Use of Research in the Practice of Community Mental Health: A Case Study
Although science is commonly viewed as providing the knowledge base for the practice of mental health, the realization of the mental health professional as a scientist-practitioner has been problematic. Questions can be raised regarding the extent to which psychotherapy is data-generating or even da...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 1985-10, Vol.16 (5), p.710-718 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 718 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 710 |
| container_title | Professional psychology, research and practice |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | O'DONOHUE, WILLIAM T CURTIS, STEPHEN D FISHER, JANE E |
| description | Although science is commonly viewed as providing the knowledge base for the practice of mental health, the realization of the mental health professional as a scientist-practitioner has been problematic. Questions can be raised regarding the extent to which psychotherapy is data-generating or even data-based. In an attempt to assess the degree to which research was cited by practitioners in justifying their initial treatment decisions, 416 representatively sampled intake evaluation reports from a community mental health center that requires a "rationale/justification for preliminary mode and type of therapy" were examined. Practitioners, in general, failed to provide rationales for their treatment decisions, and research was seldom cited when rationales were provided. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0735-7028.16.5.710 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614282291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614282291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e04bf64b11297976bd636ab0643678bf1e460e25583163dc919ede528cd459663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkFFLwzAQx4MoOKdfwKcivklrLkmviW8y1AkTRdxzSNOUdXTtTNqHfXtbJwPFpzvufvc_-BFyCTQByrNbmvE0ziiTCWCSJhnQIzIBxVUMnPFjMjkAp-QshDWllHOeTsjdMrioLaN3F5zxdhVVTdStXPTmje0q-72btZtN31TdLnpxTWfqaO5M3a3OyUlp6uAufuqULB8fPmbzePH69Dy7X8SGo-xiR0VeosgBmMpUhnmBHE1OUXDMZF6CE0gdS1PJAXlhFShXuJRJW4hUIfIpudrnbn372bvQ6XXb-2Z4qREEk4wpGCC2h6xvQ_Cu1FtfbYzfaaB6VKRHA3o0oAH10A3DKbn-STbBmrr0prFVOFxKFFLQMftmj5mt0duws8YPamoXbO_9YGQ4aP8J_Uv_xr4AGwR_Ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614282291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Research in the Practice of Community Mental Health: A Case Study</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>O'DONOHUE, WILLIAM T ; CURTIS, STEPHEN D ; FISHER, JANE E</creator><contributor>Abeles, Norman</contributor><creatorcontrib>O'DONOHUE, WILLIAM T ; CURTIS, STEPHEN D ; FISHER, JANE E ; Abeles, Norman</creatorcontrib><description>Although science is commonly viewed as providing the knowledge base for the practice of mental health, the realization of the mental health professional as a scientist-practitioner has been problematic. Questions can be raised regarding the extent to which psychotherapy is data-generating or even data-based. In an attempt to assess the degree to which research was cited by practitioners in justifying their initial treatment decisions, 416 representatively sampled intake evaluation reports from a community mental health center that requires a "rationale/justification for preliminary mode and type of therapy" were examined. Practitioners, in general, failed to provide rationales for their treatment decisions, and research was seldom cited when rationales were provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.16.5.710</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PFPSAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Judgment (Not Diagnosis) ; Community Mental Health Services ; Experimentation ; Human ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Mental Health Personnel ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Scientific Communication ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><ispartof>Professional psychology, research and practice, 1985-10, Vol.16 (5), p.710-718</ispartof><rights>1985 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1985, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e04bf64b11297976bd636ab0643678bf1e460e25583163dc919ede528cd459663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8648401$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Abeles, Norman</contributor><creatorcontrib>O'DONOHUE, WILLIAM T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURTIS, STEPHEN D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHER, JANE E</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Research in the Practice of Community Mental Health: A Case Study</title><title>Professional psychology, research and practice</title><description>Although science is commonly viewed as providing the knowledge base for the practice of mental health, the realization of the mental health professional as a scientist-practitioner has been problematic. Questions can be raised regarding the extent to which psychotherapy is data-generating or even data-based. In an attempt to assess the degree to which research was cited by practitioners in justifying their initial treatment decisions, 416 representatively sampled intake evaluation reports from a community mental health center that requires a "rationale/justification for preliminary mode and type of therapy" were examined. Practitioners, in general, failed to provide rationales for their treatment decisions, and research was seldom cited when rationales were provided.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Judgment (Not Diagnosis)</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Health Personnel</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Scientific Communication</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><issn>0735-7028</issn><issn>1939-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkFFLwzAQx4MoOKdfwKcivklrLkmviW8y1AkTRdxzSNOUdXTtTNqHfXtbJwPFpzvufvc_-BFyCTQByrNbmvE0ziiTCWCSJhnQIzIBxVUMnPFjMjkAp-QshDWllHOeTsjdMrioLaN3F5zxdhVVTdStXPTmje0q-72btZtN31TdLnpxTWfqaO5M3a3OyUlp6uAufuqULB8fPmbzePH69Dy7X8SGo-xiR0VeosgBmMpUhnmBHE1OUXDMZF6CE0gdS1PJAXlhFShXuJRJW4hUIfIpudrnbn372bvQ6XXb-2Z4qREEk4wpGCC2h6xvQ_Cu1FtfbYzfaaB6VKRHA3o0oAH10A3DKbn-STbBmrr0prFVOFxKFFLQMftmj5mt0duws8YPamoXbO_9YGQ4aP8J_Uv_xr4AGwR_Ug</recordid><startdate>198510</startdate><enddate>198510</enddate><creator>O'DONOHUE, WILLIAM T</creator><creator>CURTIS, STEPHEN D</creator><creator>FISHER, JANE E</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198510</creationdate><title>Use of Research in the Practice of Community Mental Health</title><author>O'DONOHUE, WILLIAM T ; CURTIS, STEPHEN D ; FISHER, JANE E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e04bf64b11297976bd636ab0643678bf1e460e25583163dc919ede528cd459663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Judgment (Not Diagnosis)</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Health Personnel</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Scientific Communication</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'DONOHUE, WILLIAM T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURTIS, STEPHEN D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHER, JANE E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'DONOHUE, WILLIAM T</au><au>CURTIS, STEPHEN D</au><au>FISHER, JANE E</au><au>Abeles, Norman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Research in the Practice of Community Mental Health: A Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle><date>1985-10</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>710</spage><epage>718</epage><pages>710-718</pages><issn>0735-7028</issn><eissn>1939-1323</eissn><coden>PFPSAP</coden><abstract>Although science is commonly viewed as providing the knowledge base for the practice of mental health, the realization of the mental health professional as a scientist-practitioner has been problematic. Questions can be raised regarding the extent to which psychotherapy is data-generating or even data-based. In an attempt to assess the degree to which research was cited by practitioners in justifying their initial treatment decisions, 416 representatively sampled intake evaluation reports from a community mental health center that requires a "rationale/justification for preliminary mode and type of therapy" were examined. Practitioners, in general, failed to provide rationales for their treatment decisions, and research was seldom cited when rationales were provided.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0735-7028.16.5.710</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-7028 |
| ispartof | Professional psychology, research and practice, 1985-10, Vol.16 (5), p.710-718 |
| issn | 0735-7028 1939-1323 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614282291 |
| source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Clinical Judgment (Not Diagnosis) Community Mental Health Services Experimentation Human Medical sciences Mental health Mental Health Personnel Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Scientific Communication Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry |
| title | Use of Research in the Practice of Community Mental Health: A Case Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A35%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Research%20in%20the%20Practice%20of%20Community%20Mental%20Health:%20A%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Professional%20psychology,%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=O'DONOHUE,%20WILLIAM%20T&rft.date=1985-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=710&rft.epage=718&rft.pages=710-718&rft.issn=0735-7028&rft.eissn=1939-1323&rft.coden=PFPSAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0735-7028.16.5.710&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614282291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614282291&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |