TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues

Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and even...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2010-06, Vol.134 (6), p.837-852
Hauptverfasser: Puppa, Giacomo, Sonzogni, Angelica, Colombari, Romano, Pelosi, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 852
container_issue 6
container_start_page 837
container_title Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)
container_volume 134
creator Puppa, Giacomo
Sonzogni, Angelica
Colombari, Romano
Pelosi, Giuseppe
description Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted. To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions. Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports.
doi_str_mv 10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.837
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_366698980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A230151175</galeid><sourcerecordid>A230151175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-382c3fa8c6cb6d22398dd4cb1c061cee4e66e978ab024f4e0fde9cf368bb0bed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0Utr3DAQB3ARWpo06ScIFNNCe_JGL2vl3EJom0Iel6RXM5bHuwqytJXkQ759lVdJwqKDhj-_GUmIkENGF4xKccQaKWrOVFMzIRdqocVyh-z9T9-9qHfJx5RuKaUt5-wD2eW04VIrvkf-XF9eVCnDyvpVle5SxqkKY2WCCxFNBlcZiMb6MMFxBZWJNltTUthsIthUqnu9BufQP8ywKc2YDsj7EVzCT0_7Prn5-eP69Kw-v_r1-_TkvDay4bkWmhsxgjbK9GrgXLR6GKTpmaGKGUSJSmG71NBTLkeJdBywNaNQuu9pj4PYJ98f525i-FvOzd1kk0HnwGOYU7cUgilNW1nklzfyNszRl8t1QinV6lbTgr4-ohU47KwfQ45g7kd2J1xQ1jC2bIqqt6gVeozggsfRlviVX2zxZQ04WbO14duLhjWCy-sU3Jxt8Ok1_Pz0qLmfcOg20U4Q77rn_xX_AC84pTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>366698980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Puppa, Giacomo ; Sonzogni, Angelica ; Colombari, Romano ; Pelosi, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Puppa, Giacomo ; Sonzogni, Angelica ; Colombari, Romano ; Pelosi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted. To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions. Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20524862</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APLMAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Classification ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - blood supply ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Diagnosis ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Lymphatic system ; Medical prognosis ; Metastasis ; Methods ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Neoplasm Staging - trends ; Neovascularization, Pathologic - pathology ; Patient outcomes ; Peritoneum - pathology ; Risk factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor staging ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976), 2010-06, Vol.134 (6), p.837-852</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Jun 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-382c3fa8c6cb6d22398dd4cb1c061cee4e66e978ab024f4e0fde9cf368bb0bed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20524862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puppa, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonzogni, Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombari, Romano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelosi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues</title><title>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted. To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions. Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - blood supply</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - trends</subject><subject>Neovascularization, Pathologic - pathology</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Peritoneum - pathology</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumor staging</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0Utr3DAQB3ARWpo06ScIFNNCe_JGL2vl3EJom0Iel6RXM5bHuwqytJXkQ759lVdJwqKDhj-_GUmIkENGF4xKccQaKWrOVFMzIRdqocVyh-z9T9-9qHfJx5RuKaUt5-wD2eW04VIrvkf-XF9eVCnDyvpVle5SxqkKY2WCCxFNBlcZiMb6MMFxBZWJNltTUthsIthUqnu9BufQP8ywKc2YDsj7EVzCT0_7Prn5-eP69Kw-v_r1-_TkvDay4bkWmhsxgjbK9GrgXLR6GKTpmaGKGUSJSmG71NBTLkeJdBywNaNQuu9pj4PYJ98f525i-FvOzd1kk0HnwGOYU7cUgilNW1nklzfyNszRl8t1QinV6lbTgr4-ohU47KwfQ45g7kd2J1xQ1jC2bIqqt6gVeozggsfRlviVX2zxZQ04WbO14duLhjWCy-sU3Jxt8Ok1_Pz0qLmfcOg20U4Q77rn_xX_AC84pTA</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Puppa, Giacomo</creator><creator>Sonzogni, Angelica</creator><creator>Colombari, Romano</creator><creator>Pelosi, Giuseppe</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues</title><author>Puppa, Giacomo ; Sonzogni, Angelica ; Colombari, Romano ; Pelosi, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-382c3fa8c6cb6d22398dd4cb1c061cee4e66e978ab024f4e0fde9cf368bb0bed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - blood supply</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - trends</topic><topic>Neovascularization, Pathologic - pathology</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Peritoneum - pathology</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumor staging</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puppa, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonzogni, Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombari, Romano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelosi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puppa, Giacomo</au><au>Sonzogni, Angelica</au><au>Colombari, Romano</au><au>Pelosi, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>852</epage><pages>837-852</pages><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>0003-9985</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><coden>APLMAS</coden><abstract>Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted. To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions. Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><pmid>20524862</pmid><doi>10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.837</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1543-2165
ispartof Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2010-06, Vol.134 (6), p.837-852
issn 1543-2165
0003-9985
1543-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_366698980
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Chemotherapy
Classification
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - blood supply
Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Diagnosis
Health aspects
Humans
Lymphatic system
Medical prognosis
Metastasis
Methods
Neoplasm Staging - methods
Neoplasm Staging - trends
Neovascularization, Pathologic - pathology
Patient outcomes
Peritoneum - pathology
Risk factors
Treatment Outcome
Tumor staging
Tumors
title TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T05%3A46%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TNM%20staging%20system%20of%20colorectal%20carcinoma:%20a%20critical%20appraisal%20of%20challenging%20issues&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Puppa,%20Giacomo&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=852&rft.pages=837-852&rft.issn=1543-2165&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft.coden=APLMAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.837&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA230151175%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=366698980&rft_id=info:pmid/20524862&rft_galeid=A230151175&rfr_iscdi=true