Justice Holmes and the Question of Race

Notwithstanding his youthful dalliance with abolitionism, Holmes’ votes and opinions in Supreme Court cases involving race reveal a stubborn indifference to discrimination on a range of issues. Whether this reflects a cold personal aloofness, a preoccupation with life as struggle, a commitment to ju...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of American legal studies 2021-04, Vol.10 (1), p.171-200
1. Verfasser: Halper, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 200
container_issue 1
container_start_page 171
container_title British journal of American legal studies
container_volume 10
creator Halper, Thomas
description Notwithstanding his youthful dalliance with abolitionism, Holmes’ votes and opinions in Supreme Court cases involving race reveal a stubborn indifference to discrimination on a range of issues. Whether this reflects a cold personal aloofness, a preoccupation with life as struggle, a commitment to judicial restraint or merely an insensitivity pervading the enlightened opinion of the day, his performance will continue to stain his reputation.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/bjals-2020-0025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3154883786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3154883786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-89e6b8862e3bbf1f03b29ad6ea94c96cf2dc8e8043aed200985d779aeb89d8a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsNSevQY8eIqd_Wgye_AgRa1SEEXPy2Z3oi1pUncTpP99EyvoxdM8hvfeDD_GzjlcCZXjtFjbKqYCBKQAYnbERgKUThVocfxHn7JJjGsA4BxUJvWIXT52sV05ShZNtaGY2Non7Qclzx31-6ZOmjJ5sY7O2EnZn6DJzxyzt7vb1_kiXT7dP8xvlqmTHNsUNWUFYiZIFkXJS5CF0NZnZLVyOnOl8A4JQUlLXgBonPk815YK1B5tJsfs4tC7Dc3n8INZN12o-5NG8plClDkOrunB5UITY6DSbMNqY8POcDADEPMNxAxAzACkT1wfEl-2ail4eg_drhe_9f8kec8q53IPnhZmoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3154883786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Justice Holmes and the Question of Race</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Halper, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Halper, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Notwithstanding his youthful dalliance with abolitionism, Holmes’ votes and opinions in Supreme Court cases involving race reveal a stubborn indifference to discrimination on a range of issues. Whether this reflects a cold personal aloofness, a preoccupation with life as struggle, a commitment to judicial restraint or merely an insensitivity pervading the enlightened opinion of the day, his performance will continue to stain his reputation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2719-5864</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/bjals-2020-0025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Birmingham: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Abolition of slavery ; Abolitionists ; Giles v. Harris ; Holmes ; Race ; Segregation</subject><ispartof>British journal of American legal studies, 2021-04, Vol.10 (1), p.171-200</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halper, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Justice Holmes and the Question of Race</title><title>British journal of American legal studies</title><description>Notwithstanding his youthful dalliance with abolitionism, Holmes’ votes and opinions in Supreme Court cases involving race reveal a stubborn indifference to discrimination on a range of issues. Whether this reflects a cold personal aloofness, a preoccupation with life as struggle, a commitment to judicial restraint or merely an insensitivity pervading the enlightened opinion of the day, his performance will continue to stain his reputation.</description><subject>Abolition of slavery</subject><subject>Abolitionists</subject><subject>Giles v. Harris</subject><subject>Holmes</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><issn>2049-4092</issn><issn>2049-4092</issn><issn>2719-5864</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsNSevQY8eIqd_Wgye_AgRa1SEEXPy2Z3oi1pUncTpP99EyvoxdM8hvfeDD_GzjlcCZXjtFjbKqYCBKQAYnbERgKUThVocfxHn7JJjGsA4BxUJvWIXT52sV05ShZNtaGY2Non7Qclzx31-6ZOmjJ5sY7O2EnZn6DJzxyzt7vb1_kiXT7dP8xvlqmTHNsUNWUFYiZIFkXJS5CF0NZnZLVyOnOl8A4JQUlLXgBonPk815YK1B5tJsfs4tC7Dc3n8INZN12o-5NG8plClDkOrunB5UITY6DSbMNqY8POcDADEPMNxAxAzACkT1wfEl-2ail4eg_drhe_9f8kec8q53IPnhZmoQ</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Halper, Thomas</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Justice Holmes and the Question of Race</title><author>Halper, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-89e6b8862e3bbf1f03b29ad6ea94c96cf2dc8e8043aed200985d779aeb89d8a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abolition of slavery</topic><topic>Abolitionists</topic><topic>Giles v. Harris</topic><topic>Holmes</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halper, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>British journal of American legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halper, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Justice Holmes and the Question of Race</atitle><jtitle>British journal of American legal studies</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>171-200</pages><issn>2049-4092</issn><eissn>2049-4092</eissn><eissn>2719-5864</eissn><abstract>Notwithstanding his youthful dalliance with abolitionism, Holmes’ votes and opinions in Supreme Court cases involving race reveal a stubborn indifference to discrimination on a range of issues. Whether this reflects a cold personal aloofness, a preoccupation with life as struggle, a commitment to judicial restraint or merely an insensitivity pervading the enlightened opinion of the day, his performance will continue to stain his reputation.</abstract><cop>Birmingham</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/bjals-2020-0025</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-4092
ispartof British journal of American legal studies, 2021-04, Vol.10 (1), p.171-200
issn 2049-4092
2049-4092
2719-5864
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3154883786
source De Gruyter Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Abolition of slavery
Abolitionists
Giles v. Harris
Holmes
Race
Segregation
title Justice Holmes and the Question of Race
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A35%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Justice%20Holmes%20and%20the%20Question%20of%20Race&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20American%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Halper,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=171-200&rft.issn=2049-4092&rft.eissn=2049-4092&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/bjals-2020-0025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3154883786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3154883786&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true