Queering Psychological Assessment
The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 2024-12, Vol.55 (6), p.529-536 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 536 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 529 |
container_title | Professional psychology, research and practice |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Wright, A. Jordan |
description | The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and methods, the field needs to shift in order to be explicitly antioppressive. Queering psychological assessment-applying the tenets of queer theory and therapy to the assessment process-centers client identity, lived experience, narrative, and language in the test interpretation, integration, and conceptualization processes, with an emphasis on collaboration and an acknowledgement that much of what has been identified as psychopathology represents natural human diversity mismatched with a society that is built for those from dominant groups. This article discusses how queering psychological assessment can accomplish a shift from gatekeeping (resources, accommodations, access) to collaboration, partnering with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.
Public Significance Statement
The process of psychological assessment has the potential to benefit clients, but it can also reinforce oppressive structures and gatekeep access to resources. Queering the process of psychological assessment, described in this article, has the potential to shift the process to a collaboration with clients to figure out how to improve their lives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pro0000594 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3159479428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3159479428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-bf0e05fb1aefa50f31b14c80dc1f5530431042cd00fcbbc5ca9d9a16dae9167e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxV9Q8aaszmR2us2xFL-goIKeQzab1C3b7prsHvrvTangzbnM5WGG9xXiEuEOgYr7LrSQhlV-JEaoSGVIko7FCArirAA5OxVnMa6TISIeiav3wblQb1eTt7izX23Trmprmsk8Rhfjxm37c3HiTRPdxe8ei8_Hh4_Fc7Z8fXpZzJeZkSj7rPTggH2JxnnD4AlLzO0MKouemSAnhFzaCsDbsrRsjaqUwWllnMJp4Wgsrg93U4bvwcVer9shbNNLTZgCFSqXs_8VSs4ZJCd1c1A2tDEG53UX6o0JO42g90Xpv6ISvj1g0xndpRZM6GvbuGiHEFIBe6uZ9VSzVPQDNzRpUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112545025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Queering Psychological Assessment</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Wright, A. Jordan</creator><contributor>Borden, Kathi A ; Simonian, Susan J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wright, A. Jordan ; Borden, Kathi A ; Simonian, Susan J</creatorcontrib><description>The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and methods, the field needs to shift in order to be explicitly antioppressive. Queering psychological assessment-applying the tenets of queer theory and therapy to the assessment process-centers client identity, lived experience, narrative, and language in the test interpretation, integration, and conceptualization processes, with an emphasis on collaboration and an acknowledgement that much of what has been identified as psychopathology represents natural human diversity mismatched with a society that is built for those from dominant groups. This article discusses how queering psychological assessment can accomplish a shift from gatekeeping (resources, accommodations, access) to collaboration, partnering with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.
Public Significance Statement
The process of psychological assessment has the potential to benefit clients, but it can also reinforce oppressive structures and gatekeep access to resources. Queering the process of psychological assessment, described in this article, has the potential to shift the process to a collaboration with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pro0000594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Case Conceptualization ; Evaluation ; Human ; LGBTQ ; Psychological Assessment ; Psychological Theories ; Psychopathology ; Queer theory ; Self-Report ; Test Bias ; Test Interpretation ; Testing Methods ; White supremacy</subject><ispartof>Professional psychology, research and practice, 2024-12, Vol.55 (6), p.529-536</ispartof><rights>2024 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2024, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8317-6727</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Borden, Kathi A</contributor><contributor>Simonian, Susan J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wright, A. Jordan</creatorcontrib><title>Queering Psychological Assessment</title><title>Professional psychology, research and practice</title><description>The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and methods, the field needs to shift in order to be explicitly antioppressive. Queering psychological assessment-applying the tenets of queer theory and therapy to the assessment process-centers client identity, lived experience, narrative, and language in the test interpretation, integration, and conceptualization processes, with an emphasis on collaboration and an acknowledgement that much of what has been identified as psychopathology represents natural human diversity mismatched with a society that is built for those from dominant groups. This article discusses how queering psychological assessment can accomplish a shift from gatekeeping (resources, accommodations, access) to collaboration, partnering with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.
Public Significance Statement
The process of psychological assessment has the potential to benefit clients, but it can also reinforce oppressive structures and gatekeep access to resources. Queering the process of psychological assessment, described in this article, has the potential to shift the process to a collaboration with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.</description><subject>Case Conceptualization</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>LGBTQ</subject><subject>Psychological Assessment</subject><subject>Psychological Theories</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Queer theory</subject><subject>Self-Report</subject><subject>Test Bias</subject><subject>Test Interpretation</subject><subject>Testing Methods</subject><subject>White supremacy</subject><issn>0735-7028</issn><issn>1939-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxV9Q8aaszmR2us2xFL-goIKeQzab1C3b7prsHvrvTangzbnM5WGG9xXiEuEOgYr7LrSQhlV-JEaoSGVIko7FCArirAA5OxVnMa6TISIeiav3wblQb1eTt7izX23Trmprmsk8Rhfjxm37c3HiTRPdxe8ei8_Hh4_Fc7Z8fXpZzJeZkSj7rPTggH2JxnnD4AlLzO0MKouemSAnhFzaCsDbsrRsjaqUwWllnMJp4Wgsrg93U4bvwcVer9shbNNLTZgCFSqXs_8VSs4ZJCd1c1A2tDEG53UX6o0JO42g90Xpv6ISvj1g0xndpRZM6GvbuGiHEFIBe6uZ9VSzVPQDNzRpUw</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Wright, A. Jordan</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-6727</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Queering Psychological Assessment</title><author>Wright, A. Jordan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-bf0e05fb1aefa50f31b14c80dc1f5530431042cd00fcbbc5ca9d9a16dae9167e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Case Conceptualization</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>LGBTQ</topic><topic>Psychological Assessment</topic><topic>Psychological Theories</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Queer theory</topic><topic>Self-Report</topic><topic>Test Bias</topic><topic>Test Interpretation</topic><topic>Testing Methods</topic><topic>White supremacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, A. Jordan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, A. Jordan</au><au>Borden, Kathi A</au><au>Simonian, Susan J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Queering Psychological Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>529-536</pages><issn>0735-7028</issn><eissn>1939-1323</eissn><abstract>The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and methods, the field needs to shift in order to be explicitly antioppressive. Queering psychological assessment-applying the tenets of queer theory and therapy to the assessment process-centers client identity, lived experience, narrative, and language in the test interpretation, integration, and conceptualization processes, with an emphasis on collaboration and an acknowledgement that much of what has been identified as psychopathology represents natural human diversity mismatched with a society that is built for those from dominant groups. This article discusses how queering psychological assessment can accomplish a shift from gatekeeping (resources, accommodations, access) to collaboration, partnering with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.
Public Significance Statement
The process of psychological assessment has the potential to benefit clients, but it can also reinforce oppressive structures and gatekeep access to resources. Queering the process of psychological assessment, described in this article, has the potential to shift the process to a collaboration with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/pro0000594</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-6727</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-7028 |
ispartof | Professional psychology, research and practice, 2024-12, Vol.55 (6), p.529-536 |
issn | 0735-7028 1939-1323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3159479428 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Case Conceptualization Evaluation Human LGBTQ Psychological Assessment Psychological Theories Psychopathology Queer theory Self-Report Test Bias Test Interpretation Testing Methods White supremacy |
title | Queering Psychological Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Queering%20Psychological%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Professional%20psychology,%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=Wright,%20A.%20Jordan&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=529-536&rft.issn=0735-7028&rft.eissn=1939-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pro0000594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3159479428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112545025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |