Queering Psychological Assessment

The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 2024-12, Vol.55 (6), p.529-536
1. Verfasser: Wright, A. Jordan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 536
container_issue 6
container_start_page 529
container_title Professional psychology, research and practice
container_volume 55
creator Wright, A. Jordan
description The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and methods, the field needs to shift in order to be explicitly antioppressive. Queering psychological assessment-applying the tenets of queer theory and therapy to the assessment process-centers client identity, lived experience, narrative, and language in the test interpretation, integration, and conceptualization processes, with an emphasis on collaboration and an acknowledgement that much of what has been identified as psychopathology represents natural human diversity mismatched with a society that is built for those from dominant groups. This article discusses how queering psychological assessment can accomplish a shift from gatekeeping (resources, accommodations, access) to collaboration, partnering with clients to figure out how to improve their lives. Public Significance Statement The process of psychological assessment has the potential to benefit clients, but it can also reinforce oppressive structures and gatekeep access to resources. Queering the process of psychological assessment, described in this article, has the potential to shift the process to a collaboration with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/pro0000594
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3159479428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3159479428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-bf0e05fb1aefa50f31b14c80dc1f5530431042cd00fcbbc5ca9d9a16dae9167e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxV9Q8aaszmR2us2xFL-goIKeQzab1C3b7prsHvrvTangzbnM5WGG9xXiEuEOgYr7LrSQhlV-JEaoSGVIko7FCArirAA5OxVnMa6TISIeiav3wblQb1eTt7izX23Trmprmsk8Rhfjxm37c3HiTRPdxe8ei8_Hh4_Fc7Z8fXpZzJeZkSj7rPTggH2JxnnD4AlLzO0MKouemSAnhFzaCsDbsrRsjaqUwWllnMJp4Wgsrg93U4bvwcVer9shbNNLTZgCFSqXs_8VSs4ZJCd1c1A2tDEG53UX6o0JO42g90Xpv6ISvj1g0xndpRZM6GvbuGiHEFIBe6uZ9VSzVPQDNzRpUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112545025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Queering Psychological Assessment</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Wright, A. Jordan</creator><contributor>Borden, Kathi A ; Simonian, Susan J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wright, A. Jordan ; Borden, Kathi A ; Simonian, Susan J</creatorcontrib><description>The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and methods, the field needs to shift in order to be explicitly antioppressive. Queering psychological assessment-applying the tenets of queer theory and therapy to the assessment process-centers client identity, lived experience, narrative, and language in the test interpretation, integration, and conceptualization processes, with an emphasis on collaboration and an acknowledgement that much of what has been identified as psychopathology represents natural human diversity mismatched with a society that is built for those from dominant groups. This article discusses how queering psychological assessment can accomplish a shift from gatekeeping (resources, accommodations, access) to collaboration, partnering with clients to figure out how to improve their lives. Public Significance Statement The process of psychological assessment has the potential to benefit clients, but it can also reinforce oppressive structures and gatekeep access to resources. Queering the process of psychological assessment, described in this article, has the potential to shift the process to a collaboration with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pro0000594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Case Conceptualization ; Evaluation ; Human ; LGBTQ ; Psychological Assessment ; Psychological Theories ; Psychopathology ; Queer theory ; Self-Report ; Test Bias ; Test Interpretation ; Testing Methods ; White supremacy</subject><ispartof>Professional psychology, research and practice, 2024-12, Vol.55 (6), p.529-536</ispartof><rights>2024 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2024, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8317-6727</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Borden, Kathi A</contributor><contributor>Simonian, Susan J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wright, A. Jordan</creatorcontrib><title>Queering Psychological Assessment</title><title>Professional psychology, research and practice</title><description>The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and methods, the field needs to shift in order to be explicitly antioppressive. Queering psychological assessment-applying the tenets of queer theory and therapy to the assessment process-centers client identity, lived experience, narrative, and language in the test interpretation, integration, and conceptualization processes, with an emphasis on collaboration and an acknowledgement that much of what has been identified as psychopathology represents natural human diversity mismatched with a society that is built for those from dominant groups. This article discusses how queering psychological assessment can accomplish a shift from gatekeeping (resources, accommodations, access) to collaboration, partnering with clients to figure out how to improve their lives. Public Significance Statement The process of psychological assessment has the potential to benefit clients, but it can also reinforce oppressive structures and gatekeep access to resources. Queering the process of psychological assessment, described in this article, has the potential to shift the process to a collaboration with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.</description><subject>Case Conceptualization</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>LGBTQ</subject><subject>Psychological Assessment</subject><subject>Psychological Theories</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Queer theory</subject><subject>Self-Report</subject><subject>Test Bias</subject><subject>Test Interpretation</subject><subject>Testing Methods</subject><subject>White supremacy</subject><issn>0735-7028</issn><issn>1939-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxV9Q8aaszmR2us2xFL-goIKeQzab1C3b7prsHvrvTangzbnM5WGG9xXiEuEOgYr7LrSQhlV-JEaoSGVIko7FCArirAA5OxVnMa6TISIeiav3wblQb1eTt7izX23Trmprmsk8Rhfjxm37c3HiTRPdxe8ei8_Hh4_Fc7Z8fXpZzJeZkSj7rPTggH2JxnnD4AlLzO0MKouemSAnhFzaCsDbsrRsjaqUwWllnMJp4Wgsrg93U4bvwcVer9shbNNLTZgCFSqXs_8VSs4ZJCd1c1A2tDEG53UX6o0JO42g90Xpv6ISvj1g0xndpRZM6GvbuGiHEFIBe6uZ9VSzVPQDNzRpUw</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Wright, A. Jordan</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-6727</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Queering Psychological Assessment</title><author>Wright, A. Jordan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-bf0e05fb1aefa50f31b14c80dc1f5530431042cd00fcbbc5ca9d9a16dae9167e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Case Conceptualization</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>LGBTQ</topic><topic>Psychological Assessment</topic><topic>Psychological Theories</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Queer theory</topic><topic>Self-Report</topic><topic>Test Bias</topic><topic>Test Interpretation</topic><topic>Testing Methods</topic><topic>White supremacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, A. Jordan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, A. Jordan</au><au>Borden, Kathi A</au><au>Simonian, Susan J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Queering Psychological Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>529-536</pages><issn>0735-7028</issn><eissn>1939-1323</eissn><abstract>The process of psychological assessment as it has been practiced for over a century has contributed to, reinforced, and promulgated White supremacist, cisheteronormative, and otherwise oppressive systems and structures. While maintaining the scientific rigor of research-backed tests, measures, and methods, the field needs to shift in order to be explicitly antioppressive. Queering psychological assessment-applying the tenets of queer theory and therapy to the assessment process-centers client identity, lived experience, narrative, and language in the test interpretation, integration, and conceptualization processes, with an emphasis on collaboration and an acknowledgement that much of what has been identified as psychopathology represents natural human diversity mismatched with a society that is built for those from dominant groups. This article discusses how queering psychological assessment can accomplish a shift from gatekeeping (resources, accommodations, access) to collaboration, partnering with clients to figure out how to improve their lives. Public Significance Statement The process of psychological assessment has the potential to benefit clients, but it can also reinforce oppressive structures and gatekeep access to resources. Queering the process of psychological assessment, described in this article, has the potential to shift the process to a collaboration with clients to figure out how to improve their lives.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/pro0000594</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-6727</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-7028
ispartof Professional psychology, research and practice, 2024-12, Vol.55 (6), p.529-536
issn 0735-7028
1939-1323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3159479428
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Case Conceptualization
Evaluation
Human
LGBTQ
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Theories
Psychopathology
Queer theory
Self-Report
Test Bias
Test Interpretation
Testing Methods
White supremacy
title Queering Psychological Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Queering%20Psychological%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Professional%20psychology,%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=Wright,%20A.%20Jordan&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=529-536&rft.issn=0735-7028&rft.eissn=1939-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pro0000594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3159479428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112545025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true