Phenomenological Reflections on the Possibility of First Philosophy
In this paper, I will examine the possibility of first philosophy from a phenomenological point of view. I will do this by assessing Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect. 1 , I will delineate Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect. 2 , I will introduce...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Husserl studies 2010-07, Vol.26 (2), p.131-145 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 145 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Husserl studies |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Lee, Nam-In |
description | In this paper, I will examine the possibility of first philosophy from a phenomenological point of view. I will do this by assessing Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
1
, I will delineate Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
2
, I will introduce Levinas’s conception of ethics as first philosophy and sketch out his criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
3
, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception and show that from a phenomenological point of view, it is possible to develop first philosophy only in a relative sense and not in an absolute sense. The possibility of first philosophy in a relative sense implies that both Husserl’s and Levinas’s conceptions of first philosophy have some limitations and should be revised, since in a certain way, they are each conceived from an absolute point of view. In Sect.
4
, I will show that the conception of first philosophy in a relative sense is a phenomenological one and sketch out some basic features of first philosophy in a relative sense. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10743-009-9064-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_507894058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2064635441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-86cbb37dab2f1b8a78ef53c2348b0294989fb3ffa8566afd932d5836579c6b093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNsieIxOkt1NcpRiVShYRM8h2SbdlO2mJttD_70pW_TkYZjDvPfm8SF0S-CBAPDHRICXDANILKEusThDE1JxikUF5BxNgNQcS1GKS3SV0gayhwGdoNmytX3Y5unC2je6Kz6s62wz-NCnIvTF0NpiGVLyxnd-OBTBFXMf01AsW9-FFHbt4RpdON0le3PaU_Q1f_6cveLF-8vb7GmBG1ZWAxZ1YwzjK22oI0ZoLqyrWENZKQxQWUohnWHOaVHVtXYryeiqEqyuuGxqA5JN0d2Yu4vhe2_ToDZhH_v8UlXAhSwhy6eIjKIm5tbROrWLfqvjQRFQR1RqRKUyKnVEpY6e-1OwThmBi7pvfPo1UgZcloRlHR11KZ_6tY1_Bf4P_wGeS3iy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>507894058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phenomenological Reflections on the Possibility of First Philosophy</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Lee, Nam-In</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nam-In</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, I will examine the possibility of first philosophy from a phenomenological point of view. I will do this by assessing Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
1
, I will delineate Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
2
, I will introduce Levinas’s conception of ethics as first philosophy and sketch out his criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
3
, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception and show that from a phenomenological point of view, it is possible to develop first philosophy only in a relative sense and not in an absolute sense. The possibility of first philosophy in a relative sense implies that both Husserl’s and Levinas’s conceptions of first philosophy have some limitations and should be revised, since in a certain way, they are each conceived from an absolute point of view. In Sect.
4
, I will show that the conception of first philosophy in a relative sense is a phenomenological one and sketch out some basic features of first philosophy in a relative sense.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-9848</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10743-009-9064-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Criticism ; Definitions ; Education ; Ethics ; General philosophy. Metaphysics ; Husserl, Edmund (1859-1938) ; Levinas, Emmanuel ; Modern Philosophy ; Phenomenology ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Man</subject><ispartof>Husserl studies, 2010-07, Vol.26 (2), p.131-145</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-86cbb37dab2f1b8a78ef53c2348b0294989fb3ffa8566afd932d5836579c6b093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-86cbb37dab2f1b8a78ef53c2348b0294989fb3ffa8566afd932d5836579c6b093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10743-009-9064-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10743-009-9064-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23079413$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nam-In</creatorcontrib><title>Phenomenological Reflections on the Possibility of First Philosophy</title><title>Husserl studies</title><addtitle>Husserl Stud</addtitle><description>In this paper, I will examine the possibility of first philosophy from a phenomenological point of view. I will do this by assessing Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
1
, I will delineate Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
2
, I will introduce Levinas’s conception of ethics as first philosophy and sketch out his criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
3
, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception and show that from a phenomenological point of view, it is possible to develop first philosophy only in a relative sense and not in an absolute sense. The possibility of first philosophy in a relative sense implies that both Husserl’s and Levinas’s conceptions of first philosophy have some limitations and should be revised, since in a certain way, they are each conceived from an absolute point of view. In Sect.
4
, I will show that the conception of first philosophy in a relative sense is a phenomenological one and sketch out some basic features of first philosophy in a relative sense.</description><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>General philosophy. Metaphysics</subject><subject>Husserl, Edmund (1859-1938)</subject><subject>Levinas, Emmanuel</subject><subject>Modern Philosophy</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Man</subject><issn>0167-9848</issn><issn>1572-8501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNsieIxOkt1NcpRiVShYRM8h2SbdlO2mJttD_70pW_TkYZjDvPfm8SF0S-CBAPDHRICXDANILKEusThDE1JxikUF5BxNgNQcS1GKS3SV0gayhwGdoNmytX3Y5unC2je6Kz6s62wz-NCnIvTF0NpiGVLyxnd-OBTBFXMf01AsW9-FFHbt4RpdON0le3PaU_Q1f_6cveLF-8vb7GmBG1ZWAxZ1YwzjK22oI0ZoLqyrWENZKQxQWUohnWHOaVHVtXYryeiqEqyuuGxqA5JN0d2Yu4vhe2_ToDZhH_v8UlXAhSwhy6eIjKIm5tbROrWLfqvjQRFQR1RqRKUyKnVEpY6e-1OwThmBi7pvfPo1UgZcloRlHR11KZ_6tY1_Bf4P_wGeS3iy</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Lee, Nam-In</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Phenomenological Reflections on the Possibility of First Philosophy</title><author>Lee, Nam-In</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-86cbb37dab2f1b8a78ef53c2348b0294989fb3ffa8566afd932d5836579c6b093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>General philosophy. Metaphysics</topic><topic>Husserl, Edmund (1859-1938)</topic><topic>Levinas, Emmanuel</topic><topic>Modern Philosophy</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Man</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nam-In</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Husserl studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Nam-In</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phenomenological Reflections on the Possibility of First Philosophy</atitle><jtitle>Husserl studies</jtitle><stitle>Husserl Stud</stitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>131-145</pages><issn>0167-9848</issn><eissn>1572-8501</eissn><abstract>In this paper, I will examine the possibility of first philosophy from a phenomenological point of view. I will do this by assessing Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
1
, I will delineate Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
2
, I will introduce Levinas’s conception of ethics as first philosophy and sketch out his criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect.
3
, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception and show that from a phenomenological point of view, it is possible to develop first philosophy only in a relative sense and not in an absolute sense. The possibility of first philosophy in a relative sense implies that both Husserl’s and Levinas’s conceptions of first philosophy have some limitations and should be revised, since in a certain way, they are each conceived from an absolute point of view. In Sect.
4
, I will show that the conception of first philosophy in a relative sense is a phenomenological one and sketch out some basic features of first philosophy in a relative sense.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10743-009-9064-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-9848 |
ispartof | Husserl studies, 2010-07, Vol.26 (2), p.131-145 |
issn | 0167-9848 1572-8501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_507894058 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Criticism Definitions Education Ethics General philosophy. Metaphysics Husserl, Edmund (1859-1938) Levinas, Emmanuel Modern Philosophy Phenomenology Philosophy Philosophy of Man |
title | Phenomenological Reflections on the Possibility of First Philosophy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phenomenological%20Reflections%20on%20the%20Possibility%20of%20First%20Philosophy&rft.jtitle=Husserl%20studies&rft.au=Lee,%20Nam-In&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=131-145&rft.issn=0167-9848&rft.eissn=1572-8501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10743-009-9064-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2064635441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=507894058&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |