Best Practices of CSR Reporting in Romania

Best Practices of CSR Reporting in Romania

The aim of the study is to examine the content and quality of online CSR reports of the eight large companies with the highest CSR index scores in Romania in 2020. The CSR reports of the eight large companies examined were analysed on the basis of two types of web content: on the one hand, on the ba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Communicatio 2021-12, Vol.8 (1), p.104-120
1. Verfasser: Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
best practices
CSR reporting
EU non-financial reporting
Romania
sustainability reporting
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104
container_title Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Communicatio
container_volume 8
creator Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika
description The aim of the study is to examine the content and quality of online CSR reports of the eight large companies with the highest CSR index scores in Romania in 2020. The CSR reports of the eight large companies examined were analysed on the basis of two types of web content: on the one hand, on the basis of CSR content published on the company website and on the other hand on the basis of data published in sustainability or CSR reports uploaded to the website. The research method was thematic content analysis. The analysis criteria of the mentioned content were developed on the basis of the reporting principles of the GRI framework and the ISO 26000 standard. The findings showed that the principles of content and quality of non-financial reporting prevailed in the sustainability reports, while the data published on the websites was more for wider information.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/auscom-2021-0008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3155643449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3155643449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1654-7ab4a70a16f855e3c5050840a836d2e35814a1123c1805afbcb5b5b40ef5b513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsNTePQa8CdGZ_Ui2Bw9a_IKCEntfpttNSWmzdTdB-t-7JYJeZA5vDu-9GX6MXSLccFnqW-qj9bucA8ccAPQJG3ElypyXU3H6Zz9nkxg3ycFRAlc4YtcPLnbZeyDbNdbFzNfZ7KPKKrf3oWvadda0WeV31DZ0wc5q2kY3-dExWzw9LmYv-fzt-XV2P88tFkrmJS0llUBY1FopJ6wCBVoCaVGsuBNKoyRELixqUFQv7VKlkeDqpCjG7Gqo3Qf_2afvzMb3oU0XjUClCimknCYXDC4bfIzB1WYfmh2Fg0EwRyZmYGKOTMyRSYrcDZEv2nYurNw69Ie0_Pb_F9WIIMU3iqZnKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3155643449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best Practices of CSR Reporting in Romania</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</source><source>Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika</creator><creatorcontrib>Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study is to examine the content and quality of online CSR reports of the eight large companies with the highest CSR index scores in Romania in 2020. The CSR reports of the eight large companies examined were analysed on the basis of two types of web content: on the one hand, on the basis of CSR content published on the company website and on the other hand on the basis of data published in sustainability or CSR reports uploaded to the website. The research method was thematic content analysis. The analysis criteria of the mentioned content were developed on the basis of the reporting principles of the GRI framework and the ISO 26000 standard. The findings showed that the principles of content and quality of non-financial reporting prevailed in the sustainability reports, while the data published on the websites was more for wider information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2537-2793</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2393-0438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2537-2793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/auscom-2021-0008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cluj-Napoca: Sciendo</publisher><subject>best practices ; CSR reporting ; EU non-financial reporting ; Romania ; sustainability reporting</subject><ispartof>Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Communicatio, 2021-12, Vol.8 (1), p.104-120</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1654-7ab4a70a16f855e3c5050840a836d2e35814a1123c1805afbcb5b5b40ef5b513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/auscom-2021-0008$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/auscom-2021-0008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75906,75907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika</creatorcontrib><title>Best Practices of CSR Reporting in Romania</title><title>Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Communicatio</title><description>The aim of the study is to examine the content and quality of online CSR reports of the eight large companies with the highest CSR index scores in Romania in 2020. The CSR reports of the eight large companies examined were analysed on the basis of two types of web content: on the one hand, on the basis of CSR content published on the company website and on the other hand on the basis of data published in sustainability or CSR reports uploaded to the website. The research method was thematic content analysis. The analysis criteria of the mentioned content were developed on the basis of the reporting principles of the GRI framework and the ISO 26000 standard. The findings showed that the principles of content and quality of non-financial reporting prevailed in the sustainability reports, while the data published on the websites was more for wider information.</description><subject>best practices</subject><subject>CSR reporting</subject><subject>EU non-financial reporting</subject><subject>Romania</subject><subject>sustainability reporting</subject><issn>2537-2793</issn><issn>2393-0438</issn><issn>2537-2793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsNTePQa8CdGZ_Ui2Bw9a_IKCEntfpttNSWmzdTdB-t-7JYJeZA5vDu-9GX6MXSLccFnqW-qj9bucA8ccAPQJG3ElypyXU3H6Zz9nkxg3ycFRAlc4YtcPLnbZeyDbNdbFzNfZ7KPKKrf3oWvadda0WeV31DZ0wc5q2kY3-dExWzw9LmYv-fzt-XV2P88tFkrmJS0llUBY1FopJ6wCBVoCaVGsuBNKoyRELixqUFQv7VKlkeDqpCjG7Gqo3Qf_2afvzMb3oU0XjUClCimknCYXDC4bfIzB1WYfmh2Fg0EwRyZmYGKOTMyRSYrcDZEv2nYurNw69Ie0_Pb_F9WIIMU3iqZnKg</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Best Practices of CSR Reporting in Romania</title><author>Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1654-7ab4a70a16f855e3c5050840a836d2e35814a1123c1805afbcb5b5b40ef5b513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>best practices</topic><topic>CSR reporting</topic><topic>EU non-financial reporting</topic><topic>Romania</topic><topic>sustainability reporting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Communicatio</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tőkés, Gyöngyvér Erika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best Practices of CSR Reporting in Romania</atitle><jtitle>Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Communicatio</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>104-120</pages><issn>2537-2793</issn><issn>2393-0438</issn><eissn>2537-2793</eissn><abstract>The aim of the study is to examine the content and quality of online CSR reports of the eight large companies with the highest CSR index scores in Romania in 2020. The CSR reports of the eight large companies examined were analysed on the basis of two types of web content: on the one hand, on the basis of CSR content published on the company website and on the other hand on the basis of data published in sustainability or CSR reports uploaded to the website. The research method was thematic content analysis. The analysis criteria of the mentioned content were developed on the basis of the reporting principles of the GRI framework and the ISO 26000 standard. The findings showed that the principles of content and quality of non-financial reporting prevailed in the sustainability reports, while the data published on the websites was more for wider information.</abstract><cop>Cluj-Napoca</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/auscom-2021-0008</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2537-2793
ispartof Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Communicatio, 2021-12, Vol.8 (1), p.104-120
issn 2537-2793
2393-0438
2537-2793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3155643449
source Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals; Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects best practices
CSR reporting
EU non-financial reporting
Romania
sustainability reporting
title Best Practices of CSR Reporting in Romania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T00%3A28%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20Practices%20of%20CSR%20Reporting%20in%20Romania&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Universitatis%20Sapientiae.%20Communicatio&rft.au=T%C5%91k%C3%A9s,%20Gy%C3%B6ngyv%C3%A9r%20Erika&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=104-120&rft.issn=2537-2793&rft.eissn=2537-2793&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/auscom-2021-0008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3155643449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3155643449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true