Wind and Wave Hindcast and Observations During the Black Sea Storms in November 2023
The Black Sea coasts from the northwest of Turkey through Crimea to Georgia were strongly affected by severe storms in Autumn, 2023. The aim of the work is to compare the performance of different wave model approaches and wind datasets in extreme weather conditions in the Black Sea. The study covers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pure and applied geophysics 2024-11, Vol.181 (11), p.3149-3171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3171 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3149 |
container_title | Pure and applied geophysics |
container_volume | 181 |
creator | Yurovskaya, Maria V. Shokurov, Mikhail V. Barabanov, Vladislav S. Yurovsky, Yury Yu Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N. Kamenev, Oleg T. |
description | The Black Sea coasts from the northwest of Turkey through Crimea to Georgia were strongly affected by severe storms in Autumn, 2023. The aim of the work is to compare the performance of different wave model approaches and wind datasets in extreme weather conditions in the Black Sea. The study covers the continuous period from the 1st to the 30th of November including two strong storms with wave heights up to 9–10 m. Wave simulations are performed using WAM and the 2D parametric model for surface wave development suggested in Kudryavtsev et al. (2021a). The wave models are forced by hourly wind fields from four datasets: ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA5), ECMWF Level-4 bias-corrected operational model, NCEP (CFSv2), and the regional WRF-ARW model with 6-hour NCEP/NCAR atmospheric forecast as input. The high-resolution Level-4 wave analysis for the Black Sea produced by CMEMS (also using WAM Cycle 6) is also considered. Simulation results are validated against along-track altimeter measurements of significant wave height, CFOSAT SWIM information on dominant wavelength and wave direction, and in-situ data from an oceanographic platform near Crimea. All models demonstrate their overall good performance, though third-generation wave spectral models give an expectedly higher correlation between simulations and observed data, while the parametric model is less accurate. Some recommendations to combine wind and wave models for the most accurate predictions are further given. As known, the wind speed fields produced by ECMWF are underestimated at winds higher than 15–20 m/s. While the wind correction is crucial when using the parametric model, WAM better reproduces the observed extreme waves without it. As also obtained, WAM simulations forced by NCEP and WRF winds lead to an overestimation of the largest storm waves. Increased resolution of the wind fields does not lead to significant improvement in the quality of wave predictions, which can be explained by the wind accumulation effect during wave development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00024-024-03592-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3149647546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3149647546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-ed4ef35d4cca02330aace0ad336964b11d40ac8e345d7a8345052e5a8f576a4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMFOAjEQhhujiYi-gKcmnqvTTrvLHhVFTIgckHBshm5XF2EX24VEnsZn8clcwMOfPzP555_kY-xawq0ESO8iACgtDkKTKbE7YR2pFYhMYnLKOgCIQhuD5-wixgWATFOTddh0VlY5p1Yz2no-bCdHsTlsxvPow5aasq7i78_jJpTVO28-PH9YkvvkE0980tRhFXlZ8dd661dzH7gChZfsrKBl9Ff_3mXTwdNbfyhG4-eX_v1IOGmSRvhc-wJNrp2j9gqByHmgHDHJEj2XMtdArudRmzylXmtglDfUK0yakC6wy26OvetQf218bOyi3oSqfWlR6rYjNTppU-qYcqGOMfjCrkO5ovBtJdg9PnvEZw_a47M7_AOH4mJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149647546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wind and Wave Hindcast and Observations During the Black Sea Storms in November 2023</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yurovskaya, Maria V. ; Shokurov, Mikhail V. ; Barabanov, Vladislav S. ; Yurovsky, Yury Yu ; Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N. ; Kamenev, Oleg T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yurovskaya, Maria V. ; Shokurov, Mikhail V. ; Barabanov, Vladislav S. ; Yurovsky, Yury Yu ; Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N. ; Kamenev, Oleg T.</creatorcontrib><description>The Black Sea coasts from the northwest of Turkey through Crimea to Georgia were strongly affected by severe storms in Autumn, 2023. The aim of the work is to compare the performance of different wave model approaches and wind datasets in extreme weather conditions in the Black Sea. The study covers the continuous period from the 1st to the 30th of November including two strong storms with wave heights up to 9–10 m. Wave simulations are performed using WAM and the 2D parametric model for surface wave development suggested in Kudryavtsev et al. (2021a). The wave models are forced by hourly wind fields from four datasets: ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA5), ECMWF Level-4 bias-corrected operational model, NCEP (CFSv2), and the regional WRF-ARW model with 6-hour NCEP/NCAR atmospheric forecast as input. The high-resolution Level-4 wave analysis for the Black Sea produced by CMEMS (also using WAM Cycle 6) is also considered. Simulation results are validated against along-track altimeter measurements of significant wave height, CFOSAT SWIM information on dominant wavelength and wave direction, and in-situ data from an oceanographic platform near Crimea. All models demonstrate their overall good performance, though third-generation wave spectral models give an expectedly higher correlation between simulations and observed data, while the parametric model is less accurate. Some recommendations to combine wind and wave models for the most accurate predictions are further given. As known, the wind speed fields produced by ECMWF are underestimated at winds higher than 15–20 m/s. While the wind correction is crucial when using the parametric model, WAM better reproduces the observed extreme waves without it. As also obtained, WAM simulations forced by NCEP and WRF winds lead to an overestimation of the largest storm waves. Increased resolution of the wind fields does not lead to significant improvement in the quality of wave predictions, which can be explained by the wind accumulation effect during wave development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-4553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00024-024-03592-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Altimeters ; Datasets ; Extreme waves ; Extreme weather ; Severe storms ; Significant wave height ; Simulation ; Storm waves ; Storms ; Surface water waves ; Surface waves ; Wave analysis ; Wave direction ; Wave height ; Wave models ; Wavelength ; Weather ; Weather conditions ; Wind ; Wind effects ; Wind fields ; Wind speed ; Winds</subject><ispartof>Pure and applied geophysics, 2024-11, Vol.181 (11), p.3149-3171</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Nov 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-ed4ef35d4cca02330aace0ad336964b11d40ac8e345d7a8345052e5a8f576a4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yurovskaya, Maria V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokurov, Mikhail V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barabanov, Vladislav S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurovsky, Yury Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamenev, Oleg T.</creatorcontrib><title>Wind and Wave Hindcast and Observations During the Black Sea Storms in November 2023</title><title>Pure and applied geophysics</title><description>The Black Sea coasts from the northwest of Turkey through Crimea to Georgia were strongly affected by severe storms in Autumn, 2023. The aim of the work is to compare the performance of different wave model approaches and wind datasets in extreme weather conditions in the Black Sea. The study covers the continuous period from the 1st to the 30th of November including two strong storms with wave heights up to 9–10 m. Wave simulations are performed using WAM and the 2D parametric model for surface wave development suggested in Kudryavtsev et al. (2021a). The wave models are forced by hourly wind fields from four datasets: ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA5), ECMWF Level-4 bias-corrected operational model, NCEP (CFSv2), and the regional WRF-ARW model with 6-hour NCEP/NCAR atmospheric forecast as input. The high-resolution Level-4 wave analysis for the Black Sea produced by CMEMS (also using WAM Cycle 6) is also considered. Simulation results are validated against along-track altimeter measurements of significant wave height, CFOSAT SWIM information on dominant wavelength and wave direction, and in-situ data from an oceanographic platform near Crimea. All models demonstrate their overall good performance, though third-generation wave spectral models give an expectedly higher correlation between simulations and observed data, while the parametric model is less accurate. Some recommendations to combine wind and wave models for the most accurate predictions are further given. As known, the wind speed fields produced by ECMWF are underestimated at winds higher than 15–20 m/s. While the wind correction is crucial when using the parametric model, WAM better reproduces the observed extreme waves without it. As also obtained, WAM simulations forced by NCEP and WRF winds lead to an overestimation of the largest storm waves. Increased resolution of the wind fields does not lead to significant improvement in the quality of wave predictions, which can be explained by the wind accumulation effect during wave development.</description><subject>Altimeters</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Extreme waves</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Severe storms</subject><subject>Significant wave height</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Storm waves</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Surface water waves</subject><subject>Surface waves</subject><subject>Wave analysis</subject><subject>Wave direction</subject><subject>Wave height</subject><subject>Wave models</subject><subject>Wavelength</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather conditions</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind effects</subject><subject>Wind fields</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><subject>Winds</subject><issn>0033-4553</issn><issn>1420-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMFOAjEQhhujiYi-gKcmnqvTTrvLHhVFTIgckHBshm5XF2EX24VEnsZn8clcwMOfPzP555_kY-xawq0ESO8iACgtDkKTKbE7YR2pFYhMYnLKOgCIQhuD5-wixgWATFOTddh0VlY5p1Yz2no-bCdHsTlsxvPow5aasq7i78_jJpTVO28-PH9YkvvkE0980tRhFXlZ8dd661dzH7gChZfsrKBl9Ff_3mXTwdNbfyhG4-eX_v1IOGmSRvhc-wJNrp2j9gqByHmgHDHJEj2XMtdArudRmzylXmtglDfUK0yakC6wy26OvetQf218bOyi3oSqfWlR6rYjNTppU-qYcqGOMfjCrkO5ovBtJdg9PnvEZw_a47M7_AOH4mJw</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Yurovskaya, Maria V.</creator><creator>Shokurov, Mikhail V.</creator><creator>Barabanov, Vladislav S.</creator><creator>Yurovsky, Yury Yu</creator><creator>Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N.</creator><creator>Kamenev, Oleg T.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Wind and Wave Hindcast and Observations During the Black Sea Storms in November 2023</title><author>Yurovskaya, Maria V. ; Shokurov, Mikhail V. ; Barabanov, Vladislav S. ; Yurovsky, Yury Yu ; Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N. ; Kamenev, Oleg T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-ed4ef35d4cca02330aace0ad336964b11d40ac8e345d7a8345052e5a8f576a4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Altimeters</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Extreme waves</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Severe storms</topic><topic>Significant wave height</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Storm waves</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Surface water waves</topic><topic>Surface waves</topic><topic>Wave analysis</topic><topic>Wave direction</topic><topic>Wave height</topic><topic>Wave models</topic><topic>Wavelength</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather conditions</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind effects</topic><topic>Wind fields</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><topic>Winds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yurovskaya, Maria V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokurov, Mikhail V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barabanov, Vladislav S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurovsky, Yury Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamenev, Oleg T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yurovskaya, Maria V.</au><au>Shokurov, Mikhail V.</au><au>Barabanov, Vladislav S.</au><au>Yurovsky, Yury Yu</au><au>Kudryavtsev, Vladimir N.</au><au>Kamenev, Oleg T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wind and Wave Hindcast and Observations During the Black Sea Storms in November 2023</atitle><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>181</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3149</spage><epage>3171</epage><pages>3149-3171</pages><issn>0033-4553</issn><eissn>1420-9136</eissn><abstract>The Black Sea coasts from the northwest of Turkey through Crimea to Georgia were strongly affected by severe storms in Autumn, 2023. The aim of the work is to compare the performance of different wave model approaches and wind datasets in extreme weather conditions in the Black Sea. The study covers the continuous period from the 1st to the 30th of November including two strong storms with wave heights up to 9–10 m. Wave simulations are performed using WAM and the 2D parametric model for surface wave development suggested in Kudryavtsev et al. (2021a). The wave models are forced by hourly wind fields from four datasets: ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA5), ECMWF Level-4 bias-corrected operational model, NCEP (CFSv2), and the regional WRF-ARW model with 6-hour NCEP/NCAR atmospheric forecast as input. The high-resolution Level-4 wave analysis for the Black Sea produced by CMEMS (also using WAM Cycle 6) is also considered. Simulation results are validated against along-track altimeter measurements of significant wave height, CFOSAT SWIM information on dominant wavelength and wave direction, and in-situ data from an oceanographic platform near Crimea. All models demonstrate their overall good performance, though third-generation wave spectral models give an expectedly higher correlation between simulations and observed data, while the parametric model is less accurate. Some recommendations to combine wind and wave models for the most accurate predictions are further given. As known, the wind speed fields produced by ECMWF are underestimated at winds higher than 15–20 m/s. While the wind correction is crucial when using the parametric model, WAM better reproduces the observed extreme waves without it. As also obtained, WAM simulations forced by NCEP and WRF winds lead to an overestimation of the largest storm waves. Increased resolution of the wind fields does not lead to significant improvement in the quality of wave predictions, which can be explained by the wind accumulation effect during wave development.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00024-024-03592-z</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-4553 |
ispartof | Pure and applied geophysics, 2024-11, Vol.181 (11), p.3149-3171 |
issn | 0033-4553 1420-9136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3149647546 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Altimeters Datasets Extreme waves Extreme weather Severe storms Significant wave height Simulation Storm waves Storms Surface water waves Surface waves Wave analysis Wave direction Wave height Wave models Wavelength Weather Weather conditions Wind Wind effects Wind fields Wind speed Winds |
title | Wind and Wave Hindcast and Observations During the Black Sea Storms in November 2023 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wind%20and%20Wave%20Hindcast%20and%20Observations%C2%A0During%20the%20Black%20Sea%20Storms%20in%20November%202023&rft.jtitle=Pure%20and%20applied%20geophysics&rft.au=Yurovskaya,%20Maria%20V.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3149&rft.epage=3171&rft.pages=3149-3171&rft.issn=0033-4553&rft.eissn=1420-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00024-024-03592-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3149647546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149647546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |