RUBINSHTEIN
London replies to comments made by Anent S. D. Kaplan (see record 2006-06012-023) on London's review (see record 2006-05987-023) of the book Being and Consciousness by Rubinshtein (1957). London states that he makes no wholesale dismissal of Rubinshtein's points of view as "elaboratel...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary psychology 1960-09, Vol.5 (9), p.318-318 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | London replies to comments made by Anent S. D. Kaplan (see record 2006-06012-023) on London's review (see record 2006-05987-023) of the book Being and Consciousness by Rubinshtein (1957). London states that he makes no wholesale dismissal of Rubinshtein's points of view as "elaborately argued absurdities," but patiently try to make the author's major views, dialectically expressed, meaningful to the nondialectically reared reader. Nor is there any implied reference to a deleterious effect seen as emanating from Marxian problematics. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0010-7549 |
| DOI: | 10.1037/006401 |