Visual Anthropology vs. Anthropology of Visual Communication
In visual anthropology there are three different directions, overlapping but also competing with each other at the same time: there is the visual anthropology itself, which focuses mainly on the production of ethnographic and folklore film, for promotion and teaching; another kind of visual anthropo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | SAECULUM 2021-07, Vol.51 (1), p.17-23 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 23 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 17 |
| container_title | SAECULUM |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Stănese, Radu |
| description | In visual anthropology there are three different directions, overlapping but also competing with each other at the same time: there is the visual anthropology itself, which focuses mainly on the production of ethnographic and folklore film, for promotion and teaching; another kind of visual anthropology aims at the study of pictorial means usually represented by television and film; and the third subcategory is the anthropology of visual communication (anthropology of the visual), the most ambitious of the three, which includes the anthropological study of all forms of cultural visuality, as well as the production of visual media for anthropological purposes. An overview on the epistemological and methodological implications of visual anthropology reveals a whole new direction of research, in which the role of the scientific text must be rethought in the light of nonverbal means. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2478/saec-2021-0002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3158215683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3158215683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1597-7c5b3c6884ac8cf663667ec07d9dbada43287f7f528a9e16b2484cbbc1a66b3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9LwzAUx4MoOOaungueO_OSNknRyyg6hYEX9RqSNJ2VtplJq_S_t6UDFby893h8f8AHoUvAa5JwcR2UNTHBBGKMMTlBC8IwxACCnP66z9EqhEpjyhjQcS7Q7WsVelVHm7Z78-7garcfos-w_vtwZXTU5a5p-rYyqqtce4HOSlUHuzruJXq5v3vOH-Ld0_Yx3-xiA2nGY25STQ0TIlFGmJKxsZ5bg3mRFVoVKqFE8JKXKREqs8A0SURitDagGNNU0SW6mnMP3n30NnTy3fW-HSslhVQQSJmgo2o9q4x3IXhbyoOvGuUHCVhOkOQESU6Q5ARpNNzMhi9Vd9YXdu_7YTx-0v83pgDA6TcV_W3P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3158215683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual Anthropology vs. Anthropology of Visual Communication</title><source>Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals</source><creator>Stănese, Radu</creator><creatorcontrib>Stănese, Radu</creatorcontrib><description>In visual anthropology there are three different directions, overlapping but also competing with each other at the same time: there is the visual anthropology itself, which focuses mainly on the production of ethnographic and folklore film, for promotion and teaching; another kind of visual anthropology aims at the study of pictorial means usually represented by television and film; and the third subcategory is the anthropology of visual communication (anthropology of the visual), the most ambitious of the three, which includes the anthropological study of all forms of cultural visuality, as well as the production of visual media for anthropological purposes. An overview on the epistemological and methodological implications of visual anthropology reveals a whole new direction of research, in which the role of the scientific text must be rethought in the light of nonverbal means.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2601-1182</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0080-5319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2601-1182</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/saec-2021-0002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Freiburg: Sciendo</publisher><subject>anthropologic film ; anthropologic photography ; anthropology of visual communication ; cultural pattern ; ethnology ; multimedia ; visual anthropology</subject><ispartof>SAECULUM, 2021-07, Vol.51 (1), p.17-23</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1597-7c5b3c6884ac8cf663667ec07d9dbada43287f7f528a9e16b2484cbbc1a66b3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/saec-2021-0002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/saec-2021-0002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,76133,76134</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stănese, Radu</creatorcontrib><title>Visual Anthropology vs. Anthropology of Visual Communication</title><title>SAECULUM</title><description>In visual anthropology there are three different directions, overlapping but also competing with each other at the same time: there is the visual anthropology itself, which focuses mainly on the production of ethnographic and folklore film, for promotion and teaching; another kind of visual anthropology aims at the study of pictorial means usually represented by television and film; and the third subcategory is the anthropology of visual communication (anthropology of the visual), the most ambitious of the three, which includes the anthropological study of all forms of cultural visuality, as well as the production of visual media for anthropological purposes. An overview on the epistemological and methodological implications of visual anthropology reveals a whole new direction of research, in which the role of the scientific text must be rethought in the light of nonverbal means.</description><subject>anthropologic film</subject><subject>anthropologic photography</subject><subject>anthropology of visual communication</subject><subject>cultural pattern</subject><subject>ethnology</subject><subject>multimedia</subject><subject>visual anthropology</subject><issn>2601-1182</issn><issn>0080-5319</issn><issn>2601-1182</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9LwzAUx4MoOOaungueO_OSNknRyyg6hYEX9RqSNJ2VtplJq_S_t6UDFby893h8f8AHoUvAa5JwcR2UNTHBBGKMMTlBC8IwxACCnP66z9EqhEpjyhjQcS7Q7WsVelVHm7Z78-7garcfos-w_vtwZXTU5a5p-rYyqqtce4HOSlUHuzruJXq5v3vOH-Ld0_Yx3-xiA2nGY25STQ0TIlFGmJKxsZ5bg3mRFVoVKqFE8JKXKREqs8A0SURitDagGNNU0SW6mnMP3n30NnTy3fW-HSslhVQQSJmgo2o9q4x3IXhbyoOvGuUHCVhOkOQESU6Q5ARpNNzMhi9Vd9YXdu_7YTx-0v83pgDA6TcV_W3P</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Stănese, Radu</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Visual Anthropology vs. Anthropology of Visual Communication</title><author>Stănese, Radu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1597-7c5b3c6884ac8cf663667ec07d9dbada43287f7f528a9e16b2484cbbc1a66b3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>anthropologic film</topic><topic>anthropologic photography</topic><topic>anthropology of visual communication</topic><topic>cultural pattern</topic><topic>ethnology</topic><topic>multimedia</topic><topic>visual anthropology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stănese, Radu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>SAECULUM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stănese, Radu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual Anthropology vs. Anthropology of Visual Communication</atitle><jtitle>SAECULUM</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>17-23</pages><issn>2601-1182</issn><issn>0080-5319</issn><eissn>2601-1182</eissn><abstract>In visual anthropology there are three different directions, overlapping but also competing with each other at the same time: there is the visual anthropology itself, which focuses mainly on the production of ethnographic and folklore film, for promotion and teaching; another kind of visual anthropology aims at the study of pictorial means usually represented by television and film; and the third subcategory is the anthropology of visual communication (anthropology of the visual), the most ambitious of the three, which includes the anthropological study of all forms of cultural visuality, as well as the production of visual media for anthropological purposes. An overview on the epistemological and methodological implications of visual anthropology reveals a whole new direction of research, in which the role of the scientific text must be rethought in the light of nonverbal means.</abstract><cop>Freiburg</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/saec-2021-0002</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2601-1182 |
| ispartof | SAECULUM, 2021-07, Vol.51 (1), p.17-23 |
| issn | 2601-1182 0080-5319 2601-1182 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3158215683 |
| source | Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals |
| subjects | anthropologic film anthropologic photography anthropology of visual communication cultural pattern ethnology multimedia visual anthropology |
| title | Visual Anthropology vs. Anthropology of Visual Communication |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T00%3A58%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20Anthropology%20vs.%20Anthropology%20of%20Visual%20Communication&rft.jtitle=SAECULUM&rft.au=St%C4%83nese,%20Radu&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=17-23&rft.issn=2601-1182&rft.eissn=2601-1182&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/saec-2021-0002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3158215683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3158215683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |