A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory

The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and den...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian health review 2010-05, Vol.34 (2), p.170-179
Hauptverfasser: Jakobs, Olivia M., O'Leary, Elizabeth M., Cormack, Mark F., Chong, Guan C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 170
container_title Australian health review
container_volume 34
creator Jakobs, Olivia M.
O'Leary, Elizabeth M.
Cormack, Mark F.
Chong, Guan C.
description The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges.The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction.
doi_str_mv 10.1071/AH08694
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_366809527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.357027343892391</informt_id><sourcerecordid>733134906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-f736a29e76100930b2dbd4a480da59254002ff93a28fec0c35dfb7ac56f583553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU9vFCEYhydGY9dq_AaGePE0CgMMcNxsq6up0ZiqR8IwsGVlYQtMtTc_umy7rcY_B08c3uf38Mv7Ns1jBJ8jyNCL-RLyXpA7zQwRIlouCLnbzCCifUsZ5wfNg5zXECJBeX-_OeggEYx1YtZ8n4PPMX1xYQXextF4YGMC5cyA428lqZhGF1S6BB_MhTNfQbRg4V1wWnnwPrkL583K5KvMUdQlpgxUGMGRCcXlkoELV675lKvMOxXAQm1dqelTk5KrgcuHzT2rfDaP9u9h8_Hl8eli2Z68e_V6MT9pNUW8tJbhXnXCsB5BKDAcunEYiSIcjoqKjhIIO2sFVh23RkON6WgHpjTtLeWYUnzYPLv2blM8n0wucuOyNt6rYOKUJcMYYSJgX8mnv5HrOKVQy0nc9xwK2rGfOp1izslYuU1uU1clEZS7k8j9SSr5ZK-bho0Zb7mbG1Tg0zWQNq5IHb03urgY8lqVLLNRSZ9JF-qSd_OYVnKMTqoh776qrXvpjFdbJTFlsFYjmIsOC1TFb34RV8KWf-puVTeDP2XL_5f9vdcPyTTV7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>366809527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>CSIRO Publishing Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jakobs, Olivia M. ; O'Leary, Elizabeth M. ; Cormack, Mark F. ; Chong, Guan C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, Olivia M. ; O'Leary, Elizabeth M. ; Cormack, Mark F. ; Chong, Guan C.</creatorcontrib><description>The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges.The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0156-5788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1449-8944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/AH08694</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20497729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: CSIRO</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Australian Capital Territory ; Clinical competence ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical medicine ; Complaints ; Dentistry ; Dentists ; Evaluation ; Health administration ; Health facilities ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Human error ; Humans ; Iatrogenesis ; Jurisdiction ; Medical personnel ; Medical profession ; Medical Staff Privileges ; Models, Theoretical ; Peer Review ; Physicians ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; Quality of care ; Quality standards ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Australian health review, 2010-05, Vol.34 (2), p.170-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-f736a29e76100930b2dbd4a480da59254002ff93a28fec0c35dfb7ac56f583553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-f736a29e76100930b2dbd4a480da59254002ff93a28fec0c35dfb7ac56f583553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3337,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20497729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, Olivia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cormack, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Guan C.</creatorcontrib><title>A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory</title><title>Australian health review</title><addtitle>Aust Health Rev</addtitle><description>The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges.The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Australian Capital Territory</subject><subject>Clinical competence</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iatrogenesis</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical profession</subject><subject>Medical Staff Privileges</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Peer Review</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0156-5788</issn><issn>1449-8944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU9vFCEYhydGY9dq_AaGePE0CgMMcNxsq6up0ZiqR8IwsGVlYQtMtTc_umy7rcY_B08c3uf38Mv7Ns1jBJ8jyNCL-RLyXpA7zQwRIlouCLnbzCCifUsZ5wfNg5zXECJBeX-_OeggEYx1YtZ8n4PPMX1xYQXextF4YGMC5cyA428lqZhGF1S6BB_MhTNfQbRg4V1wWnnwPrkL583K5KvMUdQlpgxUGMGRCcXlkoELV675lKvMOxXAQm1dqelTk5KrgcuHzT2rfDaP9u9h8_Hl8eli2Z68e_V6MT9pNUW8tJbhXnXCsB5BKDAcunEYiSIcjoqKjhIIO2sFVh23RkON6WgHpjTtLeWYUnzYPLv2blM8n0wucuOyNt6rYOKUJcMYYSJgX8mnv5HrOKVQy0nc9xwK2rGfOp1izslYuU1uU1clEZS7k8j9SSr5ZK-bho0Zb7mbG1Tg0zWQNq5IHb03urgY8lqVLLNRSZ9JF-qSd_OYVnKMTqoh776qrXvpjFdbJTFlsFYjmIsOC1TFb34RV8KWf-puVTeDP2XL_5f9vdcPyTTV7Q</recordid><startdate>201005</startdate><enddate>201005</enddate><creator>Jakobs, Olivia M.</creator><creator>O'Leary, Elizabeth M.</creator><creator>Cormack, Mark F.</creator><creator>Chong, Guan C.</creator><general>CSIRO</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201005</creationdate><title>A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory</title><author>Jakobs, Olivia M. ; O'Leary, Elizabeth M. ; Cormack, Mark F. ; Chong, Guan C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-f736a29e76100930b2dbd4a480da59254002ff93a28fec0c35dfb7ac56f583553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Australian Capital Territory</topic><topic>Clinical competence</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iatrogenesis</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical profession</topic><topic>Medical Staff Privileges</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Peer Review</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, Olivia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cormack, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Guan C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian health review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakobs, Olivia M.</au><au>O'Leary, Elizabeth M.</au><au>Cormack, Mark F.</au><au>Chong, Guan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory</atitle><jtitle>Australian health review</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Health Rev</addtitle><date>2010-05</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>170-179</pages><issn>0156-5788</issn><eissn>1449-8944</eissn><abstract>The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges.The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>CSIRO</pub><pmid>20497729</pmid><doi>10.1071/AH08694</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0156-5788
ispartof Australian health review, 2010-05, Vol.34 (2), p.170-179
issn 0156-5788
1449-8944
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_366809527
source MEDLINE; CSIRO Publishing Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Accountability
Australian Capital Territory
Clinical competence
Clinical Competence - standards
Clinical medicine
Complaints
Dentistry
Dentists
Evaluation
Health administration
Health facilities
Health services
Hospitals
Human error
Humans
Iatrogenesis
Jurisdiction
Medical personnel
Medical profession
Medical Staff Privileges
Models, Theoretical
Peer Review
Physicians
Professional ethics
Professionals
Quality of care
Quality standards
Studies
title A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A52%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Working%20Model%20for%20the%20Extraordinary%20Review%20of%20Clinical%20Privileges%20for%20Doctors%20and%20Dentists%20in%20the%20Australian%20Capital%20Territory&rft.jtitle=Australian%20health%20review&rft.au=Jakobs,%20Olivia%20M.&rft.date=2010-05&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=170-179&rft.issn=0156-5788&rft.eissn=1449-8944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/AH08694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733134906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=366809527&rft_id=info:pmid/20497729&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.357027343892391&rfr_iscdi=true