as contractual constraints, and a potential mechanism for integrating aggregate-level research findings into an individual-level model of the turnover process. (62 ref)</description><subject>Demographic Characteristics</subject><subject>Employee Benefits</subject><subject>Employee Motivation</subject><subject>Employee Turnover</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Literature Review</subject><subject>Working Conditions</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU9Fvbbmo0mbk8iyfsCCIHoO-Zhgl-62Ju1K_71ZVvTkZYaB550ZHoQuCS4IZtUtxozlVGJZ1KJgRSnZEZoRyWROSs6P0ewXOEVnMa4xxhUXbIbuXmHXwFemty6z3dZCP4y6TaNup9jErPPZ8AEZbPq2mwCyYQzbbgch60NnIcZzdOJ1G-Hip8_R-8PybfGUr14enxf3q1wzyYfcc-ZF6bgQDnMiayCiNp6WFiS2hlXaaUKpEUJ47TwYTbQBnIpzxBlTsjm6OuxNdz9HiINad-mVdFIJUtKalrJK0PV_EKFSSEpJzRJFD5QNXYwBvOpDs9FhUgSrvU21l6X2slQtFFPJZgrdHEK616qPk9VhaGwLUZmx_cO-ATlEdIM</recordid><startdate>197905</startdate><enddate>197905</enddate><creator>Mobley, William H</creator><creator>Griffeth, Rodger W</creator><creator>Hand, Herbert H</creator><creator>Meglino, B. M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197905</creationdate><title>Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process</title><author>Mobley, William H ; Griffeth, Rodger W ; Hand, Herbert H ; Meglino, B. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-f53f64d566d05198e168bf24ce90cb37ada122b666fadfeba1abe01abdd1dbb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Demographic Characteristics</topic><topic>Employee Benefits</topic><topic>Employee Motivation</topic><topic>Employee Turnover</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Literature Review</topic><topic>Working Conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mobley, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffeth, Rodger W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hand, Herbert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meglino, B. M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mobley, William H</au><au>Griffeth, Rodger W</au><au>Hand, Herbert H</au><au>Meglino, B. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>1979-05</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>493-522</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of the variance in turnover is explained. Lack of a clear conceptual model, failure to consider available job alternatives, insufficient multivariate research, and infrequent longitudinal studies are identified as factors precluding a better understanding of the psychology of the employee turnover process. A conceptual model is presented that suggests a need to distinguish between satisfaction (present oriented) and attraction/expected utility (future oriented) for both the present role and alternative roles, a need to consider nonwork values and nonwork consequences of turnover behavior as well as contractual constraints, and a potential mechanism for integrating aggregate-level research findings into an individual-level model of the turnover process. (62 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 1979-05, Vol.86 (3), p.493-522
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614282497
source APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Demographic Characteristics
Employee Benefits
Employee Motivation
Employee Turnover
Human
Job Satisfaction
Literature Review
Working Conditions
title Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20and%20conceptual%20analysis%20of%20the%20employee%20turnover%20process&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Mobley,%20William%20H&rft.date=1979-05&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=493-522&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614282497%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614282497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true