Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review

Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health & social care in the community 2023-09, Vol.2023 (NA), p.1-23
Hauptverfasser: Tracey, Danielle, Gray, Tonia, Manohar, Narendar, Kingsley, Jonathan, Bailey, Aisling, Pettitt, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue NA
container_start_page 1
container_title Health & social care in the community
container_volume 2023
creator Tracey, Danielle
Gray, Tonia
Manohar, Narendar
Kingsley, Jonathan
Bailey, Aisling
Pettitt, Philip
description Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and fuelled these disparities. Community gardening has emerged as a community-based solution to address these inequities, yet the research literature has largely considered outcomes for the general population rather than those with the most need. This paper represents the first systematic review to summarise the evidence on the broad impact of community gardening on outcomes for vulnerable populations. A systematic search of 13 databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, Education Source, Education Resources Information Center, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, SocINDEX, and Allied Health and Complementary Medicine Database) for English language articles from 1985 to 2022 was conducted. There were 33 studies identified where females were substantially overrepresented in the studies compared to males, and the main criteria for vulnerability included low socioeconomic-status and culturally diverse populations. Findings revealed that community gardening provides a wide range of benefits for vulnerable populations, with social connection, health, education, and nutrition being the more commonly cited. A relative emphasis on benefits of social connections, education, and nutrition is apparent for vulnerable populations in comparison to reviews considering the general population. The quality of studies was evaluated as moderate with little information provided about program characteristics. These shortcomings reduce the understanding of what characteristics are most likely to result in improvements and limit the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for vulnerable communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2023/5570089
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3159021766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3159021766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-a169e964c1d2483e36ade29ba05257c532dd38207ea5063177786ab8d2f252a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhhdRsFZv_oCAF0Fr87HZD2910VosKH5dl3Qza1N2k5pkLfvvTakH8eBpZpjnHebljaJTgq8I4XxMMWVjzlOMs3wvGhCW8BHlNN7_1R9GR86tMCaM4nQQuZkE7VXdK_2BHqBHN6ChVt4hoSUqlsKKyoNVzqvKIVOjwrRtp5Xv0VTYoN3qamPRe9dosGLRAHoy664RXhntrtEEvfTOQxvmCj3Dl4LNcXRQi8bByU8dRm93t6_F_Wj-OJ0Vk_moojz1I0GSHPIkroikccaAJUICzRcC87CvOKNSsiy4AMFxwkiaplkiFpmkdTAqcjaMznd319Z8duB82SpXQdMIDaZzJcNZmucxy-KAnv1BV6azOnxXMsJzTEmaJIG63FGVNc5ZqMu1Va2wfUlwuU2g3CZQ_iQQ8IsdvlRaio36n_4Gs5KFIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3159021766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Tracey, Danielle ; Gray, Tonia ; Manohar, Narendar ; Kingsley, Jonathan ; Bailey, Aisling ; Pettitt, Philip</creator><contributor>Collins, Tracy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tracey, Danielle ; Gray, Tonia ; Manohar, Narendar ; Kingsley, Jonathan ; Bailey, Aisling ; Pettitt, Philip ; Collins, Tracy</creatorcontrib><description>Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and fuelled these disparities. Community gardening has emerged as a community-based solution to address these inequities, yet the research literature has largely considered outcomes for the general population rather than those with the most need. This paper represents the first systematic review to summarise the evidence on the broad impact of community gardening on outcomes for vulnerable populations. A systematic search of 13 databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, Education Source, Education Resources Information Center, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, SocINDEX, and Allied Health and Complementary Medicine Database) for English language articles from 1985 to 2022 was conducted. There were 33 studies identified where females were substantially overrepresented in the studies compared to males, and the main criteria for vulnerability included low socioeconomic-status and culturally diverse populations. Findings revealed that community gardening provides a wide range of benefits for vulnerable populations, with social connection, health, education, and nutrition being the more commonly cited. A relative emphasis on benefits of social connections, education, and nutrition is apparent for vulnerable populations in comparison to reviews considering the general population. The quality of studies was evaluated as moderate with little information provided about program characteristics. These shortcomings reduce the understanding of what characteristics are most likely to result in improvements and limit the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for vulnerable communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2023/5570089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi</publisher><subject>At risk populations ; COVID-19 ; Cross-sectional studies ; Education ; English language ; Ethnicity ; Gardening ; Gardens &amp; gardening ; Health disparities ; Information centers ; Literature reviews ; Mental health ; Pandemics ; Policy research ; Population studies ; Populations ; Refugees ; Social capital ; Society ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Sustainable development ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Health &amp; social care in the community, 2023-09, Vol.2023 (NA), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Danielle Tracey et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Danielle Tracey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-a169e964c1d2483e36ade29ba05257c532dd38207ea5063177786ab8d2f252a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3008-4770 ; 0000-0002-8528-7164 ; 0000-0002-5753-6565 ; 0000-0001-9590-9812 ; 0000-0002-5358-1748 ; 0009-0000-6370-3991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27321,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Collins, Tracy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tracey, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Tonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manohar, Narendar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Aisling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review</title><title>Health &amp; social care in the community</title><description>Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and fuelled these disparities. Community gardening has emerged as a community-based solution to address these inequities, yet the research literature has largely considered outcomes for the general population rather than those with the most need. This paper represents the first systematic review to summarise the evidence on the broad impact of community gardening on outcomes for vulnerable populations. A systematic search of 13 databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, Education Source, Education Resources Information Center, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, SocINDEX, and Allied Health and Complementary Medicine Database) for English language articles from 1985 to 2022 was conducted. There were 33 studies identified where females were substantially overrepresented in the studies compared to males, and the main criteria for vulnerability included low socioeconomic-status and culturally diverse populations. Findings revealed that community gardening provides a wide range of benefits for vulnerable populations, with social connection, health, education, and nutrition being the more commonly cited. A relative emphasis on benefits of social connections, education, and nutrition is apparent for vulnerable populations in comparison to reviews considering the general population. The quality of studies was evaluated as moderate with little information provided about program characteristics. These shortcomings reduce the understanding of what characteristics are most likely to result in improvements and limit the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for vulnerable communities.</description><subject>At risk populations</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Gardening</subject><subject>Gardens &amp; gardening</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Information centers</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Policy research</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1365-2524</issn><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhhdRsFZv_oCAF0Fr87HZD2910VosKH5dl3Qza1N2k5pkLfvvTakH8eBpZpjnHebljaJTgq8I4XxMMWVjzlOMs3wvGhCW8BHlNN7_1R9GR86tMCaM4nQQuZkE7VXdK_2BHqBHN6ChVt4hoSUqlsKKyoNVzqvKIVOjwrRtp5Xv0VTYoN3qamPRe9dosGLRAHoy664RXhntrtEEvfTOQxvmCj3Dl4LNcXRQi8bByU8dRm93t6_F_Wj-OJ0Vk_moojz1I0GSHPIkroikccaAJUICzRcC87CvOKNSsiy4AMFxwkiaplkiFpmkdTAqcjaMznd319Z8duB82SpXQdMIDaZzJcNZmucxy-KAnv1BV6azOnxXMsJzTEmaJIG63FGVNc5ZqMu1Va2wfUlwuU2g3CZQ_iQQ8IsdvlRaio36n_4Gs5KFIA</recordid><startdate>20230921</startdate><enddate>20230921</enddate><creator>Tracey, Danielle</creator><creator>Gray, Tonia</creator><creator>Manohar, Narendar</creator><creator>Kingsley, Jonathan</creator><creator>Bailey, Aisling</creator><creator>Pettitt, Philip</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3008-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-7164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-6565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-9812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-1748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6370-3991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230921</creationdate><title>Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review</title><author>Tracey, Danielle ; Gray, Tonia ; Manohar, Narendar ; Kingsley, Jonathan ; Bailey, Aisling ; Pettitt, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-a169e964c1d2483e36ade29ba05257c532dd38207ea5063177786ab8d2f252a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>At risk populations</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Gardening</topic><topic>Gardens &amp; gardening</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Information centers</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Policy research</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tracey, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Tonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manohar, Narendar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Aisling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Health &amp; social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tracey, Danielle</au><au>Gray, Tonia</au><au>Manohar, Narendar</au><au>Kingsley, Jonathan</au><au>Bailey, Aisling</au><au>Pettitt, Philip</au><au>Collins, Tracy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Health &amp; social care in the community</jtitle><date>2023-09-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2023</volume><issue>NA</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>1365-2524</issn><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><abstract>Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and fuelled these disparities. Community gardening has emerged as a community-based solution to address these inequities, yet the research literature has largely considered outcomes for the general population rather than those with the most need. This paper represents the first systematic review to summarise the evidence on the broad impact of community gardening on outcomes for vulnerable populations. A systematic search of 13 databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, Education Source, Education Resources Information Center, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, SocINDEX, and Allied Health and Complementary Medicine Database) for English language articles from 1985 to 2022 was conducted. There were 33 studies identified where females were substantially overrepresented in the studies compared to males, and the main criteria for vulnerability included low socioeconomic-status and culturally diverse populations. Findings revealed that community gardening provides a wide range of benefits for vulnerable populations, with social connection, health, education, and nutrition being the more commonly cited. A relative emphasis on benefits of social connections, education, and nutrition is apparent for vulnerable populations in comparison to reviews considering the general population. The quality of studies was evaluated as moderate with little information provided about program characteristics. These shortcomings reduce the understanding of what characteristics are most likely to result in improvements and limit the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for vulnerable communities.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2023/5570089</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3008-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-7164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-6565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-9812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-1748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6370-3991</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1365-2524
ispartof Health & social care in the community, 2023-09, Vol.2023 (NA), p.1-23
issn 1365-2524
0966-0410
1365-2524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3159021766
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects At risk populations
COVID-19
Cross-sectional studies
Education
English language
Ethnicity
Gardening
Gardens & gardening
Health disparities
Information centers
Literature reviews
Mental health
Pandemics
Policy research
Population studies
Populations
Refugees
Social capital
Society
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomics
Sustainable development
Systematic review
title Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T03%3A45%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20Key%20Benefits%20and%20Characteristics%20of%20Community%20Gardening%20for%20Vulnerable%20Populations:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Tracey,%20Danielle&rft.date=2023-09-21&rft.volume=2023&rft.issue=NA&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=1365-2524&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2023/5570089&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3159021766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3159021766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true