Hybridisation between South polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the Antarctic Peninsula regionr
Hybridisation between South polar skua (C. maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the area of the Antarctic Peninsula is known at least since the beginning of the last century but no survey has been done so far. This paper reviews information on the species composition of skua colo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polar biology 2006-02, Vol.29 (3), p.153 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Polar biology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Ritz, Markus S Hahn, Steffen Janicke, Tim Peter, Hans-ulrich |
description | Hybridisation between South polar skua (C. maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the area of the Antarctic Peninsula is known at least since the beginning of the last century but no survey has been done so far. This paper reviews information on the species composition of skua colonies of more than 10 pairs in the Antarctic Peninsula region, and the incidence of mixed pairs. Morphometrics, population size and breeding success were examined in detail at King George Island. The northward distribution of South polar skuas extended to King George Island (62°11' S 59°00' W), with a small outlying population on Signy Island (60°45' S 45°36' W), whereas Brown skuas did not breed further south than Anvers Island archipelago (64°46' S 64°03' W). The proportion of mixed pairs was highest at the northern end of the 500-km-wide hybrid zone. Body size distribution of sympatric skuas from King George Island is clearly bimodal but overlaps considerably and hybrids cannot be identified. Skua population sizes at Potter Peninsula/King George Island remained stable between 1994 and 2004. Numbers of mixed breeding pairs fluctuated more strongly than those of pure species pairs. Breeding success of Brown skuas varied the least.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00300-005-0034-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_613727543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2084650061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_6137275433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjb1OwzAUhS0EEuHnAdiumGBIubGdWIxQgToiwV7duKZxm9rl2lHFM_DSeKA7w9GRzvdJR4ibBmcNonlIiAqxRmxLlK7xRFSNVrKW2HanokIjZa2xw3NxkdIGsTGdfqzEz-K7Z7_yibKPAXqXD84FeI9THmAfR2JI24ngbk55ICabCXZkbeSdt1t_DxRW8MzxEI7erEyZ2GZvCcYYQu94XUQfIA8Ono4Q3lzwIU0jAbt1OecrcfZJY3LXf30pbl9fPuaLes_xa3IpLzdx4lDQsmuUkabVSv1L-gX1y1ox</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613727543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hybridisation between South polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the Antarctic Peninsula regionr</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ritz, Markus S ; Hahn, Steffen ; Janicke, Tim ; Peter, Hans-ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Ritz, Markus S ; Hahn, Steffen ; Janicke, Tim ; Peter, Hans-ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>Hybridisation between South polar skua (C. maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the area of the Antarctic Peninsula is known at least since the beginning of the last century but no survey has been done so far. This paper reviews information on the species composition of skua colonies of more than 10 pairs in the Antarctic Peninsula region, and the incidence of mixed pairs. Morphometrics, population size and breeding success were examined in detail at King George Island. The northward distribution of South polar skuas extended to King George Island (62°11' S 59°00' W), with a small outlying population on Signy Island (60°45' S 45°36' W), whereas Brown skuas did not breed further south than Anvers Island archipelago (64°46' S 64°03' W). The proportion of mixed pairs was highest at the northern end of the 500-km-wide hybrid zone. Body size distribution of sympatric skuas from King George Island is clearly bimodal but overlaps considerably and hybrids cannot be identified. Skua population sizes at Potter Peninsula/King George Island remained stable between 1994 and 2004. Numbers of mixed breeding pairs fluctuated more strongly than those of pure species pairs. Breeding success of Brown skuas varied the least.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0722-4060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2056</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00300-005-0034-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Antarctic zone ; Archipelagoes ; Birds ; Body size ; Breeding success ; Hybridization ; Hybrids ; Ornithology ; Population number ; Species composition</subject><ispartof>Polar biology, 2006-02, Vol.29 (3), p.153</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ritz, Markus S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janicke, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Hans-ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Hybridisation between South polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the Antarctic Peninsula regionr</title><title>Polar biology</title><description>Hybridisation between South polar skua (C. maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the area of the Antarctic Peninsula is known at least since the beginning of the last century but no survey has been done so far. This paper reviews information on the species composition of skua colonies of more than 10 pairs in the Antarctic Peninsula region, and the incidence of mixed pairs. Morphometrics, population size and breeding success were examined in detail at King George Island. The northward distribution of South polar skuas extended to King George Island (62°11' S 59°00' W), with a small outlying population on Signy Island (60°45' S 45°36' W), whereas Brown skuas did not breed further south than Anvers Island archipelago (64°46' S 64°03' W). The proportion of mixed pairs was highest at the northern end of the 500-km-wide hybrid zone. Body size distribution of sympatric skuas from King George Island is clearly bimodal but overlaps considerably and hybrids cannot be identified. Skua population sizes at Potter Peninsula/King George Island remained stable between 1994 and 2004. Numbers of mixed breeding pairs fluctuated more strongly than those of pure species pairs. Breeding success of Brown skuas varied the least.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Antarctic zone</subject><subject>Archipelagoes</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><issn>0722-4060</issn><issn>1432-2056</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjb1OwzAUhS0EEuHnAdiumGBIubGdWIxQgToiwV7duKZxm9rl2lHFM_DSeKA7w9GRzvdJR4ibBmcNonlIiAqxRmxLlK7xRFSNVrKW2HanokIjZa2xw3NxkdIGsTGdfqzEz-K7Z7_yibKPAXqXD84FeI9THmAfR2JI24ngbk55ICabCXZkbeSdt1t_DxRW8MzxEI7erEyZ2GZvCcYYQu94XUQfIA8Ono4Q3lzwIU0jAbt1OecrcfZJY3LXf30pbl9fPuaLes_xa3IpLzdx4lDQsmuUkabVSv1L-gX1y1ox</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Ritz, Markus S</creator><creator>Hahn, Steffen</creator><creator>Janicke, Tim</creator><creator>Peter, Hans-ulrich</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Hybridisation between South polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the Antarctic Peninsula regionr</title><author>Ritz, Markus S ; Hahn, Steffen ; Janicke, Tim ; Peter, Hans-ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_6137275433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Antarctic zone</topic><topic>Archipelagoes</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ritz, Markus S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janicke, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Hans-ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Polar biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ritz, Markus S</au><au>Hahn, Steffen</au><au>Janicke, Tim</au><au>Peter, Hans-ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hybridisation between South polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the Antarctic Peninsula regionr</atitle><jtitle>Polar biology</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>153</spage><pages>153-</pages><issn>0722-4060</issn><eissn>1432-2056</eissn><abstract>Hybridisation between South polar skua (C. maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the area of the Antarctic Peninsula is known at least since the beginning of the last century but no survey has been done so far. This paper reviews information on the species composition of skua colonies of more than 10 pairs in the Antarctic Peninsula region, and the incidence of mixed pairs. Morphometrics, population size and breeding success were examined in detail at King George Island. The northward distribution of South polar skuas extended to King George Island (62°11' S 59°00' W), with a small outlying population on Signy Island (60°45' S 45°36' W), whereas Brown skuas did not breed further south than Anvers Island archipelago (64°46' S 64°03' W). The proportion of mixed pairs was highest at the northern end of the 500-km-wide hybrid zone. Body size distribution of sympatric skuas from King George Island is clearly bimodal but overlaps considerably and hybrids cannot be identified. Skua population sizes at Potter Peninsula/King George Island remained stable between 1994 and 2004. Numbers of mixed breeding pairs fluctuated more strongly than those of pure species pairs. Breeding success of Brown skuas varied the least.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00300-005-0034-0</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0722-4060 |
ispartof | Polar biology, 2006-02, Vol.29 (3), p.153 |
issn | 0722-4060 1432-2056 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_613727543 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal reproduction Antarctic zone Archipelagoes Birds Body size Breeding success Hybridization Hybrids Ornithology Population number Species composition |
title | Hybridisation between South polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki) and Brown skua (C. antarctica lonnbergi) in the Antarctic Peninsula regionr |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T10%3A53%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hybridisation%20between%20South%20polar%20skua%20(Catharacta%20maccormicki)%20and%20Brown%20skua%20(C.%20antarctica%20lonnbergi)%20in%20the%20Antarctic%20Peninsula%20regionr&rft.jtitle=Polar%20biology&rft.au=Ritz,%20Markus%20S&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=153&rft.pages=153-&rft.issn=0722-4060&rft.eissn=1432-2056&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00300-005-0034-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2084650061%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613727543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |