A Reliability Evaluation Methodology for X-in-the-Loop Simulation in Autonomous Vehicle Systems
X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS) is a method to validate automated vehicle systems that combines several simulation techniques. XILS combines real hardware, software, and virtual models to test the functionality of autonomous driving systems. XILS is particularly effective because it enables repeatab...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE access 2024, Vol.12, p.193622-193640 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 193640 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 193622 |
container_title | IEEE access |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Oh, Taeyoung Cho, Sungwoo Yoo, Jinwoo |
description | X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS) is a method to validate automated vehicle systems that combines several simulation techniques. XILS combines real hardware, software, and virtual models to test the functionality of autonomous driving systems. XILS is particularly effective because it enables repeatable and reproducible testing across diverse scenarios and can comprehensively evaluate system performance. While researchers have had great success implementing XILS platforms that closely approximate real-world vehicle testing environments, the performance of vehicles in XILS testing may still differ from what is observed in real-world testing, especially with respect to the reliability of the test results. In other words, better methods are still needed to evaluate the reliability of XILS platforms. In this paper, we propose such a method. The new approach includes scenario definition, key test parameter definition, and procedures to evaluate consistency and correlation based on statistical and mathematical comparisons between the datasets from XILS tests and real-world tests. This is done from both a parameter and scenario perspective. Furthermore, we introduce and examine reliability evaluation criteria for XILS that are based on empirical findings from repeated tests. In order to determine the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, we used it to evaluate the reliability of a vehicle-in-the-loop simulation, which is a specific approach within XILS, in the form of a case study. Ultimately, this paper analyzes the factors that impact the reliability of simulation-based validation for automated vehicle systems and provides guidance for improving overall reliability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3519713 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3149094638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10806714</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0687cd5c761b4741877e1fb27dda3077</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3149094638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1598-8fcd89bdd80030f4d007adb7b9aa1d2e8e9311be2769ba66cd37cf55ddfca5763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUV1LwzAULaLgmPsF-hDwuTNp2nw8jjF1MBGsim8hTdIto21m0gr993Z2yO7LvRzOOffAiaJbBOcIQf6wWC5XeT5PYJLOcYY4RfgimiSI8BhnmFye3dfRLIQ9HIYNUEYnkViAN1NZWdjKtj1Y_ciqk611DXgx7c5pV7ltD0rnwVdsm7jdmXjj3AHktu6qkWgbsOha17jadQF8mp1VlQF5H1pTh5voqpRVMLPTnkYfj6v35XO8eX1aLxebWKGMs5iVSjNeaM0gxLBMNYRU6oIWXEqkE8MMxwgVJqGEF5IQpTFVZZZpXSqZUYKn0Xr01U7uxcHbWvpeOGnFH-D8VkjfHpMJSBhVOlOUoCKlKWKUGlQWCdVaYkjp4HU_eh28--5MaMXedb4Z4guMUg55SjAbWHhkKe9C8Kb8_4qgOBYjxmLEsRhxKmZQ3Y0qa4w5UzBIKErxL8SoijM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149094638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Reliability Evaluation Methodology for X-in-the-Loop Simulation in Autonomous Vehicle Systems</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Oh, Taeyoung ; Cho, Sungwoo ; Yoo, Jinwoo</creator><creatorcontrib>Oh, Taeyoung ; Cho, Sungwoo ; Yoo, Jinwoo</creatorcontrib><description>X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS) is a method to validate automated vehicle systems that combines several simulation techniques. XILS combines real hardware, software, and virtual models to test the functionality of autonomous driving systems. XILS is particularly effective because it enables repeatable and reproducible testing across diverse scenarios and can comprehensively evaluate system performance. While researchers have had great success implementing XILS platforms that closely approximate real-world vehicle testing environments, the performance of vehicles in XILS testing may still differ from what is observed in real-world testing, especially with respect to the reliability of the test results. In other words, better methods are still needed to evaluate the reliability of XILS platforms. In this paper, we propose such a method. The new approach includes scenario definition, key test parameter definition, and procedures to evaluate consistency and correlation based on statistical and mathematical comparisons between the datasets from XILS tests and real-world tests. This is done from both a parameter and scenario perspective. Furthermore, we introduce and examine reliability evaluation criteria for XILS that are based on empirical findings from repeated tests. In order to determine the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, we used it to evaluate the reliability of a vehicle-in-the-loop simulation, which is a specific approach within XILS, in the form of a case study. Ultimately, this paper analyzes the factors that impact the reliability of simulation-based validation for automated vehicle systems and provides guidance for improving overall reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3519713</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; automated vehicle ; Automation ; autonomous driving ; Autonomous vehicles ; Effectiveness ; Hardware ; Impact analysis ; Mathematical models ; Parameters ; performance assessment ; Performance evaluation ; Platforms ; Reliability analysis ; reliability evaluation ; Reproducibility ; Roads ; Sensor systems ; Simulation ; simulation accuracy ; Software ; Software reliability ; System performance ; System reliability ; Testing ; validation methodology ; vehicle test ; virtual simulation ; X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS)</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2024, Vol.12, p.193622-193640</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1598-8fcd89bdd80030f4d007adb7b9aa1d2e8e9311be2769ba66cd37cf55ddfca5763</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2488-0455 ; 0000-0003-1025-3784</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10806714$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,4022,27632,27922,27923,27924,54932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oh, Taeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Sungwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Jinwoo</creatorcontrib><title>A Reliability Evaluation Methodology for X-in-the-Loop Simulation in Autonomous Vehicle Systems</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS) is a method to validate automated vehicle systems that combines several simulation techniques. XILS combines real hardware, software, and virtual models to test the functionality of autonomous driving systems. XILS is particularly effective because it enables repeatable and reproducible testing across diverse scenarios and can comprehensively evaluate system performance. While researchers have had great success implementing XILS platforms that closely approximate real-world vehicle testing environments, the performance of vehicles in XILS testing may still differ from what is observed in real-world testing, especially with respect to the reliability of the test results. In other words, better methods are still needed to evaluate the reliability of XILS platforms. In this paper, we propose such a method. The new approach includes scenario definition, key test parameter definition, and procedures to evaluate consistency and correlation based on statistical and mathematical comparisons between the datasets from XILS tests and real-world tests. This is done from both a parameter and scenario perspective. Furthermore, we introduce and examine reliability evaluation criteria for XILS that are based on empirical findings from repeated tests. In order to determine the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, we used it to evaluate the reliability of a vehicle-in-the-loop simulation, which is a specific approach within XILS, in the form of a case study. Ultimately, this paper analyzes the factors that impact the reliability of simulation-based validation for automated vehicle systems and provides guidance for improving overall reliability.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>automated vehicle</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>autonomous driving</subject><subject>Autonomous vehicles</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>performance assessment</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Platforms</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>reliability evaluation</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Sensor systems</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>simulation accuracy</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software reliability</subject><subject>System performance</subject><subject>System reliability</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>validation methodology</subject><subject>vehicle test</subject><subject>virtual simulation</subject><subject>X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS)</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUV1LwzAULaLgmPsF-hDwuTNp2nw8jjF1MBGsim8hTdIto21m0gr993Z2yO7LvRzOOffAiaJbBOcIQf6wWC5XeT5PYJLOcYY4RfgimiSI8BhnmFye3dfRLIQ9HIYNUEYnkViAN1NZWdjKtj1Y_ciqk611DXgx7c5pV7ltD0rnwVdsm7jdmXjj3AHktu6qkWgbsOha17jadQF8mp1VlQF5H1pTh5voqpRVMLPTnkYfj6v35XO8eX1aLxebWKGMs5iVSjNeaM0gxLBMNYRU6oIWXEqkE8MMxwgVJqGEF5IQpTFVZZZpXSqZUYKn0Xr01U7uxcHbWvpeOGnFH-D8VkjfHpMJSBhVOlOUoCKlKWKUGlQWCdVaYkjp4HU_eh28--5MaMXedb4Z4guMUg55SjAbWHhkKe9C8Kb8_4qgOBYjxmLEsRhxKmZQ3Y0qa4w5UzBIKErxL8SoijM</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Oh, Taeyoung</creator><creator>Cho, Sungwoo</creator><creator>Yoo, Jinwoo</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-0455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1025-3784</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>A Reliability Evaluation Methodology for X-in-the-Loop Simulation in Autonomous Vehicle Systems</title><author>Oh, Taeyoung ; Cho, Sungwoo ; Yoo, Jinwoo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1598-8fcd89bdd80030f4d007adb7b9aa1d2e8e9311be2769ba66cd37cf55ddfca5763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>automated vehicle</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>autonomous driving</topic><topic>Autonomous vehicles</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>performance assessment</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Platforms</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>reliability evaluation</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Sensor systems</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>simulation accuracy</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software reliability</topic><topic>System performance</topic><topic>System reliability</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>validation methodology</topic><topic>vehicle test</topic><topic>virtual simulation</topic><topic>X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oh, Taeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Sungwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Jinwoo</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oh, Taeyoung</au><au>Cho, Sungwoo</au><au>Yoo, Jinwoo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Reliability Evaluation Methodology for X-in-the-Loop Simulation in Autonomous Vehicle Systems</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>193622</spage><epage>193640</epage><pages>193622-193640</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS) is a method to validate automated vehicle systems that combines several simulation techniques. XILS combines real hardware, software, and virtual models to test the functionality of autonomous driving systems. XILS is particularly effective because it enables repeatable and reproducible testing across diverse scenarios and can comprehensively evaluate system performance. While researchers have had great success implementing XILS platforms that closely approximate real-world vehicle testing environments, the performance of vehicles in XILS testing may still differ from what is observed in real-world testing, especially with respect to the reliability of the test results. In other words, better methods are still needed to evaluate the reliability of XILS platforms. In this paper, we propose such a method. The new approach includes scenario definition, key test parameter definition, and procedures to evaluate consistency and correlation based on statistical and mathematical comparisons between the datasets from XILS tests and real-world tests. This is done from both a parameter and scenario perspective. Furthermore, we introduce and examine reliability evaluation criteria for XILS that are based on empirical findings from repeated tests. In order to determine the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, we used it to evaluate the reliability of a vehicle-in-the-loop simulation, which is a specific approach within XILS, in the form of a case study. Ultimately, this paper analyzes the factors that impact the reliability of simulation-based validation for automated vehicle systems and provides guidance for improving overall reliability.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3519713</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-0455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1025-3784</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-3536 |
ispartof | IEEE access, 2024, Vol.12, p.193622-193640 |
issn | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3149094638 |
source | IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accuracy automated vehicle Automation autonomous driving Autonomous vehicles Effectiveness Hardware Impact analysis Mathematical models Parameters performance assessment Performance evaluation Platforms Reliability analysis reliability evaluation Reproducibility Roads Sensor systems Simulation simulation accuracy Software Software reliability System performance System reliability Testing validation methodology vehicle test virtual simulation X-in-the-loop simulation (XILS) |
title | A Reliability Evaluation Methodology for X-in-the-Loop Simulation in Autonomous Vehicle Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A32%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Reliability%20Evaluation%20Methodology%20for%20X-in-the-Loop%20Simulation%20in%20Autonomous%20Vehicle%20Systems&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Oh,%20Taeyoung&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=193622&rft.epage=193640&rft.pages=193622-193640&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3519713&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3149094638%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149094638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10806714&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0687cd5c761b4741877e1fb27dda3077&rfr_iscdi=true |