Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger
Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of translational internal medicine 2014-09, Vol.2 (3), p.132-135 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 135 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 132 |
container_title | Journal of translational internal medicine |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Amiri Aref, Hosseinian Fatemeh, Shirani Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab |
description | Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and percutaneous release in terms of symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented with trigger finger Grades 2 and 3 were randomized into two groups. One group received corticosteroid injection and, in the other group, percutaneous release was performed. These patients were then assessed weekly over a period of 6 weeks and their progress was noted. Results: Thirty cases (60%) were female and 20 cases (40%) were male. The age of the patients in this study was 40-65 years (mean: 48 years). Twenty-three cases (46%) were manual workers, 17 cases (34%) were semi-professionals and 10 cases (20%) were housewives. Most of the patients had involvement of the dominant hand (62%) and non-dominant hand involved in 38% of the cases. The most common presenting symptom was pain with triggering. In both groups, significant improvement in pain and triggering occurs in the first 2 weeks, but there was better improvement of pain and triggering in the corticosteroid group after 2 weeks. In terms of swelling of the digits, no difference was noted during the course of the treatment in the two groups. The corticosteroid group of patients had a complication rate of 6% and in the second group, the percutaneous group, had an 18% complication rate. There were a total of 12 patients who had recurrence (recurrence rate 24%): five (41.6%) cases in the first or corticosteroid group and seven (58.3%) cases in the surgery group. Conclusion: The group of patients treated with corticosteroid had a better relief of pain and triggering and had a lower complication rate. The recurrence was equal in both groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/2224-4018.141840 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3156391214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A385202795</galeid><sourcerecordid>A385202795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-729402a8263c4bbe34797e2860052dcb0a1d5ecdec3f2e25269f280252e56f0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1LAzEQXUTBor17XPC8NZlkvw4eSvELCl704iWk2cma0k1qklL6702pWAUlh3l5eS8zvMmyK0omnBJ2AwC84IQ2E8ppw8lJNvqmTn_g82wcwpIQQsua86YdZW8zN6ylN8HZfIFxi2hz5Xw0yoWI3pkuN3aJKpokkLbLw8b36HeJzeM75tGjjAPamDudLqZPj7k2NpXL7EzLVcDxV73IXu_vXmaPxfz54Wk2nReKAcSihpYTkA1UTPHFAhmv2xqhqQgpoVMLImlXoupQMQ0IJVSthoYkgGWliWQX2fXh37V3HxsMUSzdxtvUUjBaVqylQPlR1csVCmO1i16qwQQlpqwpgUDdlkk1-UOVTodDisSiNon_ZSAHg_IuBI9arL0ZpN8JSsR-N2IfvtiHLw67SZbbg2UrVyniDnu_2SVwHPs_KzDKgH0Ct_-Siw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3156391214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian ; Fatemeh, Shirani ; Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creator><creatorcontrib>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian ; Fatemeh, Shirani ; Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and percutaneous release in terms of symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented with trigger finger Grades 2 and 3 were randomized into two groups. One group received corticosteroid injection and, in the other group, percutaneous release was performed. These patients were then assessed weekly over a period of 6 weeks and their progress was noted. Results: Thirty cases (60%) were female and 20 cases (40%) were male. The age of the patients in this study was 40-65 years (mean: 48 years). Twenty-three cases (46%) were manual workers, 17 cases (34%) were semi-professionals and 10 cases (20%) were housewives. Most of the patients had involvement of the dominant hand (62%) and non-dominant hand involved in 38% of the cases. The most common presenting symptom was pain with triggering. In both groups, significant improvement in pain and triggering occurs in the first 2 weeks, but there was better improvement of pain and triggering in the corticosteroid group after 2 weeks. In terms of swelling of the digits, no difference was noted during the course of the treatment in the two groups. The corticosteroid group of patients had a complication rate of 6% and in the second group, the percutaneous group, had an 18% complication rate. There were a total of 12 patients who had recurrence (recurrence rate 24%): five (41.6%) cases in the first or corticosteroid group and seven (58.3%) cases in the surgery group. Conclusion: The group of patients treated with corticosteroid had a better relief of pain and triggering and had a lower complication rate. The recurrence was equal in both groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2224-4018</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2450-131X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2224-4018</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2224-4018.141840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shenyang: De Gruyter Open</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; Corticosteroid injection ; Corticosteroids ; Dosage and administration ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Steroids ; surgery ; Tenosynovitis ; Tenotomy ; trigger finger</subject><ispartof>Journal of translational internal medicine, 2014-09, Vol.2 (3), p.132-135</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2014. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-729402a8263c4bbe34797e2860052dcb0a1d5ecdec3f2e25269f280252e56f0a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4103/2224-4018.141840/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4103/2224-4018.141840/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66901,68685</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatemeh, Shirani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger</title><title>Journal of translational internal medicine</title><description>Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and percutaneous release in terms of symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented with trigger finger Grades 2 and 3 were randomized into two groups. One group received corticosteroid injection and, in the other group, percutaneous release was performed. These patients were then assessed weekly over a period of 6 weeks and their progress was noted. Results: Thirty cases (60%) were female and 20 cases (40%) were male. The age of the patients in this study was 40-65 years (mean: 48 years). Twenty-three cases (46%) were manual workers, 17 cases (34%) were semi-professionals and 10 cases (20%) were housewives. Most of the patients had involvement of the dominant hand (62%) and non-dominant hand involved in 38% of the cases. The most common presenting symptom was pain with triggering. In both groups, significant improvement in pain and triggering occurs in the first 2 weeks, but there was better improvement of pain and triggering in the corticosteroid group after 2 weeks. In terms of swelling of the digits, no difference was noted during the course of the treatment in the two groups. The corticosteroid group of patients had a complication rate of 6% and in the second group, the percutaneous group, had an 18% complication rate. There were a total of 12 patients who had recurrence (recurrence rate 24%): five (41.6%) cases in the first or corticosteroid group and seven (58.3%) cases in the surgery group. Conclusion: The group of patients treated with corticosteroid had a better relief of pain and triggering and had a lower complication rate. The recurrence was equal in both groups.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Corticosteroid injection</subject><subject>Corticosteroids</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>Tenosynovitis</subject><subject>Tenotomy</subject><subject>trigger finger</subject><issn>2224-4018</issn><issn>2450-131X</issn><issn>2224-4018</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1LAzEQXUTBor17XPC8NZlkvw4eSvELCl704iWk2cma0k1qklL6702pWAUlh3l5eS8zvMmyK0omnBJ2AwC84IQ2E8ppw8lJNvqmTn_g82wcwpIQQsua86YdZW8zN6ylN8HZfIFxi2hz5Xw0yoWI3pkuN3aJKpokkLbLw8b36HeJzeM75tGjjAPamDudLqZPj7k2NpXL7EzLVcDxV73IXu_vXmaPxfz54Wk2nReKAcSihpYTkA1UTPHFAhmv2xqhqQgpoVMLImlXoupQMQ0IJVSthoYkgGWliWQX2fXh37V3HxsMUSzdxtvUUjBaVqylQPlR1csVCmO1i16qwQQlpqwpgUDdlkk1-UOVTodDisSiNon_ZSAHg_IuBI9arL0ZpN8JSsR-N2IfvtiHLw67SZbbg2UrVyniDnu_2SVwHPs_KzDKgH0Ct_-Siw</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian</creator><creator>Fatemeh, Shirani</creator><creator>Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creator><general>De Gruyter Open</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger</title><author>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian ; Fatemeh, Shirani ; Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-729402a8263c4bbe34797e2860052dcb0a1d5ecdec3f2e25269f280252e56f0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Corticosteroid injection</topic><topic>Corticosteroids</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>Tenosynovitis</topic><topic>Tenotomy</topic><topic>trigger finger</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatemeh, Shirani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of translational internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amiri Aref, Hosseinian</au><au>Fatemeh, Shirani</au><au>Mohammad Hosein, Kariminasab</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger</atitle><jtitle>Journal of translational internal medicine</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>132-135</pages><issn>2224-4018</issn><issn>2450-131X</issn><eissn>2224-4018</eissn><abstract>Background: Trigger finger is a common problem encountered in rheumatologic practice that causes a triggering or locking that may produce an uncomfortable sensation. There are various methods of treatment, ranging from conservative management to surgical release. Aim: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and percutaneous release in terms of symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction and complications. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented with trigger finger Grades 2 and 3 were randomized into two groups. One group received corticosteroid injection and, in the other group, percutaneous release was performed. These patients were then assessed weekly over a period of 6 weeks and their progress was noted. Results: Thirty cases (60%) were female and 20 cases (40%) were male. The age of the patients in this study was 40-65 years (mean: 48 years). Twenty-three cases (46%) were manual workers, 17 cases (34%) were semi-professionals and 10 cases (20%) were housewives. Most of the patients had involvement of the dominant hand (62%) and non-dominant hand involved in 38% of the cases. The most common presenting symptom was pain with triggering. In both groups, significant improvement in pain and triggering occurs in the first 2 weeks, but there was better improvement of pain and triggering in the corticosteroid group after 2 weeks. In terms of swelling of the digits, no difference was noted during the course of the treatment in the two groups. The corticosteroid group of patients had a complication rate of 6% and in the second group, the percutaneous group, had an 18% complication rate. There were a total of 12 patients who had recurrence (recurrence rate 24%): five (41.6%) cases in the first or corticosteroid group and seven (58.3%) cases in the surgery group. Conclusion: The group of patients treated with corticosteroid had a better relief of pain and triggering and had a lower complication rate. The recurrence was equal in both groups.</abstract><cop>Shenyang</cop><pub>De Gruyter Open</pub><doi>10.4103/2224-4018.141840</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2224-4018 |
ispartof | Journal of translational internal medicine, 2014-09, Vol.2 (3), p.132-135 |
issn | 2224-4018 2450-131X 2224-4018 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3156391214 |
source | De Gruyter Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Care and treatment Comparative analysis Corticosteroid injection Corticosteroids Dosage and administration Patient outcomes Patient satisfaction Steroids surgery Tenosynovitis Tenotomy trigger finger |
title | Comparison between corticosteroid injection and surgery in the treatment of trigger finger |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A44%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20corticosteroid%20injection%20and%20surgery%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20trigger%20finger&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20translational%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=Amiri%20Aref,%20Hosseinian&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=132-135&rft.issn=2224-4018&rft.eissn=2224-4018&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2224-4018.141840&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA385202795%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3156391214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A385202795&rfr_iscdi=true |