THE GENDERING OF MEN, 1600-1750, VOL. 2: QUEER ARTICULATIONS

THE GENDERING OF MEN, 1600-1750, VOL. 2: QUEER ARTICULATIONS

In his attempt to at once perform a queer reading of Boswell and to rescue Boswell from flawed queer readings, King argues that Boswell's attachments to men should be considered neither strictly homosocial nor decidedly homoerotic, but rather in light of Boswell's appropriations of "a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theatre journal (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2010, Vol.62 (1), p.140-141
1. Verfasser: BEYNON, JOHN C.
Format: Review
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Articulation
Foucault, Michel
Masculinity
Men
Nonfiction
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 1
container_start_page 140
container_title Theatre journal (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 62
creator BEYNON, JOHN C.
description In his attempt to at once perform a queer reading of Boswell and to rescue Boswell from flawed queer readings, King argues that Boswell's attachments to men should be considered neither strictly homosocial nor decidedly homoerotic, but rather in light of Boswell's appropriations of "a residual language of pederastic male penetration," an already outmoded discourse characteristic of the nobility of an earlier age (343). "[...] it matters less to whom queerness belongs than how we will use queerness today," he writes in his introduction (40), indicating how he finds in early modern theatrics a collection of contrivances for modern-day queer resistance.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/tj.0.0319
format Review
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_347536069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40587471</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40587471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-217e2b659cec4abebe50a91e90e58796eb8d90a412f10190aa26c6161126aa073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKw0AQhhdRsFYPPoCweBOaOLO72eyKl1LTNhATbFPxtmziFgzW1iQ9-PYmVIpzmcs_38x8hFwj-MgDft9WPvjAUZ-QAYKSHufs7ZQMADXzmFLsnFw0TQVdKaEG5DGfR3QWpU_RIk5nNJvS5ygdUZQAHoYBjOhrlviUPdCXVRQt6HiRx5NVMs7jLF1ekrO1_Wzc1V8fktU0yidzL8lm8WSceCVD3noMQ8cKGejSlcIWrnABWI1OgwtUqKUr1LsGK5CtsbsTrGWylCgRmbQWQj4ktwfurt5-713Tmmq7r7-6lYaLMOASpO5Cd4dQWW-bpnZrs6s_Nrb-MQimd2PayoDp3XRZcQRWrmw3-8b9YypQSphl76_X1x0FwDvCkNwcxqqm3dZHvoDuDREi_wVpH2fb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>347536069</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>THE GENDERING OF MEN, 1600-1750, VOL. 2: QUEER ARTICULATIONS</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>BEYNON, JOHN C.</creator><creatorcontrib>BEYNON, JOHN C.</creatorcontrib><description>In his attempt to at once perform a queer reading of Boswell and to rescue Boswell from flawed queer readings, King argues that Boswell's attachments to men should be considered neither strictly homosocial nor decidedly homoerotic, but rather in light of Boswell's appropriations of "a residual language of pederastic male penetration," an already outmoded discourse characteristic of the nobility of an earlier age (343). "[...] it matters less to whom queerness belongs than how we will use queerness today," he writes in his introduction (40), indicating how he finds in early modern theatrics a collection of contrivances for modern-day queer resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-2882</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1086-332X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-332X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/tj.0.0319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Articulation ; Foucault, Michel ; Masculinity ; Men ; Nonfiction</subject><ispartof>Theatre journal (Washington, D.C.), 2010, Vol.62 (1), p.140-141</ispartof><rights>2010 The Johns Hopkins University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 The Johns Hopkins University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40587471$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40587471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,27921,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BEYNON, JOHN C.</creatorcontrib><title>THE GENDERING OF MEN, 1600-1750, VOL. 2: QUEER ARTICULATIONS</title><title>Theatre journal (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>In his attempt to at once perform a queer reading of Boswell and to rescue Boswell from flawed queer readings, King argues that Boswell's attachments to men should be considered neither strictly homosocial nor decidedly homoerotic, but rather in light of Boswell's appropriations of "a residual language of pederastic male penetration," an already outmoded discourse characteristic of the nobility of an earlier age (343). "[...] it matters less to whom queerness belongs than how we will use queerness today," he writes in his introduction (40), indicating how he finds in early modern theatrics a collection of contrivances for modern-day queer resistance.</description><subject>Articulation</subject><subject>Foucault, Michel</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Nonfiction</subject><issn>0192-2882</issn><issn>1086-332X</issn><issn>1086-332X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DJMCT</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKw0AQhhdRsFYPPoCweBOaOLO72eyKl1LTNhATbFPxtmziFgzW1iQ9-PYmVIpzmcs_38x8hFwj-MgDft9WPvjAUZ-QAYKSHufs7ZQMADXzmFLsnFw0TQVdKaEG5DGfR3QWpU_RIk5nNJvS5ygdUZQAHoYBjOhrlviUPdCXVRQt6HiRx5NVMs7jLF1ekrO1_Wzc1V8fktU0yidzL8lm8WSceCVD3noMQ8cKGejSlcIWrnABWI1OgwtUqKUr1LsGK5CtsbsTrGWylCgRmbQWQj4ktwfurt5-713Tmmq7r7-6lYaLMOASpO5Cd4dQWW-bpnZrs6s_Nrb-MQimd2PayoDp3XRZcQRWrmw3-8b9YypQSphl76_X1x0FwDvCkNwcxqqm3dZHvoDuDREi_wVpH2fb</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>BEYNON, JOHN C.</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>A3F</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DJMCT</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>THE GENDERING OF MEN, 1600-1750, VOL. 2: QUEER ARTICULATIONS</title><author>BEYNON, JOHN C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-217e2b659cec4abebe50a91e90e58796eb8d90a412f10190aa26c6161126aa073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Articulation</topic><topic>Foucault, Michel</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Nonfiction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BEYNON, JOHN C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Performing Arts Periodicals Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Music &amp; Performing Arts Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BEYNON, JOHN C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>THE GENDERING OF MEN, 1600-1750, VOL. 2: QUEER ARTICULATIONS</atitle><jtitle>Theatre journal (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>140-141</pages><issn>0192-2882</issn><issn>1086-332X</issn><eissn>1086-332X</eissn><abstract>In his attempt to at once perform a queer reading of Boswell and to rescue Boswell from flawed queer readings, King argues that Boswell's attachments to men should be considered neither strictly homosocial nor decidedly homoerotic, but rather in light of Boswell's appropriations of "a residual language of pederastic male penetration," an already outmoded discourse characteristic of the nobility of an earlier age (343). "[...] it matters less to whom queerness belongs than how we will use queerness today," he writes in his introduction (40), indicating how he finds in early modern theatrics a collection of contrivances for modern-day queer resistance.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/tj.0.0319</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-2882
ispartof Theatre journal (Washington, D.C.), 2010, Vol.62 (1), p.140-141
issn 0192-2882
1086-332X
1086-332X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_347536069
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Articulation
Foucault, Michel
Masculinity
Men
Nonfiction
title THE GENDERING OF MEN, 1600-1750, VOL. 2: QUEER ARTICULATIONS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A06%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20GENDERING%20OF%20MEN,%201600-1750,%20VOL.%202:%20QUEER%20ARTICULATIONS&rft.jtitle=Theatre%20journal%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=BEYNON,%20JOHN%20C.&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=140-141&rft.issn=0192-2882&rft.eissn=1086-332X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/tj.0.0319&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40587471%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=347536069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40587471&rfr_iscdi=true