Variability and correlations among vital rates and their influence on population growth in mule and black‐tailed deer
To reverse range‐wide population declines, managers of black‐tailed and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) require information on the vital rates and life stages most influential to population growth to target effective management actions. We extracted black‐tailed and mule deer vital rates from a rang...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2025-02, Vol.89 (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Ruprecht, Joel Forrester, Tavis D. Clark, Darren A. Wisdom, Michael J. Smith, Joshua B. Levi, Taal |
description | To reverse range‐wide population declines, managers of black‐tailed and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) require information on the vital rates and life stages most influential to population growth to target effective management actions. We extracted black‐tailed and mule deer vital rates from a range‐wide literature review and used hierarchical models to summarize vital rates, their variability, and how they correlate with one another. We then used matrix models and life‐stage simulation analysis to determine the individual vital rates that contributed most to annual population growth rate (i.e., lambda). Annual adult female survival explained the greatest amount of variation (62%) in lambda. Annual juvenile survival explained 44% of the variation in lambda, whereas summer or winter juvenile survival by themselves were far less informative. Winter fawn:doe ratios, a metric often collected by management agencies, explained only 10% of the variation in lambda. Given an adult female survival of 0.84, our simulations estimated a lambda of 1.0 (95% credible interval = 0.88–1.14), indicating equal probability that a population would increase or decrease. Simulations further indicated that given adult survival rates |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.22690 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3156005184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3156005184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2260-44cd5bcd4211c80d44a221b7d9bf539b81289bd49d1641c4657c487cfd8df1853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4QSW2CGl-DlO4iwRggIqYsPfLnJsp3VJ4uA4RN1xBM7ISUgb1qzeYr6ZpxmEToHMgBB6se6r5YzSOCV7aAJpmASUQ7KPJoNIg4jB2yE6ats1ISEAjyeofxHOiNyUxm-wqBWW1jldCm9s3WJR2XqJP40XJXbC63aH-JU2Dpu6KDtdS41tjRvbdKMJL53t_WqQcdWVemfISyHff76-vTClVlhp7Y7RQSHKVp_83Sl6vrl-uroNFo_zu6vLRSCHFiRgTKool4pRAMmJYkxQCnmi0ryIwjTnQHmaK5YqiBlIFkeJZDyRheKqAB6FU3Q25jbOfnS69dnadq4eXmYhRDEhEXA2UOcjJZ1tW6eLrHGmEm6TAcm2w2bbYbPdsAMMI9wPbTb_kNn968N89PwCvDF9vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3156005184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability and correlations among vital rates and their influence on population growth in mule and black‐tailed deer</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ruprecht, Joel ; Forrester, Tavis D. ; Clark, Darren A. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Smith, Joshua B. ; Levi, Taal</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruprecht, Joel ; Forrester, Tavis D. ; Clark, Darren A. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Smith, Joshua B. ; Levi, Taal</creatorcontrib><description>To reverse range‐wide population declines, managers of black‐tailed and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) require information on the vital rates and life stages most influential to population growth to target effective management actions. We extracted black‐tailed and mule deer vital rates from a range‐wide literature review and used hierarchical models to summarize vital rates, their variability, and how they correlate with one another. We then used matrix models and life‐stage simulation analysis to determine the individual vital rates that contributed most to annual population growth rate (i.e., lambda). Annual adult female survival explained the greatest amount of variation (62%) in lambda. Annual juvenile survival explained 44% of the variation in lambda, whereas summer or winter juvenile survival by themselves were far less informative. Winter fawn:doe ratios, a metric often collected by management agencies, explained only 10% of the variation in lambda. Given an adult female survival of 0.84, our simulations estimated a lambda of 1.0 (95% credible interval = 0.88–1.14), indicating equal probability that a population would increase or decrease. Simulations further indicated that given adult survival rates <70%, the population would always decline, but as survival increased lambda increased linearly. In contrast, estimates of lambda plateaued when annual juvenile survival reached approximately 0.5, indicating higher survival rates yielded diminishing returns to population stability. Using simulated values within the observed range of vital rate values across the species' geographical distribution, the mean lambda was 0.975 and in 61% of the simulations, lambda was <1. After 20 years, we estimated that this distribution of lambda values would cause populations to decrease in 92% of instances with a mean decrease of 44%. Our results align with observed declines in mule deer populations throughout their range over recent decades and indicate that these trends will continue until management can improve survival of adult females.
We used hierarchical models to conduct a meta‐analysis on mule and black tailed deer vital rates. We then conducted life‐stage simulation analysis. Our results demonstrate that adult female survival overwhelmingly explains more variation in population growth than any other vital rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Deer ; Females ; Geographical distribution ; Juveniles ; large herbivore ; life‐stage simulation analysis ; Literature reviews ; matrix model ; Odocoileus ; Odocoileus hemionus ; Population decline ; Population growth ; Population stability ; Predation ; Simulation ; Simulation analysis ; Survival ; ungulate ; Variability ; Variation ; Winter</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2025-02, Vol.89 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2260-44cd5bcd4211c80d44a221b7d9bf539b81289bd49d1641c4657c487cfd8df1853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9443-7582</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjwmg.22690$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjwmg.22690$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruprecht, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Tavis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisdom, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Taal</creatorcontrib><title>Variability and correlations among vital rates and their influence on population growth in mule and black‐tailed deer</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>To reverse range‐wide population declines, managers of black‐tailed and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) require information on the vital rates and life stages most influential to population growth to target effective management actions. We extracted black‐tailed and mule deer vital rates from a range‐wide literature review and used hierarchical models to summarize vital rates, their variability, and how they correlate with one another. We then used matrix models and life‐stage simulation analysis to determine the individual vital rates that contributed most to annual population growth rate (i.e., lambda). Annual adult female survival explained the greatest amount of variation (62%) in lambda. Annual juvenile survival explained 44% of the variation in lambda, whereas summer or winter juvenile survival by themselves were far less informative. Winter fawn:doe ratios, a metric often collected by management agencies, explained only 10% of the variation in lambda. Given an adult female survival of 0.84, our simulations estimated a lambda of 1.0 (95% credible interval = 0.88–1.14), indicating equal probability that a population would increase or decrease. Simulations further indicated that given adult survival rates <70%, the population would always decline, but as survival increased lambda increased linearly. In contrast, estimates of lambda plateaued when annual juvenile survival reached approximately 0.5, indicating higher survival rates yielded diminishing returns to population stability. Using simulated values within the observed range of vital rate values across the species' geographical distribution, the mean lambda was 0.975 and in 61% of the simulations, lambda was <1. After 20 years, we estimated that this distribution of lambda values would cause populations to decrease in 92% of instances with a mean decrease of 44%. Our results align with observed declines in mule deer populations throughout their range over recent decades and indicate that these trends will continue until management can improve survival of adult females.
We used hierarchical models to conduct a meta‐analysis on mule and black tailed deer vital rates. We then conducted life‐stage simulation analysis. Our results demonstrate that adult female survival overwhelmingly explains more variation in population growth than any other vital rate.</description><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>large herbivore</subject><subject>life‐stage simulation analysis</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>matrix model</subject><subject>Odocoileus</subject><subject>Odocoileus hemionus</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Population stability</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulation analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>ungulate</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4QSW2CGl-DlO4iwRggIqYsPfLnJsp3VJ4uA4RN1xBM7ISUgb1qzeYr6ZpxmEToHMgBB6se6r5YzSOCV7aAJpmASUQ7KPJoNIg4jB2yE6ats1ISEAjyeofxHOiNyUxm-wqBWW1jldCm9s3WJR2XqJP40XJXbC63aH-JU2Dpu6KDtdS41tjRvbdKMJL53t_WqQcdWVemfISyHff76-vTClVlhp7Y7RQSHKVp_83Sl6vrl-uroNFo_zu6vLRSCHFiRgTKool4pRAMmJYkxQCnmi0ryIwjTnQHmaK5YqiBlIFkeJZDyRheKqAB6FU3Q25jbOfnS69dnadq4eXmYhRDEhEXA2UOcjJZ1tW6eLrHGmEm6TAcm2w2bbYbPdsAMMI9wPbTb_kNn968N89PwCvDF9vg</recordid><startdate>202502</startdate><enddate>202502</enddate><creator>Ruprecht, Joel</creator><creator>Forrester, Tavis D.</creator><creator>Clark, Darren A.</creator><creator>Wisdom, Michael J.</creator><creator>Smith, Joshua B.</creator><creator>Levi, Taal</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-7582</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202502</creationdate><title>Variability and correlations among vital rates and their influence on population growth in mule and black‐tailed deer</title><author>Ruprecht, Joel ; Forrester, Tavis D. ; Clark, Darren A. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Smith, Joshua B. ; Levi, Taal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2260-44cd5bcd4211c80d44a221b7d9bf539b81289bd49d1641c4657c487cfd8df1853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>large herbivore</topic><topic>life‐stage simulation analysis</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>matrix model</topic><topic>Odocoileus</topic><topic>Odocoileus hemionus</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Population stability</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulation analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>ungulate</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruprecht, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Tavis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisdom, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Taal</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruprecht, Joel</au><au>Forrester, Tavis D.</au><au>Clark, Darren A.</au><au>Wisdom, Michael J.</au><au>Smith, Joshua B.</au><au>Levi, Taal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability and correlations among vital rates and their influence on population growth in mule and black‐tailed deer</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2025-02</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>To reverse range‐wide population declines, managers of black‐tailed and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) require information on the vital rates and life stages most influential to population growth to target effective management actions. We extracted black‐tailed and mule deer vital rates from a range‐wide literature review and used hierarchical models to summarize vital rates, their variability, and how they correlate with one another. We then used matrix models and life‐stage simulation analysis to determine the individual vital rates that contributed most to annual population growth rate (i.e., lambda). Annual adult female survival explained the greatest amount of variation (62%) in lambda. Annual juvenile survival explained 44% of the variation in lambda, whereas summer or winter juvenile survival by themselves were far less informative. Winter fawn:doe ratios, a metric often collected by management agencies, explained only 10% of the variation in lambda. Given an adult female survival of 0.84, our simulations estimated a lambda of 1.0 (95% credible interval = 0.88–1.14), indicating equal probability that a population would increase or decrease. Simulations further indicated that given adult survival rates <70%, the population would always decline, but as survival increased lambda increased linearly. In contrast, estimates of lambda plateaued when annual juvenile survival reached approximately 0.5, indicating higher survival rates yielded diminishing returns to population stability. Using simulated values within the observed range of vital rate values across the species' geographical distribution, the mean lambda was 0.975 and in 61% of the simulations, lambda was <1. After 20 years, we estimated that this distribution of lambda values would cause populations to decrease in 92% of instances with a mean decrease of 44%. Our results align with observed declines in mule deer populations throughout their range over recent decades and indicate that these trends will continue until management can improve survival of adult females.
We used hierarchical models to conduct a meta‐analysis on mule and black tailed deer vital rates. We then conducted life‐stage simulation analysis. Our results demonstrate that adult female survival overwhelmingly explains more variation in population growth than any other vital rate.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.22690</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-7582</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2025-02, Vol.89 (2), p.n/a |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3156005184 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Deer Females Geographical distribution Juveniles large herbivore life‐stage simulation analysis Literature reviews matrix model Odocoileus Odocoileus hemionus Population decline Population growth Population stability Predation Simulation Simulation analysis Survival ungulate Variability Variation Winter |
title | Variability and correlations among vital rates and their influence on population growth in mule and black‐tailed deer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A26%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20and%20correlations%20among%20vital%20rates%20and%20their%20influence%20on%20population%20growth%20in%20mule%20and%20black%E2%80%90tailed%20deer&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Ruprecht,%20Joel&rft.date=2025-02&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.22690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3156005184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3156005184&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |