Improving Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about Salient Problem Features

Background Across many domains, research has shown that students often fail to select and apply appropriate conceptual knowledge when solving problems. Programs designed to support monitoring skills have been successful in several domains. Purpose (Hypothesis) Critical conceptual knowledge in static...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2010-04, Vol.99 (2), p.135-142
Hauptverfasser: Steif, Paul S., Lobue, Jamie M., Kara, Levent B., Fay, Anne L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 2
container_start_page 135
container_title Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 99
creator Steif, Paul S.
Lobue, Jamie M.
Kara, Levent B.
Fay, Anne L.
description Background Across many domains, research has shown that students often fail to select and apply appropriate conceptual knowledge when solving problems. Programs designed to support monitoring skills have been successful in several domains. Purpose (Hypothesis) Critical conceptual knowledge in statics appears to be cued by paying attention to the bodies that are present in a problem, as well as to which ones are interacting and how. The research question addresses whether students can be induced to think about the bodies present, and whether focusing on bodies improves problem solving performance. Design/Method Using a pre‐post test design, written and verbal protocols were obtained for students solving problems before and after instruction. During instruction all students saw the same set of examples and corrected answers, but only the experimental group was asked questions designed to promote body centered talk. Solutions and protocols were coded and analyzed for frequency of body centered talk and solution quality. Results The experimental group showed statistically significant increases in relevant body centered talk after instruction. Both groups improved their ability to represent unknown forces in free body diagrams after instruction, with the experimental group showing a greater, but not statistically significant, improvement. However, for both groups, the error rate in representing unknown forces at an interaction was significantly lower when a student referred to the bodies in the particular interaction. Conclusions Problem solving in conceptually rich domains can improve if, in addition to acquiring conceptual knowledge, students develop strategies for recognizing when and how to apply it.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01050.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_324515257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2040514271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3840-6afc3944aff53fdfa5756b3aacf5b835adbd5482f124d8cd0184acb01c6e61343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD1H3KXb8SMIGoapPVVCprVhajmOjpHkUO4H273GUqns2M-OZudeaA8AIwTGCMHjOxwFikR9HGI4D6LpN4iKF49MNGFxHt2CAIIt9EmJ4Dx6szSGEMWThAOyX5dHUP1n15W1MnRSq9LZ10b-V0bUpRSWVl5y9ZZW2suvvRHHwRFK3jbcVRaaq5iqdKdG0RtlHcKdFYdXTJQ_BfjbdTRb--mO-nLytfYkjAn0mtMQxIUJrinWqBQ0pS7AQUtMkwlSkSUpJFGgUkDSSKUQREdJdKJliCBM8BKPe193w3Srb8LxuTeW-5DggFNGAhm7ppV-SprbWKM2PJiuFOXMEeUeR57xDxTtUvKPILxT5yYlfe_FvVqjzP5R8NZ12lXPwe4fMNup0dRDmwFmIQ8o_3-d8u9gsVuF6w3f4DwlMihM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>324515257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about Salient Problem Features</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Steif, Paul S. ; Lobue, Jamie M. ; Kara, Levent B. ; Fay, Anne L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steif, Paul S. ; Lobue, Jamie M. ; Kara, Levent B. ; Fay, Anne L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Across many domains, research has shown that students often fail to select and apply appropriate conceptual knowledge when solving problems. Programs designed to support monitoring skills have been successful in several domains. Purpose (Hypothesis) Critical conceptual knowledge in statics appears to be cued by paying attention to the bodies that are present in a problem, as well as to which ones are interacting and how. The research question addresses whether students can be induced to think about the bodies present, and whether focusing on bodies improves problem solving performance. Design/Method Using a pre‐post test design, written and verbal protocols were obtained for students solving problems before and after instruction. During instruction all students saw the same set of examples and corrected answers, but only the experimental group was asked questions designed to promote body centered talk. Solutions and protocols were coded and analyzed for frequency of body centered talk and solution quality. Results The experimental group showed statistically significant increases in relevant body centered talk after instruction. Both groups improved their ability to represent unknown forces in free body diagrams after instruction, with the experimental group showing a greater, but not statistically significant, improvement. However, for both groups, the error rate in representing unknown forces at an interaction was significantly lower when a student referred to the bodies in the particular interaction. Conclusions Problem solving in conceptually rich domains can improve if, in addition to acquiring conceptual knowledge, students develop strategies for recognizing when and how to apply it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-4730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-9830</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01050.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEEDEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Civil engineering ; concept ; Education ; Engineering Education ; Experts ; metacognition ; Problem solving ; problem-solving strategy ; R&amp;D ; Reading Comprehension ; Research &amp; development ; Sample size ; Skills ; statics ; Studies ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 2010-04, Vol.99 (2), p.135-142</ispartof><rights>2010 American Society for Engineering Education</rights><rights>Copyright AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3840-6afc3944aff53fdfa5756b3aacf5b835adbd5482f124d8cd0184acb01c6e61343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3840-6afc3944aff53fdfa5756b3aacf5b835adbd5482f124d8cd0184acb01c6e61343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.2168-9830.2010.tb01050.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.2168-9830.2010.tb01050.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steif, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobue, Jamie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kara, Levent B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Anne L.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about Salient Problem Features</title><title>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>Background Across many domains, research has shown that students often fail to select and apply appropriate conceptual knowledge when solving problems. Programs designed to support monitoring skills have been successful in several domains. Purpose (Hypothesis) Critical conceptual knowledge in statics appears to be cued by paying attention to the bodies that are present in a problem, as well as to which ones are interacting and how. The research question addresses whether students can be induced to think about the bodies present, and whether focusing on bodies improves problem solving performance. Design/Method Using a pre‐post test design, written and verbal protocols were obtained for students solving problems before and after instruction. During instruction all students saw the same set of examples and corrected answers, but only the experimental group was asked questions designed to promote body centered talk. Solutions and protocols were coded and analyzed for frequency of body centered talk and solution quality. Results The experimental group showed statistically significant increases in relevant body centered talk after instruction. Both groups improved their ability to represent unknown forces in free body diagrams after instruction, with the experimental group showing a greater, but not statistically significant, improvement. However, for both groups, the error rate in representing unknown forces at an interaction was significantly lower when a student referred to the bodies in the particular interaction. Conclusions Problem solving in conceptually rich domains can improve if, in addition to acquiring conceptual knowledge, students develop strategies for recognizing when and how to apply it.</description><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>concept</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Engineering Education</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>metacognition</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>problem-solving strategy</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>statics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1069-4730</issn><issn>2168-9830</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD1H3KXb8SMIGoapPVVCprVhajmOjpHkUO4H273GUqns2M-OZudeaA8AIwTGCMHjOxwFikR9HGI4D6LpN4iKF49MNGFxHt2CAIIt9EmJ4Dx6szSGEMWThAOyX5dHUP1n15W1MnRSq9LZ10b-V0bUpRSWVl5y9ZZW2suvvRHHwRFK3jbcVRaaq5iqdKdG0RtlHcKdFYdXTJQ_BfjbdTRb--mO-nLytfYkjAn0mtMQxIUJrinWqBQ0pS7AQUtMkwlSkSUpJFGgUkDSSKUQREdJdKJliCBM8BKPe193w3Srb8LxuTeW-5DggFNGAhm7ppV-SprbWKM2PJiuFOXMEeUeR57xDxTtUvKPILxT5yYlfe_FvVqjzP5R8NZ12lXPwe4fMNup0dRDmwFmIQ8o_3-d8u9gsVuF6w3f4DwlMihM</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Steif, Paul S.</creator><creator>Lobue, Jamie M.</creator><creator>Kara, Levent B.</creator><creator>Fay, Anne L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Improving Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about Salient Problem Features</title><author>Steif, Paul S. ; Lobue, Jamie M. ; Kara, Levent B. ; Fay, Anne L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3840-6afc3944aff53fdfa5756b3aacf5b835adbd5482f124d8cd0184acb01c6e61343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>concept</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Engineering Education</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>metacognition</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>problem-solving strategy</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>statics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steif, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobue, Jamie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kara, Levent B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Anne L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steif, Paul S.</au><au>Lobue, Jamie M.</au><au>Kara, Levent B.</au><au>Fay, Anne L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about Salient Problem Features</atitle><jtitle>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>135-142</pages><issn>1069-4730</issn><eissn>2168-9830</eissn><coden>JEEDEQ</coden><abstract>Background Across many domains, research has shown that students often fail to select and apply appropriate conceptual knowledge when solving problems. Programs designed to support monitoring skills have been successful in several domains. Purpose (Hypothesis) Critical conceptual knowledge in statics appears to be cued by paying attention to the bodies that are present in a problem, as well as to which ones are interacting and how. The research question addresses whether students can be induced to think about the bodies present, and whether focusing on bodies improves problem solving performance. Design/Method Using a pre‐post test design, written and verbal protocols were obtained for students solving problems before and after instruction. During instruction all students saw the same set of examples and corrected answers, but only the experimental group was asked questions designed to promote body centered talk. Solutions and protocols were coded and analyzed for frequency of body centered talk and solution quality. Results The experimental group showed statistically significant increases in relevant body centered talk after instruction. Both groups improved their ability to represent unknown forces in free body diagrams after instruction, with the experimental group showing a greater, but not statistically significant, improvement. However, for both groups, the error rate in representing unknown forces at an interaction was significantly lower when a student referred to the bodies in the particular interaction. Conclusions Problem solving in conceptually rich domains can improve if, in addition to acquiring conceptual knowledge, students develop strategies for recognizing when and how to apply it.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01050.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-4730
ispartof Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 2010-04, Vol.99 (2), p.135-142
issn 1069-4730
2168-9830
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_324515257
source Wiley Journals; Education Source
subjects Civil engineering
concept
Education
Engineering Education
Experts
metacognition
Problem solving
problem-solving strategy
R&D
Reading Comprehension
Research & development
Sample size
Skills
statics
Studies
Teaching Methods
title Improving Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about Salient Problem Features
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A18%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Problem%20Solving%20Performance%20by%20Inducing%20Talk%20about%20Salient%20Problem%20Features&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20engineering%20education%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Steif,%20Paul%20S.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=135-142&rft.issn=1069-4730&rft.eissn=2168-9830&rft.coden=JEEDEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01050.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2040514271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=324515257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true