Tool Wear Prediction in Machining of Aluminum Matrix Composites with the Use of Machine Learning Models

This paper discusses the diagnostic models of tool wear during face milling of Aluminum Matrix Composite (AMC), classified as a difficult-to-cut material. Prediction and classification models were considered. The models were based on one-dimensional simple regression or on multidimensional regressio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials 2024-11, Vol.17 (23), p.5783
Hauptverfasser: Hamrol, Adam, Tabaszewski, Maciej, Kujawińska, Agnieszka, Czyżycki, Jakub
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 23
container_start_page 5783
container_title Materials
container_volume 17
creator Hamrol, Adam
Tabaszewski, Maciej
Kujawińska, Agnieszka
Czyżycki, Jakub
description This paper discusses the diagnostic models of tool wear during face milling of Aluminum Matrix Composite (AMC), classified as a difficult-to-cut material. Prediction and classification models were considered. The models were based on one-dimensional simple regression or on multidimensional regression trees, random forest, nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron neural networks. Measures of diagnostic signals obtained from measurements of cutting forces and vibration accelerations of the workpiece were used. The study demonstrated that multidimensional models outperformed one-dimensional models in terms of prediction accuracy and classification performance. Specifically, multidimensional predictive models exhibited lower maximum and average absolute prediction errors (0.036 mm vs. 0.050 mm and 0.026 mm vs. 0.045 mm, respectively), and classification models recorded fewer Type I and Type II errors. Despite the increased complexity, the higher predictive accuracy (up to 0.97) achieved with multidimensional models was shown to be suitable for industrial applications. However, simpler one-dimensional models offered the ad-vantage of greater reliability in signal acquisition and processing. It was also highlighted that the advantage of simple models from a practical point of view is the reduced complexity and consequent greater reliability of the system for acquiring and processing diagnostic signals.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ma17235783
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3144173695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A819952852</galeid><sourcerecordid>A819952852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e9b43630391e58121eec0fee5bb5316c5ed31c01950d054c23fbf164b936c9f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1rHDEMhk1paEKSS39AMfRSCptYI9s7Pi5LmxY2pIeEHocZj7zrMGNv7Rna_vt4u-kHlQ4S4nmF0MvYaxBXiEZcjy0sK1TLGl-wMzBGL8BI-fKf_pRd5vwoSiBCXZlX7BSNrlUF5oxt72Mc-FdqE_-SqPd28jFwH_hta3c--LDl0fHVMI8-zGOZTsn_4Os47mP2E2X-3U87Pu2IP2Q6oEcd8U1Z-Ut-G3sa8gU7ce2Q6fK5nrOHjx_u158Wm7ubz-vVZmEridOCTCdRo0ADpGqogMgKR6S6TiFoq6hHsAKMEr1Q0lboOgdadga1NU7iOXt33LtP8dtMeWpGny0NQxsozrlBkNqA1loU9O1_6GOcUyjXHSgJS9RGFerqSG3bgRofXJxSa0v2NHobAzlf5qu6vFtV5alF8P4osCnmnMg1--THNv1sQDQHy5q_lhX4zfMNczdS_wf9bRA-AZ2TjwM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3144173695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tool Wear Prediction in Machining of Aluminum Matrix Composites with the Use of Machine Learning Models</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hamrol, Adam ; Tabaszewski, Maciej ; Kujawińska, Agnieszka ; Czyżycki, Jakub</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamrol, Adam ; Tabaszewski, Maciej ; Kujawińska, Agnieszka ; Czyżycki, Jakub</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses the diagnostic models of tool wear during face milling of Aluminum Matrix Composite (AMC), classified as a difficult-to-cut material. Prediction and classification models were considered. The models were based on one-dimensional simple regression or on multidimensional regression trees, random forest, nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron neural networks. Measures of diagnostic signals obtained from measurements of cutting forces and vibration accelerations of the workpiece were used. The study demonstrated that multidimensional models outperformed one-dimensional models in terms of prediction accuracy and classification performance. Specifically, multidimensional predictive models exhibited lower maximum and average absolute prediction errors (0.036 mm vs. 0.050 mm and 0.026 mm vs. 0.045 mm, respectively), and classification models recorded fewer Type I and Type II errors. Despite the increased complexity, the higher predictive accuracy (up to 0.97) achieved with multidimensional models was shown to be suitable for industrial applications. However, simpler one-dimensional models offered the ad-vantage of greater reliability in signal acquisition and processing. It was also highlighted that the advantage of simple models from a practical point of view is the reduced complexity and consequent greater reliability of the system for acquiring and processing diagnostic signals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma17235783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39685219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Algorithms ; Aluminum ; Aluminum base alloys ; Aluminum matrix composites ; Classification ; Complexity ; Composite materials ; Cutting force ; Cutting tools ; Cutting wear ; Errors ; Face milling ; Industrial applications ; Machine learning ; Machining ; Mathematical models ; Multilayer perceptrons ; Neural networks ; One dimensional models ; Prediction models ; Predictions ; Principal components analysis ; Regression analysis ; Reliability ; Signal processing ; Tool wear ; Vision systems ; Workpieces</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2024-11, Vol.17 (23), p.5783</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e9b43630391e58121eec0fee5bb5316c5ed31c01950d054c23fbf164b936c9f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9870-1432 ; 0000-0001-6215-8485 ; 0000-0003-3615-3837</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39685219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamrol, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabaszewski, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujawińska, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czyżycki, Jakub</creatorcontrib><title>Tool Wear Prediction in Machining of Aluminum Matrix Composites with the Use of Machine Learning Models</title><title>Materials</title><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><description>This paper discusses the diagnostic models of tool wear during face milling of Aluminum Matrix Composite (AMC), classified as a difficult-to-cut material. Prediction and classification models were considered. The models were based on one-dimensional simple regression or on multidimensional regression trees, random forest, nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron neural networks. Measures of diagnostic signals obtained from measurements of cutting forces and vibration accelerations of the workpiece were used. The study demonstrated that multidimensional models outperformed one-dimensional models in terms of prediction accuracy and classification performance. Specifically, multidimensional predictive models exhibited lower maximum and average absolute prediction errors (0.036 mm vs. 0.050 mm and 0.026 mm vs. 0.045 mm, respectively), and classification models recorded fewer Type I and Type II errors. Despite the increased complexity, the higher predictive accuracy (up to 0.97) achieved with multidimensional models was shown to be suitable for industrial applications. However, simpler one-dimensional models offered the ad-vantage of greater reliability in signal acquisition and processing. It was also highlighted that the advantage of simple models from a practical point of view is the reduced complexity and consequent greater reliability of the system for acquiring and processing diagnostic signals.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum base alloys</subject><subject>Aluminum matrix composites</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Cutting force</subject><subject>Cutting tools</subject><subject>Cutting wear</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Face milling</subject><subject>Industrial applications</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Machining</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multilayer perceptrons</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>One dimensional models</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Tool wear</subject><subject>Vision systems</subject><subject>Workpieces</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1rHDEMhk1paEKSS39AMfRSCptYI9s7Pi5LmxY2pIeEHocZj7zrMGNv7Rna_vt4u-kHlQ4S4nmF0MvYaxBXiEZcjy0sK1TLGl-wMzBGL8BI-fKf_pRd5vwoSiBCXZlX7BSNrlUF5oxt72Mc-FdqE_-SqPd28jFwH_hta3c--LDl0fHVMI8-zGOZTsn_4Os47mP2E2X-3U87Pu2IP2Q6oEcd8U1Z-Ut-G3sa8gU7ce2Q6fK5nrOHjx_u158Wm7ubz-vVZmEridOCTCdRo0ADpGqogMgKR6S6TiFoq6hHsAKMEr1Q0lboOgdadga1NU7iOXt33LtP8dtMeWpGny0NQxsozrlBkNqA1loU9O1_6GOcUyjXHSgJS9RGFerqSG3bgRofXJxSa0v2NHobAzlf5qu6vFtV5alF8P4osCnmnMg1--THNv1sQDQHy5q_lhX4zfMNczdS_wf9bRA-AZ2TjwM</recordid><startdate>20241125</startdate><enddate>20241125</enddate><creator>Hamrol, Adam</creator><creator>Tabaszewski, Maciej</creator><creator>Kujawińska, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Czyżycki, Jakub</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9870-1432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-8485</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3615-3837</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241125</creationdate><title>Tool Wear Prediction in Machining of Aluminum Matrix Composites with the Use of Machine Learning Models</title><author>Hamrol, Adam ; Tabaszewski, Maciej ; Kujawińska, Agnieszka ; Czyżycki, Jakub</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e9b43630391e58121eec0fee5bb5316c5ed31c01950d054c23fbf164b936c9f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum base alloys</topic><topic>Aluminum matrix composites</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Cutting force</topic><topic>Cutting tools</topic><topic>Cutting wear</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Face milling</topic><topic>Industrial applications</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Machining</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multilayer perceptrons</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>One dimensional models</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Tool wear</topic><topic>Vision systems</topic><topic>Workpieces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamrol, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabaszewski, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujawińska, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czyżycki, Jakub</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamrol, Adam</au><au>Tabaszewski, Maciej</au><au>Kujawińska, Agnieszka</au><au>Czyżycki, Jakub</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tool Wear Prediction in Machining of Aluminum Matrix Composites with the Use of Machine Learning Models</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-11-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>5783</spage><pages>5783-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>This paper discusses the diagnostic models of tool wear during face milling of Aluminum Matrix Composite (AMC), classified as a difficult-to-cut material. Prediction and classification models were considered. The models were based on one-dimensional simple regression or on multidimensional regression trees, random forest, nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron neural networks. Measures of diagnostic signals obtained from measurements of cutting forces and vibration accelerations of the workpiece were used. The study demonstrated that multidimensional models outperformed one-dimensional models in terms of prediction accuracy and classification performance. Specifically, multidimensional predictive models exhibited lower maximum and average absolute prediction errors (0.036 mm vs. 0.050 mm and 0.026 mm vs. 0.045 mm, respectively), and classification models recorded fewer Type I and Type II errors. Despite the increased complexity, the higher predictive accuracy (up to 0.97) achieved with multidimensional models was shown to be suitable for industrial applications. However, simpler one-dimensional models offered the ad-vantage of greater reliability in signal acquisition and processing. It was also highlighted that the advantage of simple models from a practical point of view is the reduced complexity and consequent greater reliability of the system for acquiring and processing diagnostic signals.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39685219</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma17235783</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9870-1432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-8485</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3615-3837</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1944
ispartof Materials, 2024-11, Vol.17 (23), p.5783
issn 1996-1944
1996-1944
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3144173695
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acoustics
Algorithms
Aluminum
Aluminum base alloys
Aluminum matrix composites
Classification
Complexity
Composite materials
Cutting force
Cutting tools
Cutting wear
Errors
Face milling
Industrial applications
Machine learning
Machining
Mathematical models
Multilayer perceptrons
Neural networks
One dimensional models
Prediction models
Predictions
Principal components analysis
Regression analysis
Reliability
Signal processing
Tool wear
Vision systems
Workpieces
title Tool Wear Prediction in Machining of Aluminum Matrix Composites with the Use of Machine Learning Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A35%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tool%20Wear%20Prediction%20in%20Machining%20of%20Aluminum%20Matrix%20Composites%20with%20the%20Use%20of%20Machine%20Learning%20Models&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Hamrol,%20Adam&rft.date=2024-11-25&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=5783&rft.pages=5783-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma17235783&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA819952852%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3144173695&rft_id=info:pmid/39685219&rft_galeid=A819952852&rfr_iscdi=true