Work and nonwork: A review of models, methods, and findings

Work and nonwork: A review of models, methods, and findings

Examines 3 theories of work/leisure relations--compensation, generalization, and segmentation. All have received some support, but the present review indicates that much of the available research evidence is constrained by conceptual and methodological problems. Paradigms for describing work/leisure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological bulletin 1980-07, Vol.88 (1), p.60-77
1. Verfasser: Kabanoff, Boris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Human
Leisure Time
Literature Review
Occupations
Theories
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 88
creator Kabanoff, Boris
description Examines 3 theories of work/leisure relations--compensation, generalization, and segmentation. All have received some support, but the present review indicates that much of the available research evidence is constrained by conceptual and methodological problems. Paradigms for describing work/leisure patterns are reviewed, and it is concluded that most of these are more suitable for classifying leisure definitions than for guiding empirical research. Research in this field requires objective definitions of attributes common across life spheres. A task-based description of work and nonwork is discussed, and its research utility is illustrated. Future research should describe different work/leisure patterns, the processes underlying these patterns, and the life consequences associated with different patterns. (98 ref)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.60
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614275025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614275025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a326t-98c5a5ac124256b9d4ad57551ffa88f55c17341c21f66d3d1cebb76393757d693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLugWxPnkXnpqhRfUHCjuBwm89DUNBNnUkv_vQmVunJ1D9yPc-AD4BzBAkHCryEkJMcSykKIAhUMHoAJkkTmqKT0EEz2_2NwktISQsgpIxNw-xbiZ6Zbm7Wh3Qz5Jptl0X3XbpMFn62CdU26ylau_wh2CCPp69bW7Xs6BUdeN8md_d4peL2_e5k_5ovnh6f5bJFrglmfS2GoptogXGLKKmlLbSmnFHmvhfCUGsRJiQxGnjFLLDKuqjgjknDKLZNkCi52vV0MX2uXerUM69gOk4qhEnMKMR2gy_8ghCWTVFImBgrtKBNDStF51cV6peNWIahGkWoUpUZRSgiFFIN_zbrTqktbo2Nfm8YlVa2bPfUD9ARvJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614275025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Work and nonwork: A review of models, methods, and findings</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Kabanoff, Boris</creator><creatorcontrib>Kabanoff, Boris</creatorcontrib><description>Examines 3 theories of work/leisure relations--compensation, generalization, and segmentation. All have received some support, but the present review indicates that much of the available research evidence is constrained by conceptual and methodological problems. Paradigms for describing work/leisure patterns are reviewed, and it is concluded that most of these are more suitable for classifying leisure definitions than for guiding empirical research. Research in this field requires objective definitions of attributes common across life spheres. A task-based description of work and nonwork is discussed, and its research utility is illustrated. Future research should describe different work/leisure patterns, the processes underlying these patterns, and the life consequences associated with different patterns. (98 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.60</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Human ; Leisure Time ; Literature Review ; Occupations ; Theories</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1980-07, Vol.88 (1), p.60-77</ispartof><rights>1980 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1980, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a326t-98c5a5ac124256b9d4ad57551ffa88f55c17341c21f66d3d1cebb76393757d693</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kabanoff, Boris</creatorcontrib><title>Work and nonwork: A review of models, methods, and findings</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>Examines 3 theories of work/leisure relations--compensation, generalization, and segmentation. All have received some support, but the present review indicates that much of the available research evidence is constrained by conceptual and methodological problems. Paradigms for describing work/leisure patterns are reviewed, and it is concluded that most of these are more suitable for classifying leisure definitions than for guiding empirical research. Research in this field requires objective definitions of attributes common across life spheres. A task-based description of work and nonwork is discussed, and its research utility is illustrated. Future research should describe different work/leisure patterns, the processes underlying these patterns, and the life consequences associated with different patterns. (98 ref)</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Leisure Time</subject><subject>Literature Review</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Theories</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLugWxPnkXnpqhRfUHCjuBwm89DUNBNnUkv_vQmVunJ1D9yPc-AD4BzBAkHCryEkJMcSykKIAhUMHoAJkkTmqKT0EEz2_2NwktISQsgpIxNw-xbiZ6Zbm7Wh3Qz5Jptl0X3XbpMFn62CdU26ylau_wh2CCPp69bW7Xs6BUdeN8md_d4peL2_e5k_5ovnh6f5bJFrglmfS2GoptogXGLKKmlLbSmnFHmvhfCUGsRJiQxGnjFLLDKuqjgjknDKLZNkCi52vV0MX2uXerUM69gOk4qhEnMKMR2gy_8ghCWTVFImBgrtKBNDStF51cV6peNWIahGkWoUpUZRSgiFFIN_zbrTqktbo2Nfm8YlVa2bPfUD9ARvJg</recordid><startdate>198007</startdate><enddate>198007</enddate><creator>Kabanoff, Boris</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198007</creationdate><title>Work and nonwork: A review of models, methods, and findings</title><author>Kabanoff, Boris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a326t-98c5a5ac124256b9d4ad57551ffa88f55c17341c21f66d3d1cebb76393757d693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Leisure Time</topic><topic>Literature Review</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kabanoff, Boris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kabanoff, Boris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Work and nonwork: A review of models, methods, and findings</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>1980-07</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>60-77</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>Examines 3 theories of work/leisure relations--compensation, generalization, and segmentation. All have received some support, but the present review indicates that much of the available research evidence is constrained by conceptual and methodological problems. Paradigms for describing work/leisure patterns are reviewed, and it is concluded that most of these are more suitable for classifying leisure definitions than for guiding empirical research. Research in this field requires objective definitions of attributes common across life spheres. A task-based description of work and nonwork is discussed, and its research utility is illustrated. Future research should describe different work/leisure patterns, the processes underlying these patterns, and the life consequences associated with different patterns. (98 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.60</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 1980-07, Vol.88 (1), p.60-77
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614275025
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Human
Leisure Time
Literature Review
Occupations
Theories
title Work and nonwork: A review of models, methods, and findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A38%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Work%20and%20nonwork:%20A%20review%20of%20models,%20methods,%20and%20findings&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Kabanoff,%20Boris&rft.date=1980-07&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=60-77&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614275025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614275025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true