A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory
The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and den...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian health review 2010-05, Vol.34 (2), p.170-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 170 |
container_title | Australian health review |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Jakobs, Olivia M. O'Leary, Elizabeth M. Cormack, Mark F. Chong, Guan C. |
description | The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges.The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1071/AH08694 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_366809527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.357027343892391</informt_id><sourcerecordid>733134906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-f736a29e76100930b2dbd4a480da59254002ff93a28fec0c35dfb7ac56f583553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU9vFCEYhydGY9dq_AaGePE0CgMMcNxsq6up0ZiqR8IwsGVlYQtMtTc_umy7rcY_B08c3uf38Mv7Ns1jBJ8jyNCL-RLyXpA7zQwRIlouCLnbzCCifUsZ5wfNg5zXECJBeX-_OeggEYx1YtZ8n4PPMX1xYQXextF4YGMC5cyA428lqZhGF1S6BB_MhTNfQbRg4V1wWnnwPrkL583K5KvMUdQlpgxUGMGRCcXlkoELV675lKvMOxXAQm1dqelTk5KrgcuHzT2rfDaP9u9h8_Hl8eli2Z68e_V6MT9pNUW8tJbhXnXCsB5BKDAcunEYiSIcjoqKjhIIO2sFVh23RkON6WgHpjTtLeWYUnzYPLv2blM8n0wucuOyNt6rYOKUJcMYYSJgX8mnv5HrOKVQy0nc9xwK2rGfOp1izslYuU1uU1clEZS7k8j9SSr5ZK-bho0Zb7mbG1Tg0zWQNq5IHb03urgY8lqVLLNRSZ9JF-qSd_OYVnKMTqoh776qrXvpjFdbJTFlsFYjmIsOC1TFb34RV8KWf-puVTeDP2XL_5f9vdcPyTTV7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>366809527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>CSIRO Publishing Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jakobs, Olivia M. ; O'Leary, Elizabeth M. ; Cormack, Mark F. ; Chong, Guan C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, Olivia M. ; O'Leary, Elizabeth M. ; Cormack, Mark F. ; Chong, Guan C.</creatorcontrib><description>The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges.The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0156-5788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1449-8944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/AH08694</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20497729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: CSIRO</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Australian Capital Territory ; Clinical competence ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical medicine ; Complaints ; Dentistry ; Dentists ; Evaluation ; Health administration ; Health facilities ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Human error ; Humans ; Iatrogenesis ; Jurisdiction ; Medical personnel ; Medical profession ; Medical Staff Privileges ; Models, Theoretical ; Peer Review ; Physicians ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; Quality of care ; Quality standards ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Australian health review, 2010-05, Vol.34 (2), p.170-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-f736a29e76100930b2dbd4a480da59254002ff93a28fec0c35dfb7ac56f583553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-f736a29e76100930b2dbd4a480da59254002ff93a28fec0c35dfb7ac56f583553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3337,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20497729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, Olivia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cormack, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Guan C.</creatorcontrib><title>A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory</title><title>Australian health review</title><addtitle>Aust Health Rev</addtitle><description>The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges.The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Australian Capital Territory</subject><subject>Clinical competence</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iatrogenesis</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical profession</subject><subject>Medical Staff Privileges</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Peer Review</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0156-5788</issn><issn>1449-8944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU9vFCEYhydGY9dq_AaGePE0CgMMcNxsq6up0ZiqR8IwsGVlYQtMtTc_umy7rcY_B08c3uf38Mv7Ns1jBJ8jyNCL-RLyXpA7zQwRIlouCLnbzCCifUsZ5wfNg5zXECJBeX-_OeggEYx1YtZ8n4PPMX1xYQXextF4YGMC5cyA428lqZhGF1S6BB_MhTNfQbRg4V1wWnnwPrkL583K5KvMUdQlpgxUGMGRCcXlkoELV675lKvMOxXAQm1dqelTk5KrgcuHzT2rfDaP9u9h8_Hl8eli2Z68e_V6MT9pNUW8tJbhXnXCsB5BKDAcunEYiSIcjoqKjhIIO2sFVh23RkON6WgHpjTtLeWYUnzYPLv2blM8n0wucuOyNt6rYOKUJcMYYSJgX8mnv5HrOKVQy0nc9xwK2rGfOp1izslYuU1uU1clEZS7k8j9SSr5ZK-bho0Zb7mbG1Tg0zWQNq5IHb03urgY8lqVLLNRSZ9JF-qSd_OYVnKMTqoh776qrXvpjFdbJTFlsFYjmIsOC1TFb34RV8KWf-puVTeDP2XL_5f9vdcPyTTV7Q</recordid><startdate>201005</startdate><enddate>201005</enddate><creator>Jakobs, Olivia M.</creator><creator>O'Leary, Elizabeth M.</creator><creator>Cormack, Mark F.</creator><creator>Chong, Guan C.</creator><general>CSIRO</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201005</creationdate><title>A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory</title><author>Jakobs, Olivia M. ; O'Leary, Elizabeth M. ; Cormack, Mark F. ; Chong, Guan C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-f736a29e76100930b2dbd4a480da59254002ff93a28fec0c35dfb7ac56f583553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Australian Capital Territory</topic><topic>Clinical competence</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iatrogenesis</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical profession</topic><topic>Medical Staff Privileges</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Peer Review</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, Olivia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cormack, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Guan C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian health review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakobs, Olivia M.</au><au>O'Leary, Elizabeth M.</au><au>Cormack, Mark F.</au><au>Chong, Guan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory</atitle><jtitle>Australian health review</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Health Rev</addtitle><date>2010-05</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>170-179</pages><issn>0156-5788</issn><eissn>1449-8944</eissn><abstract>The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges.The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>CSIRO</pub><pmid>20497729</pmid><doi>10.1071/AH08694</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0156-5788 |
ispartof | Australian health review, 2010-05, Vol.34 (2), p.170-179 |
issn | 0156-5788 1449-8944 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_366809527 |
source | MEDLINE; CSIRO Publishing Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accountability Australian Capital Territory Clinical competence Clinical Competence - standards Clinical medicine Complaints Dentistry Dentists Evaluation Health administration Health facilities Health services Hospitals Human error Humans Iatrogenesis Jurisdiction Medical personnel Medical profession Medical Staff Privileges Models, Theoretical Peer Review Physicians Professional ethics Professionals Quality of care Quality standards Studies |
title | A Working Model for the Extraordinary Review of Clinical Privileges for Doctors and Dentists in the Australian Capital Territory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A52%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Working%20Model%20for%20the%20Extraordinary%20Review%20of%20Clinical%20Privileges%20for%20Doctors%20and%20Dentists%20in%20the%20Australian%20Capital%20Territory&rft.jtitle=Australian%20health%20review&rft.au=Jakobs,%20Olivia%20M.&rft.date=2010-05&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=170-179&rft.issn=0156-5788&rft.eissn=1449-8944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/AH08694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733134906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=366809527&rft_id=info:pmid/20497729&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.357027343892391&rfr_iscdi=true |