Integrating reflexivity into livelihoods research

Integrating reflexivity into livelihoods research

Much development research is not explicit about its methodology or philosophical foundations. Based on the extended case method of Burawoy and the philosophy of critical realism, this article discusses a methodological approach for reflexive livelihoods research that overcomes the unproductive socia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in development studies 2010-07, Vol.10 (3), p.211-231
1. Verfasser: Prowse, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Epistemology
Ethnography
Ontology
Research methodology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue 3
container_start_page 211
container_title Progress in development studies
container_volume 10
creator Prowse, Martin
description Much development research is not explicit about its methodology or philosophical foundations. Based on the extended case method of Burawoy and the philosophy of critical realism, this article discusses a methodological approach for reflexive livelihoods research that overcomes the unproductive social science dualism of positivism and social constructivism. The approach is linked to a livelihoods framework, and a sequence of research methods that can be iterated in light of research questions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/146499340901000302
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_366613410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_146499340901000302</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2055975821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e9ef7ce673a585620c97cf57050d95497b0d6215327f9a32233ff94d2596a2623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wNXgfuzNu1lK8VEouFFwF2ImmaaMk5qkxf57p4zgQnB1L9zvnHs4CF1juMVYyhlmgilFGSjAAECBnKAJZlLWQOTb6XEXrD4S5-gi5w0AwUrSCcLLvrg2mRL6tkrOd-4r7EM5VKEvserC3nVhHWOTh2N2Jtn1JTrzpsvu6mdO0evD_cviqV49Py4Xd6vaUj4vtVPOS-uEpIbPuSBglbSeS-DQKM6UfIdGEMwpkV4ZSgil3ivWEK6EIYLQKboZfbcpfu5cLnoTd6kfXmoqhMCUYRggMkI2xZyH_HqbwodJB41BH5vRf5sZRLNRlE3rfl3_UXwDao9hsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>366613410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating reflexivity into livelihoods research</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Prowse, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Prowse, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Much development research is not explicit about its methodology or philosophical foundations. Based on the extended case method of Burawoy and the philosophy of critical realism, this article discusses a methodological approach for reflexive livelihoods research that overcomes the unproductive social science dualism of positivism and social constructivism. The approach is linked to a livelihoods framework, and a sequence of research methods that can be iterated in light of research questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-9934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-027X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/146499340901000302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Epistemology ; Ethnography ; Ontology ; Research methodology</subject><ispartof>Progress in development studies, 2010-07, Vol.10 (3), p.211-231</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications © Jul 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e9ef7ce673a585620c97cf57050d95497b0d6215327f9a32233ff94d2596a2623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e9ef7ce673a585620c97cf57050d95497b0d6215327f9a32233ff94d2596a2623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/146499340901000302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/146499340901000302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prowse, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating reflexivity into livelihoods research</title><title>Progress in development studies</title><description>Much development research is not explicit about its methodology or philosophical foundations. Based on the extended case method of Burawoy and the philosophy of critical realism, this article discusses a methodological approach for reflexive livelihoods research that overcomes the unproductive social science dualism of positivism and social constructivism. The approach is linked to a livelihoods framework, and a sequence of research methods that can be iterated in light of research questions.</description><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><issn>1464-9934</issn><issn>1477-027X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wNXgfuzNu1lK8VEouFFwF2ImmaaMk5qkxf57p4zgQnB1L9zvnHs4CF1juMVYyhlmgilFGSjAAECBnKAJZlLWQOTb6XEXrD4S5-gi5w0AwUrSCcLLvrg2mRL6tkrOd-4r7EM5VKEvserC3nVhHWOTh2N2Jtn1JTrzpsvu6mdO0evD_cviqV49Py4Xd6vaUj4vtVPOS-uEpIbPuSBglbSeS-DQKM6UfIdGEMwpkV4ZSgil3ivWEK6EIYLQKboZfbcpfu5cLnoTd6kfXmoqhMCUYRggMkI2xZyH_HqbwodJB41BH5vRf5sZRLNRlE3rfl3_UXwDao9hsA</recordid><startdate>201007</startdate><enddate>201007</enddate><creator>Prowse, Martin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201007</creationdate><title>Integrating reflexivity into livelihoods research</title><author>Prowse, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e9ef7ce673a585620c97cf57050d95497b0d6215327f9a32233ff94d2596a2623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prowse, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Progress in development studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prowse, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating reflexivity into livelihoods research</atitle><jtitle>Progress in development studies</jtitle><date>2010-07</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>211-231</pages><issn>1464-9934</issn><eissn>1477-027X</eissn><abstract>Much development research is not explicit about its methodology or philosophical foundations. Based on the extended case method of Burawoy and the philosophy of critical realism, this article discusses a methodological approach for reflexive livelihoods research that overcomes the unproductive social science dualism of positivism and social constructivism. The approach is linked to a livelihoods framework, and a sequence of research methods that can be iterated in light of research questions.</abstract><cop>New Delhi, India</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/146499340901000302</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-9934
ispartof Progress in development studies, 2010-07, Vol.10 (3), p.211-231
issn 1464-9934
1477-027X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_366613410
source Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Epistemology
Ethnography
Ontology
Research methodology
title Integrating reflexivity into livelihoods research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A24%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20reflexivity%20into%20livelihoods%20research&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20development%20studies&rft.au=Prowse,%20Martin&rft.date=2010-07&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=211-231&rft.issn=1464-9934&rft.eissn=1477-027X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/146499340901000302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2055975821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=366613410&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_146499340901000302&rfr_iscdi=true