Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger

Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of translational internal medicine 2014-09, Vol.2 (3), p.132-135
Hauptverfasser: Amiri Aref, Hosseinian, Fatemeh, Shirani, Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 3
container_start_page 132
container_title Journal of translational internal medicine
container_volume 2
creator Amiri Aref, Hosseinian
Fatemeh, Shirani
Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab
description Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and percutaneous release in terms of symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented with trigger finger Grades 2 and 3 were randomized into two groups. One group received corticosteroid injection and, in the other group, percutaneous release was performed. These patients were then assessed weekly over a period of 6 weeks and their progress was noted. Results: Thirty cases (60%) were female and 20 cases (40%) were male. The age of the patients in this study was 40-65 years (mean: 48 years). Twenty-three cases (46%) were manual workers, 17 cases (34%) were semi-professionals and 10 cases (20%) were housewives. Most of the patients had involvement of the dominant hand (62%) and non-dominant hand involved in 38% of the cases. The most common presenting symptom was pain with triggering. In both groups, significant improvement in pain and triggering occurs in the first 2 weeks, but there was better improvement of pain and triggering in the corticosteroid group after 2 weeks. In terms of swelling of the digits, no difference was noted during the course of the treatment in the two groups. The corticosteroid group of patients had a complication rate of 6% and in the second group, the percutaneous group, had an 18% complication rate. There were a total of 12 patients who had recurrence (recurrence rate 24%): five (41.6%) cases in the first or corticosteroid group and seven (58.3%) cases in the surgery group. Conclusion: The group of patients treated with corticosteroid had a better relief of pain and triggering and had a lower complication rate. The recurrence was equal in both groups.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/2224-4018.141840
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3156391214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A385202795</galeid><sourcerecordid>A385202795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-729402a8263c4bbe34797e2860052dcb0a1d5ecdec3f2e25269f280252e56f0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1LAzEQXUTBor17XPC8NZlkvw4eSvELCl704iWk2cma0k1qklL6702pWAUlh3l5eS8zvMmyK0omnBJ2AwC84IQ2E8ppw8lJNvqmTn_g82wcwpIQQsua86YdZW8zN6ylN8HZfIFxi2hz5Xw0yoWI3pkuN3aJKpokkLbLw8b36HeJzeM75tGjjAPamDudLqZPj7k2NpXL7EzLVcDxV73IXu_vXmaPxfz54Wk2nReKAcSihpYTkA1UTPHFAhmv2xqhqQgpoVMLImlXoupQMQ0IJVSthoYkgGWliWQX2fXh37V3HxsMUSzdxtvUUjBaVqylQPlR1csVCmO1i16qwQQlpqwpgUDdlkk1-UOVTodDisSiNon_ZSAHg_IuBI9arL0ZpN8JSsR-N2IfvtiHLw67SZbbg2UrVyniDnu_2SVwHPs_KzDKgH0Ct_-Siw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3156391214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian ; Fatemeh, Shirani ; Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creator><creatorcontrib>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian ; Fatemeh, Shirani ; Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and percutaneous release in terms of symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented with trigger finger Grades 2 and 3 were randomized into two groups. One group received corticosteroid injection and, in the other group, percutaneous release was performed. These patients were then assessed weekly over a period of 6 weeks and their progress was noted. Results: Thirty cases (60%) were female and 20 cases (40%) were male. The age of the patients in this study was 40-65 years (mean: 48 years). Twenty-three cases (46%) were manual workers, 17 cases (34%) were semi-professionals and 10 cases (20%) were housewives. Most of the patients had involvement of the dominant hand (62%) and non-dominant hand involved in 38% of the cases. The most common presenting symptom was pain with triggering. In both groups, significant improvement in pain and triggering occurs in the first 2 weeks, but there was better improvement of pain and triggering in the corticosteroid group after 2 weeks. In terms of swelling of the digits, no difference was noted during the course of the treatment in the two groups. The corticosteroid group of patients had a complication rate of 6% and in the second group, the percutaneous group, had an 18% complication rate. There were a total of 12 patients who had recurrence (recurrence rate 24%): five (41.6%) cases in the first or corticosteroid group and seven (58.3%) cases in the surgery group. Conclusion: The group of patients treated with corticosteroid had a better relief of pain and triggering and had a lower complication rate. The recurrence was equal in both groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2224-4018</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2450-131X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2224-4018</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2224-4018.141840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shenyang: De Gruyter Open</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; Corticosteroid injection ; Corticosteroids ; Dosage and administration ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Steroids ; surgery ; Tenosynovitis ; Tenotomy ; trigger finger</subject><ispartof>Journal of translational internal medicine, 2014-09, Vol.2 (3), p.132-135</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2014. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-729402a8263c4bbe34797e2860052dcb0a1d5ecdec3f2e25269f280252e56f0a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4103/2224-4018.141840/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4103/2224-4018.141840/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66901,68685</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatemeh, Shirani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger</title><title>Journal of translational internal medicine</title><description>Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and percutaneous release in terms of symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented with trigger finger Grades 2 and 3 were randomized into two groups. One group received corticosteroid injection and, in the other group, percutaneous release was performed. These patients were then assessed weekly over a period of 6 weeks and their progress was noted. Results: Thirty cases (60%) were female and 20 cases (40%) were male. The age of the patients in this study was 40-65 years (mean: 48 years). Twenty-three cases (46%) were manual workers, 17 cases (34%) were semi-professionals and 10 cases (20%) were housewives. Most of the patients had involvement of the dominant hand (62%) and non-dominant hand involved in 38% of the cases. The most common presenting symptom was pain with triggering. In both groups, significant improvement in pain and triggering occurs in the first 2 weeks, but there was better improvement of pain and triggering in the corticosteroid group after 2 weeks. In terms of swelling of the digits, no difference was noted during the course of the treatment in the two groups. The corticosteroid group of patients had a complication rate of 6% and in the second group, the percutaneous group, had an 18% complication rate. There were a total of 12 patients who had recurrence (recurrence rate 24%): five (41.6%) cases in the first or corticosteroid group and seven (58.3%) cases in the surgery group. Conclusion: The group of patients treated with corticosteroid had a better relief of pain and triggering and had a lower complication rate. The recurrence was equal in both groups.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Corticosteroid injection</subject><subject>Corticosteroids</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>Tenosynovitis</subject><subject>Tenotomy</subject><subject>trigger finger</subject><issn>2224-4018</issn><issn>2450-131X</issn><issn>2224-4018</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1LAzEQXUTBor17XPC8NZlkvw4eSvELCl704iWk2cma0k1qklL6702pWAUlh3l5eS8zvMmyK0omnBJ2AwC84IQ2E8ppw8lJNvqmTn_g82wcwpIQQsua86YdZW8zN6ylN8HZfIFxi2hz5Xw0yoWI3pkuN3aJKpokkLbLw8b36HeJzeM75tGjjAPamDudLqZPj7k2NpXL7EzLVcDxV73IXu_vXmaPxfz54Wk2nReKAcSihpYTkA1UTPHFAhmv2xqhqQgpoVMLImlXoupQMQ0IJVSthoYkgGWliWQX2fXh37V3HxsMUSzdxtvUUjBaVqylQPlR1csVCmO1i16qwQQlpqwpgUDdlkk1-UOVTodDisSiNon_ZSAHg_IuBI9arL0ZpN8JSsR-N2IfvtiHLw67SZbbg2UrVyniDnu_2SVwHPs_KzDKgH0Ct_-Siw</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian</creator><creator>Fatemeh, Shirani</creator><creator>Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creator><general>De Gruyter Open</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger</title><author>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian ; Fatemeh, Shirani ; Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-729402a8263c4bbe34797e2860052dcb0a1d5ecdec3f2e25269f280252e56f0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Corticosteroid injection</topic><topic>Corticosteroids</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>Tenosynovitis</topic><topic>Tenotomy</topic><topic>trigger finger</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatemeh, Shirani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of translational internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian</au><au>Fatemeh, Shirani</au><au>Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger</atitle><jtitle>Journal of translational internal medicine</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>132-135</pages><issn>2224-4018</issn><issn>2450-131X</issn><eissn>2224-4018</eissn><abstract>Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and percutaneous release in terms of symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented with trigger finger Grades 2 and 3 were randomized into two groups. One group received corticosteroid injection and, in the other group, percutaneous release was performed. These patients were then assessed weekly over a period of 6 weeks and their progress was noted. Results: Thirty cases (60%) were female and 20 cases (40%) were male. The age of the patients in this study was 40-65 years (mean: 48 years). Twenty-three cases (46%) were manual workers, 17 cases (34%) were semi-professionals and 10 cases (20%) were housewives. Most of the patients had involvement of the dominant hand (62%) and non-dominant hand involved in 38% of the cases. The most common presenting symptom was pain with triggering. In both groups, significant improvement in pain and triggering occurs in the first 2 weeks, but there was better improvement of pain and triggering in the corticosteroid group after 2 weeks. In terms of swelling of the digits, no difference was noted during the course of the treatment in the two groups. The corticosteroid group of patients had a complication rate of 6% and in the second group, the percutaneous group, had an 18% complication rate. There were a total of 12 patients who had recurrence (recurrence rate 24%): five (41.6%) cases in the first or corticosteroid group and seven (58.3%) cases in the surgery group. Conclusion: The group of patients treated with corticosteroid had a better relief of pain and triggering and had a lower complication rate. The recurrence was equal in both groups.</abstract><cop>Shenyang</cop><pub>De Gruyter Open</pub><doi>10.4103/2224-4018.141840</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2224-4018
ispartof Journal of translational internal medicine, 2014-09, Vol.2 (3), p.132-135
issn 2224-4018
2450-131X
2224-4018
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3156391214
source De Gruyter Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Corticosteroid injection
Corticosteroids
Dosage and administration
Patient outcomes
Patient satisfaction
Steroids
surgery
Tenosynovitis
Tenotomy
trigger finger
title Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A44%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20corticosteroid%20injection%20and%20surgery%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20trigger%20finger&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20translational%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=Amiri%20Aref,%20Hosseinian&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=132-135&rft.issn=2224-4018&rft.eissn=2224-4018&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2224-4018.141840&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA385202795%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3156391214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A385202795&rfr_iscdi=true