Research progress in hydrofoil cavitation prediction and suppression methods

To reduce the adverse damage caused by cavitation phenomena to the hydraulic machinery, such as surface erosion of the equipment, increased mechanical vibration, and decreased service life, this review summarizes from the aspects of cavitation instability mechanisms, cavitation prediction methods, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics of fluids (1994) 2025-01, Vol.37 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Qiu, Qianfeng, Gu, Yunqing, Ren, Yun, Mou, Chengqi, Hu, Chaoxiang, Ding, Hongxin, Wu, Denghao, Wu, Zhenxing, Mou, Jiegang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Physics of fluids (1994)
container_volume 37
creator Qiu, Qianfeng
Gu, Yunqing
Ren, Yun
Mou, Chengqi
Hu, Chaoxiang
Ding, Hongxin
Wu, Denghao
Wu, Zhenxing
Mou, Jiegang
description To reduce the adverse damage caused by cavitation phenomena to the hydraulic machinery, such as surface erosion of the equipment, increased mechanical vibration, and decreased service life, this review summarizes from the aspects of cavitation instability mechanisms, cavitation prediction methods, and cavitation suppression methods. In terms of cavitation flow instability mechanisms, two main mechanisms that affect the shedding of cloud cavitation, reentrant jet, and bubbly shock wave, were thoroughly summarized. It is pointed out that the shedding behavior of the cavity is greatly influenced by the thickness of the reentrant jet relative to the cavity, and the bubbly shock wave is also one of the important factors in cavitation vortex dynamics. In terms of cavitation prediction methods, a detailed comparison and analysis were made between the traditional cavitation prediction methods based on numerical simulation and the currently popular cavitation prediction methods based on neural networks. The former mainly includes cavitation models and turbulence models, while the latter mainly summarizes the application of chain physics-informed neural network, pressure–velocity network, long short-term memory, and other neural networks in cavitation prediction. It is pointed out that artificial intelligence predictive models have advantages in model order reduction and accurate prediction of cavitation flow field feature parameters. In terms of cavitation suppression methods, active and passive cavitation suppression methods were thoroughly summarized. Finally, based on the current research status of hydrofoil cavitation prediction methods and cavitation suppression methods, this article discusses and looks forward to the direction of development.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0245462
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3151924230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3151924230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c972-201740216ea30826efb04e028e41e6301d7e111f67c64680b92079c1d57296c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90N1LwzAQAPAgCs7pg_9BwSeFzrskvTSPMvyCgSB7D1mauo6tqUkn7L-3dXv26e7gx30xdoswQyDxWMyAy0ISP2MThFLniojOx1xBTiTwkl2ltAEAoTlN2OLTJ2-jW2ddDF_Rp5Q1bbY-VDHUodlmzv40ve2b0A7AV437S21bZWnfdaMf653v16FK1-yittvkb05xypYvz8v5W774eH2fPy1ypxXPOaCSwJG8FVBy8vUKpAdeeomeBGClPCLWpBxJKmGlOSjtsCoU1-S0mLK7Y9th5e-9T73ZhH1sh4lGYIGaSy5gUPdH5WJIKfradLHZ2XgwCGb8lSnM6VeDfTja5E7X_oN_AQOPZ6k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3151924230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research progress in hydrofoil cavitation prediction and suppression methods</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Qiu, Qianfeng ; Gu, Yunqing ; Ren, Yun ; Mou, Chengqi ; Hu, Chaoxiang ; Ding, Hongxin ; Wu, Denghao ; Wu, Zhenxing ; Mou, Jiegang</creator><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Qianfeng ; Gu, Yunqing ; Ren, Yun ; Mou, Chengqi ; Hu, Chaoxiang ; Ding, Hongxin ; Wu, Denghao ; Wu, Zhenxing ; Mou, Jiegang</creatorcontrib><description>To reduce the adverse damage caused by cavitation phenomena to the hydraulic machinery, such as surface erosion of the equipment, increased mechanical vibration, and decreased service life, this review summarizes from the aspects of cavitation instability mechanisms, cavitation prediction methods, and cavitation suppression methods. In terms of cavitation flow instability mechanisms, two main mechanisms that affect the shedding of cloud cavitation, reentrant jet, and bubbly shock wave, were thoroughly summarized. It is pointed out that the shedding behavior of the cavity is greatly influenced by the thickness of the reentrant jet relative to the cavity, and the bubbly shock wave is also one of the important factors in cavitation vortex dynamics. In terms of cavitation prediction methods, a detailed comparison and analysis were made between the traditional cavitation prediction methods based on numerical simulation and the currently popular cavitation prediction methods based on neural networks. The former mainly includes cavitation models and turbulence models, while the latter mainly summarizes the application of chain physics-informed neural network, pressure–velocity network, long short-term memory, and other neural networks in cavitation prediction. It is pointed out that artificial intelligence predictive models have advantages in model order reduction and accurate prediction of cavitation flow field feature parameters. In terms of cavitation suppression methods, active and passive cavitation suppression methods were thoroughly summarized. Finally, based on the current research status of hydrofoil cavitation prediction methods and cavitation suppression methods, this article discusses and looks forward to the direction of development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-6631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0245462</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHFLE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Cavitation ; Cavitation erosion ; Cavitation flow ; Hydraulic machinery ; Hydrofoils ; Model reduction ; Neural networks ; Numerical models ; Prediction models ; Predictions ; Service life ; Shedding ; Shock waves ; Turbulence models ; Turbulent flow</subject><ispartof>Physics of fluids (1994), 2025-01, Vol.37 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2025 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c972-201740216ea30826efb04e028e41e6301d7e111f67c64680b92079c1d57296c93</cites><orcidid>0009-0006-9431-487X ; 0009-0007-6773-4083 ; 0009-0000-1642-4746 ; 0009-0003-6588-7001 ; 0009-0001-2441-0288 ; 0000-0002-4042-8381 ; 0000-0003-4036-3140</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,778,782,790,792,4500,27909,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Qianfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Yunqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Chengqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Chaoxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Hongxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Denghao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhenxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Jiegang</creatorcontrib><title>Research progress in hydrofoil cavitation prediction and suppression methods</title><title>Physics of fluids (1994)</title><description>To reduce the adverse damage caused by cavitation phenomena to the hydraulic machinery, such as surface erosion of the equipment, increased mechanical vibration, and decreased service life, this review summarizes from the aspects of cavitation instability mechanisms, cavitation prediction methods, and cavitation suppression methods. In terms of cavitation flow instability mechanisms, two main mechanisms that affect the shedding of cloud cavitation, reentrant jet, and bubbly shock wave, were thoroughly summarized. It is pointed out that the shedding behavior of the cavity is greatly influenced by the thickness of the reentrant jet relative to the cavity, and the bubbly shock wave is also one of the important factors in cavitation vortex dynamics. In terms of cavitation prediction methods, a detailed comparison and analysis were made between the traditional cavitation prediction methods based on numerical simulation and the currently popular cavitation prediction methods based on neural networks. The former mainly includes cavitation models and turbulence models, while the latter mainly summarizes the application of chain physics-informed neural network, pressure–velocity network, long short-term memory, and other neural networks in cavitation prediction. It is pointed out that artificial intelligence predictive models have advantages in model order reduction and accurate prediction of cavitation flow field feature parameters. In terms of cavitation suppression methods, active and passive cavitation suppression methods were thoroughly summarized. Finally, based on the current research status of hydrofoil cavitation prediction methods and cavitation suppression methods, this article discusses and looks forward to the direction of development.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Cavitation</subject><subject>Cavitation erosion</subject><subject>Cavitation flow</subject><subject>Hydraulic machinery</subject><subject>Hydrofoils</subject><subject>Model reduction</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Service life</subject><subject>Shedding</subject><subject>Shock waves</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><issn>1070-6631</issn><issn>1089-7666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90N1LwzAQAPAgCs7pg_9BwSeFzrskvTSPMvyCgSB7D1mauo6tqUkn7L-3dXv26e7gx30xdoswQyDxWMyAy0ISP2MThFLniojOx1xBTiTwkl2ltAEAoTlN2OLTJ2-jW2ddDF_Rp5Q1bbY-VDHUodlmzv40ve2b0A7AV437S21bZWnfdaMf653v16FK1-yittvkb05xypYvz8v5W774eH2fPy1ypxXPOaCSwJG8FVBy8vUKpAdeeomeBGClPCLWpBxJKmGlOSjtsCoU1-S0mLK7Y9th5e-9T73ZhH1sh4lGYIGaSy5gUPdH5WJIKfradLHZ2XgwCGb8lSnM6VeDfTja5E7X_oN_AQOPZ6k</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Qiu, Qianfeng</creator><creator>Gu, Yunqing</creator><creator>Ren, Yun</creator><creator>Mou, Chengqi</creator><creator>Hu, Chaoxiang</creator><creator>Ding, Hongxin</creator><creator>Wu, Denghao</creator><creator>Wu, Zhenxing</creator><creator>Mou, Jiegang</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9431-487X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6773-4083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1642-4746</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6588-7001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2441-0288</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4042-8381</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-3140</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Research progress in hydrofoil cavitation prediction and suppression methods</title><author>Qiu, Qianfeng ; Gu, Yunqing ; Ren, Yun ; Mou, Chengqi ; Hu, Chaoxiang ; Ding, Hongxin ; Wu, Denghao ; Wu, Zhenxing ; Mou, Jiegang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c972-201740216ea30826efb04e028e41e6301d7e111f67c64680b92079c1d57296c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Cavitation</topic><topic>Cavitation erosion</topic><topic>Cavitation flow</topic><topic>Hydraulic machinery</topic><topic>Hydrofoils</topic><topic>Model reduction</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Service life</topic><topic>Shedding</topic><topic>Shock waves</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Qianfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Yunqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Chengqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Chaoxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Hongxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Denghao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhenxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Jiegang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qiu, Qianfeng</au><au>Gu, Yunqing</au><au>Ren, Yun</au><au>Mou, Chengqi</au><au>Hu, Chaoxiang</au><au>Ding, Hongxin</au><au>Wu, Denghao</au><au>Wu, Zhenxing</au><au>Mou, Jiegang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research progress in hydrofoil cavitation prediction and suppression methods</atitle><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1070-6631</issn><eissn>1089-7666</eissn><coden>PHFLE6</coden><abstract>To reduce the adverse damage caused by cavitation phenomena to the hydraulic machinery, such as surface erosion of the equipment, increased mechanical vibration, and decreased service life, this review summarizes from the aspects of cavitation instability mechanisms, cavitation prediction methods, and cavitation suppression methods. In terms of cavitation flow instability mechanisms, two main mechanisms that affect the shedding of cloud cavitation, reentrant jet, and bubbly shock wave, were thoroughly summarized. It is pointed out that the shedding behavior of the cavity is greatly influenced by the thickness of the reentrant jet relative to the cavity, and the bubbly shock wave is also one of the important factors in cavitation vortex dynamics. In terms of cavitation prediction methods, a detailed comparison and analysis were made between the traditional cavitation prediction methods based on numerical simulation and the currently popular cavitation prediction methods based on neural networks. The former mainly includes cavitation models and turbulence models, while the latter mainly summarizes the application of chain physics-informed neural network, pressure–velocity network, long short-term memory, and other neural networks in cavitation prediction. It is pointed out that artificial intelligence predictive models have advantages in model order reduction and accurate prediction of cavitation flow field feature parameters. In terms of cavitation suppression methods, active and passive cavitation suppression methods were thoroughly summarized. Finally, based on the current research status of hydrofoil cavitation prediction methods and cavitation suppression methods, this article discusses and looks forward to the direction of development.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0245462</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9431-487X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6773-4083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1642-4746</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6588-7001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2441-0288</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4042-8381</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-3140</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-6631
ispartof Physics of fluids (1994), 2025-01, Vol.37 (1)
issn 1070-6631
1089-7666
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3151924230
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Artificial intelligence
Cavitation
Cavitation erosion
Cavitation flow
Hydraulic machinery
Hydrofoils
Model reduction
Neural networks
Numerical models
Prediction models
Predictions
Service life
Shedding
Shock waves
Turbulence models
Turbulent flow
title Research progress in hydrofoil cavitation prediction and suppression methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A55%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20progress%20in%20hydrofoil%20cavitation%20prediction%20and%20suppression%20methods&rft.jtitle=Physics%20of%20fluids%20(1994)&rft.au=Qiu,%20Qianfeng&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1070-6631&rft.eissn=1089-7666&rft.coden=PHFLE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0245462&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3151924230%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3151924230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true