UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTER OF MODERN WAR

Orend claims that in just war theory there is a robust set of rules for resorting to war (jus ad bellum) and for conduct during war (jus in bello) but not for the termination phase of war. On Rigstad's reading, JWT (Just War Theory) is the discursive practice of systematic public reflection and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Review of Contemporary Philosophy 2009-01, Vol.8, p.109
1. Verfasser:	Paun, Stefan
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Armed forces Military policy Peace Principles Terrorism Theory Violence Wages & salaries
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page	109
container_title	Review of Contemporary Philosophy
container_volume	8
creator	Paun, Stefan
description	Orend claims that in just war theory there is a robust set of rules for resorting to war (jus ad bellum) and for conduct during war (jus in bello) but not for the termination phase of war. On Rigstad's reading, JWT (Just War Theory) is the discursive practice of systematic public reflection and argument about how best to distinguish between ethically justifiable and unjustifiable warfare. Mooney says that waging war against overwhelming odds that will cause severe suffering to innocents is deemed to be practically unreasonable. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_613670824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2084354691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_6136708243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0tDAx1DU1MjPkYOAtLs4yAAIzCyDfkpNBM9TPxTUoOMTRz8XTz10hxMNVwdnDMcjROcQ1SMHfTcHXHyjtpxDuGMTDwJqWmFOcyguluRmU3FxDnD10C4ryC0tTi0vis_JLi_KAUvFmhsZm5gYWRibGRCkCAKtbK8k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613670824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTER OF MODERN WAR</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Paun, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Paun, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Orend claims that in just war theory there is a robust set of rules for resorting to war (jus ad bellum) and for conduct during war (jus in bello) but not for the termination phase of war. On Rigstad's reading, JWT (Just War Theory) is the discursive practice of systematic public reflection and argument about how best to distinguish between ethically justifiable and unjustifiable warfare. Mooney says that waging war against overwhelming odds that will cause severe suffering to innocents is deemed to be practically unreasonable. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1841-5261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Woodside: Addleton Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Military policy ; Peace ; Principles ; Terrorism ; Theory ; Violence ; Wages & salaries</subject><ispartof>Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 2009-01, Vol.8, p.109</ispartof><rights>Copyright Addleton Academic Publishers 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paun, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTER OF MODERN WAR</title><title>Review of Contemporary Philosophy</title><description>Orend claims that in just war theory there is a robust set of rules for resorting to war (jus ad bellum) and for conduct during war (jus in bello) but not for the termination phase of war. On Rigstad's reading, JWT (Just War Theory) is the discursive practice of systematic public reflection and argument about how best to distinguish between ethically justifiable and unjustifiable warfare. Mooney says that waging war against overwhelming odds that will cause severe suffering to innocents is deemed to be practically unreasonable. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><issn>1841-5261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0tDAx1DU1MjPkYOAtLs4yAAIzCyDfkpNBM9TPxTUoOMTRz8XTz10hxMNVwdnDMcjROcQ1SMHfTcHXHyjtpxDuGMTDwJqWmFOcyguluRmU3FxDnD10C4ryC0tTi0vis_JLi_KAUvFmhsZm5gYWRibGRCkCAKtbK8k</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Paun, Stefan</creator><general>Addleton Academic Publishers</general><scope>4U-</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTER OF MODERN WAR</title><author>Paun, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_6136708243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paun, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>University Readers</collection><jtitle>Review of Contemporary Philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paun, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTER OF MODERN WAR</atitle><jtitle>Review of Contemporary Philosophy</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>109</spage><pages>109-</pages><issn>1841-5261</issn><abstract>Orend claims that in just war theory there is a robust set of rules for resorting to war (jus ad bellum) and for conduct during war (jus in bello) but not for the termination phase of war. On Rigstad's reading, JWT (Just War Theory) is the discursive practice of systematic public reflection and argument about how best to distinguish between ethically justifiable and unjustifiable warfare. Mooney says that waging war against overwhelming odds that will cause severe suffering to innocents is deemed to be practically unreasonable. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Woodside</cop><pub>Addleton Academic Publishers</pub></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1841-5261
ispartof	Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 2009-01, Vol.8, p.109
issn	1841-5261
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_613670824
source	Central and Eastern European Online Library
subjects	Armed forces Military policy Peace Principles Terrorism Theory Violence Wages & salaries
title	UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTER OF MODERN WAR
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T18%3A21%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UNDERSTANDING%20THE%20CHARACTER%20OF%20MODERN%20WAR&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20Contemporary%20Philosophy&rft.au=Paun,%20Stefan&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=109&rft.pages=109-&rft.issn=1841-5261&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2084354691%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613670824&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true