Simulation study analysis of the normal five-spot model and inverted five-spot polymer injection on X field

Increasing oil production has become the main focus in the oil and gas industry, so various methods are needed to increase oil recovery after production has decreased, one of which is polymer injection. The X field is located in Indragiri Hulu Regency. It has passed the secondary recovery stage, wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2024-12, Vol.1437 (1), p.12034
Hauptverfasser: Hadita, Aflian, Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni, Muharto, Ruri, Erfando, Tomi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12034
container_title IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science
container_volume 1437
creator Hadita, Aflian
Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni
Muharto, Ruri
Erfando, Tomi
description Increasing oil production has become the main focus in the oil and gas industry, so various methods are needed to increase oil recovery after production has decreased, one of which is polymer injection. The X field is located in Indragiri Hulu Regency. It has passed the secondary recovery stage, with an estimated oil-in-place reserve of 328,542.4 MSTB, recoverable reserve of 170,426.5 MSTB, recovery factor of 51.9%, and cumulative oil production of 135,856.8 MSTB. One of the activities that need to be carried out in chemical injection is to choose the right and efficient production-injection well pattern to be applied in the field. Therefore, a reservoir simulation study compared the normal and inverted five-spot patterns using variations in polymer concentrations of 500ppm, 1000ppm and 1500ppm and injection rates of 4000bpd, 5000bpd and 6000bpd. This study aims to determine the best scenario based on the largest oil recovery factor that can be applied to the X Field by looking at the cumulative change in oil obtained and the water cut. The simulation results show that the maximum cumulative oil value in the inverted five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 69757.4 bbl, and the minimum water cut value in the inverted five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 94.81 %. While the maximum value of cumulative oil in the normal five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 310241bbl, and the minimum water cut value in the normal five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 92.78%. This study shows that the higher the polymer concentration used, the higher the cumulative oil increase, followed by the higher water cut reduction, so the selection of the right polymer concentration is very important to increase oil recovery in the X field.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1755-1315/1437/1/012034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3148837641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3148837641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1541-54a31954d9d32eeac589306274886f9051f9461bae12c9d3f57bb21e585073ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wYJXXtTmNEnTXsqYHzDwYgrehaxJsLNtatIK-_emVqaCIAQSeJ_zJnkQOgd8BTjPE-CMxUCAJUAJTyDBkGJCD9Bsnxzuz5gfoxPvtxhnnJJihl7XVTPUsq9sG_l-ULtItrLe-cpH1kT9i45a6xpZR6Z617HvbB81Vuk6YCqq2nfteq1-hJ2td412Idrq8rM1rOcA6FqdoiMja6_PvvY5erpZPi7u4tXD7f3iehWXwCjEjEoCBaOqUCTVWpYsLwjOUk7zPDMFZmAKmsFGakjLwBjGN5sUNMsZ5kQbMkcXU2_n7NugfS-2dnDhW14QCCWEZxQCxSeqdNZ7p43oXNVItxOAxWhWjM7E6E-MZgWIyWyYvJwmK9t9Vy-X69-c6NT4FvIH-98NH3rZh_c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3148837641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulation study analysis of the normal five-spot model and inverted five-spot polymer injection on X field</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><creator>Hadita, Aflian ; Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni ; Muharto, Ruri ; Erfando, Tomi</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadita, Aflian ; Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni ; Muharto, Ruri ; Erfando, Tomi</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing oil production has become the main focus in the oil and gas industry, so various methods are needed to increase oil recovery after production has decreased, one of which is polymer injection. The X field is located in Indragiri Hulu Regency. It has passed the secondary recovery stage, with an estimated oil-in-place reserve of 328,542.4 MSTB, recoverable reserve of 170,426.5 MSTB, recovery factor of 51.9%, and cumulative oil production of 135,856.8 MSTB. One of the activities that need to be carried out in chemical injection is to choose the right and efficient production-injection well pattern to be applied in the field. Therefore, a reservoir simulation study compared the normal and inverted five-spot patterns using variations in polymer concentrations of 500ppm, 1000ppm and 1500ppm and injection rates of 4000bpd, 5000bpd and 6000bpd. This study aims to determine the best scenario based on the largest oil recovery factor that can be applied to the X Field by looking at the cumulative change in oil obtained and the water cut. The simulation results show that the maximum cumulative oil value in the inverted five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 69757.4 bbl, and the minimum water cut value in the inverted five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 94.81 %. While the maximum value of cumulative oil in the normal five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 310241bbl, and the minimum water cut value in the normal five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 92.78%. This study shows that the higher the polymer concentration used, the higher the cumulative oil increase, followed by the higher water cut reduction, so the selection of the right polymer concentration is very important to increase oil recovery in the X field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1437/1/012034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>CMG-STAR ; Injection ; injection rate ; Injection wells ; inverted five spot ; Normal five spot ; Oil and gas industry ; Oil and gas production ; Oil recovery ; polymer concentration ; Polymer Injection ; Polymers ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2024-12, Vol.1437 (1), p.12034</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1541-54a31954d9d32eeac589306274886f9051f9461bae12c9d3f57bb21e585073ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1437/1/012034/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,38867,38889,53839,53866</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadita, Aflian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muharto, Ruri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erfando, Tomi</creatorcontrib><title>Simulation study analysis of the normal five-spot model and inverted five-spot polymer injection on X field</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><description>Increasing oil production has become the main focus in the oil and gas industry, so various methods are needed to increase oil recovery after production has decreased, one of which is polymer injection. The X field is located in Indragiri Hulu Regency. It has passed the secondary recovery stage, with an estimated oil-in-place reserve of 328,542.4 MSTB, recoverable reserve of 170,426.5 MSTB, recovery factor of 51.9%, and cumulative oil production of 135,856.8 MSTB. One of the activities that need to be carried out in chemical injection is to choose the right and efficient production-injection well pattern to be applied in the field. Therefore, a reservoir simulation study compared the normal and inverted five-spot patterns using variations in polymer concentrations of 500ppm, 1000ppm and 1500ppm and injection rates of 4000bpd, 5000bpd and 6000bpd. This study aims to determine the best scenario based on the largest oil recovery factor that can be applied to the X Field by looking at the cumulative change in oil obtained and the water cut. The simulation results show that the maximum cumulative oil value in the inverted five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 69757.4 bbl, and the minimum water cut value in the inverted five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 94.81 %. While the maximum value of cumulative oil in the normal five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 310241bbl, and the minimum water cut value in the normal five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 92.78%. This study shows that the higher the polymer concentration used, the higher the cumulative oil increase, followed by the higher water cut reduction, so the selection of the right polymer concentration is very important to increase oil recovery in the X field.</description><subject>CMG-STAR</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>injection rate</subject><subject>Injection wells</subject><subject>inverted five spot</subject><subject>Normal five spot</subject><subject>Oil and gas industry</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>Oil recovery</subject><subject>polymer concentration</subject><subject>Polymer Injection</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wYJXXtTmNEnTXsqYHzDwYgrehaxJsLNtatIK-_emVqaCIAQSeJ_zJnkQOgd8BTjPE-CMxUCAJUAJTyDBkGJCD9Bsnxzuz5gfoxPvtxhnnJJihl7XVTPUsq9sG_l-ULtItrLe-cpH1kT9i45a6xpZR6Z617HvbB81Vuk6YCqq2nfteq1-hJ2td412Idrq8rM1rOcA6FqdoiMja6_PvvY5erpZPi7u4tXD7f3iehWXwCjEjEoCBaOqUCTVWpYsLwjOUk7zPDMFZmAKmsFGakjLwBjGN5sUNMsZ5kQbMkcXU2_n7NugfS-2dnDhW14QCCWEZxQCxSeqdNZ7p43oXNVItxOAxWhWjM7E6E-MZgWIyWyYvJwmK9t9Vy-X69-c6NT4FvIH-98NH3rZh_c</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Hadita, Aflian</creator><creator>Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni</creator><creator>Muharto, Ruri</creator><creator>Erfando, Tomi</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Simulation study analysis of the normal five-spot model and inverted five-spot polymer injection on X field</title><author>Hadita, Aflian ; Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni ; Muharto, Ruri ; Erfando, Tomi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1541-54a31954d9d32eeac589306274886f9051f9461bae12c9d3f57bb21e585073ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>CMG-STAR</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>injection rate</topic><topic>Injection wells</topic><topic>inverted five spot</topic><topic>Normal five spot</topic><topic>Oil and gas industry</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>Oil recovery</topic><topic>polymer concentration</topic><topic>Polymer Injection</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadita, Aflian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muharto, Ruri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erfando, Tomi</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadita, Aflian</au><au>Dwi Amelia Putri, Veni</au><au>Muharto, Ruri</au><au>Erfando, Tomi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulation study analysis of the normal five-spot model and inverted five-spot polymer injection on X field</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>1437</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12034</spage><pages>12034-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>Increasing oil production has become the main focus in the oil and gas industry, so various methods are needed to increase oil recovery after production has decreased, one of which is polymer injection. The X field is located in Indragiri Hulu Regency. It has passed the secondary recovery stage, with an estimated oil-in-place reserve of 328,542.4 MSTB, recoverable reserve of 170,426.5 MSTB, recovery factor of 51.9%, and cumulative oil production of 135,856.8 MSTB. One of the activities that need to be carried out in chemical injection is to choose the right and efficient production-injection well pattern to be applied in the field. Therefore, a reservoir simulation study compared the normal and inverted five-spot patterns using variations in polymer concentrations of 500ppm, 1000ppm and 1500ppm and injection rates of 4000bpd, 5000bpd and 6000bpd. This study aims to determine the best scenario based on the largest oil recovery factor that can be applied to the X Field by looking at the cumulative change in oil obtained and the water cut. The simulation results show that the maximum cumulative oil value in the inverted five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 69757.4 bbl, and the minimum water cut value in the inverted five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 94.81 %. While the maximum value of cumulative oil in the normal five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 310241bbl, and the minimum water cut value in the normal five-spot model with a concentration of 1500 ppm and an injection rate of 6000 bpd is 92.78%. This study shows that the higher the polymer concentration used, the higher the cumulative oil increase, followed by the higher water cut reduction, so the selection of the right polymer concentration is very important to increase oil recovery in the X field.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/1437/1/012034</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-1307
ispartof IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2024-12, Vol.1437 (1), p.12034
issn 1755-1307
1755-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3148837641
source IOP Publishing Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra
subjects CMG-STAR
Injection
injection rate
Injection wells
inverted five spot
Normal five spot
Oil and gas industry
Oil and gas production
Oil recovery
polymer concentration
Polymer Injection
Polymers
Simulation
title Simulation study analysis of the normal five-spot model and inverted five-spot polymer injection on X field
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A05%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulation%20study%20analysis%20of%20the%20normal%20five-spot%20model%20and%20inverted%20five-spot%20polymer%20injection%20on%20X%20field&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Hadita,%20Aflian&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=1437&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12034&rft.pages=12034-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/1437/1/012034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E3148837641%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3148837641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true