Electrochemical goniometry: keystone reactivity at the three-phase boundary

Contact angles of liquid, spherical cap droplets immobilised on an electrode surface and bathed by a fluid are important, quantifiable measures of the liquid/fluid interfacial tension. Optical goniometry, even if computer assisted, suffers when the contact angle is 10° or less. In this work, an alte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of solid state electrochemistry 2025, Vol.29 (1), p.3-27
Hauptverfasser: Varley, Thomas S., Lawrence, Nathan S., Wadhawan, Jay D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Journal of solid state electrochemistry
container_volume 29
creator Varley, Thomas S.
Lawrence, Nathan S.
Wadhawan, Jay D.
description Contact angles of liquid, spherical cap droplets immobilised on an electrode surface and bathed by a fluid are important, quantifiable measures of the liquid/fluid interfacial tension. Optical goniometry, even if computer assisted, suffers when the contact angle is 10° or less. In this work, an alternative method of measurement is considered: electrochemical techniques (voltammetry and chronoamperometry), which rely on the transport of material from within the droplet to the conductive surface. As a result of the reactions that take place at the triple phase boundary, these are demonstrated to provide information on the size and the shape of the droplet, including its contact angle, for the cases when the droplets have a redox analyte and either have a supporting electrolyte, or not. The voltammetric behaviour is seen to change from exhaustive, thin film characteristics, to quasi-steady-state signals as the droplet becomes bigger, or the scan rate becomes larger, or diffusion of the redox material inside the droplet becomes slower. One of the surprising outcomes is that there is a zone of planar diffusion only in the case of the supported droplets, with both the droplet size and its contact angle determining whether this is seen at conventional combinations of scan rates and diffusion coefficients. Experimental data are provided which emphasize key features pertaining to the nature of the redox system and illustrate the facile nature of the contact angle estimation process, albeit to within 10% uncertainty.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10008-024-05932-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3153129458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153129458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-74fc61baa23d1240235f599f2c8f72c151e6243c4dc3a40c450a5c99bd9c93ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisTaMX0nMDlW8RCU2sLYcZ9KmtHGxXaT-PaZBYsdiHot774wOIZcMrhlAdRNzh5oClxSUFpzKIzJhUggKVVkfH3ZOa1nXp-QsxhUAq0oGE_Jyv0aXgndL3PTOrouFH3q_wRT2t8UH7mPyAxYBrUv9V5_2hU1FWmKugEi3SxuxaPxuaG3Yn5OTzq4jXvzOKXl_uH-bPdH56-Pz7G5OHQdItJKdK1ljLRct4xK4UJ3SuuOu7irumGJYcimcbJ2wEpxUYJXTumm106KxYkquxtxt8J87jMms_C4M-aQRTAnGtVR1VvFR5YKPMWBntqHf5DcNA_MDzYzQTIZmDtCMzCYxmmIWDwsMf9H_uL4BNC1vrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153129458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrochemical goniometry: keystone reactivity at the three-phase boundary</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Varley, Thomas S. ; Lawrence, Nathan S. ; Wadhawan, Jay D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Varley, Thomas S. ; Lawrence, Nathan S. ; Wadhawan, Jay D.</creatorcontrib><description>Contact angles of liquid, spherical cap droplets immobilised on an electrode surface and bathed by a fluid are important, quantifiable measures of the liquid/fluid interfacial tension. Optical goniometry, even if computer assisted, suffers when the contact angle is 10° or less. In this work, an alternative method of measurement is considered: electrochemical techniques (voltammetry and chronoamperometry), which rely on the transport of material from within the droplet to the conductive surface. As a result of the reactions that take place at the triple phase boundary, these are demonstrated to provide information on the size and the shape of the droplet, including its contact angle, for the cases when the droplets have a redox analyte and either have a supporting electrolyte, or not. The voltammetric behaviour is seen to change from exhaustive, thin film characteristics, to quasi-steady-state signals as the droplet becomes bigger, or the scan rate becomes larger, or diffusion of the redox material inside the droplet becomes slower. One of the surprising outcomes is that there is a zone of planar diffusion only in the case of the supported droplets, with both the droplet size and its contact angle determining whether this is seen at conventional combinations of scan rates and diffusion coefficients. Experimental data are provided which emphasize key features pertaining to the nature of the redox system and illustrate the facile nature of the contact angle estimation process, albeit to within 10% uncertainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-8488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-0768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10008-024-05932-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analytical Chemistry ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemical reactions ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Condensed Matter Physics ; Contact angle ; Diffusion coefficient ; Diffusion rate ; Droplets ; Electrochemistry ; Energy Storage ; Measurement methods ; Original Paper ; Phase boundaries ; Physical Chemistry ; Spherical caps ; Surface tension ; Thin films ; Voltammetry</subject><ispartof>Journal of solid state electrochemistry, 2025, Vol.29 (1), p.3-27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-74fc61baa23d1240235f599f2c8f72c151e6243c4dc3a40c450a5c99bd9c93ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10008-024-05932-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10008-024-05932-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varley, Thomas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Nathan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadhawan, Jay D.</creatorcontrib><title>Electrochemical goniometry: keystone reactivity at the three-phase boundary</title><title>Journal of solid state electrochemistry</title><addtitle>J Solid State Electrochem</addtitle><description>Contact angles of liquid, spherical cap droplets immobilised on an electrode surface and bathed by a fluid are important, quantifiable measures of the liquid/fluid interfacial tension. Optical goniometry, even if computer assisted, suffers when the contact angle is 10° or less. In this work, an alternative method of measurement is considered: electrochemical techniques (voltammetry and chronoamperometry), which rely on the transport of material from within the droplet to the conductive surface. As a result of the reactions that take place at the triple phase boundary, these are demonstrated to provide information on the size and the shape of the droplet, including its contact angle, for the cases when the droplets have a redox analyte and either have a supporting electrolyte, or not. The voltammetric behaviour is seen to change from exhaustive, thin film characteristics, to quasi-steady-state signals as the droplet becomes bigger, or the scan rate becomes larger, or diffusion of the redox material inside the droplet becomes slower. One of the surprising outcomes is that there is a zone of planar diffusion only in the case of the supported droplets, with both the droplet size and its contact angle determining whether this is seen at conventional combinations of scan rates and diffusion coefficients. Experimental data are provided which emphasize key features pertaining to the nature of the redox system and illustrate the facile nature of the contact angle estimation process, albeit to within 10% uncertainty.</description><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Condensed Matter Physics</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Diffusion rate</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Energy Storage</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phase boundaries</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>Spherical caps</subject><subject>Surface tension</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><subject>Voltammetry</subject><issn>1432-8488</issn><issn>1433-0768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisTaMX0nMDlW8RCU2sLYcZ9KmtHGxXaT-PaZBYsdiHot774wOIZcMrhlAdRNzh5oClxSUFpzKIzJhUggKVVkfH3ZOa1nXp-QsxhUAq0oGE_Jyv0aXgndL3PTOrouFH3q_wRT2t8UH7mPyAxYBrUv9V5_2hU1FWmKugEi3SxuxaPxuaG3Yn5OTzq4jXvzOKXl_uH-bPdH56-Pz7G5OHQdItJKdK1ljLRct4xK4UJ3SuuOu7irumGJYcimcbJ2wEpxUYJXTumm106KxYkquxtxt8J87jMms_C4M-aQRTAnGtVR1VvFR5YKPMWBntqHf5DcNA_MDzYzQTIZmDtCMzCYxmmIWDwsMf9H_uL4BNC1vrA</recordid><startdate>2025</startdate><enddate>2025</enddate><creator>Varley, Thomas S.</creator><creator>Lawrence, Nathan S.</creator><creator>Wadhawan, Jay D.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2025</creationdate><title>Electrochemical goniometry: keystone reactivity at the three-phase boundary</title><author>Varley, Thomas S. ; Lawrence, Nathan S. ; Wadhawan, Jay D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-74fc61baa23d1240235f599f2c8f72c151e6243c4dc3a40c450a5c99bd9c93ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Condensed Matter Physics</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Diffusion rate</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Energy Storage</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phase boundaries</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>Spherical caps</topic><topic>Surface tension</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><topic>Voltammetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varley, Thomas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Nathan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadhawan, Jay D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of solid state electrochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varley, Thomas S.</au><au>Lawrence, Nathan S.</au><au>Wadhawan, Jay D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrochemical goniometry: keystone reactivity at the three-phase boundary</atitle><jtitle>Journal of solid state electrochemistry</jtitle><stitle>J Solid State Electrochem</stitle><date>2025</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>3-27</pages><issn>1432-8488</issn><eissn>1433-0768</eissn><abstract>Contact angles of liquid, spherical cap droplets immobilised on an electrode surface and bathed by a fluid are important, quantifiable measures of the liquid/fluid interfacial tension. Optical goniometry, even if computer assisted, suffers when the contact angle is 10° or less. In this work, an alternative method of measurement is considered: electrochemical techniques (voltammetry and chronoamperometry), which rely on the transport of material from within the droplet to the conductive surface. As a result of the reactions that take place at the triple phase boundary, these are demonstrated to provide information on the size and the shape of the droplet, including its contact angle, for the cases when the droplets have a redox analyte and either have a supporting electrolyte, or not. The voltammetric behaviour is seen to change from exhaustive, thin film characteristics, to quasi-steady-state signals as the droplet becomes bigger, or the scan rate becomes larger, or diffusion of the redox material inside the droplet becomes slower. One of the surprising outcomes is that there is a zone of planar diffusion only in the case of the supported droplets, with both the droplet size and its contact angle determining whether this is seen at conventional combinations of scan rates and diffusion coefficients. Experimental data are provided which emphasize key features pertaining to the nature of the redox system and illustrate the facile nature of the contact angle estimation process, albeit to within 10% uncertainty.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10008-024-05932-4</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-8488
ispartof Journal of solid state electrochemistry, 2025, Vol.29 (1), p.3-27
issn 1432-8488
1433-0768
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3153129458
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analytical Chemistry
Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
Chemical reactions
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Condensed Matter Physics
Contact angle
Diffusion coefficient
Diffusion rate
Droplets
Electrochemistry
Energy Storage
Measurement methods
Original Paper
Phase boundaries
Physical Chemistry
Spherical caps
Surface tension
Thin films
Voltammetry
title Electrochemical goniometry: keystone reactivity at the three-phase boundary
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A05%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrochemical%20goniometry:%20keystone%20reactivity%20at%20the%20three-phase%20boundary&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20solid%20state%20electrochemistry&rft.au=Varley,%20Thomas%20S.&rft.date=2025&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=3-27&rft.issn=1432-8488&rft.eissn=1433-0768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10008-024-05932-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153129458%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153129458&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true