Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among garment workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundGarment workers are at high risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to repetitive physical tasks, long working hours and varying workstations. As there is no existing epidemiological overview of MSDs among garment workers, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the global evidence o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2025-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e085123
Hauptverfasser: Gebrye, Tadesse, Mbada, Chidozie, Apeagyei, Phoebe, Fatoye, Francis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page e085123
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 15
creator Gebrye, Tadesse
Mbada, Chidozie
Apeagyei, Phoebe
Fatoye, Francis
description BackgroundGarment workers are at high risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to repetitive physical tasks, long working hours and varying workstations. As there is no existing epidemiological overview of MSDs among garment workers, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the global evidence on prevalence of MSDs in this population.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched to identify studies published in English up to November 2022. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled prevalence.ResultsThe search yielded 258 published studies, of which 14 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The included studies reported prevalence from India (n=3), Bangladesh (n=2), Ethiopia (n=2), Thailand (n=2), Botswana (n=1), Iran (n=1), Sri Lanka (n=1), Cambodia (n=1) and Denmark (n=1) and involved 15 029 garment workers. Most of the included studies (79%) were assessed to be methodologically sound (low risk of bias). The mean age of participants ranged from 24.2 to 40 years. The prevalence of MSDs ranged from 15.5% to 92%. The pooled prevalence of MSDs from nine studies was 65.6% (95% CI 44.5% to 51.9%). Low back pain and neck pain were reported as the common MSDs in the included studies.ConclusionsThe findings highlight the considerable risk of MSDs, especially low back and neck pain, linked to repetitive tasks, extended hours and inconsistent workstations. Given the heavy toll of MSDs on this workforce, targeted interventions and ergonomic improvements are crucial to mitigate the risks and improve garment workers’ well-being.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085123
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3160662174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7b444b5de8884d87a370177b9685ed39</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3161519693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2901-65264bb112b0fa1bead6cb9dbe01a7ce843c2a96ce52f76c0c04ad9681c6b1423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEolXpJ0BClrhwCfU4tpNwQajiT6VKcICzNbYnS7ZJvNhJq_32uM1SWg74Ynv83s9j6xXFS-BvASp9Zsdt2NFUCi5kyRsFonpSHAsuZam5Uk8frI-K05S2PA-pWqXE8-Koapsm7-Rx4b9FusaBJkcsdGxckluGkK5ooBkH5vsUoqeYGI5h2rANxpGmmd2EeJWr7xiytE8zjTj3jmVUTzcMJ8_GbC9xwmGf-vSieNbhkOj0MJ8UPz59_H7-pbz8-vni_MNlaUXLodRKaGktgLC8Q7CEXjvbekscsHbUyMoJbLUjJbpaO-64RN_qBpy2IEV1UlysXB9wa3axHzHuTcDe3BVC3BiMudGBTG2llFZ5appG-qbGquZQ1zbTFPmqzaz3K2u32JG8y6-OODyCPj6Z-p9mE64NQN0ASMiENwdCDL8WSrMZ--RoGHCisCRTgQYFrW6rLH39j3Qblph_707FtRZQy6yqVpWLIaVI3X03wM1tKswhFeY2FWZNRXa9eviQe8-fDGTB2SrI7r_3_g_5G1GSxTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3160662174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among garment workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Gebrye, Tadesse ; Mbada, Chidozie ; Apeagyei, Phoebe ; Fatoye, Francis</creator><creatorcontrib>Gebrye, Tadesse ; Mbada, Chidozie ; Apeagyei, Phoebe ; Fatoye, Francis</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundGarment workers are at high risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to repetitive physical tasks, long working hours and varying workstations. As there is no existing epidemiological overview of MSDs among garment workers, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the global evidence on prevalence of MSDs in this population.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched to identify studies published in English up to November 2022. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled prevalence.ResultsThe search yielded 258 published studies, of which 14 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The included studies reported prevalence from India (n=3), Bangladesh (n=2), Ethiopia (n=2), Thailand (n=2), Botswana (n=1), Iran (n=1), Sri Lanka (n=1), Cambodia (n=1) and Denmark (n=1) and involved 15 029 garment workers. Most of the included studies (79%) were assessed to be methodologically sound (low risk of bias). The mean age of participants ranged from 24.2 to 40 years. The prevalence of MSDs ranged from 15.5% to 92%. The pooled prevalence of MSDs from nine studies was 65.6% (95% CI 44.5% to 51.9%). Low back pain and neck pain were reported as the common MSDs in the included studies.ConclusionsThe findings highlight the considerable risk of MSDs, especially low back and neck pain, linked to repetitive tasks, extended hours and inconsistent workstations. Given the heavy toll of MSDs on this workforce, targeted interventions and ergonomic improvements are crucial to mitigate the risks and improve garment workers’ well-being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39880454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Bias ; Cross-sectional studies ; Elbow ; garment ; Global Health ; GNP ; Gross National Product ; Humans ; Interviews ; Meta-analysis ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology ; Musculoskeletal disorders ; Neck pain ; Occupational Diseases - epidemiology ; Occupational Diseases - etiology ; Original Research ; Prevalence ; Questionnaires ; Shoulder ; Systematic review ; Workers ; Wrist</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2025-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e085123</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.</rights><rights>2025 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group. 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2901-65264bb112b0fa1bead6cb9dbe01a7ce843c2a96ce52f76c0c04ad9681c6b1423</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7976-2013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e085123.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e085123.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,27901,27902,53766,53768,55325,77629,77655</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39880454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gebrye, Tadesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbada, Chidozie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apeagyei, Phoebe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatoye, Francis</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among garment workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>BackgroundGarment workers are at high risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to repetitive physical tasks, long working hours and varying workstations. As there is no existing epidemiological overview of MSDs among garment workers, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the global evidence on prevalence of MSDs in this population.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched to identify studies published in English up to November 2022. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled prevalence.ResultsThe search yielded 258 published studies, of which 14 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The included studies reported prevalence from India (n=3), Bangladesh (n=2), Ethiopia (n=2), Thailand (n=2), Botswana (n=1), Iran (n=1), Sri Lanka (n=1), Cambodia (n=1) and Denmark (n=1) and involved 15 029 garment workers. Most of the included studies (79%) were assessed to be methodologically sound (low risk of bias). The mean age of participants ranged from 24.2 to 40 years. The prevalence of MSDs ranged from 15.5% to 92%. The pooled prevalence of MSDs from nine studies was 65.6% (95% CI 44.5% to 51.9%). Low back pain and neck pain were reported as the common MSDs in the included studies.ConclusionsThe findings highlight the considerable risk of MSDs, especially low back and neck pain, linked to repetitive tasks, extended hours and inconsistent workstations. Given the heavy toll of MSDs on this workforce, targeted interventions and ergonomic improvements are crucial to mitigate the risks and improve garment workers’ well-being.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Elbow</subject><subject>garment</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>GNP</subject><subject>Gross National Product</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal disorders</subject><subject>Neck pain</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEolXpJ0BClrhwCfU4tpNwQajiT6VKcICzNbYnS7ZJvNhJq_32uM1SWg74Ynv83s9j6xXFS-BvASp9Zsdt2NFUCi5kyRsFonpSHAsuZam5Uk8frI-K05S2PA-pWqXE8-Koapsm7-Rx4b9FusaBJkcsdGxckluGkK5ooBkH5vsUoqeYGI5h2rANxpGmmd2EeJWr7xiytE8zjTj3jmVUTzcMJ8_GbC9xwmGf-vSieNbhkOj0MJ8UPz59_H7-pbz8-vni_MNlaUXLodRKaGktgLC8Q7CEXjvbekscsHbUyMoJbLUjJbpaO-64RN_qBpy2IEV1UlysXB9wa3axHzHuTcDe3BVC3BiMudGBTG2llFZ5appG-qbGquZQ1zbTFPmqzaz3K2u32JG8y6-OODyCPj6Z-p9mE64NQN0ASMiENwdCDL8WSrMZ--RoGHCisCRTgQYFrW6rLH39j3Qblph_707FtRZQy6yqVpWLIaVI3X03wM1tKswhFeY2FWZNRXa9eviQe8-fDGTB2SrI7r_3_g_5G1GSxTA</recordid><startdate>20250128</startdate><enddate>20250128</enddate><creator>Gebrye, Tadesse</creator><creator>Mbada, Chidozie</creator><creator>Apeagyei, Phoebe</creator><creator>Fatoye, Francis</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-2013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250128</creationdate><title>Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among garment workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Gebrye, Tadesse ; Mbada, Chidozie ; Apeagyei, Phoebe ; Fatoye, Francis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2901-65264bb112b0fa1bead6cb9dbe01a7ce843c2a96ce52f76c0c04ad9681c6b1423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Elbow</topic><topic>garment</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>GNP</topic><topic>Gross National Product</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal disorders</topic><topic>Neck pain</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gebrye, Tadesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbada, Chidozie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apeagyei, Phoebe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatoye, Francis</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gebrye, Tadesse</au><au>Mbada, Chidozie</au><au>Apeagyei, Phoebe</au><au>Fatoye, Francis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among garment workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><stitle>BMJ Open</stitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2025-01-28</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e085123</spage><pages>e085123-</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>BackgroundGarment workers are at high risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to repetitive physical tasks, long working hours and varying workstations. As there is no existing epidemiological overview of MSDs among garment workers, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the global evidence on prevalence of MSDs in this population.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched to identify studies published in English up to November 2022. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled prevalence.ResultsThe search yielded 258 published studies, of which 14 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The included studies reported prevalence from India (n=3), Bangladesh (n=2), Ethiopia (n=2), Thailand (n=2), Botswana (n=1), Iran (n=1), Sri Lanka (n=1), Cambodia (n=1) and Denmark (n=1) and involved 15 029 garment workers. Most of the included studies (79%) were assessed to be methodologically sound (low risk of bias). The mean age of participants ranged from 24.2 to 40 years. The prevalence of MSDs ranged from 15.5% to 92%. The pooled prevalence of MSDs from nine studies was 65.6% (95% CI 44.5% to 51.9%). Low back pain and neck pain were reported as the common MSDs in the included studies.ConclusionsThe findings highlight the considerable risk of MSDs, especially low back and neck pain, linked to repetitive tasks, extended hours and inconsistent workstations. Given the heavy toll of MSDs on this workforce, targeted interventions and ergonomic improvements are crucial to mitigate the risks and improve garment workers’ well-being.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>39880454</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085123</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-2013</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2025-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e085123
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3160662174
source BMJ Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Back pain
Bias
Cross-sectional studies
Elbow
garment
Global Health
GNP
Gross National Product
Humans
Interviews
Meta-analysis
Musculoskeletal diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology
Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology
Musculoskeletal disorders
Neck pain
Occupational Diseases - epidemiology
Occupational Diseases - etiology
Original Research
Prevalence
Questionnaires
Shoulder
Systematic review
Workers
Wrist
title Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among garment workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T11%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20musculoskeletal%20disorders%20among%20garment%20workers:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Gebrye,%20Tadesse&rft.date=2025-01-28&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e085123&rft.pages=e085123-&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3161519693%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3160662174&rft_id=info:pmid/39880454&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7b444b5de8884d87a370177b9685ed39&rfr_iscdi=true