Mental Disorders Among Gifted and Nongifted Youth: A Selected Review of the Epidemiologic Literature
Given the ongoing debate over whether giftedness is associated with mental health disorders, there is a great need to highlight and compare results from the most methodologically rigorous studies. Surprisingly, the vast majority of literature reviews and background sections of research articles incl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gifted Child Quarterly 2010-01, Vol.54 (1), p.31-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Gifted Child Quarterly |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Martin, Laurie T. Burns, Rachel M. Schonlau, Matthias |
description | Given the ongoing debate over whether giftedness is associated with mental health disorders, there is a great need to highlight and compare results from the most methodologically rigorous studies. Surprisingly, the vast majority of literature reviews and background sections of research articles include studies that do not directly compare gifted and nongifted youth. Furthermore, almost no attention has been paid to how differences in the definitions of giftedness or mental health outcomes of interest affect the interpretation and comparison of studies. The authors apply an epidemiologic perspective for thinking about these issues, highlight many of the challenges of studying this population, and present results from meta-analyses that include the most methodologically rigorous studies comparing rates of depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, suicide ideation, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between gifted and nongifted youth. They conclude with recommendations to strengthen research in this area.
Putting the research to use
Through this review we sought to provide concrete recommendations to strengthen future research on the mental health of gifted children. Most notably, future studies should assess large, population-based cohorts that include both gifted and nongifted individuals. Researchers should also move toward describing their study population according to their specific aptitudes, talents, skills or abilities, rather than using the general term ‘gifted’. Thinking more specifically about these relationships will not only help us to understand the association between giftedness and mental health, but will also increase the potential to effectively shape programs and policies for gifted youth, focusing resources on the most vulnerable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0016986209352684 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_608692051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ866540</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0016986209352684</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2079046311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-b753cee14c4ddfe4bd59054dd585ee7a64a2ee4be57bc316476644df89588ec93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UD1PwzAQtRBIlMLOwGCxB-zEdmy2qpQCKiDxMTBFqX1pXaV1sRMQ_x5HQSAhMd29e-_e0x1Cx5ScUZrn54RQoaRIicp4KiTbQQOqMpYowuguGnR00vH76CCEVYRSpWSAzB1smrLGlzY4b8AHPFq7zQJPbdWAweXG4PuIe_Tq2mZ5gUf4CWrQ3eQR3i18YFfhZgl4srUG1tbVbmE1ntkGfNm0Hg7RXlXWAY6-6xC9XE2ex9fJ7GF6Mx7NEp2lqknmOc80AGWaGVMBmxuuCI89lxwgLwUrU4hj4PlcZ1SwXAjGTCUVlxK0yobotPfdevfWQmiKlWv9JkYWgkgRD-Y0ikgv0t6F4KEqtt6uS_9ZUFJ0ryz-vjKunPQr4K3-kU9upRCckUgnPR3KBfxG_mv3Bc29fJs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>608692051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mental Disorders Among Gifted and Nongifted Youth: A Selected Review of the Epidemiologic Literature</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Martin, Laurie T. ; Burns, Rachel M. ; Schonlau, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laurie T. ; Burns, Rachel M. ; Schonlau, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>Given the ongoing debate over whether giftedness is associated with mental health disorders, there is a great need to highlight and compare results from the most methodologically rigorous studies. Surprisingly, the vast majority of literature reviews and background sections of research articles include studies that do not directly compare gifted and nongifted youth. Furthermore, almost no attention has been paid to how differences in the definitions of giftedness or mental health outcomes of interest affect the interpretation and comparison of studies. The authors apply an epidemiologic perspective for thinking about these issues, highlight many of the challenges of studying this population, and present results from meta-analyses that include the most methodologically rigorous studies comparing rates of depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, suicide ideation, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between gifted and nongifted youth. They conclude with recommendations to strengthen research in this area.
Putting the research to use
Through this review we sought to provide concrete recommendations to strengthen future research on the mental health of gifted children. Most notably, future studies should assess large, population-based cohorts that include both gifted and nongifted individuals. Researchers should also move toward describing their study population according to their specific aptitudes, talents, skills or abilities, rather than using the general term ‘gifted’. Thinking more specifically about these relationships will not only help us to understand the association between giftedness and mental health, but will also increase the potential to effectively shape programs and policies for gifted youth, focusing resources on the most vulnerable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-9862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-9041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0016986209352684</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GICQAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academically Gifted ; Adolescents ; Anxiety Disorders ; Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ; Cognitive Ability ; Comparative Analysis ; Definitions ; Depression (Psychology) ; Emotional Problems ; Epidemiology ; Gifted ; Literature Reviews ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Health ; Meta Analysis ; Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ; Psychological Patterns ; Researchers ; Suicide ; Symptoms (Individual Disorders) ; Thinking Skills ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Gifted Child Quarterly, 2010-01, Vol.54 (1), p.31-41</ispartof><rights>2010 National Association for Gifted Children</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Winter 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-b753cee14c4ddfe4bd59054dd585ee7a64a2ee4be57bc316476644df89588ec93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-b753cee14c4ddfe4bd59054dd585ee7a64a2ee4be57bc316476644df89588ec93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0016986209352684$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0016986209352684$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,4021,21817,27920,27921,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ866540$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laurie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schonlau, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Mental Disorders Among Gifted and Nongifted Youth: A Selected Review of the Epidemiologic Literature</title><title>Gifted Child Quarterly</title><description>Given the ongoing debate over whether giftedness is associated with mental health disorders, there is a great need to highlight and compare results from the most methodologically rigorous studies. Surprisingly, the vast majority of literature reviews and background sections of research articles include studies that do not directly compare gifted and nongifted youth. Furthermore, almost no attention has been paid to how differences in the definitions of giftedness or mental health outcomes of interest affect the interpretation and comparison of studies. The authors apply an epidemiologic perspective for thinking about these issues, highlight many of the challenges of studying this population, and present results from meta-analyses that include the most methodologically rigorous studies comparing rates of depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, suicide ideation, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between gifted and nongifted youth. They conclude with recommendations to strengthen research in this area.
Putting the research to use
Through this review we sought to provide concrete recommendations to strengthen future research on the mental health of gifted children. Most notably, future studies should assess large, population-based cohorts that include both gifted and nongifted individuals. Researchers should also move toward describing their study population according to their specific aptitudes, talents, skills or abilities, rather than using the general term ‘gifted’. Thinking more specifically about these relationships will not only help us to understand the association between giftedness and mental health, but will also increase the potential to effectively shape programs and policies for gifted youth, focusing resources on the most vulnerable.</description><subject>Academically Gifted</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Emotional Problems</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Gifted</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0016-9862</issn><issn>1934-9041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UD1PwzAQtRBIlMLOwGCxB-zEdmy2qpQCKiDxMTBFqX1pXaV1sRMQ_x5HQSAhMd29e-_e0x1Cx5ScUZrn54RQoaRIicp4KiTbQQOqMpYowuguGnR00vH76CCEVYRSpWSAzB1smrLGlzY4b8AHPFq7zQJPbdWAweXG4PuIe_Tq2mZ5gUf4CWrQ3eQR3i18YFfhZgl4srUG1tbVbmE1ntkGfNm0Hg7RXlXWAY6-6xC9XE2ex9fJ7GF6Mx7NEp2lqknmOc80AGWaGVMBmxuuCI89lxwgLwUrU4hj4PlcZ1SwXAjGTCUVlxK0yobotPfdevfWQmiKlWv9JkYWgkgRD-Y0ikgv0t6F4KEqtt6uS_9ZUFJ0ryz-vjKunPQr4K3-kU9upRCckUgnPR3KBfxG_mv3Bc29fJs</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Martin, Laurie T.</creator><creator>Burns, Rachel M.</creator><creator>Schonlau, Matthias</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Mental Disorders Among Gifted and Nongifted Youth: A Selected Review of the Epidemiologic Literature</title><author>Martin, Laurie T. ; Burns, Rachel M. ; Schonlau, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-b753cee14c4ddfe4bd59054dd585ee7a64a2ee4be57bc316476644df89588ec93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academically Gifted</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Emotional Problems</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Gifted</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laurie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schonlau, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gifted Child Quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Laurie T.</au><au>Burns, Rachel M.</au><au>Schonlau, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ866540</ericid><atitle>Mental Disorders Among Gifted and Nongifted Youth: A Selected Review of the Epidemiologic Literature</atitle><jtitle>Gifted Child Quarterly</jtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>31-41</pages><issn>0016-9862</issn><eissn>1934-9041</eissn><coden>GICQAC</coden><abstract>Given the ongoing debate over whether giftedness is associated with mental health disorders, there is a great need to highlight and compare results from the most methodologically rigorous studies. Surprisingly, the vast majority of literature reviews and background sections of research articles include studies that do not directly compare gifted and nongifted youth. Furthermore, almost no attention has been paid to how differences in the definitions of giftedness or mental health outcomes of interest affect the interpretation and comparison of studies. The authors apply an epidemiologic perspective for thinking about these issues, highlight many of the challenges of studying this population, and present results from meta-analyses that include the most methodologically rigorous studies comparing rates of depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, suicide ideation, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between gifted and nongifted youth. They conclude with recommendations to strengthen research in this area.
Putting the research to use
Through this review we sought to provide concrete recommendations to strengthen future research on the mental health of gifted children. Most notably, future studies should assess large, population-based cohorts that include both gifted and nongifted individuals. Researchers should also move toward describing their study population according to their specific aptitudes, talents, skills or abilities, rather than using the general term ‘gifted’. Thinking more specifically about these relationships will not only help us to understand the association between giftedness and mental health, but will also increase the potential to effectively shape programs and policies for gifted youth, focusing resources on the most vulnerable.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0016986209352684</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-9862 |
ispartof | Gifted Child Quarterly, 2010-01, Vol.54 (1), p.31-41 |
issn | 0016-9862 1934-9041 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_608692051 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Academically Gifted Adolescents Anxiety Disorders Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Cognitive Ability Comparative Analysis Definitions Depression (Psychology) Emotional Problems Epidemiology Gifted Literature Reviews Mental Disorders Mental Health Meta Analysis Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Psychological Patterns Researchers Suicide Symptoms (Individual Disorders) Thinking Skills Youth |
title | Mental Disorders Among Gifted and Nongifted Youth: A Selected Review of the Epidemiologic Literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A28%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental%20Disorders%20Among%20Gifted%20and%20Nongifted%20Youth:%20A%20Selected%20Review%20of%20the%20Epidemiologic%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Gifted%20Child%20Quarterly&rft.au=Martin,%20Laurie%20T.&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=31-41&rft.issn=0016-9862&rft.eissn=1934-9041&rft.coden=GICQAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0016986209352684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2079046311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=608692051&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ866540&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0016986209352684&rfr_iscdi=true |