Effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of empathy

Effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of empathy

Studied the effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of accurate empathy (AE). 36 male undergraduates were placed into 1 of 3 feedback groups immediate, delayed, or control instructed briefly and asked to respond aloud empathically to a simulated psychotherapy film (premeasure). Ss...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of counseling psychology 1969-01, Vol.16 (1), p.59-62
1. Verfasser: Reddy, W. Brendan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Empathy
Feedback
Graduate Psychology Education
Human
Learning
Time
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Journal of counseling psychology
container_volume 16
creator Reddy, W. Brendan
description Studied the effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of accurate empathy (AE). 36 male undergraduates were placed into 1 of 3 feedback groups immediate, delayed, or control instructed briefly and asked to respond aloud empathically to a simulated psychotherapy film (premeasure). Ss were then shown 4 additional films and given appropriate feedback as to their empathic performance. On a 6th film Ss responded but received no feedback (postmeasure). Pre- and postresponses were rated independently on a 5-stage AE scale. Both experimental groups made significant gains. Analysis of the postmeasure indicated superiority of the immediate feedback method over the delayed method and the control group. (18 ref.)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0026675
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614257949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614257949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-30df1cb89f61d6a314d529214f1a171d22ae3d9739c46d6e1689865530a2b4fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqUg8RMsuHAJeO3EiY-olIdUiQucrW28pil5YaeH_HtSFcSJ00ijb2dHw9gliFsQKr_bCCG1zrMjNgOjTCJBF8dsNrkyEaDzU3YW41YISFVhZuxh6T2VQ-Sd51XTkKtwII6t445qHMlxT-TWWH7yruXDhnhNGNqq_dhfUNPjsBnP2YnHOtLFj87Z--PybfGcrF6fXhb3qwQViCFRwnko14XxGpyevNRl0khIPSDk4KREUs7kypSpdpqm5qbQWaYEynXqUc3Z1SG3D93XjuJgt90utNNLqyGVWW5SM0HX_0GgBIAWhcwn6uZAlaGLMZC3fagaDKMFYfdD2t8h_wKxR9vHscQwVGVN0ZbdzoK2YDOjvgGbuW6i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614257949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of empathy</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Reddy, W. Brendan</creator><creatorcontrib>Reddy, W. Brendan</creatorcontrib><description>Studied the effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of accurate empathy (AE). 36 male undergraduates were placed into 1 of 3 feedback groups immediate, delayed, or control instructed briefly and asked to respond aloud empathically to a simulated psychotherapy film (premeasure). Ss were then shown 4 additional films and given appropriate feedback as to their empathic performance. On a 6th film Ss responded but received no feedback (postmeasure). Pre- and postresponses were rated independently on a 5-stage AE scale. Both experimental groups made significant gains. Analysis of the postmeasure indicated superiority of the immediate feedback method over the delayed method and the control group. (18 ref.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0026675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Empathy ; Feedback ; Graduate Psychology Education ; Human ; Learning ; Time</subject><ispartof>Journal of counseling psychology, 1969-01, Vol.16 (1), p.59-62</ispartof><rights>1969 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1969, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-30df1cb89f61d6a314d529214f1a171d22ae3d9739c46d6e1689865530a2b4fa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reddy, W. Brendan</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of empathy</title><title>Journal of counseling psychology</title><description>Studied the effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of accurate empathy (AE). 36 male undergraduates were placed into 1 of 3 feedback groups immediate, delayed, or control instructed briefly and asked to respond aloud empathically to a simulated psychotherapy film (premeasure). Ss were then shown 4 additional films and given appropriate feedback as to their empathic performance. On a 6th film Ss responded but received no feedback (postmeasure). Pre- and postresponses were rated independently on a 5-stage AE scale. Both experimental groups made significant gains. Analysis of the postmeasure indicated superiority of the immediate feedback method over the delayed method and the control group. (18 ref.)</description><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Graduate Psychology Education</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>0022-0167</issn><issn>1939-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1969</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqUg8RMsuHAJeO3EiY-olIdUiQucrW28pil5YaeH_HtSFcSJ00ijb2dHw9gliFsQKr_bCCG1zrMjNgOjTCJBF8dsNrkyEaDzU3YW41YISFVhZuxh6T2VQ-Sd51XTkKtwII6t445qHMlxT-TWWH7yruXDhnhNGNqq_dhfUNPjsBnP2YnHOtLFj87Z--PybfGcrF6fXhb3qwQViCFRwnko14XxGpyevNRl0khIPSDk4KREUs7kypSpdpqm5qbQWaYEynXqUc3Z1SG3D93XjuJgt90utNNLqyGVWW5SM0HX_0GgBIAWhcwn6uZAlaGLMZC3fagaDKMFYfdD2t8h_wKxR9vHscQwVGVN0ZbdzoK2YDOjvgGbuW6i</recordid><startdate>196901</startdate><enddate>196901</enddate><creator>Reddy, W. Brendan</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196901</creationdate><title>Effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of empathy</title><author>Reddy, W. Brendan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-30df1cb89f61d6a314d529214f1a171d22ae3d9739c46d6e1689865530a2b4fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1969</creationdate><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Graduate Psychology Education</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reddy, W. Brendan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reddy, W. Brendan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of empathy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of counseling psychology</jtitle><date>1969-01</date><risdate>1969</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>59-62</pages><issn>0022-0167</issn><eissn>1939-2168</eissn><abstract>Studied the effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of accurate empathy (AE). 36 male undergraduates were placed into 1 of 3 feedback groups immediate, delayed, or control instructed briefly and asked to respond aloud empathically to a simulated psychotherapy film (premeasure). Ss were then shown 4 additional films and given appropriate feedback as to their empathic performance. On a 6th film Ss responded but received no feedback (postmeasure). Pre- and postresponses were rated independently on a 5-stage AE scale. Both experimental groups made significant gains. Analysis of the postmeasure indicated superiority of the immediate feedback method over the delayed method and the control group. (18 ref.)</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0026675</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0167
ispartof Journal of counseling psychology, 1969-01, Vol.16 (1), p.59-62
issn 0022-0167
1939-2168
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614257949
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Empathy
Feedback
Graduate Psychology Education
Human
Learning
Time
title Effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the learning of empathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T09%3A48%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20immediate%20and%20delayed%20feedback%20on%20the%20learning%20of%20empathy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20counseling%20psychology&rft.au=Reddy,%20W.%20Brendan&rft.date=1969-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=59-62&rft.issn=0022-0167&rft.eissn=1939-2168&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0026675&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614257949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614257949&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true