TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues
Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and even...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2010-06, Vol.134 (6), p.837-852 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 852 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 837 |
container_title | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Puppa, Giacomo Sonzogni, Angelica Colombari, Romano Pelosi, Giuseppe |
description | Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted.
To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions.
Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.837 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_366698980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A230151175</galeid><sourcerecordid>A230151175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-382c3fa8c6cb6d22398dd4cb1c061cee4e66e978ab024f4e0fde9cf368bb0bed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0Utr3DAQB3ARWpo06ScIFNNCe_JGL2vl3EJom0Iel6RXM5bHuwqytJXkQ759lVdJwqKDhj-_GUmIkENGF4xKccQaKWrOVFMzIRdqocVyh-z9T9-9qHfJx5RuKaUt5-wD2eW04VIrvkf-XF9eVCnDyvpVle5SxqkKY2WCCxFNBlcZiMb6MMFxBZWJNltTUthsIthUqnu9BufQP8ywKc2YDsj7EVzCT0_7Prn5-eP69Kw-v_r1-_TkvDay4bkWmhsxgjbK9GrgXLR6GKTpmaGKGUSJSmG71NBTLkeJdBywNaNQuu9pj4PYJ98f525i-FvOzd1kk0HnwGOYU7cUgilNW1nklzfyNszRl8t1QinV6lbTgr4-ohU47KwfQ45g7kd2J1xQ1jC2bIqqt6gVeozggsfRlviVX2zxZQ04WbO14duLhjWCy-sU3Jxt8Ok1_Pz0qLmfcOg20U4Q77rn_xX_AC84pTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>366698980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Puppa, Giacomo ; Sonzogni, Angelica ; Colombari, Romano ; Pelosi, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Puppa, Giacomo ; Sonzogni, Angelica ; Colombari, Romano ; Pelosi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted.
To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions.
Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20524862</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APLMAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Classification ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - blood supply ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Diagnosis ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Lymphatic system ; Medical prognosis ; Metastasis ; Methods ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Neoplasm Staging - trends ; Neovascularization, Pathologic - pathology ; Patient outcomes ; Peritoneum - pathology ; Risk factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor staging ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2010-06, Vol.134 (6), p.837-852</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Jun 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-382c3fa8c6cb6d22398dd4cb1c061cee4e66e978ab024f4e0fde9cf368bb0bed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20524862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puppa, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonzogni, Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombari, Romano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelosi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues</title><title>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted.
To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions.
Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - blood supply</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - trends</subject><subject>Neovascularization, Pathologic - pathology</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Peritoneum - pathology</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumor staging</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0Utr3DAQB3ARWpo06ScIFNNCe_JGL2vl3EJom0Iel6RXM5bHuwqytJXkQ759lVdJwqKDhj-_GUmIkENGF4xKccQaKWrOVFMzIRdqocVyh-z9T9-9qHfJx5RuKaUt5-wD2eW04VIrvkf-XF9eVCnDyvpVle5SxqkKY2WCCxFNBlcZiMb6MMFxBZWJNltTUthsIthUqnu9BufQP8ywKc2YDsj7EVzCT0_7Prn5-eP69Kw-v_r1-_TkvDay4bkWmhsxgjbK9GrgXLR6GKTpmaGKGUSJSmG71NBTLkeJdBywNaNQuu9pj4PYJ98f525i-FvOzd1kk0HnwGOYU7cUgilNW1nklzfyNszRl8t1QinV6lbTgr4-ohU47KwfQ45g7kd2J1xQ1jC2bIqqt6gVeozggsfRlviVX2zxZQ04WbO14duLhjWCy-sU3Jxt8Ok1_Pz0qLmfcOg20U4Q77rn_xX_AC84pTA</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Puppa, Giacomo</creator><creator>Sonzogni, Angelica</creator><creator>Colombari, Romano</creator><creator>Pelosi, Giuseppe</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues</title><author>Puppa, Giacomo ; Sonzogni, Angelica ; Colombari, Romano ; Pelosi, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-382c3fa8c6cb6d22398dd4cb1c061cee4e66e978ab024f4e0fde9cf368bb0bed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - blood supply</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - trends</topic><topic>Neovascularization, Pathologic - pathology</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Peritoneum - pathology</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumor staging</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puppa, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonzogni, Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombari, Romano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelosi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puppa, Giacomo</au><au>Sonzogni, Angelica</au><au>Colombari, Romano</au><au>Pelosi, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>852</epage><pages>837-852</pages><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>0003-9985</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><coden>APLMAS</coden><abstract>Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted.
To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions.
Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><pmid>20524862</pmid><doi>10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.837</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1543-2165 |
ispartof | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2010-06, Vol.134 (6), p.837-852 |
issn | 1543-2165 0003-9985 1543-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_366698980 |
source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use Cancer therapies Care and treatment Chemotherapy Classification Colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - blood supply Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Diagnosis Health aspects Humans Lymphatic system Medical prognosis Metastasis Methods Neoplasm Staging - methods Neoplasm Staging - trends Neovascularization, Pathologic - pathology Patient outcomes Peritoneum - pathology Risk factors Treatment Outcome Tumor staging Tumors |
title | TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T05%3A46%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TNM%20staging%20system%20of%20colorectal%20carcinoma:%20a%20critical%20appraisal%20of%20challenging%20issues&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Puppa,%20Giacomo&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=852&rft.pages=837-852&rft.issn=1543-2165&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft.coden=APLMAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.837&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA230151175%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=366698980&rft_id=info:pmid/20524862&rft_galeid=A230151175&rfr_iscdi=true |