Comparison of Bacterial Adherence on Different Archwires after Clinical Use

ABSTRACT Background: An essential component of orthodontic therapy, orthodontic archwires may operate as surfaces for bacterial adhesion, which might result in issues with oral health. Materials and Methods: This study assessed the bacterial adhesion to three different kinds of orthodontic archwires...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science 2024-12, Vol.16 (Suppl 4), p.S3778-S3780
Hauptverfasser: Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed, Mude, Nakul N, Chandrasekaran, Divya, Goswami, Dwijesh S, Almutairi, Omar Naif, Manimegalan, Priya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S3780
container_issue Suppl 4
container_start_page S3778
container_title Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science
container_volume 16
creator Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed
Mude, Nakul N
Chandrasekaran, Divya
Goswami, Dwijesh S
Almutairi, Omar Naif
Manimegalan, Priya
description ABSTRACT Background: An essential component of orthodontic therapy, orthodontic archwires may operate as surfaces for bacterial adhesion, which might result in issues with oral health. Materials and Methods: This study assessed the bacterial adhesion to three different kinds of orthodontic archwires: beta-titanium (TMA), nickel-titanium (NiTi), and stainless steel (SS). At the conclusion of the clinical usage period, samples of each kind of archwire were gathered and submitted to microbiological investigation in order to determine the quantity of adhering bacterial colonies. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the surface properties of the archwires were evaluated after usage. Results: The three kinds of archwires had significantly different rates of bacterial adhesion, according to the findings. With an average of 1500 ± 50 CFU/mm[sup.2], SS archwires showed the highest level of bacterial adhesion, followed by NiTi archwires at 1100 ± 45 CFU/mm[sup.2]. The least amount of bacteria adhered to TMA archwires, with an average of 800 ± 30 CFU/mm[sup.2]. According to SEM pictures, the degree of bacterial adhesion was associated with the archwires' surface roughness, with smoother surfaces showing less bacterial colonization. Conclusion: In comparison with SS and NiTi archwires, the research finds that TMA archwires are linked to the least amount of bacterial adhesion. Keywords: Bacterial adherence, beta-titanium, clinical use, microbiological analysis, nickel-titanium, orthodontic archwires, scanning electron microscopy, stainless steel
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_974_24
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3149313469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A821410913</galeid><sourcerecordid>A821410913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1369-f8a4e9d4bc5d8e652cba7b9c2472cb90bb944b0e638e09825ddf2520014f001d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtLxDAQx4MouKx791jw3DWvPnKs9YkLXtxzSNOJm6VtatJF_PZmdwUVnMBkZvKbDMwfoUuCl5xgdr0dm7DcOykKLik_QTMsiiwtOM5PD3Ge8rIQ52gRwhZHY4IKwmbouXb9qLwNbkicSW6UnsBb1SVVuwEPg4YkvtxaY_bZlFRebz6sh5AoE8mk7uxgdeTXAS7QmVFdgMX3PUfr-7vX-jFdvTw81dUq1YTlIjWl4iBa3uisLSHPqG5U0QhNeRFDgZtGcN5gyFkJWJQ0a1tDM4ox4Sa6ls3R1fHf0bv3HYRJbt3OD3GkZIQLRhjPxQ_1pjqQdjBu8kr3NmhZlZTEvcUFRGr5DxVPC73VbgBjY_1PAz42aO9C8GDk6G2v_KckWO7FkAcdfonBvgDfc30L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149313469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Bacterial Adherence on Different Archwires after Clinical Use</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed ; Mude, Nakul N ; Chandrasekaran, Divya ; Goswami, Dwijesh S ; Almutairi, Omar Naif ; Manimegalan, Priya</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed ; Mude, Nakul N ; Chandrasekaran, Divya ; Goswami, Dwijesh S ; Almutairi, Omar Naif ; Manimegalan, Priya</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Background: An essential component of orthodontic therapy, orthodontic archwires may operate as surfaces for bacterial adhesion, which might result in issues with oral health. Materials and Methods: This study assessed the bacterial adhesion to three different kinds of orthodontic archwires: beta-titanium (TMA), nickel-titanium (NiTi), and stainless steel (SS). At the conclusion of the clinical usage period, samples of each kind of archwire were gathered and submitted to microbiological investigation in order to determine the quantity of adhering bacterial colonies. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the surface properties of the archwires were evaluated after usage. Results: The three kinds of archwires had significantly different rates of bacterial adhesion, according to the findings. With an average of 1500 ± 50 CFU/mm[sup.2], SS archwires showed the highest level of bacterial adhesion, followed by NiTi archwires at 1100 ± 45 CFU/mm[sup.2]. The least amount of bacteria adhered to TMA archwires, with an average of 800 ± 30 CFU/mm[sup.2]. According to SEM pictures, the degree of bacterial adhesion was associated with the archwires' surface roughness, with smoother surfaces showing less bacterial colonization. Conclusion: In comparison with SS and NiTi archwires, the research finds that TMA archwires are linked to the least amount of bacterial adhesion. Keywords: Bacterial adherence, beta-titanium, clinical use, microbiological analysis, nickel-titanium, orthodontic archwires, scanning electron microscopy, stainless steel</description><identifier>ISSN: 0976-4879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-7406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_974_24</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Health aspects ; Microbiology ; Orthodontics ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Stainless steel ; Steel, Stainless ; Surface properties ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmacy &amp; bioallied science, 2024-12, Vol.16 (Suppl 4), p.S3778-S3780</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1369-f8a4e9d4bc5d8e652cba7b9c2472cb90bb944b0e638e09825ddf2520014f001d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,862,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mude, Nakul N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekaran, Divya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goswami, Dwijesh S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almutairi, Omar Naif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manimegalan, Priya</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Bacterial Adherence on Different Archwires after Clinical Use</title><title>Journal of pharmacy &amp; bioallied science</title><description>ABSTRACT Background: An essential component of orthodontic therapy, orthodontic archwires may operate as surfaces for bacterial adhesion, which might result in issues with oral health. Materials and Methods: This study assessed the bacterial adhesion to three different kinds of orthodontic archwires: beta-titanium (TMA), nickel-titanium (NiTi), and stainless steel (SS). At the conclusion of the clinical usage period, samples of each kind of archwire were gathered and submitted to microbiological investigation in order to determine the quantity of adhering bacterial colonies. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the surface properties of the archwires were evaluated after usage. Results: The three kinds of archwires had significantly different rates of bacterial adhesion, according to the findings. With an average of 1500 ± 50 CFU/mm[sup.2], SS archwires showed the highest level of bacterial adhesion, followed by NiTi archwires at 1100 ± 45 CFU/mm[sup.2]. The least amount of bacteria adhered to TMA archwires, with an average of 800 ± 30 CFU/mm[sup.2]. According to SEM pictures, the degree of bacterial adhesion was associated with the archwires' surface roughness, with smoother surfaces showing less bacterial colonization. Conclusion: In comparison with SS and NiTi archwires, the research finds that TMA archwires are linked to the least amount of bacterial adhesion. Keywords: Bacterial adherence, beta-titanium, clinical use, microbiological analysis, nickel-titanium, orthodontic archwires, scanning electron microscopy, stainless steel</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Steel, Stainless</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>0976-4879</issn><issn>0975-7406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkUtLxDAQx4MouKx791jw3DWvPnKs9YkLXtxzSNOJm6VtatJF_PZmdwUVnMBkZvKbDMwfoUuCl5xgdr0dm7DcOykKLik_QTMsiiwtOM5PD3Ge8rIQ52gRwhZHY4IKwmbouXb9qLwNbkicSW6UnsBb1SVVuwEPg4YkvtxaY_bZlFRebz6sh5AoE8mk7uxgdeTXAS7QmVFdgMX3PUfr-7vX-jFdvTw81dUq1YTlIjWl4iBa3uisLSHPqG5U0QhNeRFDgZtGcN5gyFkJWJQ0a1tDM4ox4Sa6ls3R1fHf0bv3HYRJbt3OD3GkZIQLRhjPxQ_1pjqQdjBu8kr3NmhZlZTEvcUFRGr5DxVPC73VbgBjY_1PAz42aO9C8GDk6G2v_KckWO7FkAcdfonBvgDfc30L</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed</creator><creator>Mude, Nakul N</creator><creator>Chandrasekaran, Divya</creator><creator>Goswami, Dwijesh S</creator><creator>Almutairi, Omar Naif</creator><creator>Manimegalan, Priya</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Bacterial Adherence on Different Archwires after Clinical Use</title><author>Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed ; Mude, Nakul N ; Chandrasekaran, Divya ; Goswami, Dwijesh S ; Almutairi, Omar Naif ; Manimegalan, Priya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1369-f8a4e9d4bc5d8e652cba7b9c2472cb90bb944b0e638e09825ddf2520014f001d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Steel, Stainless</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mude, Nakul N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekaran, Divya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goswami, Dwijesh S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almutairi, Omar Naif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manimegalan, Priya</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmacy &amp; bioallied science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashique Abdulhameed, Syed</au><au>Mude, Nakul N</au><au>Chandrasekaran, Divya</au><au>Goswami, Dwijesh S</au><au>Almutairi, Omar Naif</au><au>Manimegalan, Priya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Bacterial Adherence on Different Archwires after Clinical Use</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmacy &amp; bioallied science</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>Suppl 4</issue><spage>S3778</spage><epage>S3780</epage><pages>S3778-S3780</pages><issn>0976-4879</issn><eissn>0975-7406</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Background: An essential component of orthodontic therapy, orthodontic archwires may operate as surfaces for bacterial adhesion, which might result in issues with oral health. Materials and Methods: This study assessed the bacterial adhesion to three different kinds of orthodontic archwires: beta-titanium (TMA), nickel-titanium (NiTi), and stainless steel (SS). At the conclusion of the clinical usage period, samples of each kind of archwire were gathered and submitted to microbiological investigation in order to determine the quantity of adhering bacterial colonies. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the surface properties of the archwires were evaluated after usage. Results: The three kinds of archwires had significantly different rates of bacterial adhesion, according to the findings. With an average of 1500 ± 50 CFU/mm[sup.2], SS archwires showed the highest level of bacterial adhesion, followed by NiTi archwires at 1100 ± 45 CFU/mm[sup.2]. The least amount of bacteria adhered to TMA archwires, with an average of 800 ± 30 CFU/mm[sup.2]. According to SEM pictures, the degree of bacterial adhesion was associated with the archwires' surface roughness, with smoother surfaces showing less bacterial colonization. Conclusion: In comparison with SS and NiTi archwires, the research finds that TMA archwires are linked to the least amount of bacterial adhesion. Keywords: Bacterial adherence, beta-titanium, clinical use, microbiological analysis, nickel-titanium, orthodontic archwires, scanning electron microscopy, stainless steel</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_974_24</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0976-4879
ispartof Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science, 2024-12, Vol.16 (Suppl 4), p.S3778-S3780
issn 0976-4879
0975-7406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3149313469
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Adhesives
Health aspects
Microbiology
Orthodontics
Scanning electron microscopy
Stainless steel
Steel, Stainless
Surface properties
Titanium
title Comparison of Bacterial Adherence on Different Archwires after Clinical Use
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Bacterial%20Adherence%20on%20Different%20Archwires%20after%20Clinical%20Use&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmacy%20&%20bioallied%20science&rft.au=Ashique%20Abdulhameed,%20Syed&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=Suppl%204&rft.spage=S3778&rft.epage=S3780&rft.pages=S3778-S3780&rft.issn=0976-4879&rft.eissn=0975-7406&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_974_24&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA821410913%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149313469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A821410913&rfr_iscdi=true