Mission to Mars: Radiation safety or radiation disaster?: Space transit and Mars radiation exposure risks - the potential shielding effect of an intravehicular graphene space suit and a storm shelter during space travel
Aim: The purpose of this research was to employ radiobiological as well as physics principles to investigate materials for an intravehicular spacesuit and a "storm shelter" that might minimize radiation exposure to astronauts during a mission to Mars. Methods: NASA's OLTARIS space rad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of the Australasian Society of Aerospace Medicine (Online) 2020-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1-9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The journal of the Australasian Society of Aerospace Medicine (Online) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Squire, Tim Buchanan, Grant Elsaleh, Hany |
description | Aim: The purpose of this research was to employ radiobiological as well as physics principles to investigate materials for an intravehicular spacesuit and a "storm shelter" that might minimize radiation exposure to astronauts during a mission to Mars.
Methods: NASA's OLTARIS space radiation modelling tool was used to investigate thirty-two potential shielding materials. Radiation exposure was estimated during a return transit to Mars of 360 days duration. We assessed each shielding material by its ability to decrease effective radiation dose received by a computerized phantom during the constant galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) and a single solar particle event (SPE). For the "storm shelter" a large liquid fuel tank was modelled adjacent to the phantom during a SPE.
Results: At standard conditions, graphene appeared to be a promising shielding material when comparing other materials including polyethylene and lithium. The shielding efficacy became comparable to polyethylene but inferior to lithium when materials were normalised to 10g/cm2, 20g/cm2 and 30g/cm2. The graphene around the phantom reduced effective dose from GCR compared with an unshielded transit by 34% (162mSv/yr vs 213.3mSv/yr). A "storm shelter" using a liquid fuel tank was positioned to create a barrier adjacent to the astronauts. The liquid barrier reduced effective dose by 98.8% (44mSv vs 3614mSv). Other mitigation strategies were deduced and divided into launch, transit and habitation considerations.
Conclusion: A graphene based intravehicular suit could decrease astronaut exposure to harmful radiation during transit to Mars. A storm shelter using fuel as a barrier also decreased radiation dose during a solar particle event. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21307/asam-2019-001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3155496385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.193391627315310</informt_id><sourcerecordid>3155496385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2111-a5ce4466257dd8a344e0063a6ba896df63f6def4735a094404de138325a49cc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1v1DAQhiMEEqvSK2dLnFPs2HHWKySEKgqVWiHxcbaGeLLrJRsHj1PY38qfqZMtHwd8sTV632fG8xbFc8EvKiF58xIIDmXFhSk5F4-KlVDKlLLR6nGxqrQ0pVZCPy3Oifac86oWFTdqVfy69UQ-DCwFdguRNuwjOA9pLhF0mI4sRBb_1JwnoITx9YZ9GqFFliIM5BODwS2Af7T4cww0RWTR0zdiJUs7ZGNIOCQPPaOdx975Ycuw67BNLHSZwvyQkXe48-3UQ2TbCOMOB2S0tKPpoRcwSiEeMgX7PA9zU5xR9HuoO-yfFU866AnPH-6z4svV28-X78ubD--uL9_clG0lhCihblEprau6cW4NUinkXEvQX2FttOu07LTDTjWyhrwzxZVDIdeyqkGZtjXyrHhx4o4xfJ-Qkt2HKQ65pZWirpXRcl1n1cVJ1cZAFLGzY_QHiEcruF0ytHOGds7Q5gyzYXMy_ID5hw63cTrmx1_6_43zyeZXJ3M8-GTb0Pd5wzkU2kNajFIKbf3QhUUgjJRG6KrJA0vB5T3fmbr1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3155496385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mission to Mars: Radiation safety or radiation disaster?: Space transit and Mars radiation exposure risks - the potential shielding effect of an intravehicular graphene space suit and a storm shelter during space travel</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>Sciendo</source><creator>Squire, Tim ; Buchanan, Grant ; Elsaleh, Hany</creator><creatorcontrib>Squire, Tim ; Buchanan, Grant ; Elsaleh, Hany</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: The purpose of this research was to employ radiobiological as well as physics principles to investigate materials for an intravehicular spacesuit and a "storm shelter" that might minimize radiation exposure to astronauts during a mission to Mars.
Methods: NASA's OLTARIS space radiation modelling tool was used to investigate thirty-two potential shielding materials. Radiation exposure was estimated during a return transit to Mars of 360 days duration. We assessed each shielding material by its ability to decrease effective radiation dose received by a computerized phantom during the constant galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) and a single solar particle event (SPE). For the "storm shelter" a large liquid fuel tank was modelled adjacent to the phantom during a SPE.
Results: At standard conditions, graphene appeared to be a promising shielding material when comparing other materials including polyethylene and lithium. The shielding efficacy became comparable to polyethylene but inferior to lithium when materials were normalised to 10g/cm2, 20g/cm2 and 30g/cm2. The graphene around the phantom reduced effective dose from GCR compared with an unshielded transit by 34% (162mSv/yr vs 213.3mSv/yr). A "storm shelter" using a liquid fuel tank was positioned to create a barrier adjacent to the astronauts. The liquid barrier reduced effective dose by 98.8% (44mSv vs 3614mSv). Other mitigation strategies were deduced and divided into launch, transit and habitation considerations.
Conclusion: A graphene based intravehicular suit could decrease astronaut exposure to harmful radiation during transit to Mars. A storm shelter using fuel as a barrier also decreased radiation dose during a solar particle event.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2639-6416</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1449-3764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1449-3764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2639-6416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21307/asam-2019-001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warsaw, Poland: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Astronauts ; Carbon ; Circadian rhythm ; DNA methylation ; Fuel cells ; Graphene ; Mars probes ; Mutation ; Neutrons ; Oxidative stress ; Polyethylene ; Polymers ; Radiation therapy ; Solar energetic particles ; Space radiobiology ; Space suits ; Sun ; Testing ; United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration</subject><ispartof>The journal of the Australasian Society of Aerospace Medicine (Online), 2020-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2111-a5ce4466257dd8a344e0063a6ba896df63f6def4735a094404de138325a49cc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.21307/asam-2019-001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.21307/asam-2019-001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,76133,76134</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Squire, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsaleh, Hany</creatorcontrib><title>Mission to Mars: Radiation safety or radiation disaster?: Space transit and Mars radiation exposure risks - the potential shielding effect of an intravehicular graphene space suit and a storm shelter during space travel</title><title>The journal of the Australasian Society of Aerospace Medicine (Online)</title><description>Aim: The purpose of this research was to employ radiobiological as well as physics principles to investigate materials for an intravehicular spacesuit and a "storm shelter" that might minimize radiation exposure to astronauts during a mission to Mars.
Methods: NASA's OLTARIS space radiation modelling tool was used to investigate thirty-two potential shielding materials. Radiation exposure was estimated during a return transit to Mars of 360 days duration. We assessed each shielding material by its ability to decrease effective radiation dose received by a computerized phantom during the constant galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) and a single solar particle event (SPE). For the "storm shelter" a large liquid fuel tank was modelled adjacent to the phantom during a SPE.
Results: At standard conditions, graphene appeared to be a promising shielding material when comparing other materials including polyethylene and lithium. The shielding efficacy became comparable to polyethylene but inferior to lithium when materials were normalised to 10g/cm2, 20g/cm2 and 30g/cm2. The graphene around the phantom reduced effective dose from GCR compared with an unshielded transit by 34% (162mSv/yr vs 213.3mSv/yr). A "storm shelter" using a liquid fuel tank was positioned to create a barrier adjacent to the astronauts. The liquid barrier reduced effective dose by 98.8% (44mSv vs 3614mSv). Other mitigation strategies were deduced and divided into launch, transit and habitation considerations.
Conclusion: A graphene based intravehicular suit could decrease astronaut exposure to harmful radiation during transit to Mars. A storm shelter using fuel as a barrier also decreased radiation dose during a solar particle event.</description><subject>Astronauts</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Circadian rhythm</subject><subject>DNA methylation</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Mars probes</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neutrons</subject><subject>Oxidative stress</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Solar energetic particles</subject><subject>Space radiobiology</subject><subject>Space suits</subject><subject>Sun</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration</subject><issn>2639-6416</issn><issn>1449-3764</issn><issn>1449-3764</issn><issn>2639-6416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1v1DAQhiMEEqvSK2dLnFPs2HHWKySEKgqVWiHxcbaGeLLrJRsHj1PY38qfqZMtHwd8sTV632fG8xbFc8EvKiF58xIIDmXFhSk5F4-KlVDKlLLR6nGxqrQ0pVZCPy3Oifac86oWFTdqVfy69UQ-DCwFdguRNuwjOA9pLhF0mI4sRBb_1JwnoITx9YZ9GqFFliIM5BODwS2Af7T4cww0RWTR0zdiJUs7ZGNIOCQPPaOdx975Ycuw67BNLHSZwvyQkXe48-3UQ2TbCOMOB2S0tKPpoRcwSiEeMgX7PA9zU5xR9HuoO-yfFU866AnPH-6z4svV28-X78ubD--uL9_clG0lhCihblEprau6cW4NUinkXEvQX2FttOu07LTDTjWyhrwzxZVDIdeyqkGZtjXyrHhx4o4xfJ-Qkt2HKQ65pZWirpXRcl1n1cVJ1cZAFLGzY_QHiEcruF0ytHOGds7Q5gyzYXMy_ID5hw63cTrmx1_6_43zyeZXJ3M8-GTb0Pd5wzkU2kNajFIKbf3QhUUgjJRG6KrJA0vB5T3fmbr1</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Squire, Tim</creator><creator>Buchanan, Grant</creator><creator>Elsaleh, Hany</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Mission to Mars: Radiation safety or radiation disaster?: Space transit and Mars radiation exposure risks - the potential shielding effect of an intravehicular graphene space suit and a storm shelter during space travel</title><author>Squire, Tim ; Buchanan, Grant ; Elsaleh, Hany</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2111-a5ce4466257dd8a344e0063a6ba896df63f6def4735a094404de138325a49cc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Astronauts</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Circadian rhythm</topic><topic>DNA methylation</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Mars probes</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neutrons</topic><topic>Oxidative stress</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Solar energetic particles</topic><topic>Space radiobiology</topic><topic>Space suits</topic><topic>Sun</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Squire, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsaleh, Hany</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>The journal of the Australasian Society of Aerospace Medicine (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Squire, Tim</au><au>Buchanan, Grant</au><au>Elsaleh, Hany</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mission to Mars: Radiation safety or radiation disaster?: Space transit and Mars radiation exposure risks - the potential shielding effect of an intravehicular graphene space suit and a storm shelter during space travel</atitle><jtitle>The journal of the Australasian Society of Aerospace Medicine (Online)</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>2639-6416</issn><issn>1449-3764</issn><eissn>1449-3764</eissn><eissn>2639-6416</eissn><abstract>Aim: The purpose of this research was to employ radiobiological as well as physics principles to investigate materials for an intravehicular spacesuit and a "storm shelter" that might minimize radiation exposure to astronauts during a mission to Mars.
Methods: NASA's OLTARIS space radiation modelling tool was used to investigate thirty-two potential shielding materials. Radiation exposure was estimated during a return transit to Mars of 360 days duration. We assessed each shielding material by its ability to decrease effective radiation dose received by a computerized phantom during the constant galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) and a single solar particle event (SPE). For the "storm shelter" a large liquid fuel tank was modelled adjacent to the phantom during a SPE.
Results: At standard conditions, graphene appeared to be a promising shielding material when comparing other materials including polyethylene and lithium. The shielding efficacy became comparable to polyethylene but inferior to lithium when materials were normalised to 10g/cm2, 20g/cm2 and 30g/cm2. The graphene around the phantom reduced effective dose from GCR compared with an unshielded transit by 34% (162mSv/yr vs 213.3mSv/yr). A "storm shelter" using a liquid fuel tank was positioned to create a barrier adjacent to the astronauts. The liquid barrier reduced effective dose by 98.8% (44mSv vs 3614mSv). Other mitigation strategies were deduced and divided into launch, transit and habitation considerations.
Conclusion: A graphene based intravehicular suit could decrease astronaut exposure to harmful radiation during transit to Mars. A storm shelter using fuel as a barrier also decreased radiation dose during a solar particle event.</abstract><cop>Warsaw, Poland</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.21307/asam-2019-001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2639-6416 |
ispartof | The journal of the Australasian Society of Aerospace Medicine (Online), 2020-01, Vol.11 (1), p.1-9 |
issn | 2639-6416 1449-3764 1449-3764 2639-6416 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3155496385 |
source | De Gruyter Open Access Journals; Sciendo |
subjects | Astronauts Carbon Circadian rhythm DNA methylation Fuel cells Graphene Mars probes Mutation Neutrons Oxidative stress Polyethylene Polymers Radiation therapy Solar energetic particles Space radiobiology Space suits Sun Testing United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration |
title | Mission to Mars: Radiation safety or radiation disaster?: Space transit and Mars radiation exposure risks - the potential shielding effect of an intravehicular graphene space suit and a storm shelter during space travel |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A33%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mission%20to%20Mars:%20Radiation%20safety%20or%20radiation%20disaster?:%20Space%20transit%20and%20Mars%20radiation%20exposure%20risks%20-%20the%20potential%20shielding%20effect%20of%20an%20intravehicular%20graphene%20space%20suit%20and%20a%20storm%20shelter%20during%20space%20travel&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20the%20Australasian%20Society%20of%20Aerospace%20Medicine%20(Online)&rft.au=Squire,%20Tim&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=2639-6416&rft.eissn=1449-3764&rft_id=info:doi/10.21307/asam-2019-001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3155496385%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3155496385&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.193391627315310&rfr_iscdi=true |