Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: an international comparison
The paper investigates the efficiency of a sample of Islamic and conventional banks in 10 countries that operate Islamic banking for the period 1996-2002, using an output distance function approach. We obtain measures of efficiency after allowing for environmental influences such as country macroeco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of productivity analysis 2010-08, Vol.34 (1), p.25-43 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 43 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Journal of productivity analysis |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Abdul-Majid, Mariani Saal, David S. Battisti, Giuliana |
description | The paper investigates the efficiency of a sample of Islamic and conventional banks in 10 countries that operate Islamic banking for the period 1996-2002, using an output distance function approach. We obtain measures of efficiency after allowing for environmental influences such as country macroeconomic conditions, accessibility of banking services and bank type. While these factors are assumed to directly influence the shape of the technology, we assume that country dummies and bank size directly influence technical inefficiency. The parameter estimates highlight that during the sample period, Islamic banking appears to be associated with higher input usage. Furthermore, by allowing for bank size and international differences in the underlying inefficiency distributions, we are also able to demonstrate statistically significant differences in inefficiency related to these factors even after controlling for specific environmental characteristics and Islamic banking. Thus, for example, our results suggest that Sudan and Yemen have relatively higher inefficiency while Bahrain and Bangladesh have lower estimated inefficiency. Except for Sudan, where banks exhibits relatively strong returns to scale, most sample banks exhibit very slight returns to scale, although Islamic banks are found to have moderately higher returns to scale than conventional banks. While this suggests that Islamic banks may benefit from increased scale, we would emphasize that our results suggest that identifying and overcoming the factors that cause Islamic banks to have relatively low potential outputs for given input usage levels will be the key challenge for Islamic banking in the coming decades. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11123-009-0165-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_603661919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41766613</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41766613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-d06fda3b5502e491fbe36720d0818ba47b4e5b4608bb37d116be366b2b4d6a9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWP98AA_C4n11ZrPJbrxJqVoseFHwFpLdbEndJjXZCv32pmzRm6eBmd9783iEXCHcIkB1FxGxoDmAyAE5y-kRmSCr0qYs8ZhMoBYsZ7z4OCVnMa4ggXUlJuRl1nW2scY1u8y6bB57tbZNplybNd59GzdY71SfaeU-rVvep0viBhOcOlwav96oYKN3F-SkU300l4d5Tt4fZ2_T53zx-jSfPizyhoEY8hZ41yqqGYPClAI7bSivCmihxlqrstKlYbrkUGtNqxaR7wGuC122XAlNz8nN6LsJ_mtr4iBXfpsC9VFySCQKFAnCEWqCjzGYTm6CXauwkwhyX5kcK5OpCbmvTNKkKUZNTKxbmvBn_J_oehSt4uDD75cSK56iUPoDzld4Ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>603661919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: an international comparison</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Abdul-Majid, Mariani ; Saal, David S. ; Battisti, Giuliana</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdul-Majid, Mariani ; Saal, David S. ; Battisti, Giuliana</creatorcontrib><description>The paper investigates the efficiency of a sample of Islamic and conventional banks in 10 countries that operate Islamic banking for the period 1996-2002, using an output distance function approach. We obtain measures of efficiency after allowing for environmental influences such as country macroeconomic conditions, accessibility of banking services and bank type. While these factors are assumed to directly influence the shape of the technology, we assume that country dummies and bank size directly influence technical inefficiency. The parameter estimates highlight that during the sample period, Islamic banking appears to be associated with higher input usage. Furthermore, by allowing for bank size and international differences in the underlying inefficiency distributions, we are also able to demonstrate statistically significant differences in inefficiency related to these factors even after controlling for specific environmental characteristics and Islamic banking. Thus, for example, our results suggest that Sudan and Yemen have relatively higher inefficiency while Bahrain and Bangladesh have lower estimated inefficiency. Except for Sudan, where banks exhibits relatively strong returns to scale, most sample banks exhibit very slight returns to scale, although Islamic banks are found to have moderately higher returns to scale than conventional banks. While this suggests that Islamic banks may benefit from increased scale, we would emphasize that our results suggest that identifying and overcoming the factors that cause Islamic banks to have relatively low potential outputs for given input usage levels will be the key challenge for Islamic banking in the coming decades.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-562X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11123-009-0165-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Spring Science+Business Media</publisher><subject>Accounting/Auditing ; Bank assets ; Bank earnings ; Bank loans ; Banking industry ; Banking regulation ; Banks ; Comparative analysis ; Cost efficiency ; Distance functions ; Econometrics ; Economic efficiency ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Equity participations ; Input output ; International comparisons ; Islamic banking ; Islamic financing ; Islamic law ; Macroeconomics ; Microeconomics ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Potential output ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of productivity analysis, 2010-08, Vol.34 (1), p.25-43</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-d06fda3b5502e491fbe36720d0818ba47b4e5b4608bb37d116be366b2b4d6a9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-d06fda3b5502e491fbe36720d0818ba47b4e5b4608bb37d116be366b2b4d6a9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41766613$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41766613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdul-Majid, Mariani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saal, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battisti, Giuliana</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: an international comparison</title><title>Journal of productivity analysis</title><addtitle>J Prod Anal</addtitle><description>The paper investigates the efficiency of a sample of Islamic and conventional banks in 10 countries that operate Islamic banking for the period 1996-2002, using an output distance function approach. We obtain measures of efficiency after allowing for environmental influences such as country macroeconomic conditions, accessibility of banking services and bank type. While these factors are assumed to directly influence the shape of the technology, we assume that country dummies and bank size directly influence technical inefficiency. The parameter estimates highlight that during the sample period, Islamic banking appears to be associated with higher input usage. Furthermore, by allowing for bank size and international differences in the underlying inefficiency distributions, we are also able to demonstrate statistically significant differences in inefficiency related to these factors even after controlling for specific environmental characteristics and Islamic banking. Thus, for example, our results suggest that Sudan and Yemen have relatively higher inefficiency while Bahrain and Bangladesh have lower estimated inefficiency. Except for Sudan, where banks exhibits relatively strong returns to scale, most sample banks exhibit very slight returns to scale, although Islamic banks are found to have moderately higher returns to scale than conventional banks. While this suggests that Islamic banks may benefit from increased scale, we would emphasize that our results suggest that identifying and overcoming the factors that cause Islamic banks to have relatively low potential outputs for given input usage levels will be the key challenge for Islamic banking in the coming decades.</description><subject>Accounting/Auditing</subject><subject>Bank assets</subject><subject>Bank earnings</subject><subject>Bank loans</subject><subject>Banking industry</subject><subject>Banking regulation</subject><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Distance functions</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic efficiency</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Equity participations</subject><subject>Input output</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>Islamic banking</subject><subject>Islamic financing</subject><subject>Islamic law</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Potential output</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0895-562X</issn><issn>1573-0441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWP98AA_C4n11ZrPJbrxJqVoseFHwFpLdbEndJjXZCv32pmzRm6eBmd9783iEXCHcIkB1FxGxoDmAyAE5y-kRmSCr0qYs8ZhMoBYsZ7z4OCVnMa4ggXUlJuRl1nW2scY1u8y6bB57tbZNplybNd59GzdY71SfaeU-rVvep0viBhOcOlwav96oYKN3F-SkU300l4d5Tt4fZ2_T53zx-jSfPizyhoEY8hZ41yqqGYPClAI7bSivCmihxlqrstKlYbrkUGtNqxaR7wGuC122XAlNz8nN6LsJ_mtr4iBXfpsC9VFySCQKFAnCEWqCjzGYTm6CXauwkwhyX5kcK5OpCbmvTNKkKUZNTKxbmvBn_J_oehSt4uDD75cSK56iUPoDzld4Ow</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Abdul-Majid, Mariani</creator><creator>Saal, David S.</creator><creator>Battisti, Giuliana</creator><general>Spring Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: an international comparison</title><author>Abdul-Majid, Mariani ; Saal, David S. ; Battisti, Giuliana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-d06fda3b5502e491fbe36720d0818ba47b4e5b4608bb37d116be366b2b4d6a9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accounting/Auditing</topic><topic>Bank assets</topic><topic>Bank earnings</topic><topic>Bank loans</topic><topic>Banking industry</topic><topic>Banking regulation</topic><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Distance functions</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic efficiency</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Equity participations</topic><topic>Input output</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>Islamic banking</topic><topic>Islamic financing</topic><topic>Islamic law</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Potential output</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdul-Majid, Mariani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saal, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battisti, Giuliana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of productivity analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdul-Majid, Mariani</au><au>Saal, David S.</au><au>Battisti, Giuliana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: an international comparison</atitle><jtitle>Journal of productivity analysis</jtitle><stitle>J Prod Anal</stitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>25-43</pages><issn>0895-562X</issn><eissn>1573-0441</eissn><abstract>The paper investigates the efficiency of a sample of Islamic and conventional banks in 10 countries that operate Islamic banking for the period 1996-2002, using an output distance function approach. We obtain measures of efficiency after allowing for environmental influences such as country macroeconomic conditions, accessibility of banking services and bank type. While these factors are assumed to directly influence the shape of the technology, we assume that country dummies and bank size directly influence technical inefficiency. The parameter estimates highlight that during the sample period, Islamic banking appears to be associated with higher input usage. Furthermore, by allowing for bank size and international differences in the underlying inefficiency distributions, we are also able to demonstrate statistically significant differences in inefficiency related to these factors even after controlling for specific environmental characteristics and Islamic banking. Thus, for example, our results suggest that Sudan and Yemen have relatively higher inefficiency while Bahrain and Bangladesh have lower estimated inefficiency. Except for Sudan, where banks exhibits relatively strong returns to scale, most sample banks exhibit very slight returns to scale, although Islamic banks are found to have moderately higher returns to scale than conventional banks. While this suggests that Islamic banks may benefit from increased scale, we would emphasize that our results suggest that identifying and overcoming the factors that cause Islamic banks to have relatively low potential outputs for given input usage levels will be the key challenge for Islamic banking in the coming decades.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Spring Science+Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11123-009-0165-3</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-562X |
ispartof | Journal of productivity analysis, 2010-08, Vol.34 (1), p.25-43 |
issn | 0895-562X 1573-0441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_603661919 |
source | Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Accounting/Auditing Bank assets Bank earnings Bank loans Banking industry Banking regulation Banks Comparative analysis Cost efficiency Distance functions Econometrics Economic efficiency Economic theory Economics Economics and Finance Equity participations Input output International comparisons Islamic banking Islamic financing Islamic law Macroeconomics Microeconomics Operations Research/Decision Theory Potential output Studies |
title | Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: an international comparison |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency%20in%20Islamic%20and%20conventional%20banking:%20an%20international%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20productivity%20analysis&rft.au=Abdul-Majid,%20Mariani&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=25-43&rft.issn=0895-562X&rft.eissn=1573-0441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11123-009-0165-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41766613%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=603661919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41766613&rfr_iscdi=true |