The Mental Test as a Psychological Method

Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological review 1924-03, Vol.31 (2), p.93-117
1. Verfasser: Terman, L. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117
container_issue 2
container_start_page 93
container_title Psychological review
container_volume 31
creator Terman, L. M
description Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general principles. 2. The test, in contrast to the experiment, is characterized by simplicity, or brevity, or less elaborateness, or the use of paper and pencil instead of apparatus. 3. The test has a practical aim, usually individual diagnosis and guidance; it has to do with technology rather than with science." Five correspondents point out the methodological identity of test and experiment. The main thesis of the paper is that the mental test and the psychological experiment are essentially alike, and this is shown by examining the alleged grounds of distinction: (1) Use of tests in individual psychology; (2) pencil and paper character; (3) omission of introspection; (4) exactness, verifiability of results, control of conditions, and possibilities of analysis; (5) practical vs. theoretical aim. An historical survey shows that the mental test and the psychological experiment have grown up together. The psychologists questioned voted that the test method compares well in importance with other accepted psychological methods. From Psych Bulletin 22:01:00163.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0070938
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614243387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614243387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a308t-88fc25c8d01778f23762772e1611ea153cbacc1cb30af8c5bd75d2e2d578d52f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKvgR1j0oofVmcxmkxyl-A9a9FDBW0izWbdl7a7JVui3N1LFk3MZGH689-YxdopwhUDyugGQoEntsRFq0jkWEvfZCIAo51q8HrKjGFeQBrUesct547OZXw-2zeY-DpmNmc2e49Y1Xdu9LV26z_zQdNUxO6htG_3Jzx6zl7vb-eQhnz7dP05uprklUEOuVO24cKoClFLVnGTJpeQeS0RvUZBbWOfQLQhsrZxYVFJU3PNKSFUJXtOYne10-9B9bFIks-o2YZ0sTYkFL4iUTND5fxByDVIrjpSoix3lQhdj8LXpw_Ldhq1BMN9tmd-2_gRtb02f3rdhWLrWRxP8pyE03GiiL58TZVM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614243387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Mental Test as a Psychological Method</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Terman, L. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Terman, L. M</creatorcontrib><description>Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general principles. 2. The test, in contrast to the experiment, is characterized by simplicity, or brevity, or less elaborateness, or the use of paper and pencil instead of apparatus. 3. The test has a practical aim, usually individual diagnosis and guidance; it has to do with technology rather than with science." Five correspondents point out the methodological identity of test and experiment. The main thesis of the paper is that the mental test and the psychological experiment are essentially alike, and this is shown by examining the alleged grounds of distinction: (1) Use of tests in individual psychology; (2) pencil and paper character; (3) omission of introspection; (4) exactness, verifiability of results, control of conditions, and possibilities of analysis; (5) practical vs. theoretical aim. An historical survey shows that the mental test and the psychological experiment have grown up together. The psychologists questioned voted that the test method compares well in importance with other accepted psychological methods. From Psych Bulletin 22:01:00163.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0070938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: Psychological Review Company</publisher><subject>College Teachers ; Human ; Individual Differences ; Intelligence Measures ; Psychologists ; Psychometrics</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 1924-03, Vol.31 (2), p.93-117</ispartof><rights>1924 unknown</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a308t-88fc25c8d01778f23762772e1611ea153cbacc1cb30af8c5bd75d2e2d578d52f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terman, L. M</creatorcontrib><title>The Mental Test as a Psychological Method</title><title>Psychological review</title><description>Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general principles. 2. The test, in contrast to the experiment, is characterized by simplicity, or brevity, or less elaborateness, or the use of paper and pencil instead of apparatus. 3. The test has a practical aim, usually individual diagnosis and guidance; it has to do with technology rather than with science." Five correspondents point out the methodological identity of test and experiment. The main thesis of the paper is that the mental test and the psychological experiment are essentially alike, and this is shown by examining the alleged grounds of distinction: (1) Use of tests in individual psychology; (2) pencil and paper character; (3) omission of introspection; (4) exactness, verifiability of results, control of conditions, and possibilities of analysis; (5) practical vs. theoretical aim. An historical survey shows that the mental test and the psychological experiment have grown up together. The psychologists questioned voted that the test method compares well in importance with other accepted psychological methods. From Psych Bulletin 22:01:00163.</description><subject>College Teachers</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Intelligence Measures</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1924</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKvgR1j0oofVmcxmkxyl-A9a9FDBW0izWbdl7a7JVui3N1LFk3MZGH689-YxdopwhUDyugGQoEntsRFq0jkWEvfZCIAo51q8HrKjGFeQBrUesct547OZXw-2zeY-DpmNmc2e49Y1Xdu9LV26z_zQdNUxO6htG_3Jzx6zl7vb-eQhnz7dP05uprklUEOuVO24cKoClFLVnGTJpeQeS0RvUZBbWOfQLQhsrZxYVFJU3PNKSFUJXtOYne10-9B9bFIks-o2YZ0sTYkFL4iUTND5fxByDVIrjpSoix3lQhdj8LXpw_Ldhq1BMN9tmd-2_gRtb02f3rdhWLrWRxP8pyE03GiiL58TZVM</recordid><startdate>19240301</startdate><enddate>19240301</enddate><creator>Terman, L. M</creator><general>Psychological Review Company</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19240301</creationdate><title>The Mental Test as a Psychological Method</title><author>Terman, L. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a308t-88fc25c8d01778f23762772e1611ea153cbacc1cb30af8c5bd75d2e2d578d52f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1924</creationdate><topic>College Teachers</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Intelligence Measures</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terman, L. M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terman, L. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Mental Test as a Psychological Method</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><date>1924-03-01</date><risdate>1924</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>93-117</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><abstract>Professor Terman compares the mental test and the psychological experiment, basing his comparison upon a questionary sent to twenty-two psychologists. The following differences were noted: "1. Tests are intended to throw light upon individual differences; the experiment, to establish general principles. 2. The test, in contrast to the experiment, is characterized by simplicity, or brevity, or less elaborateness, or the use of paper and pencil instead of apparatus. 3. The test has a practical aim, usually individual diagnosis and guidance; it has to do with technology rather than with science." Five correspondents point out the methodological identity of test and experiment. The main thesis of the paper is that the mental test and the psychological experiment are essentially alike, and this is shown by examining the alleged grounds of distinction: (1) Use of tests in individual psychology; (2) pencil and paper character; (3) omission of introspection; (4) exactness, verifiability of results, control of conditions, and possibilities of analysis; (5) practical vs. theoretical aim. An historical survey shows that the mental test and the psychological experiment have grown up together. The psychologists questioned voted that the test method compares well in importance with other accepted psychological methods. From Psych Bulletin 22:01:00163.</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>Psychological Review Company</pub><doi>10.1037/h0070938</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-295X
ispartof Psychological review, 1924-03, Vol.31 (2), p.93-117
issn 0033-295X
1939-1471
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614243387
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects College Teachers
Human
Individual Differences
Intelligence Measures
Psychologists
Psychometrics
title The Mental Test as a Psychological Method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Mental%20Test%20as%20a%20Psychological%20Method&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Terman,%20L.%20M&rft.date=1924-03-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=93-117&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0070938&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614243387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614243387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true