A Comparative Analysis of Text Difficulty in Slovak and Canadian Science Textbooks

One of the main purposes of textbooks is the mediation of educational content to students. The factual accuracy of information, as well as the clarity of the text for students plays a crucial role in this aspect. The inadequate text difficulty can complicate students' learning. Comparing differ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemistry didactics ecology metrology 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.89-97
Hauptverfasser: Beníčková, Zuzana, Vojíř, Karel, Held, Ľubomír
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title Chemistry didactics ecology metrology
container_volume 26
creator Beníčková, Zuzana
Vojíř, Karel
Held, Ľubomír
description One of the main purposes of textbooks is the mediation of educational content to students. The factual accuracy of information, as well as the clarity of the text for students plays a crucial role in this aspect. The inadequate text difficulty can complicate students' learning. Comparing different approaches to the text in textbooks, considering the objectives of education, represents key knowledge for teaching materials innovation. This research was therefore focused on the comparison of the Slovak and Canadian science textbooks for lower secondary education. The methodology for assessing text difficulty according to Nestler, Prucha and Pluskal was used for this purpose. The samples of text from the textbooks for 6th and 8th grade of lower-secondary school were assessed. It was found that the text in Slovak textbooks is significantly more difficult. While from the syntactic difficulty point of view differences were rather partial, the significant differences were found in the semantic difficulty of the text. The Slovak textbooks are burdened with an excessive number of professional terms. Considering the results in measuring scientific literacy, this approach to the text in the Slovak textbooks is not effective. The results obtained are therefore an incentive to revise used educational materials.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/cdem-2021-0007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3155662632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3155662632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f6b8fce80151423010b681959deb6d3dc207cefbdc58b3f2f71b6a180cb71773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLw0AUhQdRsGi3rgdcp84jmZkuXJT4hIKgdT3MU6ZNkzqTVPPvTaygCzf3Hi7nHLgfABcYzUjOxZWxbpsRRHCGEOJHYEKQyLO8QOz4jz4F05TWgwPzYeR0Ap4XsGy2OxVVG_YOLmpV9Skk2Hi4cp8tvAneB9NVbQ9DDV-qZq82UNUWlqpWNqjhZoKrjfu266bZpHNw4lWV3PRnn4HXu9tV-ZAtn-4fy8UyM5ThNis808IbJxAucE4owkgzgefF3DrNLLWGIG6c19YUQlNPPMeaKSyQ0RxzTs_A5aF3F5v3zqVWrpsuDg8kSXFRMEYYJYNrdnCZ2KQUnZe7GLYq9hIjOaKTIzo5opMjuiFwfQh8qKp10bq32PWD-G3_P0gYlkTM6RfQTXUZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3155662632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Analysis of Text Difficulty in Slovak and Canadian Science Textbooks</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Beníčková, Zuzana ; Vojíř, Karel ; Held, Ľubomír</creator><creatorcontrib>Beníčková, Zuzana ; Vojíř, Karel ; Held, Ľubomír</creatorcontrib><description>One of the main purposes of textbooks is the mediation of educational content to students. The factual accuracy of information, as well as the clarity of the text for students plays a crucial role in this aspect. The inadequate text difficulty can complicate students' learning. Comparing different approaches to the text in textbooks, considering the objectives of education, represents key knowledge for teaching materials innovation. This research was therefore focused on the comparison of the Slovak and Canadian science textbooks for lower secondary education. The methodology for assessing text difficulty according to Nestler, Prucha and Pluskal was used for this purpose. The samples of text from the textbooks for 6th and 8th grade of lower-secondary school were assessed. It was found that the text in Slovak textbooks is significantly more difficult. While from the syntactic difficulty point of view differences were rather partial, the significant differences were found in the semantic difficulty of the text. The Slovak textbooks are burdened with an excessive number of professional terms. Considering the results in measuring scientific literacy, this approach to the text in the Slovak textbooks is not effective. The results obtained are therefore an incentive to revise used educational materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2084-4506</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1640-9019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2084-4506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2021-0007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Opole: Sciendo</publisher><subject>lower secondary schools ; science education ; science textbooks ; text difficulty ; Textbooks</subject><ispartof>Chemistry didactics ecology metrology, 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.89-97</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f6b8fce80151423010b681959deb6d3dc207cefbdc58b3f2f71b6a180cb71773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f6b8fce80151423010b681959deb6d3dc207cefbdc58b3f2f71b6a180cb71773</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7619-9891</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/cdem-2021-0007$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/cdem-2021-0007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75906,75907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beníčková, Zuzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vojíř, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Held, Ľubomír</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Analysis of Text Difficulty in Slovak and Canadian Science Textbooks</title><title>Chemistry didactics ecology metrology</title><description>One of the main purposes of textbooks is the mediation of educational content to students. The factual accuracy of information, as well as the clarity of the text for students plays a crucial role in this aspect. The inadequate text difficulty can complicate students' learning. Comparing different approaches to the text in textbooks, considering the objectives of education, represents key knowledge for teaching materials innovation. This research was therefore focused on the comparison of the Slovak and Canadian science textbooks for lower secondary education. The methodology for assessing text difficulty according to Nestler, Prucha and Pluskal was used for this purpose. The samples of text from the textbooks for 6th and 8th grade of lower-secondary school were assessed. It was found that the text in Slovak textbooks is significantly more difficult. While from the syntactic difficulty point of view differences were rather partial, the significant differences were found in the semantic difficulty of the text. The Slovak textbooks are burdened with an excessive number of professional terms. Considering the results in measuring scientific literacy, this approach to the text in the Slovak textbooks is not effective. The results obtained are therefore an incentive to revise used educational materials.</description><subject>lower secondary schools</subject><subject>science education</subject><subject>science textbooks</subject><subject>text difficulty</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><issn>2084-4506</issn><issn>1640-9019</issn><issn>2084-4506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtLw0AUhQdRsGi3rgdcp84jmZkuXJT4hIKgdT3MU6ZNkzqTVPPvTaygCzf3Hi7nHLgfABcYzUjOxZWxbpsRRHCGEOJHYEKQyLO8QOz4jz4F05TWgwPzYeR0Ap4XsGy2OxVVG_YOLmpV9Skk2Hi4cp8tvAneB9NVbQ9DDV-qZq82UNUWlqpWNqjhZoKrjfu266bZpHNw4lWV3PRnn4HXu9tV-ZAtn-4fy8UyM5ThNis808IbJxAucE4owkgzgefF3DrNLLWGIG6c19YUQlNPPMeaKSyQ0RxzTs_A5aF3F5v3zqVWrpsuDg8kSXFRMEYYJYNrdnCZ2KQUnZe7GLYq9hIjOaKTIzo5opMjuiFwfQh8qKp10bq32PWD-G3_P0gYlkTM6RfQTXUZ</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Beníčková, Zuzana</creator><creator>Vojíř, Karel</creator><creator>Held, Ľubomír</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7619-9891</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>A Comparative Analysis of Text Difficulty in Slovak and Canadian Science Textbooks</title><author>Beníčková, Zuzana ; Vojíř, Karel ; Held, Ľubomír</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f6b8fce80151423010b681959deb6d3dc207cefbdc58b3f2f71b6a180cb71773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>lower secondary schools</topic><topic>science education</topic><topic>science textbooks</topic><topic>text difficulty</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beníčková, Zuzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vojíř, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Held, Ľubomír</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Chemistry didactics ecology metrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beníčková, Zuzana</au><au>Vojíř, Karel</au><au>Held, Ľubomír</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Analysis of Text Difficulty in Slovak and Canadian Science Textbooks</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry didactics ecology metrology</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>89-97</pages><issn>2084-4506</issn><issn>1640-9019</issn><eissn>2084-4506</eissn><abstract>One of the main purposes of textbooks is the mediation of educational content to students. The factual accuracy of information, as well as the clarity of the text for students plays a crucial role in this aspect. The inadequate text difficulty can complicate students' learning. Comparing different approaches to the text in textbooks, considering the objectives of education, represents key knowledge for teaching materials innovation. This research was therefore focused on the comparison of the Slovak and Canadian science textbooks for lower secondary education. The methodology for assessing text difficulty according to Nestler, Prucha and Pluskal was used for this purpose. The samples of text from the textbooks for 6th and 8th grade of lower-secondary school were assessed. It was found that the text in Slovak textbooks is significantly more difficult. While from the syntactic difficulty point of view differences were rather partial, the significant differences were found in the semantic difficulty of the text. The Slovak textbooks are burdened with an excessive number of professional terms. Considering the results in measuring scientific literacy, this approach to the text in the Slovak textbooks is not effective. The results obtained are therefore an incentive to revise used educational materials.</abstract><cop>Opole</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/cdem-2021-0007</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7619-9891</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2084-4506
ispartof Chemistry didactics ecology metrology, 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.89-97
issn 2084-4506
1640-9019
2084-4506
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3155662632
source De Gruyter Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects lower secondary schools
science education
science textbooks
text difficulty
Textbooks
title A Comparative Analysis of Text Difficulty in Slovak and Canadian Science Textbooks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A54%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Text%20Difficulty%20in%20Slovak%20and%20Canadian%20Science%20Textbooks&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20didactics%20ecology%20metrology&rft.au=Ben%C3%AD%C4%8Dkov%C3%A1,%20Zuzana&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=89-97&rft.issn=2084-4506&rft.eissn=2084-4506&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/cdem-2021-0007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3155662632%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3155662632&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true