Peak flow in single-building lots in a residential areas with rainwater storage facilities in Taiwan

In this study, the Storm Water Management Model of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and different rainfall return periods were employed to investigate peak flow, runoff allocation, and potential legal revisions following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in compliance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Earth System Science 2024-12, Vol.134 (1), p.15, Article 15
Hauptverfasser: Fu, J C, Tung, C M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Journal of Earth System Science
container_volume 134
creator Fu, J C
Tung, C M
description In this study, the Storm Water Management Model of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and different rainfall return periods were employed to investigate peak flow, runoff allocation, and potential legal revisions following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in compliance with Taiwan’s Building Technical Regulations. This study focused on single-building lots covering an area of 63.1 ha within the residential areas of Danhai New Town, New Taipei City. The study area comprised 180 subcatchments, 173 of which are single-building lots that are located in the residential areas and have a size ranging from 0.09 to 2.80 ha. The capacity (m3) of the rainwater storage facilities in these lots was calculated by multiplying the building lot area by 0.045. The results revealed that despite a reduction in peak flow of 0.0018–0.0166 m3/s during 1-h and 24-h rainfall events with different return periods following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in the single-building lots, further room for improvement in the peak flow reduction existed. On the basis of the results as well as the regulations and the floor area ratio incentives implemented for building lots with various areas, the percentage reduction in peak flow ranged from 4.434 to 4.476% for lots smaller than 0.3 ha. This finding suggests that rainwater storage facilities are a suitable water retention solution for such small lots. However, for lots larger than 0.3 ha, in which a higher floor area ratio is incentivized for residential development, the percentage reduction in peak flow of approximately 4.303–4.404% was slightly lower than the aforementioned range. Consequently, due to the building lots with large area and floor area ratio incentives that result in higher runoff, additional runoff allocation responsibilities and proactive water retention strategies need to be implemented. Overall, to minimize the peak flow in building lots and flood damage in urban areas, Taiwan should promote the installation of rainwater storage facilities across various types of building lots. At the same time, the responsibility for runoff allocation from public facility zones and private development zones should be increased, and potential legal revisions should be added to the low-impact development (LID) facilities for various land uses in urban areas.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12040-024-02459-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3149797114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3149797114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-f2dbf9364aa16fe070a6c98625334ca66fa5a5e4ce047d4b89192dc4daaa08d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFPA8-pkk002RylqhYIeKngL001SU9fdmqQs_nu3rQcPwzyG9-bBR8g1g1sGoO4SK0FAAaXYT6ULOCET0IoXSon303_6nFyktAHgslZ6Quyrw0_q236goaMpdOvWFatdaO0oadvntL8jjS4F67ocsKUYHSY6hPxBI4ZuwOwiTbmPuHbUYxPakIM7BJcYBuwuyZnHNrmrvz0lb48Py9m8WLw8Pc_uF0XDKpkLX9qV11wKRCa9AwUoG13LsuJcNCilxworJxoHQlmxqjXTpW2ERUSobc2n5Ob4dxv7751L2Wz6XezGSsOZ0EorxsToKo-uJvYpRefNNoYvjD-GgdnTNEeaZiRpDjQN8F-bXmk_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149797114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peak flow in single-building lots in a residential areas with rainwater storage facilities in Taiwan</title><source>Indian Academy of Sciences</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fu, J C ; Tung, C M</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, J C ; Tung, C M</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the Storm Water Management Model of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and different rainfall return periods were employed to investigate peak flow, runoff allocation, and potential legal revisions following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in compliance with Taiwan’s Building Technical Regulations. This study focused on single-building lots covering an area of 63.1 ha within the residential areas of Danhai New Town, New Taipei City. The study area comprised 180 subcatchments, 173 of which are single-building lots that are located in the residential areas and have a size ranging from 0.09 to 2.80 ha. The capacity (m3) of the rainwater storage facilities in these lots was calculated by multiplying the building lot area by 0.045. The results revealed that despite a reduction in peak flow of 0.0018–0.0166 m3/s during 1-h and 24-h rainfall events with different return periods following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in the single-building lots, further room for improvement in the peak flow reduction existed. On the basis of the results as well as the regulations and the floor area ratio incentives implemented for building lots with various areas, the percentage reduction in peak flow ranged from 4.434 to 4.476% for lots smaller than 0.3 ha. This finding suggests that rainwater storage facilities are a suitable water retention solution for such small lots. However, for lots larger than 0.3 ha, in which a higher floor area ratio is incentivized for residential development, the percentage reduction in peak flow of approximately 4.303–4.404% was slightly lower than the aforementioned range. Consequently, due to the building lots with large area and floor area ratio incentives that result in higher runoff, additional runoff allocation responsibilities and proactive water retention strategies need to be implemented. Overall, to minimize the peak flow in building lots and flood damage in urban areas, Taiwan should promote the installation of rainwater storage facilities across various types of building lots. At the same time, the responsibility for runoff allocation from public facility zones and private development zones should be increased, and potential legal revisions should be added to the low-impact development (LID) facilities for various land uses in urban areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-774X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0253-4126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-774X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12040-024-02459-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bangalore: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Building damage ; Damage ; Drainage ; Environmental management ; Environmental protection ; Flood damage ; Floods ; Flow ; Incentives ; Land use ; Local government ; Neighborhoods ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Rain water ; Rainfall ; Rainwater ; Regulations ; Residential areas ; Residential development ; Residential location ; Retention ; Revisions ; Runoff ; Storage facilities ; Storms ; Stormwater ; Stormwater management ; Urban areas ; Urban planning ; Urban runoff ; Water damage ; Water management</subject><ispartof>Journal of Earth System Science, 2024-12, Vol.134 (1), p.15, Article 15</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Mar 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-f2dbf9364aa16fe070a6c98625334ca66fa5a5e4ce047d4b89192dc4daaa08d83</cites><orcidid>0009-0004-9136-0585</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tung, C M</creatorcontrib><title>Peak flow in single-building lots in a residential areas with rainwater storage facilities in Taiwan</title><title>Journal of Earth System Science</title><description>In this study, the Storm Water Management Model of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and different rainfall return periods were employed to investigate peak flow, runoff allocation, and potential legal revisions following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in compliance with Taiwan’s Building Technical Regulations. This study focused on single-building lots covering an area of 63.1 ha within the residential areas of Danhai New Town, New Taipei City. The study area comprised 180 subcatchments, 173 of which are single-building lots that are located in the residential areas and have a size ranging from 0.09 to 2.80 ha. The capacity (m3) of the rainwater storage facilities in these lots was calculated by multiplying the building lot area by 0.045. The results revealed that despite a reduction in peak flow of 0.0018–0.0166 m3/s during 1-h and 24-h rainfall events with different return periods following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in the single-building lots, further room for improvement in the peak flow reduction existed. On the basis of the results as well as the regulations and the floor area ratio incentives implemented for building lots with various areas, the percentage reduction in peak flow ranged from 4.434 to 4.476% for lots smaller than 0.3 ha. This finding suggests that rainwater storage facilities are a suitable water retention solution for such small lots. However, for lots larger than 0.3 ha, in which a higher floor area ratio is incentivized for residential development, the percentage reduction in peak flow of approximately 4.303–4.404% was slightly lower than the aforementioned range. Consequently, due to the building lots with large area and floor area ratio incentives that result in higher runoff, additional runoff allocation responsibilities and proactive water retention strategies need to be implemented. Overall, to minimize the peak flow in building lots and flood damage in urban areas, Taiwan should promote the installation of rainwater storage facilities across various types of building lots. At the same time, the responsibility for runoff allocation from public facility zones and private development zones should be increased, and potential legal revisions should be added to the low-impact development (LID) facilities for various land uses in urban areas.</description><subject>Building damage</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Flood damage</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Flow</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain water</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainwater</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Residential development</subject><subject>Residential location</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Storage facilities</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Stormwater management</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Urban runoff</subject><subject>Water damage</subject><subject>Water management</subject><issn>0973-774X</issn><issn>0253-4126</issn><issn>0973-774X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFPA8-pkk002RylqhYIeKngL001SU9fdmqQs_nu3rQcPwzyG9-bBR8g1g1sGoO4SK0FAAaXYT6ULOCET0IoXSon303_6nFyktAHgslZ6Quyrw0_q236goaMpdOvWFatdaO0oadvntL8jjS4F67ocsKUYHSY6hPxBI4ZuwOwiTbmPuHbUYxPakIM7BJcYBuwuyZnHNrmrvz0lb48Py9m8WLw8Pc_uF0XDKpkLX9qV11wKRCa9AwUoG13LsuJcNCilxworJxoHQlmxqjXTpW2ERUSobc2n5Ob4dxv7751L2Wz6XezGSsOZ0EorxsToKo-uJvYpRefNNoYvjD-GgdnTNEeaZiRpDjQN8F-bXmk_</recordid><startdate>20241228</startdate><enddate>20241228</enddate><creator>Fu, J C</creator><creator>Tung, C M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9136-0585</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241228</creationdate><title>Peak flow in single-building lots in a residential areas with rainwater storage facilities in Taiwan</title><author>Fu, J C ; Tung, C M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-f2dbf9364aa16fe070a6c98625334ca66fa5a5e4ce047d4b89192dc4daaa08d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Building damage</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Flood damage</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Flow</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain water</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainwater</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Residential development</topic><topic>Residential location</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Storage facilities</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Stormwater management</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Urban runoff</topic><topic>Water damage</topic><topic>Water management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tung, C M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of Earth System Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, J C</au><au>Tung, C M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peak flow in single-building lots in a residential areas with rainwater storage facilities in Taiwan</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Earth System Science</jtitle><date>2024-12-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><pages>15-</pages><artnum>15</artnum><issn>0973-774X</issn><issn>0253-4126</issn><eissn>0973-774X</eissn><abstract>In this study, the Storm Water Management Model of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and different rainfall return periods were employed to investigate peak flow, runoff allocation, and potential legal revisions following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in compliance with Taiwan’s Building Technical Regulations. This study focused on single-building lots covering an area of 63.1 ha within the residential areas of Danhai New Town, New Taipei City. The study area comprised 180 subcatchments, 173 of which are single-building lots that are located in the residential areas and have a size ranging from 0.09 to 2.80 ha. The capacity (m3) of the rainwater storage facilities in these lots was calculated by multiplying the building lot area by 0.045. The results revealed that despite a reduction in peak flow of 0.0018–0.0166 m3/s during 1-h and 24-h rainfall events with different return periods following the installation of rainwater storage facilities in the single-building lots, further room for improvement in the peak flow reduction existed. On the basis of the results as well as the regulations and the floor area ratio incentives implemented for building lots with various areas, the percentage reduction in peak flow ranged from 4.434 to 4.476% for lots smaller than 0.3 ha. This finding suggests that rainwater storage facilities are a suitable water retention solution for such small lots. However, for lots larger than 0.3 ha, in which a higher floor area ratio is incentivized for residential development, the percentage reduction in peak flow of approximately 4.303–4.404% was slightly lower than the aforementioned range. Consequently, due to the building lots with large area and floor area ratio incentives that result in higher runoff, additional runoff allocation responsibilities and proactive water retention strategies need to be implemented. Overall, to minimize the peak flow in building lots and flood damage in urban areas, Taiwan should promote the installation of rainwater storage facilities across various types of building lots. At the same time, the responsibility for runoff allocation from public facility zones and private development zones should be increased, and potential legal revisions should be added to the low-impact development (LID) facilities for various land uses in urban areas.</abstract><cop>Bangalore</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s12040-024-02459-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9136-0585</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0973-774X
ispartof Journal of Earth System Science, 2024-12, Vol.134 (1), p.15, Article 15
issn 0973-774X
0253-4126
0973-774X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3149797114
source Indian Academy of Sciences; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Building damage
Damage
Drainage
Environmental management
Environmental protection
Flood damage
Floods
Flow
Incentives
Land use
Local government
Neighborhoods
Precipitation
Rain
Rain water
Rainfall
Rainwater
Regulations
Residential areas
Residential development
Residential location
Retention
Revisions
Runoff
Storage facilities
Storms
Stormwater
Stormwater management
Urban areas
Urban planning
Urban runoff
Water damage
Water management
title Peak flow in single-building lots in a residential areas with rainwater storage facilities in Taiwan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A57%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peak%20flow%20in%20single-building%20lots%20in%20a%20residential%20areas%20with%20rainwater%20storage%20facilities%20in%20Taiwan&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Earth%20System%20Science&rft.au=Fu,%20J%20C&rft.date=2024-12-28&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.pages=15-&rft.artnum=15&rft.issn=0973-774X&rft.eissn=0973-774X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12040-024-02459-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3149797114%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149797114&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true