Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process
Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological bulletin 1979-05, Vol.86 (3), p.493-522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 493 |
container_title | Psychological bulletin |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Mobley, William H Griffeth, Rodger W Hand, Herbert H Meglino, B. M |
description | Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of the variance in turnover is explained. Lack of a clear conceptual model, failure to consider available job alternatives, insufficient multivariate research, and infrequent longitudinal studies are identified as factors precluding a better understanding of the psychology of the employee turnover process. A conceptual model is presented that suggests a need to distinguish between satisfaction (present oriented) and attraction/expected utility (future oriented) for both the present role and alternative roles, a need to consider nonwork values and nonwork consequences of turnover behavior as well as contractual constraints, and a potential mechanism for integrating aggregate-level research findings into an individual-level model of the turnover process. (62 ref) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614282497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614282497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-f53f64d566d05198e168bf24ce90cb37ada122b666fadfeba1abe01abdd1dbb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU9Fvbbmo0mbk8iyfsCCIHoO-Zhgl-62Ju1K_71ZVvTkZYaB550ZHoQuCS4IZtUtxozlVGJZ1KJgRSnZEZoRyWROSs6P0ewXOEVnMa4xxhUXbIbuXmHXwFemty6z3dZCP4y6TaNup9jErPPZ8AEZbPq2mwCyYQzbbgch60NnIcZzdOJ1G-Hip8_R-8PybfGUr14enxf3q1wzyYfcc-ZF6bgQDnMiayCiNp6WFiS2hlXaaUKpEUJ47TwYTbQBnIpzxBlTsjm6OuxNdz9HiINad-mVdFIJUtKalrJK0PV_EKFSSEpJzRJFD5QNXYwBvOpDs9FhUgSrvU21l6X2slQtFFPJZgrdHEK616qPk9VhaGwLUZmx_cO-ATlEdIM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614282497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Mobley, William H ; Griffeth, Rodger W ; Hand, Herbert H ; Meglino, B. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mobley, William H ; Griffeth, Rodger W ; Hand, Herbert H ; Meglino, B. M</creatorcontrib><description>Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of the variance in turnover is explained. Lack of a clear conceptual model, failure to consider available job alternatives, insufficient multivariate research, and infrequent longitudinal studies are identified as factors precluding a better understanding of the psychology of the employee turnover process. A conceptual model is presented that suggests a need to distinguish between satisfaction (present oriented) and attraction/expected utility (future oriented) for both the present role and alternative roles, a need to consider nonwork values and nonwork consequences of turnover behavior as well as contractual constraints, and a potential mechanism for integrating aggregate-level research findings into an individual-level model of the turnover process. (62 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Demographic Characteristics ; Employee Benefits ; Employee Motivation ; Employee Turnover ; Human ; Job Satisfaction ; Literature Review ; Working Conditions</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1979-05, Vol.86 (3), p.493-522</ispartof><rights>1979 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1979, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-f53f64d566d05198e168bf24ce90cb37ada122b666fadfeba1abe01abdd1dbb43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mobley, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffeth, Rodger W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hand, Herbert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meglino, B. M</creatorcontrib><title>Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of the variance in turnover is explained. Lack of a clear conceptual model, failure to consider available job alternatives, insufficient multivariate research, and infrequent longitudinal studies are identified as factors precluding a better understanding of the psychology of the employee turnover process. A conceptual model is presented that suggests a need to distinguish between satisfaction (present oriented) and attraction/expected utility (future oriented) for both the present role and alternative roles, a need to consider nonwork values and nonwork consequences of turnover behavior as well as contractual constraints, and a potential mechanism for integrating aggregate-level research findings into an individual-level model of the turnover process. (62 ref)</description><subject>Demographic Characteristics</subject><subject>Employee Benefits</subject><subject>Employee Motivation</subject><subject>Employee Turnover</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Literature Review</subject><subject>Working Conditions</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU9Fvbbmo0mbk8iyfsCCIHoO-Zhgl-62Ju1K_71ZVvTkZYaB550ZHoQuCS4IZtUtxozlVGJZ1KJgRSnZEZoRyWROSs6P0ewXOEVnMa4xxhUXbIbuXmHXwFemty6z3dZCP4y6TaNup9jErPPZ8AEZbPq2mwCyYQzbbgch60NnIcZzdOJ1G-Hip8_R-8PybfGUr14enxf3q1wzyYfcc-ZF6bgQDnMiayCiNp6WFiS2hlXaaUKpEUJ47TwYTbQBnIpzxBlTsjm6OuxNdz9HiINad-mVdFIJUtKalrJK0PV_EKFSSEpJzRJFD5QNXYwBvOpDs9FhUgSrvU21l6X2slQtFFPJZgrdHEK616qPk9VhaGwLUZmx_cO-ATlEdIM</recordid><startdate>197905</startdate><enddate>197905</enddate><creator>Mobley, William H</creator><creator>Griffeth, Rodger W</creator><creator>Hand, Herbert H</creator><creator>Meglino, B. M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197905</creationdate><title>Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process</title><author>Mobley, William H ; Griffeth, Rodger W ; Hand, Herbert H ; Meglino, B. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-f53f64d566d05198e168bf24ce90cb37ada122b666fadfeba1abe01abdd1dbb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Demographic Characteristics</topic><topic>Employee Benefits</topic><topic>Employee Motivation</topic><topic>Employee Turnover</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Literature Review</topic><topic>Working Conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mobley, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffeth, Rodger W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hand, Herbert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meglino, B. M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mobley, William H</au><au>Griffeth, Rodger W</au><au>Hand, Herbert H</au><au>Meglino, B. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>1979-05</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>493-522</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>Research on employee turnover since L. W. Porter and R. M. Steers's analysis of the literature reveals that age, tenure, overall satisfaction, job content, intentions to remain on the job, and commitment are consistently and negatively related to turnover. Generally, however, less than 20% of the variance in turnover is explained. Lack of a clear conceptual model, failure to consider available job alternatives, insufficient multivariate research, and infrequent longitudinal studies are identified as factors precluding a better understanding of the psychology of the employee turnover process. A conceptual model is presented that suggests a need to distinguish between satisfaction (present oriented) and attraction/expected utility (future oriented) for both the present role and alternative roles, a need to consider nonwork values and nonwork consequences of turnover behavior as well as contractual constraints, and a potential mechanism for integrating aggregate-level research findings into an individual-level model of the turnover process. (62 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 1979-05, Vol.86 (3), p.493-522 |
issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614282497 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Demographic Characteristics Employee Benefits Employee Motivation Employee Turnover Human Job Satisfaction Literature Review Working Conditions |
title | Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20and%20conceptual%20analysis%20of%20the%20employee%20turnover%20process&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Mobley,%20William%20H&rft.date=1979-05&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=493-522&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614282497%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614282497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |