Comparison of Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Rice in Arkansas

Historically high N prices have increased farmer interest in economic optimum N rates for rice (Oryza sativa L.). This study uses five to 8 yr of rice variety by N data from four research locations in Arkansas varying by soil series [Perry clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); Sharkey clay (Vertic Haplaquepts)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2010-07, Vol.102 (4), p.1099-1108
Hauptverfasser: Watkins, K.B, Hignight, J.A, Norman, R.J, Roberts, T.L, Slaton, N.A, Wilson, C.E. Jr, Frizzell, D.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1108
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1099
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 102
creator Watkins, K.B
Hignight, J.A
Norman, R.J
Roberts, T.L
Slaton, N.A
Wilson, C.E. Jr
Frizzell, D.L
description Historically high N prices have increased farmer interest in economic optimum N rates for rice (Oryza sativa L.). This study uses five to 8 yr of rice variety by N data from four research locations in Arkansas varying by soil series [Perry clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); Sharkey clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); DeWitt silt loam (Typic Albaqualfs); and Hillemann silt loam (Thermic, Albic, Glossic Natraqualfs)] to estimate rice yield response to N functions for five common functional forms [quadratic, quadratic-plateau, square root, linear-plateau, and Mitscherlich]. Economic optimum N rates (EONs) are calculated by location and functional form across years using both nonlinear optimization and a numerical method proposed for making N rate guidelines in the Corn Belt of the United States. Statistical analysis indicated the quadratic fits the yield data best at three of four locations and performs as well as either the linear-plateau or quadratic-plateau at the fourth location. The numerical method produces approximately the same EON rates (within ±1 kg ha–1) as nonlinear optimization. Economic optimum N rates varied by research location and are as follows assuming average 2006–2008 rice price and N cost data and annual quadratic functions: 150 kg N ha–1 at the DeWitt silt loam location; 122 kg N ha–1 at the Hillemann silt loam location; 181 kg N ha–1 at the Sharkey clay location; and 187 kg N ha–1 at the Perry clay location.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2009.0497
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_608706006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2079031431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-aab17f698f5aef8fdfa1051cc18fa7843dc24116e4f036eab420d90caac0c8bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKtrlwbB5ejLx2QyK6mlVkUsVLseXtOkpHYmNWmR_nuntOjS1YPHuefCJeSSwS1nQt7hPIZmwQHKW5BlcUQ6TIo8AyXzY9IBAJ6xUvFTcpbSAoCxUrIOeeiHeoXRp9DQ4OjAhCbU3tDRau3rTU3f_DqGuW3oGNc2URciHXtjqW9oL35ikzCdkxOHy2QvDrdLJo-Dj_5T9joaPvd7r5kRhS4yxCkrnCq1y9E67WYOGeTMGKYdFlqKmeGSMWWlA6EsTiWHWQkG0YDR06nokuu9dxXD18amdbUIm9i0lZUCXYACUC10t4dMDClF66pV9DXGbcWg2u1U_e1U7XZqEzcHLSaDSxexMT79xrgAnnNRttz9nvv2S7v9T1v1hi-8NxyP3l52v0PT1d7gMOz4tmXyzoEJYFrpIs_FDzbdhYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>608706006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Rice in Arkansas</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Watkins, K.B ; Hignight, J.A ; Norman, R.J ; Roberts, T.L ; Slaton, N.A ; Wilson, C.E. Jr ; Frizzell, D.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Watkins, K.B ; Hignight, J.A ; Norman, R.J ; Roberts, T.L ; Slaton, N.A ; Wilson, C.E. Jr ; Frizzell, D.L</creatorcontrib><description>Historically high N prices have increased farmer interest in economic optimum N rates for rice (Oryza sativa L.). This study uses five to 8 yr of rice variety by N data from four research locations in Arkansas varying by soil series [Perry clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); Sharkey clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); DeWitt silt loam (Typic Albaqualfs); and Hillemann silt loam (Thermic, Albic, Glossic Natraqualfs)] to estimate rice yield response to N functions for five common functional forms [quadratic, quadratic-plateau, square root, linear-plateau, and Mitscherlich]. Economic optimum N rates (EONs) are calculated by location and functional form across years using both nonlinear optimization and a numerical method proposed for making N rate guidelines in the Corn Belt of the United States. Statistical analysis indicated the quadratic fits the yield data best at three of four locations and performs as well as either the linear-plateau or quadratic-plateau at the fourth location. The numerical method produces approximately the same EON rates (within ±1 kg ha–1) as nonlinear optimization. Economic optimum N rates varied by research location and are as follows assuming average 2006–2008 rice price and N cost data and annual quadratic functions: 150 kg N ha–1 at the DeWitt silt loam location; 122 kg N ha–1 at the Hillemann silt loam location; 181 kg N ha–1 at the Sharkey clay location; and 187 kg N ha–1 at the Perry clay location.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0497</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; commodity prices ; cultivars ; economic analysis ; fertilizer rates ; fertilizer requirements ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; geographical variation ; grain yield ; input costs ; mathematical models ; model validation ; nitrogen fertilizers ; optimization ; Oryza sativa ; profitability ; rice ; soil types ; yield response</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2010-07, Vol.102 (4), p.1099-1108</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-aab17f698f5aef8fdfa1051cc18fa7843dc24116e4f036eab420d90caac0c8bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-aab17f698f5aef8fdfa1051cc18fa7843dc24116e4f036eab420d90caac0c8bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2009.0497$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2009.0497$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23025239$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watkins, K.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hignight, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaton, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, C.E. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frizzell, D.L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Rice in Arkansas</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Historically high N prices have increased farmer interest in economic optimum N rates for rice (Oryza sativa L.). This study uses five to 8 yr of rice variety by N data from four research locations in Arkansas varying by soil series [Perry clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); Sharkey clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); DeWitt silt loam (Typic Albaqualfs); and Hillemann silt loam (Thermic, Albic, Glossic Natraqualfs)] to estimate rice yield response to N functions for five common functional forms [quadratic, quadratic-plateau, square root, linear-plateau, and Mitscherlich]. Economic optimum N rates (EONs) are calculated by location and functional form across years using both nonlinear optimization and a numerical method proposed for making N rate guidelines in the Corn Belt of the United States. Statistical analysis indicated the quadratic fits the yield data best at three of four locations and performs as well as either the linear-plateau or quadratic-plateau at the fourth location. The numerical method produces approximately the same EON rates (within ±1 kg ha–1) as nonlinear optimization. Economic optimum N rates varied by research location and are as follows assuming average 2006–2008 rice price and N cost data and annual quadratic functions: 150 kg N ha–1 at the DeWitt silt loam location; 122 kg N ha–1 at the Hillemann silt loam location; 181 kg N ha–1 at the Sharkey clay location; and 187 kg N ha–1 at the Perry clay location.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>commodity prices</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>economic analysis</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>fertilizer requirements</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>geographical variation</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>input costs</subject><subject>mathematical models</subject><subject>model validation</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>Oryza sativa</subject><subject>profitability</subject><subject>rice</subject><subject>soil types</subject><subject>yield response</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKtrlwbB5ejLx2QyK6mlVkUsVLseXtOkpHYmNWmR_nuntOjS1YPHuefCJeSSwS1nQt7hPIZmwQHKW5BlcUQ6TIo8AyXzY9IBAJ6xUvFTcpbSAoCxUrIOeeiHeoXRp9DQ4OjAhCbU3tDRau3rTU3f_DqGuW3oGNc2URciHXtjqW9oL35ikzCdkxOHy2QvDrdLJo-Dj_5T9joaPvd7r5kRhS4yxCkrnCq1y9E67WYOGeTMGKYdFlqKmeGSMWWlA6EsTiWHWQkG0YDR06nokuu9dxXD18amdbUIm9i0lZUCXYACUC10t4dMDClF66pV9DXGbcWg2u1U_e1U7XZqEzcHLSaDSxexMT79xrgAnnNRttz9nvv2S7v9T1v1hi-8NxyP3l52v0PT1d7gMOz4tmXyzoEJYFrpIs_FDzbdhYk</recordid><startdate>201007</startdate><enddate>201007</enddate><creator>Watkins, K.B</creator><creator>Hignight, J.A</creator><creator>Norman, R.J</creator><creator>Roberts, T.L</creator><creator>Slaton, N.A</creator><creator>Wilson, C.E. Jr</creator><creator>Frizzell, D.L</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201007</creationdate><title>Comparison of Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Rice in Arkansas</title><author>Watkins, K.B ; Hignight, J.A ; Norman, R.J ; Roberts, T.L ; Slaton, N.A ; Wilson, C.E. Jr ; Frizzell, D.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-aab17f698f5aef8fdfa1051cc18fa7843dc24116e4f036eab420d90caac0c8bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>commodity prices</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>economic analysis</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>fertilizer requirements</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>geographical variation</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>input costs</topic><topic>mathematical models</topic><topic>model validation</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>Oryza sativa</topic><topic>profitability</topic><topic>rice</topic><topic>soil types</topic><topic>yield response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watkins, K.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hignight, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaton, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, C.E. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frizzell, D.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watkins, K.B</au><au>Hignight, J.A</au><au>Norman, R.J</au><au>Roberts, T.L</au><au>Slaton, N.A</au><au>Wilson, C.E. Jr</au><au>Frizzell, D.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Rice in Arkansas</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2010-07</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1099</spage><epage>1108</epage><pages>1099-1108</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Historically high N prices have increased farmer interest in economic optimum N rates for rice (Oryza sativa L.). This study uses five to 8 yr of rice variety by N data from four research locations in Arkansas varying by soil series [Perry clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); Sharkey clay (Vertic Haplaquepts); DeWitt silt loam (Typic Albaqualfs); and Hillemann silt loam (Thermic, Albic, Glossic Natraqualfs)] to estimate rice yield response to N functions for five common functional forms [quadratic, quadratic-plateau, square root, linear-plateau, and Mitscherlich]. Economic optimum N rates (EONs) are calculated by location and functional form across years using both nonlinear optimization and a numerical method proposed for making N rate guidelines in the Corn Belt of the United States. Statistical analysis indicated the quadratic fits the yield data best at three of four locations and performs as well as either the linear-plateau or quadratic-plateau at the fourth location. The numerical method produces approximately the same EON rates (within ±1 kg ha–1) as nonlinear optimization. Economic optimum N rates varied by research location and are as follows assuming average 2006–2008 rice price and N cost data and annual quadratic functions: 150 kg N ha–1 at the DeWitt silt loam location; 122 kg N ha–1 at the Hillemann silt loam location; 181 kg N ha–1 at the Sharkey clay location; and 187 kg N ha–1 at the Perry clay location.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2009.0497</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2010-07, Vol.102 (4), p.1099-1108
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_608706006
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
commodity prices
cultivars
economic analysis
fertilizer rates
fertilizer requirements
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
geographical variation
grain yield
input costs
mathematical models
model validation
nitrogen fertilizers
optimization
Oryza sativa
profitability
rice
soil types
yield response
title Comparison of Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Rice in Arkansas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Economic%20Optimum%20Nitrogen%20Rates%20for%20Rice%20in%20Arkansas&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Watkins,%20K.B&rft.date=2010-07&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1099&rft.epage=1108&rft.pages=1099-1108&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2009.0497&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2079031431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=608706006&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true