Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review
Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health & social care in the community 2023-09, Vol.2023 (NA), p.1-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | NA |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Health & social care in the community |
container_volume | 2023 |
creator | Tracey, Danielle Gray, Tonia Manohar, Narendar Kingsley, Jonathan Bailey, Aisling Pettitt, Philip |
description | Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and fuelled these disparities. Community gardening has emerged as a community-based solution to address these inequities, yet the research literature has largely considered outcomes for the general population rather than those with the most need. This paper represents the first systematic review to summarise the evidence on the broad impact of community gardening on outcomes for vulnerable populations. A systematic search of 13 databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, Education Source, Education Resources Information Center, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, SocINDEX, and Allied Health and Complementary Medicine Database) for English language articles from 1985 to 2022 was conducted. There were 33 studies identified where females were substantially overrepresented in the studies compared to males, and the main criteria for vulnerability included low socioeconomic-status and culturally diverse populations. Findings revealed that community gardening provides a wide range of benefits for vulnerable populations, with social connection, health, education, and nutrition being the more commonly cited. A relative emphasis on benefits of social connections, education, and nutrition is apparent for vulnerable populations in comparison to reviews considering the general population. The quality of studies was evaluated as moderate with little information provided about program characteristics. These shortcomings reduce the understanding of what characteristics are most likely to result in improvements and limit the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for vulnerable communities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2023/5570089 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3159021766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3159021766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-a169e964c1d2483e36ade29ba05257c532dd38207ea5063177786ab8d2f252a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhhdRsFZv_oCAF0Fr87HZD2910VosKH5dl3Qza1N2k5pkLfvvTakH8eBpZpjnHebljaJTgq8I4XxMMWVjzlOMs3wvGhCW8BHlNN7_1R9GR86tMCaM4nQQuZkE7VXdK_2BHqBHN6ChVt4hoSUqlsKKyoNVzqvKIVOjwrRtp5Xv0VTYoN3qamPRe9dosGLRAHoy664RXhntrtEEvfTOQxvmCj3Dl4LNcXRQi8bByU8dRm93t6_F_Wj-OJ0Vk_moojz1I0GSHPIkroikccaAJUICzRcC87CvOKNSsiy4AMFxwkiaplkiFpmkdTAqcjaMznd319Z8duB82SpXQdMIDaZzJcNZmucxy-KAnv1BV6azOnxXMsJzTEmaJIG63FGVNc5ZqMu1Va2wfUlwuU2g3CZQ_iQQ8IsdvlRaio36n_4Gs5KFIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3159021766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Tracey, Danielle ; Gray, Tonia ; Manohar, Narendar ; Kingsley, Jonathan ; Bailey, Aisling ; Pettitt, Philip</creator><contributor>Collins, Tracy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tracey, Danielle ; Gray, Tonia ; Manohar, Narendar ; Kingsley, Jonathan ; Bailey, Aisling ; Pettitt, Philip ; Collins, Tracy</creatorcontrib><description>Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and fuelled these disparities. Community gardening has emerged as a community-based solution to address these inequities, yet the research literature has largely considered outcomes for the general population rather than those with the most need. This paper represents the first systematic review to summarise the evidence on the broad impact of community gardening on outcomes for vulnerable populations. A systematic search of 13 databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, Education Source, Education Resources Information Center, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, SocINDEX, and Allied Health and Complementary Medicine Database) for English language articles from 1985 to 2022 was conducted. There were 33 studies identified where females were substantially overrepresented in the studies compared to males, and the main criteria for vulnerability included low socioeconomic-status and culturally diverse populations. Findings revealed that community gardening provides a wide range of benefits for vulnerable populations, with social connection, health, education, and nutrition being the more commonly cited. A relative emphasis on benefits of social connections, education, and nutrition is apparent for vulnerable populations in comparison to reviews considering the general population. The quality of studies was evaluated as moderate with little information provided about program characteristics. These shortcomings reduce the understanding of what characteristics are most likely to result in improvements and limit the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for vulnerable communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2023/5570089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi</publisher><subject>At risk populations ; COVID-19 ; Cross-sectional studies ; Education ; English language ; Ethnicity ; Gardening ; Gardens & gardening ; Health disparities ; Information centers ; Literature reviews ; Mental health ; Pandemics ; Policy research ; Population studies ; Populations ; Refugees ; Social capital ; Society ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Sustainable development ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Health & social care in the community, 2023-09, Vol.2023 (NA), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Danielle Tracey et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Danielle Tracey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-a169e964c1d2483e36ade29ba05257c532dd38207ea5063177786ab8d2f252a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3008-4770 ; 0000-0002-8528-7164 ; 0000-0002-5753-6565 ; 0000-0001-9590-9812 ; 0000-0002-5358-1748 ; 0009-0000-6370-3991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27321,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Collins, Tracy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tracey, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Tonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manohar, Narendar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Aisling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review</title><title>Health & social care in the community</title><description>Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and fuelled these disparities. Community gardening has emerged as a community-based solution to address these inequities, yet the research literature has largely considered outcomes for the general population rather than those with the most need. This paper represents the first systematic review to summarise the evidence on the broad impact of community gardening on outcomes for vulnerable populations. A systematic search of 13 databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, Education Source, Education Resources Information Center, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, SocINDEX, and Allied Health and Complementary Medicine Database) for English language articles from 1985 to 2022 was conducted. There were 33 studies identified where females were substantially overrepresented in the studies compared to males, and the main criteria for vulnerability included low socioeconomic-status and culturally diverse populations. Findings revealed that community gardening provides a wide range of benefits for vulnerable populations, with social connection, health, education, and nutrition being the more commonly cited. A relative emphasis on benefits of social connections, education, and nutrition is apparent for vulnerable populations in comparison to reviews considering the general population. The quality of studies was evaluated as moderate with little information provided about program characteristics. These shortcomings reduce the understanding of what characteristics are most likely to result in improvements and limit the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for vulnerable communities.</description><subject>At risk populations</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Gardening</subject><subject>Gardens & gardening</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Information centers</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Policy research</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1365-2524</issn><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhhdRsFZv_oCAF0Fr87HZD2910VosKH5dl3Qza1N2k5pkLfvvTakH8eBpZpjnHebljaJTgq8I4XxMMWVjzlOMs3wvGhCW8BHlNN7_1R9GR86tMCaM4nQQuZkE7VXdK_2BHqBHN6ChVt4hoSUqlsKKyoNVzqvKIVOjwrRtp5Xv0VTYoN3qamPRe9dosGLRAHoy664RXhntrtEEvfTOQxvmCj3Dl4LNcXRQi8bByU8dRm93t6_F_Wj-OJ0Vk_moojz1I0GSHPIkroikccaAJUICzRcC87CvOKNSsiy4AMFxwkiaplkiFpmkdTAqcjaMznd319Z8duB82SpXQdMIDaZzJcNZmucxy-KAnv1BV6azOnxXMsJzTEmaJIG63FGVNc5ZqMu1Va2wfUlwuU2g3CZQ_iQQ8IsdvlRaio36n_4Gs5KFIA</recordid><startdate>20230921</startdate><enddate>20230921</enddate><creator>Tracey, Danielle</creator><creator>Gray, Tonia</creator><creator>Manohar, Narendar</creator><creator>Kingsley, Jonathan</creator><creator>Bailey, Aisling</creator><creator>Pettitt, Philip</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3008-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-7164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-6565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-9812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-1748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6370-3991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230921</creationdate><title>Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review</title><author>Tracey, Danielle ; Gray, Tonia ; Manohar, Narendar ; Kingsley, Jonathan ; Bailey, Aisling ; Pettitt, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-a169e964c1d2483e36ade29ba05257c532dd38207ea5063177786ab8d2f252a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>At risk populations</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Gardening</topic><topic>Gardens & gardening</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Information centers</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Policy research</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tracey, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Tonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manohar, Narendar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Aisling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tracey, Danielle</au><au>Gray, Tonia</au><au>Manohar, Narendar</au><au>Kingsley, Jonathan</au><au>Bailey, Aisling</au><au>Pettitt, Philip</au><au>Collins, Tracy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle><date>2023-09-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2023</volume><issue>NA</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>1365-2524</issn><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><abstract>Vulnerable communities (including people from refugee, Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, and low socioeconomic backgrounds) represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic, and social outcomes. The recent COVID-19 pandemic both highlighted and fuelled these disparities. Community gardening has emerged as a community-based solution to address these inequities, yet the research literature has largely considered outcomes for the general population rather than those with the most need. This paper represents the first systematic review to summarise the evidence on the broad impact of community gardening on outcomes for vulnerable populations. A systematic search of 13 databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, Education Source, Education Resources Information Center, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, SocINDEX, and Allied Health and Complementary Medicine Database) for English language articles from 1985 to 2022 was conducted. There were 33 studies identified where females were substantially overrepresented in the studies compared to males, and the main criteria for vulnerability included low socioeconomic-status and culturally diverse populations. Findings revealed that community gardening provides a wide range of benefits for vulnerable populations, with social connection, health, education, and nutrition being the more commonly cited. A relative emphasis on benefits of social connections, education, and nutrition is apparent for vulnerable populations in comparison to reviews considering the general population. The quality of studies was evaluated as moderate with little information provided about program characteristics. These shortcomings reduce the understanding of what characteristics are most likely to result in improvements and limit the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for vulnerable communities.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2023/5570089</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3008-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-7164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-6565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-9812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-1748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6370-3991</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1365-2524 |
ispartof | Health & social care in the community, 2023-09, Vol.2023 (NA), p.1-23 |
issn | 1365-2524 0966-0410 1365-2524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3159021766 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | At risk populations COVID-19 Cross-sectional studies Education English language Ethnicity Gardening Gardens & gardening Health disparities Information centers Literature reviews Mental health Pandemics Policy research Population studies Populations Refugees Social capital Society Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomics Sustainable development Systematic review |
title | Identifying Key Benefits and Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T03%3A45%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20Key%20Benefits%20and%20Characteristics%20of%20Community%20Gardening%20for%20Vulnerable%20Populations:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Tracey,%20Danielle&rft.date=2023-09-21&rft.volume=2023&rft.issue=NA&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=1365-2524&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2023/5570089&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3159021766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3159021766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |