Women as Woman

Women as Woman

Reviews the book, The Woman in America by Robert Jay Lifton (Ed.) (see record 1965-14834-000). This book is the outcome of a conference called by Daedalus magazine in 1963. As a series of contributions to our knowledge of women in America, their problems and their solutions, it is this reviewer'...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary psychology 1967-08, Vol.12 (8), p.423-424
1. Verfasser: WHITE, MARY ALICE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Demographic Characteristics
Human
Human Females
Individual Differences
Stereotyped Attitudes
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 424
container_issue 8
container_start_page 423
container_title Contemporary psychology
container_volume 12
creator WHITE, MARY ALICE
description Reviews the book, The Woman in America by Robert Jay Lifton (Ed.) (see record 1965-14834-000). This book is the outcome of a conference called by Daedalus magazine in 1963. As a series of contributions to our knowledge of women in America, their problems and their solutions, it is this reviewer's opinion that the psychological- analytic group comes off rather badly. Why? Their contributions are marred by lack of definition of their subjects; by a lack of demographic data; by use of case-studies that have limited generalization; by reliance on psychoanalyticallyoriented views that lack adequate evidence in the eyes of those of us who are data-oriented rather than faith-oriented; and by an almost total disregard for either the notion of individual differences or the danger of stereotypes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/009289
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614208236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614208236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586-2641662581abdb84bb9cc1b0fad3539c15045992580b98dc87e438e7075bca2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01rAjEURbOwUGvrbxAX3U19L58vyyLaFgQ3QpchyWRA0RlNdNF_78h0de_icC-HsSnCB4IwCwDLyY7YGAChMkraZ_ZSygEANCcxZtPf7pTamS-zvvj2lT01_ljS239O2G692i2_q83262f5uamiIl1xLVFrrgh9qAPJEGyMGKDxtVDCRlQglbU9AMFSHckkKSgZMCpEz72YsPkwe87d5ZbK1R26W277R6dRciAudA-9D1DMXSk5Ne6c9yef_xyCe9i5wU7cAWRhP0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614208236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women as Woman</title><source>Portico (Triggered Content) Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>WHITE, MARY ALICE</creator><creatorcontrib>WHITE, MARY ALICE</creatorcontrib><description>Reviews the book, The Woman in America by Robert Jay Lifton (Ed.) (see record 1965-14834-000). This book is the outcome of a conference called by Daedalus magazine in 1963. As a series of contributions to our knowledge of women in America, their problems and their solutions, it is this reviewer's opinion that the psychological- analytic group comes off rather badly. Why? Their contributions are marred by lack of definition of their subjects; by a lack of demographic data; by use of case-studies that have limited generalization; by reliance on psychoanalyticallyoriented views that lack adequate evidence in the eyes of those of us who are data-oriented rather than faith-oriented; and by an almost total disregard for either the notion of individual differences or the danger of stereotypes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/009289</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Demographic Characteristics ; Human ; Human Females ; Individual Differences ; Stereotyped Attitudes</subject><ispartof>Contemporary psychology, 1967-08, Vol.12 (8), p.423-424</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>WHITE, MARY ALICE</creatorcontrib><title>Women as Woman</title><title>Contemporary psychology</title><description>Reviews the book, The Woman in America by Robert Jay Lifton (Ed.) (see record 1965-14834-000). This book is the outcome of a conference called by Daedalus magazine in 1963. As a series of contributions to our knowledge of women in America, their problems and their solutions, it is this reviewer's opinion that the psychological- analytic group comes off rather badly. Why? Their contributions are marred by lack of definition of their subjects; by a lack of demographic data; by use of case-studies that have limited generalization; by reliance on psychoanalyticallyoriented views that lack adequate evidence in the eyes of those of us who are data-oriented rather than faith-oriented; and by an almost total disregard for either the notion of individual differences or the danger of stereotypes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>Demographic Characteristics</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Females</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Stereotyped Attitudes</subject><issn>0010-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj01rAjEURbOwUGvrbxAX3U19L58vyyLaFgQ3QpchyWRA0RlNdNF_78h0de_icC-HsSnCB4IwCwDLyY7YGAChMkraZ_ZSygEANCcxZtPf7pTamS-zvvj2lT01_ljS239O2G692i2_q83262f5uamiIl1xLVFrrgh9qAPJEGyMGKDxtVDCRlQglbU9AMFSHckkKSgZMCpEz72YsPkwe87d5ZbK1R26W277R6dRciAudA-9D1DMXSk5Ne6c9yef_xyCe9i5wU7cAWRhP0E</recordid><startdate>196708</startdate><enddate>196708</enddate><creator>WHITE, MARY ALICE</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196708</creationdate><title>Women as Woman</title><author>WHITE, MARY ALICE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c586-2641662581abdb84bb9cc1b0fad3539c15045992580b98dc87e438e7075bca2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><topic>Demographic Characteristics</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Females</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Stereotyped Attitudes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WHITE, MARY ALICE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Contemporary psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WHITE, MARY ALICE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women as Woman</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary psychology</jtitle><date>1967-08</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>424</epage><pages>423-424</pages><issn>0010-7549</issn><abstract>Reviews the book, The Woman in America by Robert Jay Lifton (Ed.) (see record 1965-14834-000). This book is the outcome of a conference called by Daedalus magazine in 1963. As a series of contributions to our knowledge of women in America, their problems and their solutions, it is this reviewer's opinion that the psychological- analytic group comes off rather badly. Why? Their contributions are marred by lack of definition of their subjects; by a lack of demographic data; by use of case-studies that have limited generalization; by reliance on psychoanalyticallyoriented views that lack adequate evidence in the eyes of those of us who are data-oriented rather than faith-oriented; and by an almost total disregard for either the notion of individual differences or the danger of stereotypes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><doi>10.1037/009289</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-7549
ispartof Contemporary psychology, 1967-08, Vol.12 (8), p.423-424
issn 0010-7549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614208236
source Portico (Triggered Content) Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Demographic Characteristics
Human
Human Females
Individual Differences
Stereotyped Attitudes
title Women as Woman
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%20as%20Woman&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20psychology&rft.au=WHITE,%20MARY%20ALICE&rft.date=1967-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=424&rft.pages=423-424&rft.issn=0010-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/009289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614208236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614208236&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true