Dryland Performance of Sweet Sorghum and Grain Crops for Biofuel in Nebraska
Sweet sorghum [SS; Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a potential biofuel crop for the Great Plains. Sweet sorghum was compared with corn [Zea mays (L.)] and grain sorghum for potential ethanol yield, energy use efficiency, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at seven dryland site-years in Nebraska. Sea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2010-01, Vol.102 (1), p.319-326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 326 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Wortmann, C.S Liska, A.J Ferguson, R.B Lyon, D.J Klein, R.N Dweikat, I |
description | Sweet sorghum [SS; Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a potential biofuel crop for the Great Plains. Sweet sorghum was compared with corn [Zea mays (L.)] and grain sorghum for potential ethanol yield, energy use efficiency, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at seven dryland site-years in Nebraska. Seasonal rainfall ranged from approximately 340 to 660 mm. Soils were deep with medium texture at all site-years. The effects of seeding rate, N rate, and cultivar on SS performance were evaluated. Sweet sorghum sugar yield was not affected by seeding rate and N application at six of seven site-years, but yield was increased by 19% at one site-year. Calculated ethanol yield and net energy yield were 33 and 21% more, respectively, with the grain crops compared with SS, but mean net energy yield of an earlier-maturing SS cultivar was comparable with the grain crops. The mean ratio of energy produced in ethanol per total energy invested was 23% less for grain crops compared with SS. Mean life cycle GHG emissions were 53% and 66 to 69% less compared with gasoline for SS and grain crops, respectively. Very efficient use of the ethanol coproducts was assumed for the grain crops while SS bagasse was assumed to be returned to the field. At least one SS cultivar is competitive with grain crops for some biofuel criteria, but SS is not competitive with grain crops for total or net liquid transportation fuel produced per hectare. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj2009.0271 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_336829685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2042273941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5201-c01f2e61cbf6adfd6f3769e8299804f5d2ba7b2b55f08a1dc17ca3f4542083653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPwjAYhhujiYiePdqYeBx8bdduOxlERQkBI3Jeuq3F4VixZSH8e7tA9OjpS7487_smD0LXBHqUsLAvl9bUKwqQ9IBG5AR1SMh4ACLkp6gDADQgiaDn6MK5FQAhSUg6aPJo95WsC_ymrDZ2LetcYaPxfKfUFs-NXX42a9wCIyvLGg-t2TjsSfxQGt2oCvvnVGVWui95ic60rJy6Ot4uWjw_fQxfgsls9DocTIKcUyBBDkRTJUieaSELXQjNIpGomCZJDKHmBc1klNGMcw2xJEVOolwyHfKQQswEZ110e-jdWPPdKLdNV6axtZ9MGRO-R8Qt1D9AuTXOWaXTjS3X0u5TAmlrLP0zlrbGfOLuWCtdLittvYzS_cYoZYwwL7WL7g_crqzU_r_adDAa08HofTYdt7_j0s2hQUvT8n5lMfdqGJCIxpRH7Afyv4et</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>336829685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dryland Performance of Sweet Sorghum and Grain Crops for Biofuel in Nebraska</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Wortmann, C.S ; Liska, A.J ; Ferguson, R.B ; Lyon, D.J ; Klein, R.N ; Dweikat, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, C.S ; Liska, A.J ; Ferguson, R.B ; Lyon, D.J ; Klein, R.N ; Dweikat, I</creatorcontrib><description>Sweet sorghum [SS; Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a potential biofuel crop for the Great Plains. Sweet sorghum was compared with corn [Zea mays (L.)] and grain sorghum for potential ethanol yield, energy use efficiency, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at seven dryland site-years in Nebraska. Seasonal rainfall ranged from approximately 340 to 660 mm. Soils were deep with medium texture at all site-years. The effects of seeding rate, N rate, and cultivar on SS performance were evaluated. Sweet sorghum sugar yield was not affected by seeding rate and N application at six of seven site-years, but yield was increased by 19% at one site-year. Calculated ethanol yield and net energy yield were 33 and 21% more, respectively, with the grain crops compared with SS, but mean net energy yield of an earlier-maturing SS cultivar was comparable with the grain crops. The mean ratio of energy produced in ethanol per total energy invested was 23% less for grain crops compared with SS. Mean life cycle GHG emissions were 53% and 66 to 69% less compared with gasoline for SS and grain crops, respectively. Very efficient use of the ethanol coproducts was assumed for the grain crops while SS bagasse was assumed to be returned to the field. At least one SS cultivar is competitive with grain crops for some biofuel criteria, but SS is not competitive with grain crops for total or net liquid transportation fuel produced per hectare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0271</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Arid zones ; bagasse ; Biofuels ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cereal crops ; corn ; crop residue management ; crop yield ; energy content ; energy crops ; energy efficiency ; ethanol ; ethanol production ; fertilizer rates ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gas emissions ; Grain crops ; grain sorghum ; greenhouse gases ; nitrogen fertilizers ; plant byproducts ; Sorghum bicolor ; sugar crops ; sugars ; sweet sorghum ; waste utilization ; yields ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2010-01, Vol.102 (1), p.319-326</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5201-c01f2e61cbf6adfd6f3769e8299804f5d2ba7b2b55f08a1dc17ca3f4542083653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5201-c01f2e61cbf6adfd6f3769e8299804f5d2ba7b2b55f08a1dc17ca3f4542083653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2009.0271$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2009.0271$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22331314$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liska, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, R.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, R.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dweikat, I</creatorcontrib><title>Dryland Performance of Sweet Sorghum and Grain Crops for Biofuel in Nebraska</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Sweet sorghum [SS; Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a potential biofuel crop for the Great Plains. Sweet sorghum was compared with corn [Zea mays (L.)] and grain sorghum for potential ethanol yield, energy use efficiency, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at seven dryland site-years in Nebraska. Seasonal rainfall ranged from approximately 340 to 660 mm. Soils were deep with medium texture at all site-years. The effects of seeding rate, N rate, and cultivar on SS performance were evaluated. Sweet sorghum sugar yield was not affected by seeding rate and N application at six of seven site-years, but yield was increased by 19% at one site-year. Calculated ethanol yield and net energy yield were 33 and 21% more, respectively, with the grain crops compared with SS, but mean net energy yield of an earlier-maturing SS cultivar was comparable with the grain crops. The mean ratio of energy produced in ethanol per total energy invested was 23% less for grain crops compared with SS. Mean life cycle GHG emissions were 53% and 66 to 69% less compared with gasoline for SS and grain crops, respectively. Very efficient use of the ethanol coproducts was assumed for the grain crops while SS bagasse was assumed to be returned to the field. At least one SS cultivar is competitive with grain crops for some biofuel criteria, but SS is not competitive with grain crops for total or net liquid transportation fuel produced per hectare.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>bagasse</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>crop residue management</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>energy content</subject><subject>energy crops</subject><subject>energy efficiency</subject><subject>ethanol</subject><subject>ethanol production</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gas emissions</subject><subject>Grain crops</subject><subject>grain sorghum</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>plant byproducts</subject><subject>Sorghum bicolor</subject><subject>sugar crops</subject><subject>sugars</subject><subject>sweet sorghum</subject><subject>waste utilization</subject><subject>yields</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFPwjAYhhujiYiePdqYeBx8bdduOxlERQkBI3Jeuq3F4VixZSH8e7tA9OjpS7487_smD0LXBHqUsLAvl9bUKwqQ9IBG5AR1SMh4ACLkp6gDADQgiaDn6MK5FQAhSUg6aPJo95WsC_ymrDZ2LetcYaPxfKfUFs-NXX42a9wCIyvLGg-t2TjsSfxQGt2oCvvnVGVWui95ic60rJy6Ot4uWjw_fQxfgsls9DocTIKcUyBBDkRTJUieaSELXQjNIpGomCZJDKHmBc1klNGMcw2xJEVOolwyHfKQQswEZ110e-jdWPPdKLdNV6axtZ9MGRO-R8Qt1D9AuTXOWaXTjS3X0u5TAmlrLP0zlrbGfOLuWCtdLittvYzS_cYoZYwwL7WL7g_crqzU_r_adDAa08HofTYdt7_j0s2hQUvT8n5lMfdqGJCIxpRH7Afyv4et</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Wortmann, C.S</creator><creator>Liska, A.J</creator><creator>Ferguson, R.B</creator><creator>Lyon, D.J</creator><creator>Klein, R.N</creator><creator>Dweikat, I</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Dryland Performance of Sweet Sorghum and Grain Crops for Biofuel in Nebraska</title><author>Wortmann, C.S ; Liska, A.J ; Ferguson, R.B ; Lyon, D.J ; Klein, R.N ; Dweikat, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5201-c01f2e61cbf6adfd6f3769e8299804f5d2ba7b2b55f08a1dc17ca3f4542083653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>bagasse</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>crop residue management</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>energy content</topic><topic>energy crops</topic><topic>energy efficiency</topic><topic>ethanol</topic><topic>ethanol production</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gas emissions</topic><topic>Grain crops</topic><topic>grain sorghum</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>plant byproducts</topic><topic>Sorghum bicolor</topic><topic>sugar crops</topic><topic>sugars</topic><topic>sweet sorghum</topic><topic>waste utilization</topic><topic>yields</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liska, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, R.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, R.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dweikat, I</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wortmann, C.S</au><au>Liska, A.J</au><au>Ferguson, R.B</au><au>Lyon, D.J</au><au>Klein, R.N</au><au>Dweikat, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dryland Performance of Sweet Sorghum and Grain Crops for Biofuel in Nebraska</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>319-326</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Sweet sorghum [SS; Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a potential biofuel crop for the Great Plains. Sweet sorghum was compared with corn [Zea mays (L.)] and grain sorghum for potential ethanol yield, energy use efficiency, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at seven dryland site-years in Nebraska. Seasonal rainfall ranged from approximately 340 to 660 mm. Soils were deep with medium texture at all site-years. The effects of seeding rate, N rate, and cultivar on SS performance were evaluated. Sweet sorghum sugar yield was not affected by seeding rate and N application at six of seven site-years, but yield was increased by 19% at one site-year. Calculated ethanol yield and net energy yield were 33 and 21% more, respectively, with the grain crops compared with SS, but mean net energy yield of an earlier-maturing SS cultivar was comparable with the grain crops. The mean ratio of energy produced in ethanol per total energy invested was 23% less for grain crops compared with SS. Mean life cycle GHG emissions were 53% and 66 to 69% less compared with gasoline for SS and grain crops, respectively. Very efficient use of the ethanol coproducts was assumed for the grain crops while SS bagasse was assumed to be returned to the field. At least one SS cultivar is competitive with grain crops for some biofuel criteria, but SS is not competitive with grain crops for total or net liquid transportation fuel produced per hectare.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2009.0271</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2010-01, Vol.102 (1), p.319-326 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_336829685 |
source | Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Arid zones bagasse Biofuels Biological and medical sciences Cereal crops corn crop residue management crop yield energy content energy crops energy efficiency ethanol ethanol production fertilizer rates Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology gas emissions Grain crops grain sorghum greenhouse gases nitrogen fertilizers plant byproducts Sorghum bicolor sugar crops sugars sweet sorghum waste utilization yields Zea mays |
title | Dryland Performance of Sweet Sorghum and Grain Crops for Biofuel in Nebraska |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T13%3A29%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dryland%20Performance%20of%20Sweet%20Sorghum%20and%20Grain%20Crops%20for%20Biofuel%20in%20Nebraska&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Wortmann,%20C.S&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=319-326&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2009.0271&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2042273941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=336829685&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |