Hand-assisted laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection utilizing the planned end colostomy site
Background Aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing the planned end colostomy site for placing the hand-assist device in performing hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections (HAL APR) in patients with low rectal cancer. Methods Patients with low rectal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Techniques in coloproctology 2010-06, Vol.14 (2), p.201-206 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 206 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 201 |
container_title | Techniques in coloproctology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Koh, D. C. Law, C.-W. Kristian, I. Cheong, W.-K. Tsang, C. B. |
description | Background
Aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing the planned end colostomy site for placing the hand-assist device in performing hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections (HAL APR) in patients with low rectal cancer.
Methods
Patients with low rectal cancers not suitable for a sphincter salvage proctectomy were recruited. HAL APR was performed by placing the hand-assist device over the planned colostomy site. Standard total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed, and the specimen was delivered via the perineal incision. Patient data and perioperative variables were obtained from the institution colorectal cancer database and analyzed.
Results
Six patients underwent HAL APR from November 2004 to January 2006. Mean operative time was 213 min with no conversions or intraoperative complications. One patient developed post-operative ileus which resolved spontaneously. There were no other morbidities or mortalities. Mean hospitalization was 6.8 days. After a mean follow-up of 13.3 months, one patient developed a parastomal hernia which was subsequently repaired during liver resection for liver metastases. No other long-term complications occurred.
Conclusion
HAL APR with the hand device placed at the planned stoma site is technically feasible. Without creating an additional incision, the operation is oncologically comparable and renders similar short-term outcomes as SL methods, maintaining the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10151-010-0581-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_365638972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2052325551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ec21a3d0ce8130fd1b359387ba6ddb49ba773dd71475f9898aa5404ad28cbf683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQxG7wxXHsjKgCilSJBSQ2y7Gd4iq1g50M5deT0gIT051074fuQegSyA0Qwm8TEGCACRBMmABcHKEpQC4wKdjb8fdOcUkpn6CzlNaEAOcMTtEkJ0UuKmBTJBfKG6xScqm3JmtVp2JIOnROZ6o2YeN8wJ2NzlvVZtEmq3sXfDb0rnWfzq-y_t1mXau8H-3Wm0yHNqQ-bLZZcr09RyeNapO9OMwZen24f5kv8PL58Wl-t8SaUtFjq3NQ1BBtBVDSGKgpq6jgtSqNqYuqVpxTYzgUnDWVqIRSrCCFMrnQdVMKOkPX-9wuho_Bpl6uwxD9WClpyUoqKp6PItiL9PhjiraRXXQbFbcSiNwRlXuiciQqd0RlMXquDsFDvbHm1_GDcBTke0EaT35l41_z_6lfEy2Cmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>365638972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hand-assisted laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection utilizing the planned end colostomy site</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Koh, D. C. ; Law, C.-W. ; Kristian, I. ; Cheong, W.-K. ; Tsang, C. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koh, D. C. ; Law, C.-W. ; Kristian, I. ; Cheong, W.-K. ; Tsang, C. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing the planned end colostomy site for placing the hand-assist device in performing hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections (HAL APR) in patients with low rectal cancer.
Methods
Patients with low rectal cancers not suitable for a sphincter salvage proctectomy were recruited. HAL APR was performed by placing the hand-assist device over the planned colostomy site. Standard total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed, and the specimen was delivered via the perineal incision. Patient data and perioperative variables were obtained from the institution colorectal cancer database and analyzed.
Results
Six patients underwent HAL APR from November 2004 to January 2006. Mean operative time was 213 min with no conversions or intraoperative complications. One patient developed post-operative ileus which resolved spontaneously. There were no other morbidities or mortalities. Mean hospitalization was 6.8 days. After a mean follow-up of 13.3 months, one patient developed a parastomal hernia which was subsequently repaired during liver resection for liver metastases. No other long-term complications occurred.
Conclusion
HAL APR with the hand device placed at the planned stoma site is technically feasible. Without creating an additional incision, the operation is oncologically comparable and renders similar short-term outcomes as SL methods, maintaining the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1123-6337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1128-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10151-010-0581-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20428915</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TECOFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Colorectal Surgery ; Colostomy ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Humans ; Laparoscopes ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multimedia Article ; Proctology ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Surgical Stomas ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Techniques in coloproctology, 2010-06, Vol.14 (2), p.201-206</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ec21a3d0ce8130fd1b359387ba6ddb49ba773dd71475f9898aa5404ad28cbf683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ec21a3d0ce8130fd1b359387ba6ddb49ba773dd71475f9898aa5404ad28cbf683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10151-010-0581-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10151-010-0581-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20428915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koh, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, C.-W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristian, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, W.-K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, C. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Hand-assisted laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection utilizing the planned end colostomy site</title><title>Techniques in coloproctology</title><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><description>Background
Aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing the planned end colostomy site for placing the hand-assist device in performing hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections (HAL APR) in patients with low rectal cancer.
Methods
Patients with low rectal cancers not suitable for a sphincter salvage proctectomy were recruited. HAL APR was performed by placing the hand-assist device over the planned colostomy site. Standard total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed, and the specimen was delivered via the perineal incision. Patient data and perioperative variables were obtained from the institution colorectal cancer database and analyzed.
Results
Six patients underwent HAL APR from November 2004 to January 2006. Mean operative time was 213 min with no conversions or intraoperative complications. One patient developed post-operative ileus which resolved spontaneously. There were no other morbidities or mortalities. Mean hospitalization was 6.8 days. After a mean follow-up of 13.3 months, one patient developed a parastomal hernia which was subsequently repaired during liver resection for liver metastases. No other long-term complications occurred.
Conclusion
HAL APR with the hand device placed at the planned stoma site is technically feasible. Without creating an additional incision, the operation is oncologically comparable and renders similar short-term outcomes as SL methods, maintaining the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Colostomy</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopes</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multimedia Article</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Stomas</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1123-6337</issn><issn>1128-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQxG7wxXHsjKgCilSJBSQ2y7Gd4iq1g50M5deT0gIT051074fuQegSyA0Qwm8TEGCACRBMmABcHKEpQC4wKdjb8fdOcUkpn6CzlNaEAOcMTtEkJ0UuKmBTJBfKG6xScqm3JmtVp2JIOnROZ6o2YeN8wJ2NzlvVZtEmq3sXfDb0rnWfzq-y_t1mXau8H-3Wm0yHNqQ-bLZZcr09RyeNapO9OMwZen24f5kv8PL58Wl-t8SaUtFjq3NQ1BBtBVDSGKgpq6jgtSqNqYuqVpxTYzgUnDWVqIRSrCCFMrnQdVMKOkPX-9wuho_Bpl6uwxD9WClpyUoqKp6PItiL9PhjiraRXXQbFbcSiNwRlXuiciQqd0RlMXquDsFDvbHm1_GDcBTke0EaT35l41_z_6lfEy2Cmw</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Koh, D. C.</creator><creator>Law, C.-W.</creator><creator>Kristian, I.</creator><creator>Cheong, W.-K.</creator><creator>Tsang, C. B.</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Hand-assisted laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection utilizing the planned end colostomy site</title><author>Koh, D. C. ; Law, C.-W. ; Kristian, I. ; Cheong, W.-K. ; Tsang, C. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ec21a3d0ce8130fd1b359387ba6ddb49ba773dd71475f9898aa5404ad28cbf683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Colostomy</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopes</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multimedia Article</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Stomas</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koh, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, C.-W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristian, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, W.-K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, C. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koh, D. C.</au><au>Law, C.-W.</au><au>Kristian, I.</au><au>Cheong, W.-K.</au><au>Tsang, C. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hand-assisted laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection utilizing the planned end colostomy site</atitle><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle><stitle>Tech Coloproctol</stitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>201-206</pages><issn>1123-6337</issn><eissn>1128-045X</eissn><coden>TECOFO</coden><abstract>Background
Aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing the planned end colostomy site for placing the hand-assist device in performing hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections (HAL APR) in patients with low rectal cancer.
Methods
Patients with low rectal cancers not suitable for a sphincter salvage proctectomy were recruited. HAL APR was performed by placing the hand-assist device over the planned colostomy site. Standard total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed, and the specimen was delivered via the perineal incision. Patient data and perioperative variables were obtained from the institution colorectal cancer database and analyzed.
Results
Six patients underwent HAL APR from November 2004 to January 2006. Mean operative time was 213 min with no conversions or intraoperative complications. One patient developed post-operative ileus which resolved spontaneously. There were no other morbidities or mortalities. Mean hospitalization was 6.8 days. After a mean follow-up of 13.3 months, one patient developed a parastomal hernia which was subsequently repaired during liver resection for liver metastases. No other long-term complications occurred.
Conclusion
HAL APR with the hand device placed at the planned stoma site is technically feasible. Without creating an additional incision, the operation is oncologically comparable and renders similar short-term outcomes as SL methods, maintaining the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><pmid>20428915</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10151-010-0581-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1123-6337 |
ispartof | Techniques in coloproctology, 2010-06, Vol.14 (2), p.201-206 |
issn | 1123-6337 1128-045X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_365638972 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Adult Aged Cohort Studies Colorectal Surgery Colostomy Feasibility Studies Female Gastroenterology Humans Laparoscopes Laparoscopy - methods Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Multimedia Article Proctology Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Surgery Surgical Stomas Treatment Outcome |
title | Hand-assisted laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection utilizing the planned end colostomy site |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A38%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hand-assisted%20laparoscopic%20abdomino-perineal%20resection%20utilizing%20the%20planned%20end%20colostomy%20site&rft.jtitle=Techniques%20in%20coloproctology&rft.au=Koh,%20D.%20C.&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=201-206&rft.issn=1123-6337&rft.eissn=1128-045X&rft.coden=TECOFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10151-010-0581-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2052325551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=365638972&rft_id=info:pmid/20428915&rfr_iscdi=true |