Revisiting bilingual foreign language learning advantages: The role of extramural exposure

Aims and objectives: Prior research shows that bilingual pupils may have foreign language learning advantages over monolinguals, but evidence is controversial. Investigating English as a foreign language (EFL) in the context of the Netherlands, we hypothesized that the conflicting findings may be pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior cross-linguistic studies of language behavior, 2025-02, Vol.29 (1), p.218-236
Hauptverfasser: Tribushinina, Elena, Boz, Betül, Aalbers, Vera, Blom, Elma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 236
container_issue 1
container_start_page 218
container_title The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior
container_volume 29
creator Tribushinina, Elena
Boz, Betül
Aalbers, Vera
Blom, Elma
description Aims and objectives: Prior research shows that bilingual pupils may have foreign language learning advantages over monolinguals, but evidence is controversial. Investigating English as a foreign language (EFL) in the context of the Netherlands, we hypothesized that the conflicting findings may be partly explained by differences in extramural EFL exposure. We further predicted that amount and length of EFL exposure might moderate the effects of bilingualism on EFL learning and cross-language relationships between English and the previously acquired languages. Approach: Twelve- to 14-year-old Turkish–Dutch bilinguals (n = 30) and Dutch monolinguals (n = 31) participated. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test was used to measure receptive vocabulary in English, Dutch, and Turkish. Grammatical ability was measured with a sentence repetition task. A questionnaire was used to obtain information on children’s language exposure. Data and analysis: Data were analyzed by means of multilevel linear regression. Amount and length of extramural exposure were used as control variables in the analyses comparing EFL skills of bilinguals and monolinguals. The role of exposure as a moderator of bilingual effects and cross-language relationships was also tested. Findings/conclusions: If differences in exposure were not taken into account, the bilinguals were outperformed by the monolinguals on EFL vocabulary, but not on grammar. However, the between-group difference disappeared once exposure measures were controlled for. Bilinguals with little exposure to English performed worse than monolingual peers, but at higher exposure levels, bilinguals outperformed monolinguals. In the bilingual sample, Dutch vocabulary predicted English vocabulary, but Turkish proficiency did not predict English skills. Originality: This is the first study to include measures of extramural exposure in investigating the effects of bilingualism on EFL learning. Significance/implications: This research shows that differences between monolingual and bilingual EFL learners can be either concealed or inflated if exposure is not controlled for. Furthermore, exposure moderates bilingual effects in EFL learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/13670069231224542
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3160946328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_13670069231224542</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3160946328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-60b53e992b32264af22a0add009606115dc0a687fc9f90262f4370c13ba81da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAUDKLguvoDvAU8d30vaZPGmyx-wYIgPXkpaZusXbrNmrTL-u9NWcGDeHpfM_OYIeQaYYEo5S1yIQGEYhwZS7OUnZAZykwkIpf5aezjPZkA5-QihA0A5hLljLy_mX0b2qHt17Rqu1hG3VHrvGnXPe30NK8N7Yz2_YTRzV73Q1yFO1p8GOpdZ6iz1BwGr7ejj2Rz2LkwenNJzqzugrn6qXNSPD4Uy-dk9fr0srxfJTUHOSQCqowbpVjFGROptoxp0E0DoAQIxKypQUcXtlZWARPMplxCjbzSOTaaz8nNUXbn3edowlBu3Oj7-LHkKEClgrM8ovCIqr0LwRtb7ny71f6rRCinBMs_CUbO4sgJ0e-v6v-Eb-SacIE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3160946328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting bilingual foreign language learning advantages: The role of extramural exposure</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Tribushinina, Elena ; Boz, Betül ; Aalbers, Vera ; Blom, Elma</creator><creatorcontrib>Tribushinina, Elena ; Boz, Betül ; Aalbers, Vera ; Blom, Elma</creatorcontrib><description>Aims and objectives: Prior research shows that bilingual pupils may have foreign language learning advantages over monolinguals, but evidence is controversial. Investigating English as a foreign language (EFL) in the context of the Netherlands, we hypothesized that the conflicting findings may be partly explained by differences in extramural EFL exposure. We further predicted that amount and length of EFL exposure might moderate the effects of bilingualism on EFL learning and cross-language relationships between English and the previously acquired languages. Approach: Twelve- to 14-year-old Turkish–Dutch bilinguals (n = 30) and Dutch monolinguals (n = 31) participated. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test was used to measure receptive vocabulary in English, Dutch, and Turkish. Grammatical ability was measured with a sentence repetition task. A questionnaire was used to obtain information on children’s language exposure. Data and analysis: Data were analyzed by means of multilevel linear regression. Amount and length of extramural exposure were used as control variables in the analyses comparing EFL skills of bilinguals and monolinguals. The role of exposure as a moderator of bilingual effects and cross-language relationships was also tested. Findings/conclusions: If differences in exposure were not taken into account, the bilinguals were outperformed by the monolinguals on EFL vocabulary, but not on grammar. However, the between-group difference disappeared once exposure measures were controlled for. Bilinguals with little exposure to English performed worse than monolingual peers, but at higher exposure levels, bilinguals outperformed monolinguals. In the bilingual sample, Dutch vocabulary predicted English vocabulary, but Turkish proficiency did not predict English skills. Originality: This is the first study to include measures of extramural exposure in investigating the effects of bilingualism on EFL learning. Significance/implications: This research shows that differences between monolingual and bilingual EFL learners can be either concealed or inflated if exposure is not controlled for. Furthermore, exposure moderates bilingual effects in EFL learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-0069</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/13670069231224542</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bilingualism ; Children ; Dutch language ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; English as a second language learning ; English as a second language tests ; English Language Learners ; English proficiency ; Foreign language learning ; Grammar ; Language ; Monolingualism ; Native language acquisition ; Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test ; Receptive language ; Second Language Learning ; Second language vocabulary learning ; Students ; Turkish ; Turkish language ; Vocabulary Skills</subject><ispartof>The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior, 2025-02, Vol.29 (1), p.218-236</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-60b53e992b32264af22a0add009606115dc0a687fc9f90262f4370c13ba81da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1688-7307</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13670069231224542$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13670069231224542$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tribushinina, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boz, Betül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aalbers, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blom, Elma</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting bilingual foreign language learning advantages: The role of extramural exposure</title><title>The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior</title><description>Aims and objectives: Prior research shows that bilingual pupils may have foreign language learning advantages over monolinguals, but evidence is controversial. Investigating English as a foreign language (EFL) in the context of the Netherlands, we hypothesized that the conflicting findings may be partly explained by differences in extramural EFL exposure. We further predicted that amount and length of EFL exposure might moderate the effects of bilingualism on EFL learning and cross-language relationships between English and the previously acquired languages. Approach: Twelve- to 14-year-old Turkish–Dutch bilinguals (n = 30) and Dutch monolinguals (n = 31) participated. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test was used to measure receptive vocabulary in English, Dutch, and Turkish. Grammatical ability was measured with a sentence repetition task. A questionnaire was used to obtain information on children’s language exposure. Data and analysis: Data were analyzed by means of multilevel linear regression. Amount and length of extramural exposure were used as control variables in the analyses comparing EFL skills of bilinguals and monolinguals. The role of exposure as a moderator of bilingual effects and cross-language relationships was also tested. Findings/conclusions: If differences in exposure were not taken into account, the bilinguals were outperformed by the monolinguals on EFL vocabulary, but not on grammar. However, the between-group difference disappeared once exposure measures were controlled for. Bilinguals with little exposure to English performed worse than monolingual peers, but at higher exposure levels, bilinguals outperformed monolinguals. In the bilingual sample, Dutch vocabulary predicted English vocabulary, but Turkish proficiency did not predict English skills. Originality: This is the first study to include measures of extramural exposure in investigating the effects of bilingualism on EFL learning. Significance/implications: This research shows that differences between monolingual and bilingual EFL learners can be either concealed or inflated if exposure is not controlled for. Furthermore, exposure moderates bilingual effects in EFL learning.</description><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English as a second language tests</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>English proficiency</subject><subject>Foreign language learning</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Monolingualism</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</subject><subject>Receptive language</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second language vocabulary learning</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Turkish</subject><subject>Turkish language</subject><subject>Vocabulary Skills</subject><issn>1367-0069</issn><issn>1756-6878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAUDKLguvoDvAU8d30vaZPGmyx-wYIgPXkpaZusXbrNmrTL-u9NWcGDeHpfM_OYIeQaYYEo5S1yIQGEYhwZS7OUnZAZykwkIpf5aezjPZkA5-QihA0A5hLljLy_mX0b2qHt17Rqu1hG3VHrvGnXPe30NK8N7Yz2_YTRzV73Q1yFO1p8GOpdZ6iz1BwGr7ejj2Rz2LkwenNJzqzugrn6qXNSPD4Uy-dk9fr0srxfJTUHOSQCqowbpVjFGROptoxp0E0DoAQIxKypQUcXtlZWARPMplxCjbzSOTaaz8nNUXbn3edowlBu3Oj7-LHkKEClgrM8ovCIqr0LwRtb7ny71f6rRCinBMs_CUbO4sgJ0e-v6v-Eb-SacIE</recordid><startdate>20250201</startdate><enddate>20250201</enddate><creator>Tribushinina, Elena</creator><creator>Boz, Betül</creator><creator>Aalbers, Vera</creator><creator>Blom, Elma</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1688-7307</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250201</creationdate><title>Revisiting bilingual foreign language learning advantages: The role of extramural exposure</title><author>Tribushinina, Elena ; Boz, Betül ; Aalbers, Vera ; Blom, Elma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-60b53e992b32264af22a0add009606115dc0a687fc9f90262f4370c13ba81da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English as a second language tests</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>English proficiency</topic><topic>Foreign language learning</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Monolingualism</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</topic><topic>Receptive language</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second language vocabulary learning</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Turkish</topic><topic>Turkish language</topic><topic>Vocabulary Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tribushinina, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boz, Betül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aalbers, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blom, Elma</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tribushinina, Elena</au><au>Boz, Betül</au><au>Aalbers, Vera</au><au>Blom, Elma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting bilingual foreign language learning advantages: The role of extramural exposure</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior</jtitle><date>2025-02-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>218</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>218-236</pages><issn>1367-0069</issn><eissn>1756-6878</eissn><abstract>Aims and objectives: Prior research shows that bilingual pupils may have foreign language learning advantages over monolinguals, but evidence is controversial. Investigating English as a foreign language (EFL) in the context of the Netherlands, we hypothesized that the conflicting findings may be partly explained by differences in extramural EFL exposure. We further predicted that amount and length of EFL exposure might moderate the effects of bilingualism on EFL learning and cross-language relationships between English and the previously acquired languages. Approach: Twelve- to 14-year-old Turkish–Dutch bilinguals (n = 30) and Dutch monolinguals (n = 31) participated. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test was used to measure receptive vocabulary in English, Dutch, and Turkish. Grammatical ability was measured with a sentence repetition task. A questionnaire was used to obtain information on children’s language exposure. Data and analysis: Data were analyzed by means of multilevel linear regression. Amount and length of extramural exposure were used as control variables in the analyses comparing EFL skills of bilinguals and monolinguals. The role of exposure as a moderator of bilingual effects and cross-language relationships was also tested. Findings/conclusions: If differences in exposure were not taken into account, the bilinguals were outperformed by the monolinguals on EFL vocabulary, but not on grammar. However, the between-group difference disappeared once exposure measures were controlled for. Bilinguals with little exposure to English performed worse than monolingual peers, but at higher exposure levels, bilinguals outperformed monolinguals. In the bilingual sample, Dutch vocabulary predicted English vocabulary, but Turkish proficiency did not predict English skills. Originality: This is the first study to include measures of extramural exposure in investigating the effects of bilingualism on EFL learning. Significance/implications: This research shows that differences between monolingual and bilingual EFL learners can be either concealed or inflated if exposure is not controlled for. Furthermore, exposure moderates bilingual effects in EFL learning.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/13670069231224542</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1688-7307</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-0069
ispartof The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior, 2025-02, Vol.29 (1), p.218-236
issn 1367-0069
1756-6878
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3160946328
source SAGE Complete
subjects Bilingualism
Children
Dutch language
English (Second Language)
English as a second language
English as a second language learning
English as a second language tests
English Language Learners
English proficiency
Foreign language learning
Grammar
Language
Monolingualism
Native language acquisition
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
Receptive language
Second Language Learning
Second language vocabulary learning
Students
Turkish
Turkish language
Vocabulary Skills
title Revisiting bilingual foreign language learning advantages: The role of extramural exposure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A36%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20bilingual%20foreign%20language%20learning%20advantages:%20The%20role%20of%20extramural%20exposure&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20bilingualism%20:%20cross-disciplinary,%20cross-linguistic%20studies%20of%20language%20behavior&rft.au=Tribushinina,%20Elena&rft.date=2025-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=218-236&rft.issn=1367-0069&rft.eissn=1756-6878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/13670069231224542&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3160946328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3160946328&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_13670069231224542&rfr_iscdi=true