A region-wide, multi-year set of crop field boundary labels for Africa

African agriculture is undergoing rapid transformation. Annual maps of crop fields are key to understanding the nature of this transformation, but such maps are currently lacking and must be developed using advanced machine learning models trained on high resolution remote sensing imagery. To enable...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Estes, L D, Wussah, A, Asipunu, M, Gathigi, M, Kovačič, P, Muhando, J, Yeboah, B V, Addai, F K, Akakpo, E S, Allotey, M K, Amkoya, P, Amponsem, E, Donkoh, K D, N Ha, Heltzel, E, Juma, C, Mdawida, R, Miroyo, A, Mucha, J, Mugami, J, Mwawaza, F, Nyarko, D A, Oduor, P, Ohemeng, K N, Segbefia, S I D, Tumbula, T, Wambua, F, Xeflide, G H, S Ye, Yeboah, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Estes, L D
Wussah, A
Asipunu, M
Gathigi, M
Kovačič, P
Muhando, J
Yeboah, B V
Addai, F K
Akakpo, E S
Allotey, M K
Amkoya, P
Amponsem, E
Donkoh, K D
N Ha
Heltzel, E
Juma, C
Mdawida, R
Miroyo, A
Mucha, J
Mugami, J
Mwawaza, F
Nyarko, D A
Oduor, P
Ohemeng, K N
Segbefia, S I D
Tumbula, T
Wambua, F
Xeflide, G H
S Ye
Yeboah, F
description African agriculture is undergoing rapid transformation. Annual maps of crop fields are key to understanding the nature of this transformation, but such maps are currently lacking and must be developed using advanced machine learning models trained on high resolution remote sensing imagery. To enable the development of such models, we delineated field boundaries in 33,746 Planet images captured between 2017 and 2023 across the continent using a custom labeling platform with built-in procedures for assessing and mitigating label error. We collected 42,403 labels, including 7,204 labels arising from tasks dedicated to assessing label quality (Class 1 labels), 32,167 from sites mapped once by a single labeller (Class 2) and 3,032 labels from sites where 3 or more labellers were tasked to map the same location (Class 4). Class 1 labels were used to calculate labeller-specific quality scores, while Class 1 and 4 sites mapped by at least 3 labellers were used to further evaluate label uncertainty using a Bayesian risk metric. Quality metrics showed that label quality was moderately high (0.75) for measures of total field extent, but low regarding the number of individual fields delineated (0.33), and the position of field edges (0.05). These values are expected when delineating small-scale fields in 3-5 m resolution imagery, which can be too coarse to reliably distinguish smaller fields, particularly in dense croplands, and therefore requires substantial labeller judgement. Nevertheless, previous work shows that such labels can train effective field mapping models. Furthermore, this large, probabilistic sample on its own provides valuable insight into regional agricultural characteristics, highlighting variations in the median field size and density. The imagery and vectorized labels along with quality information is available for download from two public repositories.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3149107673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3149107673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_31491076733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyk0KwjAQQOEgCBbtHQbcGkiT_uiyiMUDuC-xnUhKbOqkQXp7XXgAV2_xvRVLpFIZP-ZSblgawiCEkGUli0IlrKmB8GH9yN-2xwM8o5stX1ATBJzBG-jIT2Asuh7uPo69pgWcvqMLYDxBbch2esfWRruA6a9btm8ut_OVT-RfEcPcDj7S-KVWZfkpE1VZKfXf9QFJpjpq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149107673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A region-wide, multi-year set of crop field boundary labels for Africa</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Estes, L D ; Wussah, A ; Asipunu, M ; Gathigi, M ; Kovačič, P ; Muhando, J ; Yeboah, B V ; Addai, F K ; Akakpo, E S ; Allotey, M K ; Amkoya, P ; Amponsem, E ; Donkoh, K D ; N Ha ; Heltzel, E ; Juma, C ; Mdawida, R ; Miroyo, A ; Mucha, J ; Mugami, J ; Mwawaza, F ; Nyarko, D A ; Oduor, P ; Ohemeng, K N ; Segbefia, S I D ; Tumbula, T ; Wambua, F ; Xeflide, G H ; S Ye ; Yeboah, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Estes, L D ; Wussah, A ; Asipunu, M ; Gathigi, M ; Kovačič, P ; Muhando, J ; Yeboah, B V ; Addai, F K ; Akakpo, E S ; Allotey, M K ; Amkoya, P ; Amponsem, E ; Donkoh, K D ; N Ha ; Heltzel, E ; Juma, C ; Mdawida, R ; Miroyo, A ; Mucha, J ; Mugami, J ; Mwawaza, F ; Nyarko, D A ; Oduor, P ; Ohemeng, K N ; Segbefia, S I D ; Tumbula, T ; Wambua, F ; Xeflide, G H ; S Ye ; Yeboah, F</creatorcontrib><description>African agriculture is undergoing rapid transformation. Annual maps of crop fields are key to understanding the nature of this transformation, but such maps are currently lacking and must be developed using advanced machine learning models trained on high resolution remote sensing imagery. To enable the development of such models, we delineated field boundaries in 33,746 Planet images captured between 2017 and 2023 across the continent using a custom labeling platform with built-in procedures for assessing and mitigating label error. We collected 42,403 labels, including 7,204 labels arising from tasks dedicated to assessing label quality (Class 1 labels), 32,167 from sites mapped once by a single labeller (Class 2) and 3,032 labels from sites where 3 or more labellers were tasked to map the same location (Class 4). Class 1 labels were used to calculate labeller-specific quality scores, while Class 1 and 4 sites mapped by at least 3 labellers were used to further evaluate label uncertainty using a Bayesian risk metric. Quality metrics showed that label quality was moderately high (0.75) for measures of total field extent, but low regarding the number of individual fields delineated (0.33), and the position of field edges (0.05). These values are expected when delineating small-scale fields in 3-5 m resolution imagery, which can be too coarse to reliably distinguish smaller fields, particularly in dense croplands, and therefore requires substantial labeller judgement. Nevertheless, previous work shows that such labels can train effective field mapping models. Furthermore, this large, probabilistic sample on its own provides valuable insight into regional agricultural characteristics, highlighting variations in the median field size and density. The imagery and vectorized labels along with quality information is available for download from two public repositories.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Agricultural aircraft ; Image quality ; Image resolution ; Labels ; Machine learning ; Position measurement ; Remote sensing ; Transformations (mathematics)</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Estes, L D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wussah, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asipunu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathigi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovačič, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhando, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeboah, B V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addai, F K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akakpo, E S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allotey, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amkoya, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amponsem, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donkoh, K D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heltzel, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juma, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mdawida, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miroyo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mucha, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugami, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwawaza, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyarko, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oduor, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohemeng, K N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segbefia, S I D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tumbula, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wambua, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xeflide, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeboah, F</creatorcontrib><title>A region-wide, multi-year set of crop field boundary labels for Africa</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>African agriculture is undergoing rapid transformation. Annual maps of crop fields are key to understanding the nature of this transformation, but such maps are currently lacking and must be developed using advanced machine learning models trained on high resolution remote sensing imagery. To enable the development of such models, we delineated field boundaries in 33,746 Planet images captured between 2017 and 2023 across the continent using a custom labeling platform with built-in procedures for assessing and mitigating label error. We collected 42,403 labels, including 7,204 labels arising from tasks dedicated to assessing label quality (Class 1 labels), 32,167 from sites mapped once by a single labeller (Class 2) and 3,032 labels from sites where 3 or more labellers were tasked to map the same location (Class 4). Class 1 labels were used to calculate labeller-specific quality scores, while Class 1 and 4 sites mapped by at least 3 labellers were used to further evaluate label uncertainty using a Bayesian risk metric. Quality metrics showed that label quality was moderately high (0.75) for measures of total field extent, but low regarding the number of individual fields delineated (0.33), and the position of field edges (0.05). These values are expected when delineating small-scale fields in 3-5 m resolution imagery, which can be too coarse to reliably distinguish smaller fields, particularly in dense croplands, and therefore requires substantial labeller judgement. Nevertheless, previous work shows that such labels can train effective field mapping models. Furthermore, this large, probabilistic sample on its own provides valuable insight into regional agricultural characteristics, highlighting variations in the median field size and density. The imagery and vectorized labels along with quality information is available for download from two public repositories.</description><subject>Agricultural aircraft</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Image resolution</subject><subject>Labels</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Position measurement</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Transformations (mathematics)</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyk0KwjAQQOEgCBbtHQbcGkiT_uiyiMUDuC-xnUhKbOqkQXp7XXgAV2_xvRVLpFIZP-ZSblgawiCEkGUli0IlrKmB8GH9yN-2xwM8o5stX1ATBJzBG-jIT2Asuh7uPo69pgWcvqMLYDxBbch2esfWRruA6a9btm8ut_OVT-RfEcPcDj7S-KVWZfkpE1VZKfXf9QFJpjpq</recordid><startdate>20241224</startdate><enddate>20241224</enddate><creator>Estes, L D</creator><creator>Wussah, A</creator><creator>Asipunu, M</creator><creator>Gathigi, M</creator><creator>Kovačič, P</creator><creator>Muhando, J</creator><creator>Yeboah, B V</creator><creator>Addai, F K</creator><creator>Akakpo, E S</creator><creator>Allotey, M K</creator><creator>Amkoya, P</creator><creator>Amponsem, E</creator><creator>Donkoh, K D</creator><creator>N Ha</creator><creator>Heltzel, E</creator><creator>Juma, C</creator><creator>Mdawida, R</creator><creator>Miroyo, A</creator><creator>Mucha, J</creator><creator>Mugami, J</creator><creator>Mwawaza, F</creator><creator>Nyarko, D A</creator><creator>Oduor, P</creator><creator>Ohemeng, K N</creator><creator>Segbefia, S I D</creator><creator>Tumbula, T</creator><creator>Wambua, F</creator><creator>Xeflide, G H</creator><creator>S Ye</creator><creator>Yeboah, F</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241224</creationdate><title>A region-wide, multi-year set of crop field boundary labels for Africa</title><author>Estes, L D ; Wussah, A ; Asipunu, M ; Gathigi, M ; Kovačič, P ; Muhando, J ; Yeboah, B V ; Addai, F K ; Akakpo, E S ; Allotey, M K ; Amkoya, P ; Amponsem, E ; Donkoh, K D ; N Ha ; Heltzel, E ; Juma, C ; Mdawida, R ; Miroyo, A ; Mucha, J ; Mugami, J ; Mwawaza, F ; Nyarko, D A ; Oduor, P ; Ohemeng, K N ; Segbefia, S I D ; Tumbula, T ; Wambua, F ; Xeflide, G H ; S Ye ; Yeboah, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31491076733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural aircraft</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Image resolution</topic><topic>Labels</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Position measurement</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Transformations (mathematics)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Estes, L D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wussah, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asipunu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathigi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovačič, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhando, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeboah, B V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addai, F K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akakpo, E S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allotey, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amkoya, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amponsem, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donkoh, K D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heltzel, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juma, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mdawida, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miroyo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mucha, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugami, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwawaza, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyarko, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oduor, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohemeng, K N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segbefia, S I D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tumbula, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wambua, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xeflide, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeboah, F</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Estes, L D</au><au>Wussah, A</au><au>Asipunu, M</au><au>Gathigi, M</au><au>Kovačič, P</au><au>Muhando, J</au><au>Yeboah, B V</au><au>Addai, F K</au><au>Akakpo, E S</au><au>Allotey, M K</au><au>Amkoya, P</au><au>Amponsem, E</au><au>Donkoh, K D</au><au>N Ha</au><au>Heltzel, E</au><au>Juma, C</au><au>Mdawida, R</au><au>Miroyo, A</au><au>Mucha, J</au><au>Mugami, J</au><au>Mwawaza, F</au><au>Nyarko, D A</au><au>Oduor, P</au><au>Ohemeng, K N</au><au>Segbefia, S I D</au><au>Tumbula, T</au><au>Wambua, F</au><au>Xeflide, G H</au><au>S Ye</au><au>Yeboah, F</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>A region-wide, multi-year set of crop field boundary labels for Africa</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-12-24</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>African agriculture is undergoing rapid transformation. Annual maps of crop fields are key to understanding the nature of this transformation, but such maps are currently lacking and must be developed using advanced machine learning models trained on high resolution remote sensing imagery. To enable the development of such models, we delineated field boundaries in 33,746 Planet images captured between 2017 and 2023 across the continent using a custom labeling platform with built-in procedures for assessing and mitigating label error. We collected 42,403 labels, including 7,204 labels arising from tasks dedicated to assessing label quality (Class 1 labels), 32,167 from sites mapped once by a single labeller (Class 2) and 3,032 labels from sites where 3 or more labellers were tasked to map the same location (Class 4). Class 1 labels were used to calculate labeller-specific quality scores, while Class 1 and 4 sites mapped by at least 3 labellers were used to further evaluate label uncertainty using a Bayesian risk metric. Quality metrics showed that label quality was moderately high (0.75) for measures of total field extent, but low regarding the number of individual fields delineated (0.33), and the position of field edges (0.05). These values are expected when delineating small-scale fields in 3-5 m resolution imagery, which can be too coarse to reliably distinguish smaller fields, particularly in dense croplands, and therefore requires substantial labeller judgement. Nevertheless, previous work shows that such labels can train effective field mapping models. Furthermore, this large, probabilistic sample on its own provides valuable insight into regional agricultural characteristics, highlighting variations in the median field size and density. The imagery and vectorized labels along with quality information is available for download from two public repositories.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2024-12
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3149107673
source Free E- Journals
subjects Agricultural aircraft
Image quality
Image resolution
Labels
Machine learning
Position measurement
Remote sensing
Transformations (mathematics)
title A region-wide, multi-year set of crop field boundary labels for Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=A%20region-wide,%20multi-year%20set%20of%20crop%20field%20boundary%20labels%20for%20Africa&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Estes,%20L%20D&rft.date=2024-12-24&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3149107673%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149107673&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true