The Mental Test as a Psychological Method
Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological review 1924-03, Vol.31 (2), p.93-117 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | Psychological review |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Terman, L. M |
description | Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general principles. 2. The test, in contrast to the experiment, is characterized by simplicity, or brevity, or less elaborateness, or the use of paper and pencil instead of apparatus. 3. The test has a practical aim, usually individual diagnosis and guidance; it has to do with technology rather than with science." Five correspondents point out the methodological identity of test and experiment. The main thesis of the paper is that the mental test and the psychological experiment are essentially alike, and this is shown by examining the alleged grounds of distinction: (1) Use of tests in individual psychology; (2) pencil and paper character; (3) omission of introspection; (4) exactness, verifiability of results, control of conditions, and possibilities of analysis; (5) practical
vs.
theoretical aim. An historical survey shows that the mental test and the psychological experiment have grown up together. The psychologists questioned voted that the test method compares well in importance with other accepted psychological methods. From Psych Bulletin 22:01:00163. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0070938 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614243387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614243387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a308t-88fc25c8d01778f23762772e1611ea153cbacc1cb30af8c5bd75d2e2d578d52f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKvgR1j0oofVmcxmkxyl-A9a9FDBW0izWbdl7a7JVui3N1LFk3MZGH689-YxdopwhUDyugGQoEntsRFq0jkWEvfZCIAo51q8HrKjGFeQBrUesct547OZXw-2zeY-DpmNmc2e49Y1Xdu9LV26z_zQdNUxO6htG_3Jzx6zl7vb-eQhnz7dP05uprklUEOuVO24cKoClFLVnGTJpeQeS0RvUZBbWOfQLQhsrZxYVFJU3PNKSFUJXtOYne10-9B9bFIks-o2YZ0sTYkFL4iUTND5fxByDVIrjpSoix3lQhdj8LXpw_Ldhq1BMN9tmd-2_gRtb02f3rdhWLrWRxP8pyE03GiiL58TZVM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614243387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Mental Test as a Psychological Method</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Terman, L. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Terman, L. M</creatorcontrib><description>Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general principles. 2. The test, in contrast to the experiment, is characterized by simplicity, or brevity, or less elaborateness, or the use of paper and pencil instead of apparatus. 3. The test has a practical aim, usually individual diagnosis and guidance; it has to do with technology rather than with science." Five correspondents point out the methodological identity of test and experiment. The main thesis of the paper is that the mental test and the psychological experiment are essentially alike, and this is shown by examining the alleged grounds of distinction: (1) Use of tests in individual psychology; (2) pencil and paper character; (3) omission of introspection; (4) exactness, verifiability of results, control of conditions, and possibilities of analysis; (5) practical
vs.
theoretical aim. An historical survey shows that the mental test and the psychological experiment have grown up together. The psychologists questioned voted that the test method compares well in importance with other accepted psychological methods. From Psych Bulletin 22:01:00163.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0070938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: Psychological Review Company</publisher><subject>College Teachers ; Human ; Individual Differences ; Intelligence Measures ; Psychologists ; Psychometrics</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 1924-03, Vol.31 (2), p.93-117</ispartof><rights>1924 unknown</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a308t-88fc25c8d01778f23762772e1611ea153cbacc1cb30af8c5bd75d2e2d578d52f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terman, L. M</creatorcontrib><title>The Mental Test as a Psychological Method</title><title>Psychological review</title><description>Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general principles. 2. The test, in contrast to the experiment, is characterized by simplicity, or brevity, or less elaborateness, or the use of paper and pencil instead of apparatus. 3. The test has a practical aim, usually individual diagnosis and guidance; it has to do with technology rather than with science." Five correspondents point out the methodological identity of test and experiment. The main thesis of the paper is that the mental test and the psychological experiment are essentially alike, and this is shown by examining the alleged grounds of distinction: (1) Use of tests in individual psychology; (2) pencil and paper character; (3) omission of introspection; (4) exactness, verifiability of results, control of conditions, and possibilities of analysis; (5) practical
vs.
theoretical aim. An historical survey shows that the mental test and the psychological experiment have grown up together. The psychologists questioned voted that the test method compares well in importance with other accepted psychological methods. From Psych Bulletin 22:01:00163.</description><subject>College Teachers</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Intelligence Measures</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1924</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKvgR1j0oofVmcxmkxyl-A9a9FDBW0izWbdl7a7JVui3N1LFk3MZGH689-YxdopwhUDyugGQoEntsRFq0jkWEvfZCIAo51q8HrKjGFeQBrUesct547OZXw-2zeY-DpmNmc2e49Y1Xdu9LV26z_zQdNUxO6htG_3Jzx6zl7vb-eQhnz7dP05uprklUEOuVO24cKoClFLVnGTJpeQeS0RvUZBbWOfQLQhsrZxYVFJU3PNKSFUJXtOYne10-9B9bFIks-o2YZ0sTYkFL4iUTND5fxByDVIrjpSoix3lQhdj8LXpw_Ldhq1BMN9tmd-2_gRtb02f3rdhWLrWRxP8pyE03GiiL58TZVM</recordid><startdate>19240301</startdate><enddate>19240301</enddate><creator>Terman, L. M</creator><general>Psychological Review Company</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19240301</creationdate><title>The Mental Test as a Psychological Method</title><author>Terman, L. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a308t-88fc25c8d01778f23762772e1611ea153cbacc1cb30af8c5bd75d2e2d578d52f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1924</creationdate><topic>College Teachers</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Intelligence Measures</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terman, L. M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terman, L. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Mental Test as a Psychological Method</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><date>1924-03-01</date><risdate>1924</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>93-117</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><abstract>Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general principles. 2. The test, in contrast to the experiment, is characterized by simplicity, or brevity, or less elaborateness, or the use of paper and pencil instead of apparatus. 3. The test has a practical aim, usually individual diagnosis and guidance; it has to do with technology rather than with science." Five correspondents point out the methodological identity of test and experiment. The main thesis of the paper is that the mental test and the psychological experiment are essentially alike, and this is shown by examining the alleged grounds of distinction: (1) Use of tests in individual psychology; (2) pencil and paper character; (3) omission of introspection; (4) exactness, verifiability of results, control of conditions, and possibilities of analysis; (5) practical
vs.
theoretical aim. An historical survey shows that the mental test and the psychological experiment have grown up together. The psychologists questioned voted that the test method compares well in importance with other accepted psychological methods. From Psych Bulletin 22:01:00163.</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>Psychological Review Company</pub><doi>10.1037/h0070938</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-295X |
ispartof | Psychological review, 1924-03, Vol.31 (2), p.93-117 |
issn | 0033-295X 1939-1471 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614243387 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | College Teachers Human Individual Differences Intelligence Measures Psychologists Psychometrics |
title | The Mental Test as a Psychological Method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Mental%20Test%20as%20a%20Psychological%20Method&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Terman,%20L.%20M&rft.date=1924-03-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=93-117&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0070938&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614243387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614243387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |